@lundy86_4 said:
@Miyomatic said:
Just because it was lambasted for those reasons doesn't mean each of the three Hobbit movies is only "part" of one overall movie. They may tell part of the story, but as I stated above, part of a story =/= part of a game. A full game can tell a part of another game's overall story.
The point is when you say "FFVII: Remake is 25% of a full game", well, that's just objectively false.
Jesus Christ. You stipulated, and I quote:
@Miyomatic said:
According to you, each separate LOTR film is only "part" of a movie. Are you only seeing part of a movie when you watch one of them? Can you even watch the entire movie if all of them combined don't tell the entirety of the original story? So according to your own logic, a full LOTR movie doesn't exist?
LOTR was a 3-book narrative, with a 3 movie representation. Your analogy was incorrect. The Hobbit was a single book split into 3 movies, and was largely lambasted for that move... Kinda like FF7R.
You are hung up on the fact that I originally named LOTR in my example rather than lasering in on The Hobbit, and correctly pointed out my mistake. Cool, you're really, really into LOTR. You don't need to try and prove how much of a superfan you are, I get it. But don't let that cause you to lose sight of the point.
It doesn't erase the fact that the Hobbit movies serve as the perfect comparison, and the fact remains there were three full movies that told the same story as a single book did. But again, they were three full movies, each telling a part of an overall story. Yes, JUST like FFVIIR is a fullgame telling part of an overall story.
I really don't get the pushback. It really does seem like the same crowd that was mad they broke up the Hobbit is still here years later crying about FFVIIR.
Log in to comment