Metro 2033 PC vs 360 comparison

[QUOTE="darthogre"]

[QUOTE="XPierreKirbyX"]

It is an AAA title. Some sites gave it 9/10, but i think GS will give it 8/10, 8.5 for PC version maybe.

Dataleak

Metro 2033 >>>> Killzone 2. Get over it.

Wait for gamespot review.

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="darthogre"] It IS a AAA? what? Ok, how about I say it's a A game? The same amount of sites that gave it 9/10 also gave it 7/10. So who is right. Right now it's obvious the game is not AAA quality and is not the graphics king. If this game gets AAA on Gamespot they were paid off......maybe the devs gave them gifts because this getting AAA would be worse that ODST getting AAA.

sayonara89

Metro 2033 >>>> Killzone 2. Get over it.

Wait for gamespot review.

:roll: Innovative games always fail with reviewers.

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

Metro 2033 >>>> Killzone 2. Get over it.

Dataleak

Wait for gamespot review.

:roll: Innovative games always fail with reviewers.

Maybe but Metro 2033 isn't innovative game, it's just another great post-apocalyptic shooter ;)

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Wait for gamespot review.

sayonara89

:roll: Innovative games always fail with reviewers.

Maybe but Metro 2033 isn't innovative game, it's just another great post-apocalyptic shooter ;)

Yeah I guess. But still, it feels fresh. And it has some cool ideas. :P

I am currently playing the 360 version and it looks nice in places, but it can look fairly rough in spots as well. Still, it is a must play game, in my opinion.

[QUOTE="XPierreKirbyX"]

[QUOTE="darthogre"]lol, Lems hyped this as the console graphics king........beating GOW3 and Uncharted 2. Seriously, when are they ever going to learn? At least let the game come out and use real pics before you place your foot in your mouth. I remember seeing people say this was a AAA game because they were wowed by the graphics lol.darthogre

It is an AAA title. Some sites gave it 9/10, but i think GS will give it 8/10, 8.5 for PC version maybe.

Well, you haven't played it, so how can you give it anything? Just wondering...

Oh, yes, let's bash it because it's 360/PC.

I'm actually surprised at how well the 360 version holds up. It reminds me of 360 bioshock vs. PC.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

However, yes, there are clear differences between the versions, and the PC (for obvious reasons) looks much better.

SolidTy

So that PC version looks much better?

I gotta check that out. I've seen some vids, but I want to see both running in front of me, I got the impression it wasn't going to be significantly different from posters here in SW.

I may have to buy one and rent one.:P

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Wait for gamespot review.

sayonara89

:roll: Innovative games always fail with reviewers.

Maybe but Metro 2033 isn't innovative game, it's just another great post-apocalyptic shooter ;)

The 360 version does hold up rather well. I'm happy to see these old consoles can still hold their own.

If those two images are in direct comparison of each other.. Then it's a daaamn shame for the 360 version. Although, as I said, I find it hard to believe.

I mean (looking at the 360 version) the stairs in the back are lite up. The guy on the podium's not.

WhyS

[QUOTE="sayonara89"]

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

:roll: Innovative games always fail with reviewers.

Animal-Mother

Maybe but Metro 2033 isn't innovative game, it's just another great post-apocalyptic shooter ;)

What exactly is innovative about the game to begin with?

I always felt this game would be superior on the PC. Seems like it was made for it.juden41

This game looks great on 360, easily the best-looking FPP title on this console, and of the best looking games overall as well.Salt_The_Fries

You know what they're doing.

It shouldn't be surprising.

And don't buy into fanboy BS comparison propaganda, this game has even remarkable amount of bump-mapping for a console game.Salt_The_Fries

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"]And don't buy into fanboy BS comparison propaganda, this game has even remarkable amount of bump-mapping for a console game.WhyS

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"]And don't buy into fanboy BS comparison propaganda, this game has even remarkable amount of bump-mapping for a console game.WhyS

Nope. Both of those screens look like **** compared to what it really looks like.

[QUOTE="WhyS"][QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"]And don't buy into fanboy BS comparison propaganda, this game has even remarkable amount of bump-mapping for a console game.Salt_The_Fries

Whats wrong with those pics :S....i played this game yesterday and it looks miles better than this..Magik85

agreed, i've been playing the 360 version for the last two days and it looks much better then some of the pics posted in this thread.

Ouch. Metro 2033 definitely isn't a hard hitter on 360.aaronmullan

Agreed, Its not even close to being the best looking game on a console , hell its not even close to being the best looking game on the 360.

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Ouch. Metro 2033 definitely isn't a hard hitter on 360.TheSterls

Agreed, Its not even close to being the best looking game on a console , hell its not even close to being the best looking game on the 360.

I have the game since yesterday, and so far I have found DX10 to run better than DX9. My 8800GT handles it pretty well on high settings. However if I run at 16x10 I encounter some dips into 20 especially in combat or in so very intensive lighting&particle effects, so I just run it at 1360x765, and its buttery smooth. I better update my drivers, cause the game gives me a notice that mine are outdated. This game has some very nice graphics, and in some areas it beats Call of Pripyat, and on others it rivals it. here are some of my own screens, but in DX9, fraps won't work in DX10 for some reason. I saw some 360 screens and I honestly would never get that version, unless my PC was really old. This just goes to show that consoles are very outdated, and comparisons between consoles and PC are very pointless. There is no way consoles can even compete.muscleserge

Not really, If anything it goes to show it is a bad pc port made by a dev that has never done a console game. Other great multiplat titles look outstanding on console such as ME2 for an example. I wouldnt really judge the 360 based on this game as I can name many titles on the 360 that look better then the 360 version.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Ouch. Metro 2033 definitely isn't a hard hitter on 360.Salt_The_Fries

Agreed, Its not even close to being the best looking game on a console , hell its not even close to being the best looking game on the 360.

Look at the game? Its visually on part with Fall out 3 except I dont think its as big.

I said: come in, don't stand there!Salt_The_Fries

What are you? A statue? If you got something, spill the beans. If not, TAKE A HIKE! :P

-

Metro Looks Great on Both, I'm defiantly gonna Buy it, unfortunately though for Metro, BF:BC2 is next on my list, However I'll be picking this up in a week or two.(PC) 8)

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Agreed, Its not even close to being the best looking game on a console , hell its not even close to being the best looking game on the 360.

TheSterls

Look at the game? Its visually on part with Fall out 3 except I dont think its as big.

No. I was about to agree with you until you said it was visually on par with Fallout 3.

That shot the argument for me. Metro has things going on technically that Fallout 3 could only dream of.

[QUOTE="juden41"]I always felt this game would be superior on the PC. Seems like it was made for it.WhyS

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Agreed, Its not even close to being the best looking game on a console , hell its not even close to being the best looking game on the 360.

TheSterls

Look at the game? Its visually on part with Fall out 3 except I dont think its as big.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"] Why?BioShockOwnz

Look at the game? Its visually on part with Fall out 3 except I dont think its as big.

No. I was about to agree with you until you said it was visually on par with Fallout 3.

That shot the argument for me. Metro has things going on technically that Fallout 3 could only dream of.

IGN UK gave it a 7.5 graphics :|

The texture work and geometry levels are terrible and what things are you talking about? Its got some nice lighting effects and outside of that its doing nothing special.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"] Why?Salt_The_Fries

Look at the game? Its visually on part with Fall out 3 except I dont think its as big.

You honestly think its the best looking game on the 360? lol

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Look at the game? Its visually on part with Fall out 3 except I dont think its as big.

TheSterls

No. I was about to agree with you until you said it was visually on par with Fallout 3.

That shot the argument for me. Metro has things going on technically that Fallout 3 could only dream of.

IGN UK gave it a 7.5 graphics :|

The texture work and geometry levels are terrible and what things are you talking about? Its got some nice lighting effects and outside of that its doing nothing special.

Do you think I give a damn what they gave the graphics? I can quote another review that scored the graphics highly. But no, unlike you, I'm not going to lean on a review to prove a point.

FO3 doesn't have the great particle effects, bump mapping, lighting, etc, of Metro.

It just doesn't.

And I don't need you to quote IGN. I have my own eyes, thank you very much.

Even having a 4 year old gpu(Geforce 8800) can mop up the console graphics, when properly ultizied.04dcarraher

It should, that's a whole generation after the consoles graphics cards.

I posted some screenshots in this thread of max settings in 1080p of the Metro 2003 PC.

If you want to see what the game truly looks like visit that thread.

I do not want to flood this thread with the same pics.

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27226401&page=8&tag=topics;page;9

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

No. I was about to agree with you until you said it was visually on par with Fallout 3.

That shot the argument for me. Metro has things going on technically that Fallout 3 could only dream of.

BioShockOwnz

IGN UK gave it a 7.5 graphics :|

The texture work and geometry levels are terrible and what things are you talking about? Its got some nice lighting effects and outside of that its doing nothing special.

Do you think I give a damn what they gave the graphics? I can quote another review that scored the graphics highly. But no, unlike you, I'm not going to lean on a review to prove a point.

FO3 doesn't have the great particle effects, bump mapping, lighting, etc, of Metro.

It just doesn't.

And I don't need you to quote IGN. I have my own eyes, thank you very much.

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Look at the game? Its visually on part with Fall out 3 except I dont think its as big.

TheSterls

You honestly think its the best looking game on the 360? lol

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

IGN UK gave it a 7.5 graphics :|

The texture work and geometry levels are terrible and what things are you talking about? Its got some nice lighting effects and outside of that its doing nothing special.

aaronmullan

Do you think I give a damn what they gave the graphics? I can quote another review that scored the graphics highly. But no, unlike you, I'm not going to lean on a review to prove a point.

FO3 doesn't have the great particle effects, bump mapping, lighting, etc, of Metro.

It just doesn't.

And I don't need you to quote IGN. I have my own eyes, thank you very much.

Cool, then I'll do the same if he wants to take that route. Plenty of 360 reviews that point out the great visuals. I can do dat.

I was take the high road, though. I dunno, I can go back to posting teh quotes, however.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"] No, it ain't, and I played both on 360, and I can tell that without a shadow of a doubt that Metro 2033 is a clear winner.Salt_The_Fries

You honestly think its the best looking game on the 360? lol

Ok im gonna take your line as BS there.. Killzone 2 obliterates Metro 2033 from a visual perspective in pretty much every conceviable way . So to take that crap pc port is top of the line for console standards simply doesnt fly.

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Do you think I give a damn what they gave the graphics? I can quote another review that scored the graphics highly. But no, unlike you, I'm not going to lean on a review to prove a point.

FO3 doesn't have the great particle effects, bump mapping, lighting, etc, of Metro.

It just doesn't.

And I don't need you to quote IGN. I have my own eyes, thank you very much.

BioShockOwnz

Cool, then I'll do the same if he wants to take that route. Plenty of 360 reviews that point out the great visuals. I can do dat.

I was take the high road, though. I dunno, I can go back to posting teh quotes, however.