Metro 2033 PC vs 360 comparison

No deeplinking is being shown. I posted these in another Metro 2033 thread and it was being a pain in the butt with posting.

However, yes, there are clear differences between the versions, and the PC (for obvious reasons) looks much better.

Obviously the PC version looks better but, I am very impressed with the way the 360 version looks.

However, yes, there are clear differences between the versions, and the PC (for obvious reasons) looks much better.

lundy86_4

So that PC version looks much better?

I gotta check that out. I've seen some vids, but I want to see both running in front of me, I got the impression it wasn't going to be significantly different from posters here in SW.

I may have to buy one and rent one.:P

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

However, yes, there are clear differences between the versions, and the PC (for obvious reasons) looks much better.

SolidTy

So that PC version looks much better?

I gotta check that out. I've seen some vids, but I want to see both running in front of me, I got the impression it wasn't going to be significantly different from posters here in SW.

I may have to buy one and rent one.:P

I haven't played it yet, because i'm waiting to upgrade to DX11. From the pictures there are notable differences between teh two versions. Texture resolution is much higher for the PC, and lighting takes a significant bump.

Both versions look great though.

The 360 version looks awful depending on the area of the game. Some places it looks likethe low setting on Pc and other places ir looks like its sub Pc low settings. Even the Dx 9 mode of the game look miles better then the 360 version

http://translate.google.de/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcgames.de%2Faid%2C706639%2FMetro-2033-PC-vs-Xbox-360-Teilweise-gravierende-optische-Unterschiede-festgestellt%2FPC%2F&sl=de&tl=en

what happened to the 360 version being the console graphics king?

I mean no offense, but it seems a bit pointless to compare a PC game to a console game. PC hardware is constantly upgrading, so if you have the money to buy a high end system then the PC version of any game is always going to look better than its console counterpart.

I mean no offense, but it seems a bit pointless to compare a PC game to a console game. PC hardware is constantly upgrading, so if you have the money to buy a high end system then the PC version of any game is always going to look better than its console counterpart.

gruoch1

Yeah, it's obvious. It's just done to show the differences between the multiplatform games on PC and consoles. They did the same for Dragon Age. It's interesting to see for people.

The 360 version looks awful depending on the area of the game. Some places it looks likethe low setting on Pc and other places ir looks like its sub Pc low settings. Look http://translate.google.de/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcgames.de%2Faid%2C706639%2FMetro-2033-PC-vs-Xbox-360-Teilweise-gravierende-optische-Unterschiede-festgestellt%2FPC%2F&sl=de&tl=en04dcarraher

I see...here is one of many shots since no one has posted anything.

Even a light source is missing?

[QUOTE="gruoch1"]

I mean no offense, but it seems a bit pointless to compare a PC game to a console game. PC hardware is constantly upgrading, so if you have the money to buy a high end system then the PC version of any game is always going to look better than its console counterpart.

Yeah, it's obvious. It's just done to show the differences between the multiplatform games on PC and consoles. They did the same for Dragon Age. It's interesting to see for people.

I mean no offense, but it seems a bit pointless to compare a PC game to a console game. PC hardware is constantly upgrading, so if you have the money to buy a high end system then the PC version of any game is always going to look better than its console counterpart.

gruoch1

what happened to the 360 version being the console graphics king?

karsa-orlong

well to be fair, most console games look like garbage compared to PC

Here's a picture for you guys...

Here a few more

Here's a picture for you guys...

GTSaiyanjin2

That looks horrible...even MW2 looks way better.

MW2 looks awful too detail wise, ever looked at the texture detail on objects? like the running lights on the Humvee's are just a cluster of pixels reminds me of a Dos game. 04dcarraher

yeah the only saving grace about MW2's graphics was always the animations

MW2 looks awful too detail wise, ever looked at the texture detail on objects? like the running lights on the Humvee's are just a cluster of pixels reminds me of a Dos game. 04dcarraher

Yeah well, everything looks terrible on the 360 version screenshot. It looks like a 3 year old game on the 360.

Yeah, it's not "console graphics king" as some lems hyped it but it's good looking game, deferred lighting FTW! :Psayonara89

I haven't seen it running in front of me, but no...these screens show that people way overhyped this games graphics.

The 360 fail hard because the pc version on low settings look better.

Of course the PC wins in the visual department. :P

The 360 fail hard because the pc version on low settings look better.

MK-Professor

what happened to the 360 version being the console graphics king?

karsa-orlong

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

The 360 fail hard because the pc version on low settings look better.

Tessellation

To read what????:?

I have test the metro2033 in my pc with low, medium, high, veryhigh stetting, and this game on low setting looks good and of course the low-setting looks better than the 360 version.

These sort of comparisons always irritate me a bit.

Hey let's take a possibly 1920x1200 image and scale it down to console size for comparison, that will really show off the extra resolution PC brings.

Lots of hate here!! Most reviews i have been reading say the game looks incredible on 360...

Lots of hate here!! Most reviews i have been reading say the game looks incredible on 360...

PAL360

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Lots of hate here!! Most reviews i have been reading say the game looks incredible on 360...

Brainkiller05

Well, obviously PC version will look and perform better. It allways do

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Lots of hate here!! Most reviews i have been reading say the game looks incredible on 360...

PAL360

Well, obviously PC version will look and perform better. It allways do

These sort of comparisons always irritate me a bit.

Hey let's take a possibly 1920x1200 image and scale it down to console size for comparison, that will really show off the extra resolution PC brings.

AnnoyedDragon

This. Unfortunately, this seems to be more common than not when it comes to multiplat comparisons

I think the recent Just Cause 2 PC vs consoles comparison is one of the few lately in which the PC shots were not resized, and the difference was very apparent.

maybe by console standards, but comparing it to the PC version is making people have second thoughts about how good it looks. Brainkiller05

Well, obviously PC version will look and perform better. It allways do

I doubt the 360 screens are fairly taken. Look at the last two "comparisons". I find it hard to believe that the devs would put a guy up on the podium and barely make him visible. I'll probably find out how it really looks like when I get it on the 360.WhyS

PC>>>the 3 Consoles. Just get over it

[QUOTE="WhyS"]I doubt the 360 screens are fairly taken. Look at the last two "comparisons". I find it hard to believe that the devs would put a guy up on the podium and barely make him visible. I'll probably find out how it really looks like when I get it on the 360.XPierreKirbyX

[QUOTE="XPierreKirbyX"][QUOTE="WhyS"]I doubt the 360 screens are fairly taken. Look at the last two "comparisons". I find it hard to believe that the devs would put a guy up on the podium and barely make him visible. I'll probably find out how it really looks like when I get it on the 360.WhyS

The PC version is a port of the 360 version. If they didn't optimise something fully it would be the PC version.

I'm pretty sure the 360 wields enough power to light up a room, despite the fact it costs only $200.

Not really. Metro 2033 has really advanced lightning system, so little light sources on screen may have improved performance. Might be wrong though.

If those two images are in direct comparison of each other.. Then it's a daaamn shame for the 360 version. Although, as I said, I find it hard to believe.

I mean (looking at the 360 version) the stairs in the back are lite up. The guy on the podium's not.

Well as i said, Metro 2033 has one of, if not the most advanced lightning in a game. So putting too much of it might kill performance.

lol, Lems hyped this as the console graphics king........beating GOW3 and Uncharted 2. Seriously, when are they ever going to learn? At least let the game come out and use real pics before you place your foot in your mouth. I remember seeing people say this was a AAA game because they were wowed by the graphics lol.darthogre

It is an AAA title. Some sites gave it 9/10, but i think GS will give it 8/10, 8.5 for PC version maybe.

[QUOTE="darthogre"]lol, Lems hyped this as the console graphics king........beating GOW3 and Uncharted 2. Seriously, when are they ever going to learn? At least let the game come out and use real pics before you place your foot in your mouth. I remember seeing people say this was a AAA game because they were wowed by the graphics lol.XPierreKirbyX

It is an AAA title. Some sites gave it 9/10, but i think GS will give it 8/10, 8.5 for PC version maybe.

[QUOTE="XPierreKirbyX"]

[QUOTE="darthogre"]lol, Lems hyped this as the console graphics king........beating GOW3 and Uncharted 2. Seriously, when are they ever going to learn? At least let the game come out and use real pics before you place your foot in your mouth. I remember seeing people say this was a AAA game because they were wowed by the graphics lol.darthogre

It is an AAA title. Some sites gave it 9/10, but i think GS will give it 8/10, 8.5 for PC version maybe.

Crysis is graphic king. Deal with it. Metro 2033 PC though is one of the best looking games i have played.

[QUOTE="WhyS"][QUOTE="XPierreKirbyX"] Ofc its all a conspiracy to make the 360 version look bad. Can't you accept that a modern day PC has more power than your 200$ console?XPierreKirbyX

The PC version is a port of the 360 version. If they didn't optimise something fully it would be the PC version.

I'm pretty sure the 360 wields enough power to light up a room, despite the fact it costs only $200.

Not really. Metro 2033 has really advanced lightning system, so little light sources on screen may have improved performance. Might be wrong though.

[QUOTE="XPierreKirbyX"]

[QUOTE="darthogre"]lol, Lems hyped this as the console graphics king........beating GOW3 and Uncharted 2. Seriously, when are they ever going to learn? At least let the game come out and use real pics before you place your foot in your mouth. I remember seeing people say this was a AAA game because they were wowed by the graphics lol.darthogre

It is an AAA title. Some sites gave it 9/10, but i think GS will give it 8/10, 8.5 for PC version maybe.

Metro 2033 >>>> Killzone 2. Get over it.