This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well, Gamespot doesn't know actually. We don't know.. nobody knows. At all.thrones
Maybe the devs showed them some gameplay or told them in an interview, but I hope your right.
I've learned from experience that CGI trailers don't mean ****.
Learnt' that from the first KZ2 trailer.
Dude, we know next to nothing about the game. We've seen no screenshots or gameplay. Yet you think it will be garbage because it (might be) in a first person view mode?
Crazy kids...
the fact that its being developed by zipper already lost my interest
if i wanted a shooter mmo, i'd get hyped over the agency
where it stands now, i hate socom and i hate mmos so this is a big fat steaming pile of vaporware for me right now
i'm not saying it will be terrible.. socom games score decent in general
i just hate playing on servers with a ton of people because it really dilutes the sense of community and team work
the fact that its being developed by zipper already lost my interest
if i wanted a shooter mmo, i'd get hyped over the agency
where it stands now, i hate socom and i hate mmos so this is a big fat steaming pile of vaporware for me right now
voxware00
Uhhh, yea... because this game has been talked about for years without seeing any results :|. If you're not into shooters, cool... that's a matter of preference. But the game is no more an MMO than Warhawk or COD4, and it is not like The Agency or SOCOM either. This is something completely fresh and I applaud them for that.
It's made by the same people who make SOCOM, and from what I've heard will run on the same tech as SOCOM4. So there will probably be a third and first person option. They're putting emphasis on the first person because of the genre's popularity right now.
I think its better to bash a game and be proven wrong than hype a game and be proven wrong.
ReverseCycology
I disagree.
If you bash a game and get proven wrong you look like an ass. If you hype and game and get proven wrong you look naive.
This game looks really fun.
And online games in 3rd person view are usually crap.
LagSwitch
Ever played Socom online? if this plays anything like Socom the gameplay will be amazing.
What was Socom 3, because it certainly wasn't good.Judging from a 2 min trailer wth? or I guess you already played it, hows the gameplay, graphics and controls like?
And for your information Zipper never makes crap games.
Hitman533
The only thing that worries me about MAG is the waaaaay too large amount of people. Socom II ran very well (at times) with a 16 player cap. Socom III on the other hand was pretty laggy in full 32 man rooms.
Outside of that, RFoM had some very cool game modes, but the robust amount of players ruined the Breach and Meltdown blueprint structure. 20 people respawning on a defend point, doesn't make for a fun experience, especially when matches could go 4 hours long.
"MAG will be crap": How do you know?AaronHullLfc
cause its on the PS3. its taint on software knows no bounds.
u didnt know that?
[QUOTE="voxware00"]the fact that its being developed by zipper already lost my interest
if i wanted a shooter mmo, i'd get hyped over the agency
where it stands now, i hate socom and i hate mmos so this is a big fat steaming pile of vaporware for me right now
haze_blaze
Uhhh, yea... because this game has been talked about for years without seeing any results :|. If you're not into shooters, cool... that's a matter of preference. But the game is no more an MMO than Warhawk or COD4, and it is not like The Agency or SOCOM either. This is something completely fresh and I applaud them for that.
perhaps they're taking a good approach to executing the game
but its the concept that just bothers me, for the same reason as socom
these war games have such a generic approach, even if the gameplay is solid i just can't get into it
not to say scifi shooters haven't been done to death either these days
maybe its not vaporware now but it sounds like a very ambitious project, perhaps the next killzone to cause sonys financial hemmorage
the lack of standard voice communication alone sounds like dissaray for team cooperation let alone the scale of the battles, which like i said, is also another factor this just doesn't appeal to me
i can see this having a huge appeal to hardcore online gamers and don't let me stop you people from getting excited
i see it as a distraction of leaving the core elements with much to be desired however
[QUOTE="AaronHullLfc"]"MAG will be crap": How do you know?-GhostMLD-
cause its on the PS3. its taint on software knows no bounds.
You are wrong.
[QUOTE="AaronHullLfc"]"MAG will be crap": How do you know?-GhostMLD-
cause its on the PS3. its taint on software knows no bounds.
u didnt know that?
i made my sig just for people like you
[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"][QUOTE="AaronHullLfc"]"MAG will be crap": How do you know?sireclaborn
cause its on the PS3. its taint on software knows no bounds.
u didnt know that?
i made my sig just for people like you
ur sig coulnt be any more wrong. we dont need your games, but taking them away from you amuses us.
[QUOTE="sireclaborn"][QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"][QUOTE="AaronHullLfc"]"MAG will be crap": How do you know?-GhostMLD-
cause its on the PS3. its taint on software knows no bounds.
u didnt know that?
i made my sig just for people like you
ur sig coulnt be any more wrong. we dont need your games, but taking them away from you amuses us.
right.........;)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment