MASS EFFECT will make fools of Sony Fanboys the same way Gears has!

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zandeus
Zandeus

3126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Zandeus
Member since 2006 • 3126 Posts

Cows tried to rant and pic on Gears back when, hollaring about "teh downgrade", "oh teh jaggies, my eyes hurt", blah blah blah..... then Gears released and garnered acclaim from everyone at how beautiful it is and how great the gameplay is......

NOW, Cows are attempting the same crap with Mass Effect....

My question is.... DO COWS EVER GROW TIRED OF EATING THEIR WORDS OR ARE THEY JUST STARVING FOR ATTENTION, since there isnt really much to talk about in regards to the PS3, other than, that their is very little to talk about when discussing the PS3!

Avatar image for HeHateMe_basic
HeHateMe_basic

7161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 HeHateMe_basic
Member since 2002 • 7161 Posts
cows said graphics didnt matter with ps2.
Avatar image for mestizoman
mestizoman

4172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 mestizoman
Member since 2006 • 4172 Posts

im not a cow, but either there was a massive, excuse the pun, downgrade, or bio is pulling a massive, albeit stupid, stunt

Avatar image for OhhSnap50893
OhhSnap50893

27110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#4 OhhSnap50893
Member since 2006 • 27110 Posts
The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.
Avatar image for asdasd
asdasd

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 asdasd
Member since 2005 • 4464 Posts

im not a cow, but either there was a massive, excuse the pun, downgrade, or bio is pulling a massive, albeit stupid, stunt

mestizoman

I agree. We just gotta wait and see what the graphics are when the game comes out :D Cant wait for it. 

Avatar image for HeHateMe_basic
HeHateMe_basic

7161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 HeHateMe_basic
Member since 2002 • 7161 Posts
you cannot go by pics this gen, hi def games looks better when running in HD. i dont know why theres even a debate over this .
Avatar image for Zandeus
Zandeus

3126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Zandeus
Member since 2006 • 3126 Posts

The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ

Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts

im not a cow, but either there was a massive, excuse the pun, downgrade, or bio is pulling a massive, albeit stupid, stunt

mestizoman
There is no "downgrade". You cannot have a game a couple of months away from release and then just got back and "downgrade" all of your art assets. Believe it or not, graphical quality is not created by a level which has "good" at one end and "bad" at the other. The most recent video is simply from a work-in-progress build of the game. Sheesh.
Avatar image for WeeWeeJumbo
WeeWeeJumbo

5380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 WeeWeeJumbo
Member since 2005 • 5380 Posts
It'll be much better to wait quietly for the game to deliver.  If it doesn't, too bad, if it does, then great.  But this constant hyping creates a situation where it's nearly impossible for the final product to live up to grossly inflated expectations.  Gears blew everybody away, but it's not really reasonable to expect every hotly anticipated title to reach that level of greatness.
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.Zandeus

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ

Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?
Avatar image for jack244
jack244

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 jack244
Member since 2003 • 282 Posts
[QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.Meu2k7

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

So pretty much you have never played Gears of War before because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Gears' cover system is the greatest a game has ever seen, only Rainbow 6 Vegas provides a comparable cover system. Blind fire is actually useful in Gears though which makes a difference.

Active reloads also are extremley useful when you got 2 guys attacking you at once and you run out of ammo. If you can get that active reload off in time, you can dispose of the threat much easier, plus you reload faster too.

Avatar image for Lilac_Benjie
Lilac_Benjie

12287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Lilac_Benjie
Member since 2006 • 12287 Posts
[QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.Meu2k7

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

Gears does handle it better though. I agree that it isn't revolutionary, it's just a good game. Certainly a hell of a lot better than Resistance Fall of Man.

Avatar image for MCGSMB
MCGSMB

2149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 MCGSMB
Member since 2007 • 2149 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.jack244

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

So pretty much you have never played Gears of War before because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Gears' cover system is the greatest a game has ever seen, only Rainbow 6 Vegas provides a comparable cover system. Blind fire is actually useful in Gears though which makes a difference.

Gears DID revolutionize TPS gaming. If you had actually played it then you would know that.
Avatar image for arm9218
arm9218

503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 arm9218
Member since 2007 • 503 Posts

Cows tried to rant and pic on Gears back when, hollaring about "teh downgrade", "oh teh jaggies, my eyes hurt", blah blah blah..... then Gears released and garnered acclaim from everyone at how beautiful it is and how great the gameplay is......

NOW, Cows are attempting the same crap with Mass Effect....

My question is.... DO COWS EVER GROW TIRED OF EATING THEIR WORDS OR ARE THEY JUST STARVING FOR ATTENTION, since there isnt really much to talk about in regards to the PS3, other than, that their is very little to talk about when discussing the PS3!

Zandeus

calm down, its just a game

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.jack244

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

So pretty much you have never played Gears of War before because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Gears' cover system is the greatest a game has ever seen, only Rainbow 6 Vegas provides a comparable cover system. Blind fire is actually useful in Gears though which makes a difference.

Active reloads also are extremley useful when you got 2 guys attacking you at once and you run out of ammo. If you can get that active reload off in time, you can dispose of the threat much easier, plus you reload faster too.

Erm yes I have actually, you can cover and shoot blind over a wall or edge out and strafe, sorry I could do that in any game, just not in the same way , the active reload is fine yea.
Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts

The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893

 

your right graphics arnt everything the game is dam fun funner then 90 % of those games that come out with teh innovation. It just proves that innovation isnt needed to make a good game if it is just fun it will be better then anything else not that cows will admit this all we see is there nothing new where is the CTF this game suks 

Avatar image for jack244
jack244

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 jack244
Member since 2003 • 282 Posts
[QUOTE="jack244"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.MCGSMB

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

So pretty much you have never played Gears of War before because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Gears' cover system is the greatest a game has ever seen, only Rainbow 6 Vegas provides a comparable cover system. Blind fire is actually useful in Gears though which makes a difference.


Gears DID revolutionize TPS gaming. If you had actually played it then you would know that.

Seriously. Now when I play shooting games, something feels missing when I cant cover against a wall and blind fire or peak and steady aim. Only Rainbow 6 can offer that besides gears and it's a tactical fps.

Avatar image for jack244
jack244

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 jack244
Member since 2003 • 282 Posts
[QUOTE="jack244"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.Meu2k7

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

So pretty much you have never played Gears of War before because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Gears' cover system is the greatest a game has ever seen, only Rainbow 6 Vegas provides a comparable cover system. Blind fire is actually useful in Gears though which makes a difference.

Active reloads also are extremley useful when you got 2 guys attacking you at once and you run out of ammo. If you can get that active reload off in time, you can dispose of the threat much easier, plus you reload faster too.

Erm yes I have actually, you can cover and shoot blind over a wall or edge out and strafe, sorry I could do that in any game, just not in the same way , the active reload is fine yea.

Therefor it's pretty unique and useful, as you said you cant do it the same way in other games so your argument is null and void. Blind fire is when you are backed against a wall and you stick your gun out while remaining completley safe, please tell me what other games allow you to do this while being useful.

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893

Games don't have to be revolutionary to be fun.

Avatar image for LordFarquad
LordFarquad

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 LordFarquad
Member since 2003 • 1004 Posts
Im sorry I support the 360 all the way but there WAS a downgrade :(.  Probably to fix framrate issues, I remember seeing the gameplay and it would stutter and crap.
Avatar image for XxTRIFORCExX
XxTRIFORCExX

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 XxTRIFORCExX
Member since 2007 • 406 Posts
The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893

Gears had excellent gameplay too. IMO the online is better than Halo 2.
Avatar image for jack244
jack244

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 jack244
Member since 2003 • 282 Posts

:lol: Gears was crap. same with Mass Effect. Gears is nothing more than a Halo 3 filler. its just to keep the lemmings happy unitl Halo 3 is released.xxThyLordxx

Says the jealous cow who's still waiting for good games. We know you want Gears and Mass Effect on PS3.

Avatar image for Downplays
Downplays

169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Downplays
Member since 2007 • 169 Posts
[QUOTE="jack244"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.MCGSMB

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

So pretty much you have never played Gears of War before because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Gears' cover system is the greatest a game has ever seen, only Rainbow 6 Vegas provides a comparable cover system. Blind fire is actually useful in Gears though which makes a difference.


Gears DID revolutionize TPS gaming. If you had actually played it then you would know that.

RE4 says hi.

Avatar image for FearlessSpirit
FearlessSpirit

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 FearlessSpirit
Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893

Yes, Gears plays exactly the same as Halo or FEAR. In all those shooters you can blindfire and take active cover. Not to mention they all have exploding heads, cut open guts and whatnot. Oh wait, I guess the gameplay is different and graphics and visuals do matter. That's why it got such high scores. Silly me.

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

:lol: Gears was crap. same with Mass Effect. Gears is nothing more than a Halo 3 filler. its just to keep the lemmings happy unitl Halo 3 is released.xxThyLordxx

I seriously doubt you've played Gears and I know for a fact you haven't played Mass Effect. Back in your hole fanboy!

Avatar image for tonythestudent
tonythestudent

2592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 tonythestudent
Member since 2004 • 2592 Posts
[QUOTE="MCGSMB"][QUOTE="jack244"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.Downplays

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ



Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

So pretty much you have never played Gears of War before because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Gears' cover system is the greatest a game has ever seen, only Rainbow 6 Vegas provides a comparable cover system. Blind fire is actually useful in Gears though which makes a difference.


Gears DID revolutionize TPS gaming. If you had actually played it then you would know that.

RE4 says hi.

Then pops you in the head with a shotgun for blasphemy
Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts

 I like Gears of WAr dont get me wrong, but 9.6? Just shows how much easier the Xbox360 gets ratings than the other systems (PC Included) , the Online is schokingly bad.. it was an afterthought , it even has Bullet Lag , Epic Games ... the Creators of Unreal the most balanced of all ... making a game with bullet lag ... seriously ...

 it got 9.6 on its graphics mainly .., all-round it lacks in certain areas. 

Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#29 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts
I guess all you guys didn't read Epic's comments on "innovation for innovation's sake is just stupid". They set out to make a brilliant, fun and engaging game and they succeeded on every level. If you're honestly coming out with nonsense like "the only good thing about gears is its graphics" i suggest you tone down your fanboy meter and actually play games before you bash them. Gears sold well because it's beautiful, and incredibly fun. What more can you ask for?
Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#30 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts

I like Gears of WAr dont get me wrong, but 9.6? Just shows how much easier the Xbox360 gets ratings than the other systems (PC Included) , the Online is schokingly bad.. it was an afterthought , it even has Bullet Lag , Epic Games ... the Creators of Unreal the most balanced of all ... making a game with bullet lag ... seriously ...

it got 9.6 on its graphics mainly .., all-round it lacks in certain areas.

Meu2k7
Again - play the game. Online shockingly bad? That's why it smashed the most played online game record on xbox live a week after release, right? Darn fanboys.
Avatar image for Liquid_47
Liquid_47

4905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 Liquid_47
Member since 2003 • 4905 Posts

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.FearlessSpirit

Yes, Gears plays exactly the same as Halo or FEAR. In all those shooters you can blindfire and take active cover. Not to mention they all have exploding heads, cut open guts and whatnot. Oh wait, I guess the gameplay is different and graphics and visuals do matter. That's why it got such high scores. Silly me.



:lol:

You haven't played Gears then mate.

Silly you, you should realize that graphics doesn't give Gears a 9.6? Why? Because graphics contributes very little to the overall score.

Man, PC ftw, but 360 haters are getting desperate...
Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts
lol cows got no milk :)

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#33 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts
:lol: At the guy who says gears plays just like Halo and FEAR. I didn't know halo had a cover system. And blindfiring? Nope. :lol: More proof that you cows dont even play the games you bash.
Avatar image for -The-G-Man-
-The-G-Man-

6414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 -The-G-Man-
Member since 2007 • 6414 Posts
No game is guaranteed to flop or not flop.
Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

:lol: At the guy who says gears plays just like Halo and FEAR. I didn't know halo had a cover system. And blindfiring? Nope. :lol: More proof that you cows dont even play the games you bash.Ninja-Vox

He was being sarcastic.

Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts

Once again, the words of a few are representing an entire fanbase. Next time someone wants to bash the entire Sony fanbase, you should ask yourself 'Is that what TekkenMaster606 would think? Do I want to make myself look bad by claiming an entire fanbase thinks one way before confirming one of the biggest members of that group, a logical one also shares those views?'

 

I never bashed Gears of War. Great game. 

Avatar image for farhan007
farhan007

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 farhan007
Member since 2003 • 204 Posts
The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893
play the game....
Avatar image for farhan007
farhan007

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 farhan007
Member since 2003 • 204 Posts
The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893
play the game....
Avatar image for farhan007
farhan007

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 farhan007
Member since 2003 • 204 Posts
[QUOTE="Zandeus"]

[QUOTE="OhhSnap50893"]The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.Meu2k7

active reloads and cover system, beg to differ

Cover system? You could do that on GTA San Andreas just by crouching behind a car, you dont need a script gluing you to a wall to cover in any FPS or TPS , and active reloads? lol?

omg.... you call that cover? the system is vastly drawn out and had alot of thought put into it. It creates a whole new aspect of firefights in shooters that i miss when i play games like counter-strike online. You obviously never played geow to say a silly thing like that.
Avatar image for GermanShepard06
GermanShepard06

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 GermanShepard06
Member since 2006 • 3285 Posts

geow was downgraded from early screens.

Avatar image for lordseer
lordseer

4671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 lordseer
Member since 2004 • 4671 Posts

The only thing that made GeOW attractive compared to other shooters was it's graphics. It didn't revolutionize or even change gameplay, it just gave 360 a game that looked outstanding. Graphics aren't everything.OhhSnap50893

Are you kidding me?  Gears gets as much acclaim from its gameplay as it does its graphics.  The cover system, active reload, and just general perfection of gameplay is why people love Gears.  Not to mention that it has brought a brutal feeling to shooters.  Even the third person view and the aiming is an upgrade from pretty much every other third person shooter.  Then you have the chainsaw gun, grenade sticks, the melee system. 

Seriously people need to get over Gears.  It's an awesome game.

Avatar image for HazeNPopes
HazeNPopes

735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 HazeNPopes
Member since 2007 • 735 Posts
Kill Switch provided the cover system and blind firing and Duke Nukem did the active reload *so i heard*, The shooting over the shoulder was provided from RE4, Gears squished these ideas in one game and made it great, so GEOW haters owned.
Avatar image for farhan007
farhan007

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 farhan007
Member since 2003 • 204 Posts

 I like Gears of WAr dont get me wrong, but 9.6? Just shows how much easier the Xbox360 gets ratings than the other systems (PC Included) , the Online is schokingly bad.. it was an afterthought , it even has Bullet Lag , Epic Games ... the Creators of Unreal the most balanced of all ... making a game with bullet lag ... seriously ...

 it got 9.6 on its graphics mainly .., all-round it lacks in certain areas. 

Meu2k7
you see that 9/10 for gameplay? you see it? Did you know that gameplay != graphics... And gears multiplayer is some of the funnest gaming i have ever done.
Avatar image for -The-G-Man-
-The-G-Man-

6414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 -The-G-Man-
Member since 2007 • 6414 Posts

:lol: Gears was crap. same with Mass Effect. Gears is nothing more than a Halo 3 filler. its just to keep the lemmings happy unitl Halo 3 is released.xxThyLordxx

So I guess all those great scores mean absolutely nothing.  Too bad a crappy game like Gears owns the entire PS3 lineup.

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#45 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts
Lemmings get a lot nastier when they're on the defense. I guess that 4 years of loosing to Sony gave them a lot of experience, and we'd all just forgotten since they've been so busy making fun of PS3's misfortunes until recently.
Avatar image for lordseer
lordseer

4671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 lordseer
Member since 2004 • 4671 Posts

 I like Gears of WAr dont get me wrong, but 9.6? Just shows how much easier the Xbox360 gets ratings than the other systems (PC Included) , the Online is schokingly bad.. it was an afterthought , it even has Bullet Lag , Epic Games ... the Creators of Unreal the most balanced of all ... making a game with bullet lag ... seriously ...

 it got 9.6 on its graphics mainly .., all-round it lacks in certain areas. 

Meu2k7

You're seriously going to try to make the "standards" argument.  Good games are good games.  Game rankings doesn't use "standards" and gears still kills the competition.  GOTY awards don't use standards, it's each game compared to every other game.  Give it up.

Avatar image for lordseer
lordseer

4671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 lordseer
Member since 2004 • 4671 Posts

Lemmings get a lot nastier when they're on the defense. I guess that 4 years of loosing will do that to you.Timstuff

That was a great post.

Avatar image for elementz28
elementz28

1829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 elementz28
Member since 2007 • 1829 Posts

Cows tried to rant and pic on Gears back when, hollaring about "teh downgrade", "oh teh jaggies, my eyes hurt", blah blah blah..... then Gears released and garnered acclaim from everyone at how beautiful it is and how great the gameplay is......

NOW, Cows are attempting the same crap with Mass Effect....

My question is.... DO COWS EVER GROW TIRED OF EATING THEIR WORDS OR ARE THEY JUST STARVING FOR ATTENTION, since there isnt really much to talk about in regards to the PS3, other than, that their is very little to talk about when discussing the PS3!

Zandeus

 

Gears of War is a really short game..and if mass effect is only able to achieve the same graphics as gears then i dont see anythin impressive but gameplay probaly..

Avatar image for Maelkav
Maelkav

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Maelkav
Member since 2007 • 399 Posts

MASS EFFECT isn't the one that'll smoke cows.

Blue Dragon will.

Sony has long been known as THE "Japanese RPG" platform, but now the 360 is poised to take that crown away with Blue Dragon. The game is already selling in droves in Japan, and so the 360 will only follow the cash trail and make more J-style RPGs of the same (and higher) caliber as Blue Dragon.

Sorry Sony...

Avatar image for HazeNPopes
HazeNPopes

735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 HazeNPopes
Member since 2007 • 735 Posts

MASS EFFECT isn't the one that'll smoke cows.

Blue Dragon will.

Sony has long been known as THE "Japanese RPG" platform, but now the 360 is poised to take that crown away with Blue Dragon. The game is already selling in droves in Japan, and so the 360 will only follow the cash trail and make more J-style RPGs of the same (and higher) caliber as Blue Dragon.

Sorry Sony...

Maelkav
What the hell Blue Dragon is doing crap in japan.