http://thehardline.gamerlimit.com/2010/02/microsoft-refusing-to-provide-us-army-with-xboxes-2/
Thoughts? They're by no means obligated to give out free Xboxes to people in the army in my book. It seems like a lame excuse to bash Microsoft.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://thehardline.gamerlimit.com/2010/02/microsoft-refusing-to-provide-us-army-with-xboxes-2/
Thoughts? They're by no means obligated to give out free Xboxes to people in the army in my book. It seems like a lame excuse to bash Microsoft.
Yea, I'm sure there will be some people who decide that Microsoft are now traitors though :pProbably a reason why no one has posted this article yet, because no one really cares.
spinecaton
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/
So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:
Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9g
Pretty ridiculous reasons cited.
Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.
I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war
IN ALL SERIOUSNESS... their reasons aren't great but they make some sense. My friend, when younger, had to work quite hard for his parents to ok him buying CoD (MW1 at the time i think). A big reason they were scared of the game, is they didn't like the whole pro war feel of CoD. NOW I AM NOT SAYING CALL OF DUTY HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH ARMY TRAINING. What I am saying, is imagine if the same parents heard that the xbox was literally used by the military for training... they would likely just throw the xbox away.
lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield.Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.
I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war
MellowMighty
meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?OntainWell Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.
lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield. for controlling some bomb detection robots you do.[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]
Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.
I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war
RJay123
lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield. Seriously...I don't see how a video game with a controller can be a good training tool for any military.[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]
Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.
I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war
RJay123
...except maybe France..they could use any help they can get :p
Great more reaons for people bash MS, and they will all over look the tons of computers they sent to 3rd world countries.
lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield.[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]
Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.
I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war
RJay123
umm i don't think that anyone in the world actually uses akimbo shotties anywhere. nor is there such thing as a tactical nuke (that as I explained is only used on battlefields that your winning). aka sarcasm
[QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?kittyloaf69Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different. it's a multinational. Sony owns way to much to be just known as a Japanese company. btw so is MS.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/
So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:
- Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
- A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
- If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.
Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9gPretty ridiculous reasons cited.
Brownesque
First reason is enough for any intelligent person to not sell the consoles.
Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.
I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war
IN ALL SERIOUSNESS... their reasons aren't great but they make some sense. My friend, when younger, had to work quite hard for his parents to ok him buying CoD (MW1 at the time i think). A big reason they were scared of the game, is they didn't like the whole pro war feel of CoD. NOW I AM NOT SAYING CALL OF DUTY HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH ARMY TRAINING. What I am saying, is imagine if the same parents heard that the xbox was literally used by the military for training... they would likely just throw the xbox away.
LOL what this guy said. MS' doesn't have the best reasons but it makes sense. BTW, why do we care about this "news" again?[QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?kittyloaf69Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?cainetao11Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Japan has a defense army.
the reasons microsoft listed do make sense from a business sense .lawlessxYea they do. Look at the 1st reason. Would you want a group of people buying up 300 360's at $299 for $89 700 or would you want 200 360's sold at $299 and 10 games sold each console and MS getting $15 a share 90000 (Disclaimer: This is just an example, numbers not accurate :P)
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?cainetao11Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also. LOL i can't see wii's being used to train soldiers
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?cainetao11Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.
Sony already sold more than 2000 PS3s to the Air Force.
Anyways. This is why US soldiers need the 360s :P
How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.Odrec
Sony already sold more than 2000 PS3s to the Air Force.
Anyways. This is why US soldiers need the 360s :P
[QUOTE="Odrec"]
[QUOTE="cainetao11"]How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.navyguy21
Sony already sold more than 2000 PS3s to the Air Force.
Anyways. This is why US soldiers need the 360s :P
There are a lot of videos of people destroying PS3s but not from the US army or the Air Force (although that would be cool) ;)
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/
So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:
- Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
- A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
- If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.
Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9gPretty ridiculous reasons cited.Brownesque
Yes, I figured you'd say that was ridiculous reasons. I find them perfectly viable. Especially the 3rd reason.
MS is just made because they choose Sony 1st and have been using their PS3's for number crunching. Get out of your feelings MS, maybe if you would of built a more reliable system then they would of chosen you 1st. Also MS probably knows that they need more targets to shoot at for practice.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/
So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:
- Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
- A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
- If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.
Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9gPretty ridiculous reasons cited.
Brownesque
Wow, that's heartless. Even by multimillion dollar corporation standards.
lol, well it is kinda useless to have an rrod 360 in the desertyou're all wrong
it's because of THIS vid (language warning).
hammerofcrom
Actually, they make perfect sense from a business standpoint. You can deny it all you want, but Microsoft, just like Sony and Nintendo, want money. And those reasons listed are legitimate reasons pointing to the contrary.http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/
So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:
- Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
- A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
- If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.
Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9gPretty ridiculous reasons cited.
Brownesque
[QUOTE="hammerofcrom"]haha, thats awesome.Poor Xbox. Thats what you get foo!you're all wrong
it's because of THIS vid (language warning).
ULTIMATEZWARRIO
[QUOTE="hammerofcrom"]haha, thats awesome.Poor Xbox. Thats what you get foo!you're all wrong
it's because of THIS vid (language warning).
ULTIMATEZWARRIO
the only reason that can be even slightly validated is the third one, the first 2 are just bogus.http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/
So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:
- Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
- A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
- If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.
Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9gPretty ridiculous reasons cited.
Brownesque
[QUOTE="hammerofcrom"]lol, well it is kinda useless to have an rrod 360 in the desertyou're all wrong
it's because of THIS vid (language warning).
ULTIMATEZWARRIO
oh hey I didn't say I blamed 'em. if that was the only xbox around, and it got RROD, I'd do the exact same thing.
the only reason that can be even slightly validated is the third one, the first 2 are just bogus.
Dead-Memories
Like I said earlier in the thread, this story is based on talks from 2006. At the time the 360 wasn't in good supply and MS was losing money on each 360 sold.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment