Medal of Honor Warfighter World TV Premiere

looks good i might pre-order if they get off their high horse and admit origin isnt as good as steam

So Generic

Looks like if Call of Duty and Battlefield mated and had some sort of weird, awkward baby. Then they decided to name said baby after their good old local friend Ghost Recon.

it LOOKS amazing but very generic otherwise. Thank God no lens flares though

Warfighter must be one of the dullest, most uninspired video game titles in recent years.

4 hour campaign, here I come

4 hour campaign, here I come

R4gn4r0k

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

4 hour campaign, here I come

001011000101101

MOH had one of the most intimate campaigns for a modern military game this gen. This one looks different.

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

4 hour campaign, here I come

001011000101101

This looks like a complete copy of MW3 :|.. at least do something original *sigh*.. yeah i wont bother with this till its $9

This looks like a complete copy of MW3 :|.. at least do something original *sigh*.. yeah i wont bother with this till its $9

finalstar2007

This looks like a complete copy of MW3 :|.. at least do something original *sigh*.. yeah i wont bother with this till its $9

finalstar2007

I find it interesting that the first trailer for Black Ops shows markedly different settings and weapons while Warfighter essentially looks like Battlefield 3, yet people in the comments still complain about CoD being recycled and praise MOH as a worthy competitor.

I find it interesting that the first trailer for Black Ops shows markedly different settings and weapons while Warfighter essentially looks like Battlefield 3, yet people in the comments still complain about CoD being recycled and praise MOH as a worthy competitor.

WTA2k5

Nearly everyone in this thread so far has complained about how generic the game looks.

I find it interesting that the first trailer for Black Ops shows markedly different settings and weapons while Warfighter essentially looks like Battlefield 3, yet people in the comments still complain about CoD being recycled and praise MOH as a worthy competitor.

WTA2k5

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

4 hour campaign, here I come

001011000101101

What kind of a question is that ? But I'll answer it:

Before every game wanted to be like COD and focus on multiplayer 10+ hour FPS weren't an exception. Everyone enjoyed them, no complaints about the length whatsoever.

Seeing as Killzone 3 and Resistance 3 were two of my favourite singleplayer FPS last year and they were both longer than your average COD clone, I would say yes I don't mind playing a good FPS for over 10 hours.

On the other hand, no I wouldn't play an FPS with a BF3 campaign for more than 2 hours. If we are talking about Bad Company on the other hand ...

This looks like a complete copy of MW3 :|.. at least do something original *sigh*.. yeah i wont bother with this till its $9

finalstar2007

Lol if this was called Call of Duty: Warfighter you would be all over it.

[QUOTE="WTA2k5"]

I find it interesting that the first trailer for Black Ops shows markedly different settings and weapons while Warfighter essentially looks like Battlefield 3, yet people in the comments still complain about CoD being recycled and praise MOH as a worthy competitor.

lawlessx

Check the YouTube comments.

Semi-interested.

I enjoyed MOH2010.

[QUOTE="001011000101101"][QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

4 hour campaign, here I come

Jebus213

[QUOTE="WTA2k5"]

I find it interesting that the first trailer for Black Ops shows markedly different settings and weapons while Warfighter essentially looks like Battlefield 3, yet people in the comments still complain about CoD being recycled and praise MOH as a worthy competitor.

DraugenCP

Nearly everyone in this thread so far has complained about how generic the game looks.

I saw what they were trying to do with the previous MoH, and I really liked it for that. Unfortunately, the bugs and general lack of polish ruined it.

I'm hoping the new MoH redeems its past mistakes. Going for the angle of presenting operators from different countries is relatively novel and pretty cool in my book. EA just has to execute on that idea.

Semi-interested.

I enjoyed MOH2010.

freedomfreak

Hey everyone he liked MOH2010 GET HIM !!!

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]

Semi-interested.

I enjoyed MOH2010.

seanmcloughlin

Hey everyone he liked MOH2010 GET HIM !!!

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]

Semi-interested.

I enjoyed MOH2010.

freedomfreak

Hey everyone he liked MOH2010 GET HIM !!!

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]

Semi-interested.

I enjoyed MOH2010.

freedomfreak

Hey everyone he liked MOH2010 GET HIM !!!

SOW NO MERCY !!

[QUOTE="001011000101101"][QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

4 hour campaign, here I come

Jebus213

Not like there is usually much story behind these military shooters so most of the time it ends abruptly anyway.

You could have told me that was a Call of Duty or Battlefield trailer and I wouldn't have questioned you.

[QUOTE="001011000101101"][QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

4 hour campaign, here I come

R4gn4r0k

What kind of a question is that ? But I'll answer it:

Before every game wanted to be like COD and focus on multiplayer 10+ hour FPS weren't an exception. Everyone enjoyed them, no complaints about the length whatsoever.

Seeing as Killzone 3 and Resistance 3 were two of my favourite singleplayer FPS last year and they were both longer than your average COD clone, I would say yes I don't mind playing a good FPS for over 10 hours.

On the other hand, no I wouldn't play an FPS with a BF3 campaign for more than 2 hours. If we are talking about Bad Company on the other hand ...

But I think it's better for Call of Duty.

The campaigns are so expertly paced and well made that a short single player is fine, and replayability will come from multiplayer.

4 hour campaings for shooters are fine. Not all, but for CoD and the like they are.

[QUOTE="campzor"]generic as hell... moh is irrelevant to the industry now. Cod is the go to shooter for small faced paced battles bf is the go to shooter for large scale battles.JohnnyCageMK

agreed

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="campzor"]generic as hell... moh is irrelevant to the industry now. Cod is the go to shooter for small faced paced battles bf is the go to shooter for large scale battles.campzor

agreed

[QUOTE="campzor"]

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"] and CS is the go to shooter for people that want a game that takes skill.JohnnyCageMK

agreed

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"][QUOTE="campzor"]

agreed

campzor

i once went 10-0 in 1 v 1 with my buddy in wh40k: space marine. he had a gamepad i with mouse & keyboard. and thats with aim assist.

[QUOTE="campzor"]

[QUOTE="JohnnyCageMK"] and CS is the go to shooter for people that want a game that takes skill.JohnnyCageMK

agreed

Isn't this the same exact thing as the teaser trailer released some time ago?AcidSoldner

But I think it's better for Call of Duty.

The campaigns are so expertly paced and well made that a short single player is fine, and replayability will come from multiplayer.

4 hour campaings for shooters are fine. Not all, but for CoD and the like they are.

OB-47

For Call of Duty it is indeed better, because not a lot of people play that game for SP. But I wouldn't want every FPS to be like COD and have the length of it too.

I can only play so many MP games, while I play a lot of SP games. Luckily there are still FPS that focus on singleplayer rather than online like Rage, Half Life and Bioshock.