Microsoft Kinect vs PlayStation Move

Standard controllerGiancar

Kinect, although its not nearly as precise as move it opens the way for more creativity. Also in the future it would be cool to use it at the same time as a controller for voice commands, or leaning....just for a quick example.

I'm with Giancar for now, but I'm leaning towards getting the Socom bundle, comes with the move and the gun piece. maybe get kz3 with it sooner or later. nothing on kinect interests me yet, wanna see how forza kinect is like before jumping in

Kinect is more interesting creatively, but I like the Move's functionality better.

I think Kinect's all in one design is light years better than Move's idiotic patchwork setup though.

They both have their pros and cons. I don't think either is much better than the other.

Games will dictate who comes out on top, but right now they're both losers.

Standard controllerGiancar

both are awful

Controller

If I had to chose, Kinect hands down. Browsing and playing games with no hands is a HUGE deal with parties, lolz.

the move because imho its more hardcore with more core games and it already has move games like lbp2 socom4 killzone3, those are core move games

I don't own either and would rather havea Dual Shock or 360 controller anyway.

[QUOTE="Giancar"]Standard controllerskelton-man

What is your choiseskelton-man

[QUOTE="skelton-man"][QUOTE="Giancar"]Standard controllerannoyingdevil

Kinect has no buttons.

PS Move has buttons.

I pick PS Move.

Kinect is better for family games

Move is better for casual games (Dads. Golf simulators, etc)

Move is the best for accuracy in Hardcore games.

the move because imho its more hardcore with more core games and it already has move games like lbp2 socom4 killzone3, those are core move games

_SWAG_

I don't understand. In what universe would yopu want to play a real game with a motion controller. Bowling and dancing is one thing but keep motion controls away from the normal games.

I would think Move compatability would be as big a negative as the Wii controller is with Zelda or the silly waggling needed in Lair.

Kinect. Not that I'm particularly fond of either, but the Kinect doesn't look like a lolipop and isn't the bad version of a Wii Remote.

only tried kinect at bestbuy for like 10 minutes , so i dont know too much about it.. i do however really like playstation move , i cant get enough of sports champions

[QUOTE="_SWAG_"]

the move because imho its more hardcore with more core games and it already has move games like lbp2 socom4 killzone3, those are core move games

juliankennedy23

I don't understand. In what universe would yopu want to play a real game with a motion controller. Bowling and dancing is one thing but keep motion controls away from the normal games.

I would think Move compatability would be as big a negative as the Wii controller is with Zelda or the silly waggling needed in Lair.

Outside of cost, I am far more inclined to the Move than Kinect

:) :)

I don't understand these console add-ons to the PS3 and Xbox 360. Its like the Sega Genesis all over again. And if anyone remembers, the Sega CD and Sega 32X were not successful for the genesis. I choose normal controller. Who likes to wave their arms around like a spaz to play a video game?

Kinnect, the EyeToy is so archaic, you have to change the angle of the lens manually just to play Move.

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

:) :)

:) :)

Jankarcop

I like razer mice using a lachesis here myself and its awesome but why is there a 12 button numpad on the side :shock:

Kinect. Not that I'm particularly fond of either, but the Kinect doesn't look like a lolipop and isn't the bad version of a Wii Remote.

TehOverkill

I like the DS more than motion controls, unless it's a game like Boom Blox, then you need motion controls for it to be the same game. In that case, the move would obviously be better, since the game was made for a Wiimote.

I just don't see Kinect allowing for fun gameplay. So far it's best game seems to be more of an excercise video that watches you mimic the video and then tells you how well you did.

[QUOTE="TehOverkill"]

Kinect. Not that I'm particularly fond of either, but the Kinect doesn't look like a lolipop and isn't the bad version of a Wii Remote.

DJ_Headshot

For full on motion it is a bit better. Although the Move has some drawbacks compared to the Wiimote too. Like having to calibrate it before every game just to use a pointer (after which it's functionally identical). The design precludes its use as a "steering wheel" or hybrid control schemes (ala Super Paper Mario or Metroid other M). And the Nav controller doesn't have any motion sensing.

What is your choiseskelton-man

Standard controller I hate motion sensing.

neither as they both are casual gimmick crap... but if i HAD to choose...move soley on the reason that it has buttons.campzor

Microsoft Kinect vs PlayStation Move............... v Asus Wavi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ubD4p3uboE My choice is the Asus Wavi :P.

gaming mouse and keyboard. dualshock for those games that feel better with controller

Controller

If I had to chose, Kinect hands down. Browsing and playing games with no hands is a HUGE deal with parties, lolz.

Squall18

Dance Central was fun, but that's really all Kinect has going for it. As for party games... I disagree. The masses understand a motion wand. If you're playing a golf game, or baseball, or tennis, or any of those casual sports games, you want to be holding something in your hand. It feels more natural. Really the ONLY sub-genre of casual party games that Kinect is better for is dance games--and even then, it's not a huge advantage. Move could do Dance Central (I'm pretty sure Harmonix have said that as well).

Honestly, I read the title of the topic and get the image of two mentally challenged kids in the slap fight of their lives.