Metro 2033 PC vs 360 comparison

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"] But you quote reviews and stuff all the time. I think he can if he wants :Paaronmullan

Cool, then I'll do the same if he wants to take that route. Plenty of 360 reviews that point out the great visuals. I can do dat.

I was take the high road, though. I dunno, I can go back to posting teh quotes, however.

I agree with that. The PC version obliterates every console game.

And I also agree that Killzone 2 looks better than the 360 version.

Fallout 3, however, does not.

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Do you think I give a damn what they gave the graphics? I can quote another review that scored the graphics highly. But no, unlike you, I'm not going to lean on a review to prove a point.

FO3 doesn't have the great particle effects, bump mapping, lighting, etc, of Metro.

It just doesn't.

And I don't need you to quote IGN. I have my own eyes, thank you very much.

BioShockOwnz

Cool, then I'll do the same if he wants to take that route. Plenty of 360 reviews that point out the great visuals. I can do dat.

I was take the high road, though. I dunno, I can go back to posting teh quotes, however.

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Cool, then I'll do the same if he wants to take that route. Plenty of 360 reviews that point out the great visuals. I can do dat.

I was take the high road, though. I dunno, I can go back to posting teh quotes, however.

BioShockOwnz

I agree with that. The PC version obliterates every console game.

And I also agree that Killzone 2 looks better than the 360 version.

Fallout 3, however, does not.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"] You always seem to mix and match. I don't really care since I know the 360 version look bad compared to the PC version :P All I'm here for :Daaronmullan

I agree with that. The PC version obliterates every console game.

And I also agree that Killzone 2 looks better than the 360 version.

Fallout 3, however, does not.

Seriously. It looks fine when you're at a distance, but the game looks like *** close up. Worst looking NPC's eva!

Oblivion had scary *** NPC's, too.

Yuck.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"] But you quote reviews and stuff all the time. I think he can if he wants :PTheSterls

Cool, then I'll do the same if he wants to take that route. Plenty of 360 reviews that point out the great visuals. I can do dat.

I was take the high road, though. I dunno, I can go back to posting teh quotes, however.

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

Apprantly you have not seen the 1080p directx 11 screenshots that I posted.

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27226401&page=8&tag=topics;page;9

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"] You always seem to mix and match. I don't really care since I know the 360 version look bad compared to the PC version :P All I'm here for :Daaronmullan

I agree with that. The PC version obliterates every console game.

And I also agree that Killzone 2 looks better than the 360 version.

Fallout 3, however, does not.

I compared it to FO3 because they have a simliar theme, yeat it looks better then FO3 but it dam well should its not anywhere near as big. And my point is you compare metro 2033 on the 360 to Killzone 2 and KZ2 obliterates it. I just think thats funny when lemmings were saying this would be the best looking game on a console and a game that came out over a year ago trounces it. I also think GeoW 2 trounces it as well and I could go on and on .

The bottom line as a 360 title it looks nothing speical and has bad pc port writtten all over it.

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

I agree with that. The PC version obliterates every console game.

And I also agree that Killzone 2 looks better than the 360 version.

Fallout 3, however, does not.

TheSterls

I compared it to FO3 because they have a simliar theme, yeat it looks better then FO3 but it dam well should its not anywhere near as big. And my point is you compare metro 2033 on the 360 to Killzone 2 and KZ2 obliterates it. I just think thats funny when lemmings were saying this would be the best game on a console and a game that came out over a year ago trounces it.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Cool, then I'll do the same if he wants to take that route. Plenty of 360 reviews that point out the great visuals. I can do dat.

I was take the high road, though. I dunno, I can go back to posting teh quotes, however.

Hakkai007

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

Apprantly you have not seen the 1080p directx 11 screenshots that I posted.

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27226401&page=8&tag=topics;page;9

Apprantly you need reading comprehension as we are talking about the 360 version :|

Also hermits are overhyping it because its DX11 as no that doesnt look that speical .

I'll pass on this, don't want my 4850 catching fire.

This game looks simply amazing on PC. Its also TONS of fun.

All this talk about Fallout3... well I enjoy this game more then I do Fallout3 thats forsure

I'll pass on this, don't want my 4850 catching fire.

lespaul1919

I have a EVGA GTS 8800 512 and its fine for this game, I cant max teh game out but it loosk wonderful and plays at a good FPS aswell.

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

You honestly think its the best looking game on the 360? lol

TheSterls

Ok im gonna take your line as BS there.. Killzone 2 obliterates Metro 2033 from a visual perspective in pretty much every conceviable way . So to take that crap pc port is top of the line for console standards simply doesnt fly.

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

TheSterls

Apprantly you have not seen the 1080p directx 11 screenshots that I posted.

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27226401&page=8&tag=topics;page;9

Apprantly you need reading comprehension as we are talking about the 360 version :|

And apparantly you didn't see that he said the game doesn't look special "even" by 360 standards.

Meaning he was also talking about the PC version.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"] Best FPP - probably yes. Some things on technical level are miles above any game on 360 or PS3, and most definetly PC version kills every single title on 360 and PS3 combined.Salt_The_Fries

Ok im gonna take your line as BS there.. Killzone 2 obliterates Metro 2033 from a visual perspective in pretty much every conceviable way . So to take that crap pc port is top of the line for console standards simply doesnt fly.

And thats why I use professional reviews rather then people in SW to settle the diffrences. Metro 2033 isnt doing anything on the 360 that KZ2 doesnt do better. KZ2 wins in Lighting, character models , animations, gun models and yes even textures.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

Apprantly you have not seen the 1080p directx 11 screenshots that I posted.

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=27226401&page=8&tag=topics;page;9

Hakkai007

Apprantly you need reading comprehension as we are talking about the 360 version :|

And apparantly you didn't see that he said the game doesn't look special "even" by 360 standards.

Meaning he was also talking about the PC version.

Im the one that wrote that , and im implying that the 360 version does not look good by 360 standards.

Having played both versions...........

PC version looks alot better, but the 360 version still looks very well and among the best lookign 360 games imo (gears2, ME2 and Kameo are also very good looking).

Basically the 360 version looks like LOW settings on pc and im not just saying that its true. I love all consoles and pc, but this is from what ive seen, the pc version on low = 360 version with HDMI output on 40' hdtv.

Metro is a game that looks amazing even on low or normal settings aswell.

[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Apprantly you need reading comprehension as we are talking about the 360 version :|

TheSterls

And apparantly you didn't see that he said the game doesn't look special "even" by 360 standards.

Meaning he was also talking about the PC version.

Im the one that wrote that , and im implying that the 360 version does not look good by 360 standards.

oh ok sorry for misunderstanding then.

Anyone else blown away by the atmosphere created in this game? Simply amazing!!!!!!!

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"] FO3 is a horrible looking game. Almost anything looks better than it.aaronmullan

I compared it to FO3 because they have a simliar theme, yeat it looks better then FO3 but it dam well should its not anywhere near as big. And my point is you compare metro 2033 on the 360 to Killzone 2 and KZ2 obliterates it. I just think thats funny when lemmings were saying this would be the best game on a console and a game that came out over a year ago trounces it.

Not always, ME2 i thought looked great on 360 it almost looked identical to the pc version other then image quality settings . ButMetro just didnt hold up well in transition.

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Ok im gonna take your line as BS there.. Killzone 2 obliterates Metro 2033 from a visual perspective in pretty much every conceviable way . So to take that crap pc port is top of the line for console standards simply doesnt fly.

TheSterls

And thats why I use professional reviews rather then people in SW to settle the diffrences. Metro 2033 isnt doing anything on the 360 that KZ2 doesnt do better. KZ2 wins in Lighting, character models , animations, gun models and yes even textures.

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

TheSterls

And that wasn't my argument, bud. You said FO3 looked better. It doesn't. Plain and simple.

Also, some nice quotes on the visuals and such...

"Beautiful environments with a surprising amount of detail are aided by fantastic animation" - Game Informer

"Technically, the game looks great on console." - Vandal Online

"2033 Metro graphically that its Xbox 360 version is an outstanding game is something no one should doubt that despite its obvious inferiority with respect to the PC version. Difference logic on the other hand by the hardware capabilities of Microsoft's console on compatible products.With a wonderful use of lighting with very good textures and modeling, the title offers plenty of twigs to qualify as a title that takes good advantage of the possibilities of the console from Microsoft.

Best of Metro, however, is that it uses all this power playable visual purposes, and the ambience is that you get from your use of light is so distressing and visually brilliant." - 3DJuegos

"Metro 2033 is far busier and far more accomplished than I expected it to be, and it's also one of the best-looking games - at least in a few very special scenes - on the Xbox 360." - Eurogamer

Ahem, there's just 4.

Good one, TheSterls.

I always deliver, btw.

is the game any fun?

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

BioShockOwnz

And that wasn't my argument, bud. You said FO3 looked better. It doesn't. Plain and simple.

Also, some nice quotes on the visuals and such...

"Beautiful environments with a surprising amount of detail are aided by fantastic animation" - Game Informer

"Technically, the game looks great on console." - Vandal Online

"2033 Metro graphically that its Xbox 360 version is an outstanding game is something no one should doubt that despite its obvious inferiority with respect to the PC version. Difference logic on the other hand by the hardware capabilities of Microsoft's console on compatible products.With a wonderful use of lighting with very good textures and modeling, the title offers plenty of twigs to qualify as a title that takes good advantage of the possibilities of the console from Microsoft.

Best of Metro, however, is that it uses all this power playable visual purposes, and the ambience is that you get from your use of light is so distressing and visually brilliant." - 3DJuegos

"Metro 2033 is far busier and far more accomplished than I expected it to be, and it's also one of the best-looking games - at least in a few very special scenes - on the Xbox 360." - Eurogamer

Ahem, there's just 4.

Good one, TheSterls.

I always deliver, btw.

Not one said it was among the best looking games though. You want me to post links where they say UC2 and GOW3 is the best looking game to ever grace a console ?

Your responce would be , meh they dont look that good.

PS. Yea it looks better then FO3 its also nowhere near as big.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

And thats why I use professional reviews rather then people in SW to settle the diffrences. Metro 2033 isnt doing anything on the 360 that KZ2 doesnt do better. KZ2 wins in Lighting, character models , animations, gun models and yes even textures.

TheSterls

Theres nothing personal about the opionion , The fact is KZ2 is is technically more impressive and we only have to look at the techincal marks both games have got to confirm that. I also think your a liar, one who buys the 360 version and then gets the pc version ? Also you can look at any gameplay video or screenshot and see KZ2 smokes the 360 version.

Also ill get the pc version if i deem it worthy , so far its it doesnt seem to be anything special.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

TheSterls

And that wasn't my argument, bud. You said FO3 looked better. It doesn't. Plain and simple.

Also, some nice quotes on the visuals and such...

"Beautiful environments with a surprising amount of detail are aided by fantastic animation" - Game Informer

"Technically, the game looks great on console." - Vandal Online

"2033 Metro graphically that its Xbox 360 version is an outstanding game is something no one should doubt that despite its obvious inferiority with respect to the PC version. Difference logic on the other hand by the hardware capabilities of Microsoft's console on compatible products.With a wonderful use of lighting with very good textures and modeling, the title offers plenty of twigs to qualify as a title that takes good advantage of the possibilities of the console from Microsoft.

Best of Metro, however, is that it uses all this power playable visual purposes, and the ambience is that you get from your use of light is so distressing and visually brilliant." - 3DJuegos

"Metro 2033 is far busier and far more accomplished than I expected it to be, and it's also one of the best-looking games - at least in a few very special scenes - on the Xbox 360." - Eurogamer

Ahem, there's just 4.

Good one, TheSterls.

I always deliver, btw.

Not one said it was among the best looking games though. You want me to post links where they say UC2 and GOW3 is the best looking game to ever grace a console ?

Your responce would be , meh they dont look that good.

PS. Yea it looks better then FO3 its also nowhere near as big.

And I didn't say that, so you're making things up now.

You keep saying it's a crappy port. It doesn't look as good as Fallout 3.

I just proved the first one wrong. And we know the second one doesn't pan out, because you're even reversing on that comment now.

But hey, it's not on PS3, so let's bash it. Or at least let's bash the one on the competitors console, right?

You said reviews matter. I just posted reviews that said it's up to snuff as far as consoles go. Crappy? Not so much. :|

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

And that wasn't my argument, bud. You said FO3 looked better. It doesn't. Plain and simple.

Also, some nice quotes on the visuals and such...

"Beautiful environments with a surprising amount of detail are aided by fantastic animation" - Game Informer

"Technically, the game looks great on console." - Vandal Online

"2033 Metro graphically that its Xbox 360 version is an outstanding game is something no one should doubt that despite its obvious inferiority with respect to the PC version. Difference logic on the other hand by the hardware capabilities of Microsoft's console on compatible products.With a wonderful use of lighting with very good textures and modeling, the title offers plenty of twigs to qualify as a title that takes good advantage of the possibilities of the console from Microsoft.

Best of Metro, however, is that it uses all this power playable visual purposes, and the ambience is that you get from your use of light is so distressing and visually brilliant." - 3DJuegos

"Metro 2033 is far busier and far more accomplished than I expected it to be, and it's also one of the best-looking games - at least in a few very special scenes - on the Xbox 360." - Eurogamer

Ahem, there's just 4.

Good one, TheSterls.

I always deliver, btw.

BioShockOwnz

Not one said it was among the best looking games though. You want me to post links where they say UC2 and GOW3 is the best looking game to ever grace a console ?

Your responce would be , meh they dont look that good.

PS. Yea it looks better then FO3 its also nowhere near as big.

And I didn't say that, so you're making things up now.

You keep saying it's a crappy port. It doesn't look as good as Fallout 3.

I just proved the first one wrong. And we know the second one doesn't pan out, because you're even reversing on that comment now.

But hey, it's not on PS3, so let's bash it. Or at least let's bash the one on the competitors console, right?

You said reviews matter. I just posted reviews that said it's up to snuff as far as consoles go. Crappy? Not so much. :|

I said it was about on par with FO3, I never siad it looked like crap comapred to FO3 . Does Metro 2033 look better? Yes but its not even close to the same scale so you have to take that into consideration. I compared them as they have simliar settings ( post apocalyptic wastelands)

Also I bring up the PS3 in the argument as you were one of the ones raving how this would be among the best looking game on consoles and it isnt. You didnt post me any links proving otherwise you just showed that some think it looks decent.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"] And professional reviewers like eurogamer said is a technical achievement,are you gonna come with another excuse? i have kz2 and metro for 360 and the game looks comparable to kz2 n better in some other stuffs and vise versa,im getting the pc version tomorrow which smokes kz2,stop trying to pass your personal opinions as fact.Tessellation

Theres nothing personal about the opionion , The fact is KZ2 is is technically more impressive and we only have to look at the techincal marks both games have got to confirm that. I also think your a liar, one who buys the 360 version and then gets the pc version ? Also you can look at any gameplay video or screenshot and see KZ2 smokes the 360 version.

Also ill get the pc version if i deem it worthy , so far its it doesnt seem to be anything special.

Killzone 2 was nominated for best visuals on every website last year , it lost to UC2 but the fact is metro 2033 on the 360 most likely wont get nominated for anything ever. Why? Because it doesnt look as good, its not getting anywhere near the same praise as KZ2 . Those are facts.

Rather what you think looks better , thats your opionion but from a technical standpoint its not that impressive on the 360.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Theres nothing personal about the opionion , The fact is KZ2 is is technically more impressive and we only have to look at the techincal marks both games have got to confirm that. I also think your a liar, one who buys the 360 version and then gets the pc version ? Also you can look at any gameplay video or screenshot and see KZ2 smokes the 360 version.

Also ill get the pc version if i deem it worthy , so far its it doesnt seem to be anything special.

TheSterls

Killzone 2 was nominated for best visuals on every website last year , it lost to UC2 but the fact is metro 2033 on the 360 most likely wont get nominated for anything ever. Why? Because it doesnt look as good, its not getting anywhere near the same praise as KZ2 . Those are facts.

Rather what you think looks better , thats your opionion but from a technical standpoint its not that impressive on the 360.

I said it was about on par with FO3, I never siad it looked like crap comapred to FO3 . Does Metro 2033 look better? Yes but its not even close to the same scale so you have to take that into consideration. I compared them as they have simliar settings ( post apocalyptic wastelands)

Also I bring up the PS3 in the argument as you were one of the ones raving how this would be among the best looking game on consoles and it isnt. You didnt post me any links proving otherwise you just showed that some think it looks decent.

TheSterls

Links? I posted the source. Go to Metacritic and find out for yourself.

And "decent"? I'd say that those comments are beyond "decent".

First you acted like FO3 looked better. Then you acted like reviews matter, so I gave you plenty of quotes from reviews on the technical aspects.

I said KZ2 looks better. I never debated otherwise. It's not crappy on Xbox in terms of how it runs or looks. Period.

PC version on high beats anything on PS3. But it's linear as KZ2 and UC2, so i don't know if it's fair to count :P

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="sayonara89"]

Maybe but Metro 2033 isn't innovative game, it's just another great post-apocalyptic shooter ;)

sSubZerOo

What exactly is innovative about the game to begin with?

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Theres nothing personal about the opionion , The fact is KZ2 is is technically more impressive and we only have to look at the techincal marks both games have got to confirm that. I also think your a liar, one who buys the 360 version and then gets the pc version ? Also you can look at any gameplay video or screenshot and see KZ2 smokes the 360 version.

Also ill get the pc version if i deem it worthy , so far its it doesnt seem to be anything special.

TheSterls

Killzone 2 was nominated for best visuals on every website last year , it lost to UC2 but the fact is metro 2033 on the 360 most likely wont get nominated for anything ever. Why? Because it doesnt look as good, its not getting anywhere near the same praise as KZ2 . Those are facts.

Rather what you think looks better , thats your opionion but from a technical standpoint its not that impressive on the 360.

From MY opinion, when I played Killzone 2 it was like, "Meh, looks abit better then Gears 2". But Metro 2033 has made my jaw drop a few times.

Man it looks like crap compared to the PC. I mean it looks like 2 different games. millerlight89

Yeah, it does. The thing I love about the PC version, apart from the Object Motion Blur, Lighting ect, is the particles. The swirling smoke, the green dust, it just looks so pretty. :)

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

There is not one review that has said its among the best looking games out " NOT ONE" The game looks nothing special even by 360 standards.

BioShockOwnz

And that wasn't my argument, bud. You said FO3 looked better. It doesn't. Plain and simple.

Also, some nice quotes on the visuals and such...

"Beautiful environments with a surprising amount of detail are aided by fantastic animation" - Game Informer

"Technically, the game looks great on console." - Vandal Online

"2033 Metro graphically that its Xbox 360 version is an outstanding game is something no one should doubt that despite its obvious inferiority with respect to the PC version. Difference logic on the other hand by the hardware capabilities of Microsoft's console on compatible products.With a wonderful use of lighting with very good textures and modeling, the title offers plenty of twigs to qualify as a title that takes good advantage of the possibilities of the console from Microsoft.

Best of Metro, however, is that it uses all this power playable visual purposes, and the ambience is that you get from your use of light is so distressing and visually brilliant." - 3DJuegos

"Metro 2033 is far busier and far more accomplished than I expected it to be, and it's also one of the best-looking games - at least in a few very special scenes - on the Xbox 360." - Eurogamer

Ahem, there's just 4.

Good one, TheSterls.

I always deliver, btw.

Bioshock makes another fanboy look silly :lol:
Add it to the list... number 1million yet? :lol:

"But But.. Bioshockz is TEH 360 fanboy and doesnt own a ps3!" :roll:

I agree with Bioshock on what hes been saying in this thread.

Metro looks simply amazing and graphically it looks much better then Fallout, has better atmopshere to.

And whats so bad about Linear games these days? Not every game has to be a GTA, Gothic or Stalker type of open world.

Cant people enjoy both linear and open world games? Or are linear games no longer cool?

If they are done right linear games can be amazing (the darkness, Uncharted2, metro, riddick, bioshock, etc..)

another decent game.................82 on metacritic............at least killzone 2 delivered graphics with a 91 on metacritic /THREAD

another decent game.................82 on metacritic............at least killzone 2 delivered graphics with a 91 on metacritic /THREAD

Classic24

82 = Great on SWs.

Just admit it Lems, the game you claimed was the console graphics king didn't deliver. You were so busy looking at the PC pics you forgot the X360 was never going to look like that. I'm not saying this is a bad looking game but for crying out loud, you still are in here claiming it blows away this and that on the PS3. No it doesn't. It doesn't even match the best games on PS3 so please just stop.....it's not going o get console graphics king or get a AAA score either (of course gamespot will end up proving me wrong watch)darthogre

I'm pretty sure this thread has nothing to do with PS3.

Not sure what's up with some people not being able to keep teh PS3'er out of this thread. I know some want to get some lem ownage, but let it go, guys. Jeeze.

Metro is just another game not on PS3, so let's keep it on-topic with PC and 360.

I will tell the truth and ... the game has better graphics on pc, not discussed, in part because he is playing the 2 versions and the differences that are known long ago that the pc is superior, but otherwise besides the game's creator said ah The PC version surpasses the consoles and he plan it that way. If consoles are some things (I think few) that are "nice" may be, but the PC version is far superior in view DX9, DX10 and DX11 not only towards the resolution. discuss this is ridiculous. But the game itself and I do not like the graphics part of the artistic design of the game is very poor do not like at all, there are many things that are not very good and it far exceeds Crysis, even I like how GTA4 pc sees in high or Resident evil 5,metro2033 have the best yes, but not the best lighting and shadows, but many of the same time from many sources of light in one stage. If I only would have a xbox360 i would not play this game some look better, on ps3 never mind .antalus

Yeah, damn those 80+ Metacritic average titles!

You wouldn't play it? I wonder why. Oh, you just defended PS3. I know why. :P

[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

And thats why I use professional reviews rather then people in SW to settle the diffrences. Metro 2033 isnt doing anything on the 360 that KZ2 doesnt do better. KZ2 wins in Lighting, character models , animations, gun models and yes even textures.

Theres nothing personal about the opionion , The fact is KZ2 is is technically more impressive and we only have to look at the techincal marks both games have got to confirm that. I also think your a liar, one who buys the 360 version and then gets the pc version ? Also you can look at any gameplay video or screenshot and see KZ2 smokes the 360 version.

Also ill get the pc version if i deem it worthy , so far its it doesnt seem to be anything special.

And professional reviewers like eurogamer said is a technical achievement,are you gonna come with another excuse? i have kz2 and metro for 360 and the game looks comparable to kz2 n better in some other stuffs and vise versa,im getting the pc version tomorrow which smokes kz2,stop trying to pass your personal opinions as fact.Tessellation

Theres nothing personal about the opionion , The fact is KZ2 is is technically more impressive and we only have to look at the techincal marks both games have got to confirm that. I also think your a liar, one who buys the 360 version and then gets the pc version ? Also you can look at any gameplay video or screenshot and see KZ2 smokes the 360 version.

Also ill get the pc version if i deem it worthy , so far its it doesnt seem to be anything special.

These screen comparisons are complete and utter BS. I just came across this very scene ^^. The 360 version of these two screens is taken after the guy's speech is finished and the lights are turned off, even then this image is much darker than it actually is. Needless to say the PC image is taken while he is speaking. Ridiculous how people go through with all of this just to downplay a different version of the game.

The 360 version looks great so far (I'm only 15 minutes in) and I can only imagine what it looks like on the PC.

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Theres nothing personal about the opionion , The fact is KZ2 is is technically more impressive and we only have to look at the techincal marks both games have got to confirm that. I also think your a liar, one who buys the 360 version and then gets the pc version ? Also you can look at any gameplay video or screenshot and see KZ2 smokes the 360 version.

Also ill get the pc version if i deem it worthy , so far its it doesnt seem to be anything special.

ocstew

Erm, refer to "floating-point buffers". RSX has issues with HDR FP and MSAA.

From http://www.guerrilla-games.com/publications/dr_kz2_rsx_dev07.pdf where's "High Dynamic Range" (HDR). Remember, KZ2 uses hardware MSAA and uses Bloom.

Metro 2033's tech list from http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/metro-2033-4a-engine-impresses-blog-entry