MGS:TS The black sheep of the series?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for phatrawk
phatrawk

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 phatrawk
Member since 2003 • 187 Posts

Is MGS:The Twin Snakes (GameCube) and good representation of the MGS series?

People go on and on about how this series is so great, how all of them are classics, but based on this game, for the life of me I can't see it.

-Lame dialog. As slick/cool as the cutscenes are, as soon as the dialog starts, I tune out. It's like a 14-year-old wrote this stuff, lame sexual inuendo and all. "You're on a SNEAKING MISSION". Did they really just say that? I can't keep a straight face when they talk, and it's sad that they actually make it sound serious. Snake almost makes Jack Carver (Far Cry) seem like an Oscar winner.

-Poor camera angles. At first I thought "Hmm, this is a bit cooler than Thief of Splinter Cell, I can't just hide in a shadow one foot away from the bad guy. I actually have to stay out of view!"... until I realized I can't see more than a few feet in front of me, unless I use the clunky first-person view.

-Pac-man gameplay...except with bad camera angles. Did this assasin/commando really sneak into this enemy base with nothing but a radio? Is he really unable to put these baddies to rest for more then 10 seconds? Did he watch too many Chuck Norris movies with that spin kick? Get me Jack Bauer, this guy has no idea what he's doing. At least Pac-Man has good vision, eats healthy (fruits), and can WTFPWN ghosts.

Now I expect some flaming based on this, but hear me out. I haven't played any of the other games, so maybe this one just sucks.

When I see MGS4 gameplay, it actually looks good/cool. Over-the-shoulder camera a-la RE4/SC hopefully means no camera angle problems. The dialog in the trailer seems a lot less cheesy with better voice acting. I'm hopeful for MGS4, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills (/Mugatu) when people say this is the greatest series ever.

Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts
Hehe... Pacman gameplay... it does seem like it. lol
Avatar image for Dunkaman
Dunkaman

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Dunkaman
Member since 2005 • 111 Posts
different developer
Avatar image for phatrawk
phatrawk

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 phatrawk
Member since 2003 • 187 Posts
So which other one from the series should I try?
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Isn't that just MGS1 with better graphics? And different cutscenes?
Avatar image for deactivated-59603ff9b9423
deactivated-59603ff9b9423

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-59603ff9b9423
Member since 2007 • 2413 Posts

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

PS3Compass
What he said
Avatar image for hmac777
hmac777

1351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 hmac777
Member since 2007 • 1351 Posts

Id say go with mgs3 subsistence. It allows more freedom with the camera, has the best graphics, and being the most recent of the series has improved in most ways, including diologue. However, it sounds like you may just not be into what this series is about, it aint your fault.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

PS3Compass

The game is exactly the same with better graphics and new cutscenes.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

PS3Compass

and it's a remake of the first game with the same gameplay and dialog... with some updates...

I don't see the problem...

Avatar image for Javy03
Javy03

6886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Javy03
Member since 2006 • 6886 Posts

Look MGS: Twin Snakes is a very decent representation of MGS for the PS1. Its a good game to play if your curious about the story but not a hardcore fan because lets face it, going to play MGS on the PS1 is something only a true fan would do, otherwise the graphics fall is just too much for casuals to get in to.

I own both.

Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts
The thing that piss me off in TS is that it seems that they change the cool encounter music for some reasons. The music that plays instead is so boring and forgettable.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="PS3Compass"]

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

JLF1

The game is exactly the same with better graphics and new cutscenes.

no its not the same game

same story? yes but a bit hardder to follow due to changes in diaologe

Avatar image for Pietrooper
Pietrooper

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Pietrooper
Member since 2008 • 1549 Posts
[QUOTE="PS3Compass"]

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

JLF1

The game is exactly the same with better graphics and new cutscenes.

Yeah, but problems like that were acceptable back in the days :P

Nothing to do with Silicon Knights, they made a (relatively) faithful remake.

Avatar image for The_Owner
The_Owner

727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 The_Owner
Member since 2003 • 727 Posts
These games were never known for the camera angles. As for the dialogue? While I do think MGS has a better story than Splinter Cell, I've always kind of regarded it as a little bit G.I. Joe for grownups.
Avatar image for L1qu1dSword
L1qu1dSword

2835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 L1qu1dSword
Member since 2006 • 2835 Posts

Is MGS:The Twin Snakes (GameCube) and good representation of the MGS series?

People go on and on about how this series is so great, how all of them are classics, but based on this game, for the life of me I can't see it.

-Lame dialog. As slick/cool as the cutscenes are, as soon as the dialog starts, I tune out. It's like a 14-year-old wrote this stuff, lame sexual inuendo and all. "You're on a SNEAKING MISSION". Did they really just say that? I can't keep a straight face when they talk, and it's sad that they actually make it sound serious. Snake almost makes Jack Carver (Far Cry) seem like an Oscar winner.

-Poor camera angles. At first I thought "Hmm, this is a bit cooler than Thief of Splinter Cell, I can't just hide in a shadow one foot away from the bad guy. I actually have to stay out of view!"... until I realized I can't see more than a few feet in front of me, unless I use the clunky first-person view.

-Pac-man gameplay...except with bad camera angles. Did this assasin/commando really sneak into this enemy base with nothing but a radio? Is he really unable to put these baddies to rest for more then 10 seconds? Did he watch too many Chuck Norris movies with that spin kick? Get me Jack Bauer, this guy has no idea what he's doing. At least Pac-Man has good vision, eats healthy (fruits), and can WTFPWN ghosts.

Now I expect some flaming based on this, but hear me out. I haven't played any of the other games, so maybe this one just sucks.

When I see MGS4 gameplay, it actually looks good/cool. Over-the-shoulder camera a-la RE4/SC hopefully means no camera angle problems. The dialog in the trailer seems a lot less cheesy with better voice acting. I'm hopeful for MGS4, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills (/Mugatu) when people say this is the greatest series ever.

phatrawk

Sad thing is that this game you are talking about is the best in the series lol! MGear SUCKS!!! I played that one a little and MGS2 all the way through and you are so right about the story. Kojima is hailed a genious for storytelling( by cows) and I can't see why. Sons of Liberty had one of the most laughably convoluted, unbleivable plots ever concieved for a videogame. The first game was the best and sadly the suckiness continues. Kojima is a hack and does not deserve half the credit.

Avatar image for Pietrooper
Pietrooper

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Pietrooper
Member since 2008 • 1549 Posts
[QUOTE="phatrawk"]

Is MGS:The Twin Snakes (GameCube) and good representation of the MGS series?

People go on and on about how this series is so great, how all of them are classics, but based on this game, for the life of me I can't see it.

-Lame dialog. As slick/cool as the cutscenes are, as soon as the dialog starts, I tune out. It's like a 14-year-old wrote this stuff, lame sexual inuendo and all. "You're on a SNEAKING MISSION". Did they really just say that? I can't keep a straight face when they talk, and it's sad that they actually make it sound serious. Snake almost makes Jack Carver (Far Cry) seem like an Oscar winner.

-Poor camera angles. At first I thought "Hmm, this is a bit cooler than Thief of Splinter Cell, I can't just hide in a shadow one foot away from the bad guy. I actually have to stay out of view!"... until I realized I can't see more than a few feet in front of me, unless I use the clunky first-person view.

-Pac-man gameplay...except with bad camera angles. Did this assasin/commando really sneak into this enemy base with nothing but a radio? Is he really unable to put these baddies to rest for more then 10 seconds? Did he watch too many Chuck Norris movies with that spin kick? Get me Jack Bauer, this guy has no idea what he's doing. At least Pac-Man has good vision, eats healthy (fruits), and can WTFPWN ghosts.

Now I expect some flaming based on this, but hear me out. I haven't played any of the other games, so maybe this one just sucks.

When I see MGS4 gameplay, it actually looks good/cool. Over-the-shoulder camera a-la RE4/SC hopefully means no camera angle problems. The dialog in the trailer seems a lot less cheesy with better voice acting. I'm hopeful for MGS4, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills (/Mugatu) when people say this is the greatest series ever.

L1qu1dSword

Sad thing is that this game you are talking about is the best in the series lol! MGear SUCKS!!! I played that one a little and MGS2 all the way through and you are so right about the story. Kojima is hailed a genious for storytelling( by cows) and I can't see why. Sons of Liberty had one of the most laughably convoluted, unbleivable plots ever concieved for a videogame. The first game was the best and sadly the suckiness continues. Kojima is a hack and does not deserve half the credit.

lol, Gears of War had the worse gameplay and worse level design and terrible bland graphics.

Epic is a hack and doesn't deserve credit.

See, we can all play that game :D

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

the onley game I thought was bad was METAL GEAR for the msx/subsistence port

it had terrible gameplay and sneaking was very hard because guards coul;d see in like all 4 directions

and when yer seen its likely you are dead because yer enemys instaintly gain a 2x speed boost and when you touch them you take damage and they shoot even when their lokking behind

Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Twin Snakes is like MGS and MGS2 kinda combined. It has improvements over MGS and is not as good as MGS2 but overall a solid MG game. I voice acting is funny and stupid and there are some good easter eggs but thats part of the game and many find them enjoyable.
Avatar image for magiciandude
magiciandude

9667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 magiciandude
Member since 2004 • 9667 Posts
If anything is the black sheep, it's Snake's Revenge. I enjoyed MGS: TS
Avatar image for Dystopian-X
Dystopian-X

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Dystopian-X
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts

Sad thing is that this game you are talking about is the best in the series lol! MGear SUCKS!!! I played that one a little and MGS2 all the way through and you are so right about the story. Kojima is hailed a genious for storytelling( by cows) and I can't see why. Sons of Liberty had one of the most laughably convoluted, unbleivable plots ever concievedfor a videogame. The first game was the best and sadly the suckiness continues. Kojima is a hack and does not deserve half the credit.

L1qu1dSword

You are just pointing that out as negative for whatever the reason, some others actually liked that and know how it was actually the point of the game. That's what made it great.

As for TTS, is not that bad but I wouldn't take it over the first one for several reasons also, it didn't bring anything new other than the MGS2 copypasta to be called a great remake.

Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts
It's a remake of an old PS1 game. Lots of dialogue was lame back in the PS1 days. Such has RE1 & RE2. But it still got the job done and told a great story. MGS2+ has the better dialogue.
Avatar image for L1qu1dSword
L1qu1dSword

2835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 L1qu1dSword
Member since 2006 • 2835 Posts
[QUOTE="L1qu1dSword"][QUOTE="phatrawk"]

Is MGS:The Twin Snakes (GameCube) and good representation of the MGS series?

People go on and on about how this series is so great, how all of them are classics, but based on this game, for the life of me I can't see it.

-Lame dialog. As slick/cool as the cutscenes are, as soon as the dialog starts, I tune out. It's like a 14-year-old wrote this stuff, lame sexual inuendo and all. "You're on a SNEAKING MISSION". Did they really just say that? I can't keep a straight face when they talk, and it's sad that they actually make it sound serious. Snake almost makes Jack Carver (Far Cry) seem like an Oscar winner.

-Poor camera angles. At first I thought "Hmm, this is a bit cooler than Thief of Splinter Cell, I can't just hide in a shadow one foot away from the bad guy. I actually have to stay out of view!"... until I realized I can't see more than a few feet in front of me, unless I use the clunky first-person view.

-Pac-man gameplay...except with bad camera angles. Did this assasin/commando really sneak into this enemy base with nothing but a radio? Is he really unable to put these baddies to rest for more then 10 seconds? Did he watch too many Chuck Norris movies with that spin kick? Get me Jack Bauer, this guy has no idea what he's doing. At least Pac-Man has good vision, eats healthy (fruits), and can WTFPWN ghosts.

Now I expect some flaming based on this, but hear me out. I haven't played any of the other games, so maybe this one just sucks.

When I see MGS4 gameplay, it actually looks good/cool. Over-the-shoulder camera a-la RE4/SC hopefully means no camera angle problems. The dialog in the trailer seems a lot less cheesy with better voice acting. I'm hopeful for MGS4, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills (/Mugatu) when people say this is the greatest series ever.

Pietrooper

Sad thing is that this game you are talking about is the best in the series lol! MGear SUCKS!!! I played that one a little and MGS2 all the way through and you are so right about the story. Kojima is hailed a genious for storytelling( by cows) and I can't see why. Sons of Liberty had one of the most laughably convoluted, unbleivable plots ever concieved for a videogame. The first game was the best and sadly the suckiness continues. Kojima is a hack and does not deserve half the credit.

lol, Gears of War had the worse gameplay and worse level design and terrible bland graphics.

Epic is a hack and doesn't deserve credit.

See, we can all play that game :D

lol say what you want about Gears. its not like your credibillity wouldn't completely drop to zero by saying it has "terrible graphics" or anything would it. oh yeah your playing the knee jerk reaction game mistakingly thinking I was doing the same. sorry man i call em like I see em. I wanted to throw the controller at the TV when Sons of Liberty was over. I cannot stress how incredibly STUPID the story for that game was. Gameplay was allright but stealth games in general are not nearly as cool as they used to be.

Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts
-The Dialog in all the MGS games can get a bit corny at times, yes. Especially the series's trademark breaking of the fourth wall. -TS uses the same camera system uses in all but the most recent MGS games (they changed it in Subsistence). -And yes, they all start out with Snake (or someone else) sneaking in with bare minimum equipment.
Avatar image for Pietrooper
Pietrooper

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Pietrooper
Member since 2008 • 1549 Posts
[QUOTE="Pietrooper"][QUOTE="L1qu1dSword"][QUOTE="phatrawk"]

Is MGS:The Twin Snakes (GameCube) and good representation of the MGS series?

People go on and on about how this series is so great, how all of them are classics, but based on this game, for the life of me I can't see it.

-Lame dialog. As slick/cool as the cutscenes are, as soon as the dialog starts, I tune out. It's like a 14-year-old wrote this stuff, lame sexual inuendo and all. "You're on a SNEAKING MISSION". Did they really just say that? I can't keep a straight face when they talk, and it's sad that they actually make it sound serious. Snake almost makes Jack Carver (Far Cry) seem like an Oscar winner.

-Poor camera angles. At first I thought "Hmm, this is a bit cooler than Thief of Splinter Cell, I can't just hide in a shadow one foot away from the bad guy. I actually have to stay out of view!"... until I realized I can't see more than a few feet in front of me, unless I use the clunky first-person view.

-Pac-man gameplay...except with bad camera angles. Did this assasin/commando really sneak into this enemy base with nothing but a radio? Is he really unable to put these baddies to rest for more then 10 seconds? Did he watch too many Chuck Norris movies with that spin kick? Get me Jack Bauer, this guy has no idea what he's doing. At least Pac-Man has good vision, eats healthy (fruits), and can WTFPWN ghosts.

Now I expect some flaming based on this, but hear me out. I haven't played any of the other games, so maybe this one just sucks.

When I see MGS4 gameplay, it actually looks good/cool. Over-the-shoulder camera a-la RE4/SC hopefully means no camera angle problems. The dialog in the trailer seems a lot less cheesy with better voice acting. I'm hopeful for MGS4, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills (/Mugatu) when people say this is the greatest series ever.

L1qu1dSword

Sad thing is that this game you are talking about is the best in the series lol! MGear SUCKS!!! I played that one a little and MGS2 all the way through and you are so right about the story. Kojima is hailed a genious for storytelling( by cows) and I can't see why. Sons of Liberty had one of the most laughably convoluted, unbleivable plots ever concieved for a videogame. The first game was the best and sadly the suckiness continues. Kojima is a hack and does not deserve half the credit.

lol, Gears of War had the worse gameplay and worse level design and terrible bland graphics.

Epic is a hack and doesn't deserve credit.

See, we can all play that game :D

lol say what you want about Gears. its not like your credibillity wouldn't completely drop to zero by saying it has "terrible graphics" or anything would it. oh yeah your playing the knee jerk reaction game mistakingly thinking I was doing the same. sorry man i call em like I see em. I wanted to throw the controller at the TV when Sons of Liberty was over. I cannot stress how incredibly STUPID the story for that game was. Gameplay was allright but stealth games in general are not nearly as cool as they used to be.

I said Bland, not bad. :P

Frankly, I love GeoW but I knew that would bring you out.

Avatar image for L1qu1dSword
L1qu1dSword

2835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 L1qu1dSword
Member since 2006 • 2835 Posts

I said Bland, not bad. :P

Frankly, I love GeoW but I knew that would bring you out.

dude you didnt "bring me out." it was too obvious what you were doing for me to really care. also i think "terrible" is synonymous with "bad."

besides that the mgs4 graphics look far worse then gears. everything is cast through a sickening greenish yellow tint and the textures are far inferior to Gears. your only making MG worse by bringing this game up.

Avatar image for Pietrooper
Pietrooper

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Pietrooper
Member since 2008 • 1549 Posts

L1qu1dSword

I said Bland, not bad. :P

Frankly, I love GeoW but I knew that would bring you out.

dude you didnt "bring me out." it was too obvious what you were doing for me to really care. also i think "terrible" is synonymous with "bad."

besides that the mgs4 graphics look far worse then gears. everything is cast through a sickening greenish yellow tint and the textures are far inferior to Gears. your only making MG worse by bringing this game up.

They removed that:

See latest MGS4 Trailer.

Avatar image for Funkyhamster
Funkyhamster

17366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Funkyhamster
Member since 2005 • 17366 Posts
I love TTS, but it has plenty of flaws... however, your problems with TTS all still hold true in the other games.
Avatar image for Articuno76
Articuno76

19799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#30 Articuno76
Member since 2004 • 19799 Posts

MGSTS is probably what MGS was supposed to be like if the PS could have handled what Kojima wanted *looks at MGS2 and 3*...yeah it's defintely the way MGS was supposed to be...

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

PS3Compass

Then why it is that TS resembles MGS2 and 3 more closely than the original? It doesn't matter who made it, the lengthy exposition and well...basically everything that people claim ruined TS are exactly what Kojima himself is infamous for putting into his games.

Avatar image for manicfoot
manicfoot

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#31 manicfoot
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts

I absolutely hated Twin Snakes when I first played it through. The cutscenes were way too over the top even for MGS and, as someone already pointed out - the music was changed and the game lost something because of that. However, I've played twin snakes recently and I've come to like it a lot more. I personally prefer the original, but I can also play Twin Snakes when can't take squares-for-eyes :P

Oh, and as for the black sheep of the series, I think that firmly goes to Snake Eater. The snake we know isn't anywhere in the game, none of the bosses have a backstory and are just far too silly (a man who fires bees at you? SERIOUSLY?:roll:) and you have to constantly change camo (gets tedious after a while)

Avatar image for Rage010101
Rage010101

5470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Rage010101
Member since 2006 • 5470 Posts
I have both MGS for ps1 and MGS:TS for the gamecube. i'll tell you right now i love MGS for ps1 to death, but for the life of me, there is something that MGS:TS lacks that turns me away from it for some reason. some games just shouldnt have a remake, MGS being one of them. well at least if they were gonna do a remake they should have just updated the graphics only instead of implementing mgs2's engine gameplay(i think thats what sort of causing the issue for me).
Avatar image for armymen4
armymen4

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 armymen4
Member since 2008 • 501 Posts

Is MGS:The Twin Snakes (GameCube) and good representation of the MGS series?

People go on and on about how this series is so great, how all of them are classics, but based on this game, for the life of me I can't see it.

-Lame dialog. As slick/cool as the cutscenes are, as soon as the dialog starts, I tune out. It's like a 14-year-old wrote this stuff, lame sexual inuendo and all. "You're on a SNEAKING MISSION". Did they really just say that? I can't keep a straight face when they talk, and it's sad that they actually make it sound serious. Snake almost makes Jack Carver (Far Cry) seem like an Oscar winner.

-Poor camera angles. At first I thought "Hmm, this is a bit cooler than Thief of Splinter Cell, I can't just hide in a shadow one foot away from the bad guy. I actually have to stay out of view!"... until I realized I can't see more than a few feet in front of me, unless I use the clunky first-person view.

-Pac-man gameplay...except with bad camera angles. Did this assasin/commando really sneak into this enemy base with nothing but a radio? Is he really unable to put these baddies to rest for more then 10 seconds? Did he watch too many Chuck Norris movies with that spin kick? Get me Jack Bauer, this guy has no idea what he's doing. At least Pac-Man has good vision, eats healthy (fruits), and can WTFPWN ghosts.

Now I expect some flaming based on this, but hear me out. I haven't played any of the other games, so maybe this one just sucks.

When I see MGS4 gameplay, it actually looks good/cool. Over-the-shoulder camera a-la RE4/SC hopefully means no camera angle problems. The dialog in the trailer seems a lot less cheesy with better voice acting. I'm hopeful for MGS4, but I feel like I'm taking crazy pills (/Mugatu) when people say this is the greatest series ever.

phatrawk

the game was a remake of the first one from the PSone. I dont think its a good representation, because, the game wasnt actually changed from the original, still at the standards of a ps1 game, all they did was make the graphics better, and let you do what you could do in MGS2.(hiding in lockers,etc....)

Avatar image for Rage010101
Rage010101

5470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Rage010101
Member since 2006 • 5470 Posts

I absolutely hated Twin Snakes when I first played it through. The cutscenes were way too over the top even for MGS and, as someone already pointed out - the music was changed and the game lost something because of that. However, I've played twin snakes recently and I've come to like it a lot more. I personally prefer the original, but I can also play Twin Snakes when can't take squares-for-eyes :P

Oh, and as for the black sheep of the series, I think that firmly goes to Snake Eater. The snake we know isn't anywhere in the game, none of the bosses have a backstory and are just far too silly (a man who fires bees at you? SERIOUSLY?:roll:) and you have to constantly change camo (gets tedious after a while)

manicfoot

im with you on this one man, not only did the camo get tedious for me as well, but after awhile I hated healing myself and constantly forced to eat things...it was cool at first, but it gets too repetitive after awhile. Id rather play it old school style (mgs1&2 gameplay without having to constantly use camo and eat food). MGS4 looks to fix this by making the camo apply itself with the push of a button. i cant wait for mgs4 :D

Avatar image for rexCo
rexCo

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#35 rexCo
Member since 2005 • 943 Posts

I absolutely hated Twin Snakes when I first played it through. The cutscenes were way too over the top even for MGS and, as someone already pointed out - the music was changed and the game lost something because of that. However, I've played twin snakes recently and I've come to like it a lot more. I personally prefer the original, but I can also play Twin Snakes when can't take squares-for-eyes :P

Oh, and as for the black sheep of the series, I think that firmly goes to Snake Eater. The snake we know isn't anywhere in the game, none of the bosses have a backstory and are just far too silly (a man who fires bees at you? SERIOUSLY?:roll:) and you have to constantly change camo (gets tedious after a while)

manicfoot

I do think Snake Eater was the black sheep, but I think it was better for it.
The plot was very effective and much less convoluted than 2's, and it had tons and tons of character and a unique st yle. Plus, it's a game where the plot isn't alwyas given to you; you actually have to instigate a lot of the story's codec sequences yourself in order to get the full gist.

And though some of the bosses (the Cobras minus THe Boss) didn't have a huge in depth backstory, it really didn't matter; they were still better than most of MGS2's.

Fortune had to be one of the most boring characters ever.. Solidus was alright, but overall the character just didn't compare to what it was in Snake Eater. The plot itself, though interesting due to the whole massive decoy thing, was still lacking, and any complaints about Metal Gear Solid dialogue are most numerous in 2 than any other.

TTS I liked, just because the character was there and the plot was unique, even if not as effective as 3's. The cutscenes were also more smooth than they were in the PS1/2 games (even if they were over the top :P).
Avatar image for NAPK1NS
NAPK1NS

14870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 NAPK1NS
Member since 2004 • 14870 Posts
Pac-Man? That was the dumbest possible comparison you could make.
Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#37 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts
TC just got a FISSION MAILED
Avatar image for manicfoot
manicfoot

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#38 manicfoot
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts
[QUOTE="manicfoot"]

I absolutely hated Twin Snakes when I first played it through. The cutscenes were way too over the top even for MGS and, as someone already pointed out - the music was changed and the game lost something because of that. However, I've played twin snakes recently and I've come to like it a lot more. I personally prefer the original, but I can also play Twin Snakes when can't take squares-for-eyes :P

Oh, and as for the black sheep of the series, I think that firmly goes to Snake Eater. The snake we know isn't anywhere in the game, none of the bosses have a backstory and are just far too silly (a man who fires bees at you? SERIOUSLY?:roll:) and you have to constantly change camo (gets tedious after a while)

rexCo


I do think Snake Eater was the black sheep, but I think it was better for it.
The plot was very effective and much less convoluted than 2's, and it had tons and tons of character and a unique st yle. Plus, it's a game where the plot isn't alwyas given to you; you actually have to instigate a lot of the story's codec sequences yourself in order to get the full gist.

And though some of the bosses (the Cobras minus THe Boss) didn't have a huge in depth backstory, it really didn't matter; they were still better than most of MGS2's.

Fortune had to be one of the most boring characters ever.. Solidus was alright, but overall the character just didn't compare to what it was in Snake Eater. The plot itself, though interesting due to the whole massive decoy thing, was still lacking, and any complaints about Metal Gear Solid dialogue are most numerous in 2 than any other.

TTS I liked, just because the character was there and the plot was unique, even if not as effective as 3's. The cutscenes were also more smooth than they were in the PS1/2 games (even if they were over the top :P).

I see where you're coming from and respect your opinion, but I loved the convulted MGS2 storyline and how it completely messes with your head towards the end. It is one of my favourite moments in gaming ever :)
I really tried to like MGS3, but I couldn't get over the bosses not having anything to do with the story because that was one of the massive hooks for me in the previous games. Fatman may have been a pretty silly boss, but the build up with Stillman and the bombs was immense and gave me an emotional connection to the absurdity (is that a word? :P) of the boss fight. While I admit the story with Eva and The Boss was good, the tediousness of constantly healing yourself, changing camo and bosses mindlessly yelling their names ("FEAARRRRRR") just killed it for me. I preferred the pick up and play gameplay of the others.

Avatar image for rexCo
rexCo

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#39 rexCo
Member since 2005 • 943 Posts
[QUOTE="rexCo"][QUOTE="manicfoot"]

I absolutely hated Twin Snakes when I first played it through. The cutscenes were way too over the top even for MGS and, as someone already pointed out - the music was changed and the game lost something because of that. However, I've played twin snakes recently and I've come to like it a lot more. I personally prefer the original, but I can also play Twin Snakes when can't take squares-for-eyes :P

Oh, and as for the black sheep of the series, I think that firmly goes to Snake Eater. The snake we know isn't anywhere in the game, none of the bosses have a backstory and are just far too silly (a man who fires bees at you? SERIOUSLY?:roll:) and you have to constantly change camo (gets tedious after a while)

manicfoot


I do think Snake Eater was the black sheep, but I think it was better for it.
The plot was very effective and much less convoluted than 2's, and it had tons and tons of character and a unique st yle. Plus, it's a game where the plot isn't alwyas given to you; you actually have to instigate a lot of the story's codec sequences yourself in order to get the full gist.

And though some of the bosses (the Cobras minus THe Boss) didn't have a huge in depth backstory, it really didn't matter; they were still better than most of MGS2's.

Fortune had to be one of the most boring characters ever.. Solidus was alright, but overall the character just didn't compare to what it was in Snake Eater. The plot itself, though interesting due to the whole massive decoy thing, was still lacking, and any complaints about Metal Gear Solid dialogue are most numerous in 2 than any other.

TTS I liked, just because the character was there and the plot was unique, even if not as effective as 3's. The cutscenes were also more smooth than they were in the PS1/2 games (even if they were over the top :P).

I see where you're coming from and respect your opinion, but I loved the convulted MGS2 storyline and how it completely messes with your head towards the end. It is one of my favourite moments in gaming ever :)
I really tried to like MGS3, but I couldn't get over the bosses not having anything to do with the story because that was one of the massive hooks for me in the previous games. Fatman may have been a pretty silly boss, but the build up with Stillman and the bombs was immense and gave me an emotional connection to the absurdity (is that a word? :P) of the boss fight. While I admit the story with Eva and The Boss was good, the tediousness of constantly healing yourself, changing camo and bosses mindlessly yelling their names ("FEAARRRRRR") just killed it for me. I preferred the pick up and play gameplay of the others.


:O You didn't like the boss' saying their names constnantly??? THIS... IS THE END.
I was disappointed when Fury and the Boss didn't... K not really :P
But anyways, I see where you come from, and for me it's a love/hate thing with 2's storyline; I liked how it was kinda a big fake decoy thing and all that, but I just feel the presentation came a little too short for me; that and there wasnt' enough Ocelot/Snake, too much Liquid and too much of the other characters that I just couldn't get into. (Plus, the whole messing with your head thing just annoyed me :P I really wanted to punch the AI in the face.. and Rose/Raiden a few times too). It worked though, and I was ultimately satisfied.. I just loved 3's so much more (my heart broke for the Boss and that whole shabang...wow).

PS Anyone else really hate the whole Liquid Ocelot idea??
Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts
So which other one from the series should I try?phatrawk
If old graphics don't bother you, then get MGS1 (PS1). If those graphics are to much for you (as in to old), then get MGS2 (PS2). I loved both of them, but skipped TS. And from the sounds of it from what I have read about the game, I am glade I did.
Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

[QUOTE="phatrawk"]So which other one from the series should I try?l-_-l
If old graphics don't bother you, then get MGS1 (PS1). If those graphics are to much for you (as in to old), then get MGS2 (PS2). I loved both of them, but skipped TS. And from the sounds of it from what I have read about the game, I am glade I did.

TS was a great remake, that some people just have problems with for some unknown reason to me... I loved TS... and am a big MGS fan.

Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts

[QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="phatrawk"]So which other one from the series should I try?GundamGuy0

If old graphics don't bother you, then get MGS1 (PS1). If those graphics are to much for you (as in to old), then get MGS2 (PS2). I loved both of them, but skipped TS. And from the sounds of it from what I have read about the game, I am glade I did.

TS was a great remake, that some people just have problems with for some unknown reason to me... I loved TS... and am a big MGS fan.

Maybe that was the problem. Maybe you liked it cause you are a big MGS fan. I am not. I like 1 and 2 cause they are good games, not cause they carry the MGS name. I actually like Splinter Cell more.
Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#43 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="l-_-l"][QUOTE="phatrawk"]So which other one from the series should I try?l-_-l

If old graphics don't bother you, then get MGS1 (PS1). If those graphics are to much for you (as in to old), then get MGS2 (PS2). I loved both of them, but skipped TS. And from the sounds of it from what I have read about the game, I am glade I did.

TS was a great remake, that some people just have problems with for some unknown reason to me... I loved TS... and am a big MGS fan.

Maybe that was the problem. Maybe you liked it cause you are a big MGS fan. I am not. I like 1 and 2 cause they are good games, not cause they carry the MGS name. I actually like Splinter Cell more.

TS has all the things that were in MGS, in the exact same places too. But they over did some stuff, and killed other more emotional moments, as Grey battling Rex

Avatar image for Truth_Seekr
Truth_Seekr

4214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Truth_Seekr
Member since 2007 • 4214 Posts

I hate to assume, but I would say that's perhaps cause of your age.

Even tho it's a remake, I think older gamers appreciate it more than youngens due to the initial impact the gameplay and story had on us when the Metal Gear series was introduced to the PlayStation and that's what we, or at least I, remember. Never before have we played like that or Tenchu back then, but now, youngers gamers are introduced to the idea and gameplay of espionage/black ops with more recent titles, so when you play a classic or remake of an older title, you probably wont see what's all the hype about.

Avatar image for darkIink
darkIink

2705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 darkIink
Member since 2006 • 2705 Posts
[QUOTE="PS3Compass"]

The problem is Silicon Knights made it, and not Kojima.

JLF1

The game is exactly the same with better graphics and new cutscenes.

Exactly. MGS1 PS1 aged horribly. Twin Snakes is a better version of MGS1.
Avatar image for rcignoni
rcignoni

8863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 rcignoni
Member since 2004 • 8863 Posts
I played and beat Twin Snakes, and that it was a pretty good game. The characters all had depth, and the story was pretty great. The dialogue did get cheesy, but it's bearable. The gameplay, while not being my favorite, was ok. I did HATE the beginning though, was a ***** to get around all those enemies.