Microsoft refusing to provide US army with Xboxes

  • 142 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts

http://thehardline.gamerlimit.com/2010/02/microsoft-refusing-to-provide-us-army-with-xboxes-2/

Thoughts? They're by no means obligated to give out free Xboxes to people in the army in my book. It seems like a lame excuse to bash Microsoft.

Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

Probably a reason why no one has posted this article yet, because no one really cares.

Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts

Probably a reason why no one has posted this article yet, because no one really cares.

spinecaton
Yea, I'm sure there will be some people who decide that Microsoft are now traitors though :p
Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#5 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
They can just go the store and buy one for themselves. What's the big deal?
Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/

So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:

  • Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
  • A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
  • If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9g

Pretty ridiculous reasons cited.

Avatar image for MellowMighty
MellowMighty

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 MellowMighty
Member since 2008 • 691 Posts

Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.

I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war

IN ALL SERIOUSNESS... their reasons aren't great but they make some sense. My friend, when younger, had to work quite hard for his parents to ok him buying CoD (MW1 at the time i think). A big reason they were scared of the game, is they didn't like the whole pro war feel of CoD. NOW I AM NOT SAYING CALL OF DUTY HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH ARMY TRAINING. What I am saying, is imagine if the same parents heard that the xbox was literally used by the military for training... they would likely just throw the xbox away.

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts
Why would they? They would lose money and it would reinforce the "murder simulator" thing.
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

How about bombs rather than x-boxes.

Avatar image for RJay123
RJay123

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 RJay123
Member since 2009 • 911 Posts

Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.

I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war

MellowMighty

lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield.

Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts
meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?Ontain
Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]

Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.

I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war

RJay123

lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield.

for controlling some bomb detection robots you do.
Avatar image for kittyloaf69
kittyloaf69

1023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 kittyloaf69
Member since 2009 • 1023 Posts

[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]

Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.

I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war

RJay123

lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield.

Seriously...I don't see how a video game with a controller can be a good training tool for any military.

...except maybe France..they could use any help they can get :p

Avatar image for Sickology101
Sickology101

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Sickology101
Member since 2009 • 73 Posts

Great more reaons for people bash MS, and they will all over look the tons of computers they sent to 3rd world countries.

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

If you read the actual article on Wired, you would find out that this all took place back in 2006, ie when 360's were in limited supply and MS was losing money on each console sold (hence the issue with the Army only buying 1 game/console).

http://www.martingordon.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/the_more_you_know.jpg

Avatar image for MellowMighty
MellowMighty

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 MellowMighty
Member since 2008 • 691 Posts

[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]

Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.

I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war

RJay123

lol using an analog stick is hardly good practice for anything but winning a video game. You don't use an analog stick out in the battlefield.

umm i don't think that anyone in the world actually uses akimbo shotties anywhere. nor is there such thing as a tactical nuke (that as I explained is only used on battlefields that your winning). aka sarcasm

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
[QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?kittyloaf69
Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.

it's a multinational. Sony owns way to much to be just known as a Japanese company. btw so is MS.
Avatar image for Sickology101
Sickology101

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Sickology101
Member since 2009 • 73 Posts

OK now after reading it, just sounds like a MS hater trying to start crap.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17926 Posts
OMG, its THEIR product, they can do with it what they want. What if i criticized you for not donating to charity every year? They clearly said they wanted to maintain an image. While i dont agree with their reasons, you cant bash them for doing what THEY feel is in the best interest of THEIR product. Geez people.
Avatar image for akbar13
akbar13

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 akbar13
Member since 2009 • 2186 Posts

Microsoft is horrible they wont even sell their own company xbox 360s. Microsoft owns the army and they cant give them 360s? Wow.

Avatar image for theBeorn
theBeorn

1378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 theBeorn
Member since 2003 • 1378 Posts

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/

So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:

  • Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
  • A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
  • If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9g

Pretty ridiculous reasons cited.

Brownesque

First reason is enough for any intelligent person to not sell the consoles.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
the reasons microsoft listed do make sense from a business sense .
Avatar image for Cityboy_
Cityboy_

55

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Cityboy_
Member since 2010 • 55 Posts
Microsoft is a great company and they know their product better then anyone and how to market it. Business is business and I can see why they would not want a large amount of Xbox purchased if they are going to lose money make since
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
[QUOTE="MellowMighty"]

Wtf is up with microsoft and this whole "Making money" thing? Seriously M$, get over this fad about "money". sheesh.

I mean... how else will our soldiers practice for battle but MW2... sniping with those akimbo shotties takes practice you know. And this way they can practice when they are clearly winning the battle (It's very hard to be losing when you get 25 kills in a row), they can call their commander to NUKE the battlefield (the one that they are likely already winning). MW2 is good practice for real life war

IN ALL SERIOUSNESS... their reasons aren't great but they make some sense. My friend, when younger, had to work quite hard for his parents to ok him buying CoD (MW1 at the time i think). A big reason they were scared of the game, is they didn't like the whole pro war feel of CoD. NOW I AM NOT SAYING CALL OF DUTY HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH ARMY TRAINING. What I am saying, is imagine if the same parents heard that the xbox was literally used by the military for training... they would likely just throw the xbox away.

LOL what this guy said. MS' doesn't have the best reasons but it makes sense. BTW, why do we care about this "news" again?
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#26 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38065 Posts
[QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?kittyloaf69
Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.

How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.
Avatar image for akbar13
akbar13

2186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 akbar13
Member since 2009 • 2186 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?cainetao11
Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.

How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2.

Japan has a defense army.
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
the reasons microsoft listed do make sense from a business sense .lawlessx
Yea they do. Look at the 1st reason. Would you want a group of people buying up 300 360's at $299 for $89 700 or would you want 200 360's sold at $299 and 10 games sold each console and MS getting $15 a share 90000 (Disclaimer: This is just an example, numbers not accurate :P)
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#29 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38065 Posts
[QUOTE="akbar13"][QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.

How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2.

Japan has a defense army.

I am well aware of their defense army. Are you familiar with their constitution? We are responsible for their protection.
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?cainetao11
Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.

How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.

LOL i can't see wii's being used to train soldiers
Avatar image for Odrec
Odrec

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Odrec
Member since 2009 • 1897 Posts

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="Ontain"]meh. did sony give ps3's free to the military too for those cell "supercomputers"?cainetao11
Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.

How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.


Sony already sold more than 2000 PS3s to the Air Force.

Anyways. This is why US soldiers need the 360s :P

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#32 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17926 Posts

[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] Well Sony is a Japanese company so it's a little different.Odrec

How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.


Sony already sold more than 2000 PS3s to the Air Force.

Anyways. This is why US soldiers need the 360s :P

They were sold to the airforce for different reasons, not for training purposes. Im sure sony would want to avoid that stigma as well. Now why dont you post videos of people destroying PS3s? ;)

Avatar image for Odrec
Odrec

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Odrec
Member since 2009 • 1897 Posts

[QUOTE="Odrec"]

[QUOTE="cainetao11"]How so? The U.S.. military is responsible for defending Japan in case of a war. Japan isn't allowed to military according to the constitution put in place after WW2. Ours, is their military. If MS "should" give boxes, Ninty, Sony should also.navyguy21


Sony already sold more than 2000 PS3s to the Air Force.

Anyways. This is why US soldiers need the 360s :P

They were sold to the airforce for different reasons, not for training purposes. Im sure sony would want to avoid that stigma as well. Now why dont you post videos of people destroying PS3s? ;)

There are a lot of videos of people destroying PS3s but not from the US army or the Air Force (although that would be cool) ;)

Avatar image for TheOwnerOner
TheOwnerOner

2921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 TheOwnerOner
Member since 2007 • 2921 Posts
They cant even get into the Movies for free. why isn't anyone complaining about that?
Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/

So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:

  • Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
  • A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
  • If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9g

Pretty ridiculous reasons cited.Brownesque

Yes, I figured you'd say that was ridiculous reasons. I find them perfectly viable. Especially the 3rd reason.

Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#36 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts
you mean the army? the thing with the single biggest budget anywhere is crying about not getting free xboxes?
Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
2006 there weren't many 360's available.
Avatar image for ItsBriskBaby
ItsBriskBaby

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ItsBriskBaby
Member since 2007 • 1748 Posts

MS is just made because they choose Sony 1st and have been using their PS3's for number crunching. Get out of your feelings MS, maybe if you would of built a more reliable system then they would of chosen you 1st. Also MS probably knows that they need more targets to shoot at for practice.

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/

So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:

  • Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
  • A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
  • If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9g

Pretty ridiculous reasons cited.

Brownesque

Wow, that's heartless. Even by multimillion dollar corporation standards.

Avatar image for ULTIMATEZWARRIO
ULTIMATEZWARRIO

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#40 ULTIMATEZWARRIO
Member since 2004 • 6026 Posts
Umm, read the article people, They wanted to buy 360's meaning they would paid for aka not free. So i think this is even worse because they shouldn't not sell their products based off of a perception of what the customer might do, this is discrimination
Avatar image for hammerofcrom
hammerofcrom

1323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 hammerofcrom
Member since 2009 • 1323 Posts

you're all wrong

it's because of THIS vid (language warning).

Avatar image for ULTIMATEZWARRIO
ULTIMATEZWARRIO

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#42 ULTIMATEZWARRIO
Member since 2004 • 6026 Posts

you're all wrong

it's because of THIS vid (language warning).

hammerofcrom
lol, well it is kinda useless to have an rrod 360 in the desert
Avatar image for DonPerian
DonPerian

3773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 DonPerian
Member since 2005 • 3773 Posts

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/

So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:

  • Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
  • A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
  • If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9g

Pretty ridiculous reasons cited.

Brownesque

Actually, they make perfect sense from a business standpoint. You can deny it all you want, but Microsoft, just like Sony and Nintendo, want money. And those reasons listed are legitimate reasons pointing to the contrary.

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
Microsoft couldn't sell barely any Xbox's if the men and women out there weren't risking their life's for Americans every day. Good show-man ship MS. You disgrace me. HA!
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
[QUOTE="hammerofcrom"]

you're all wrong

it's because of THIS vid (language warning).

ULTIMATEZWARRIO
haha, thats awesome.Poor Xbox. Thats what you get foo!
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
[QUOTE="hammerofcrom"]

you're all wrong

it's because of THIS vid (language warning).

ULTIMATEZWARRIO
haha, thats awesome.Poor Xbox. Thats what you get foo!
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#47 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/

So will the Army go out and buy the Xbox? Not quite.Roger Smith, chief technology officer for PEO STRI, the Army command responsible for purchasing training equipment, claims that Microsoft refused to sell him the consoles.Smith told me that he discussed acquiring the Xbox with Microsoft representatives at a trade show back in 2006. According to Smith, the Microsoft executives said they would neither sell the Xbox 360 nor license XNA game development tools to the Army for three reasons:

  • Microsoft was afraid that the military would buy up lots of Xbox 360s, but would buy only one game for each of them, so MS wouldn't make much money off of the games.
  • A big military purchase could create a shortage of Xbox 360s.
  • If the Xbox became an Army training device, it could taint its reputation. Microsoft was concerned that "do we want the Xbox 360 to be seen as having the flavor of a weapon? Do we want Mom and Dad knowing that their kid is buying the same game console as the military trains the SEALs and Rangers on?" Smith told me during an interview for Training & Simulation Journal.


Read More http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/why-the-army-doesnt-train-on-xboxes/#ixzz0f6Gi8X9g

Pretty ridiculous reasons cited.

Brownesque

the only reason that can be even slightly validated is the third one, the first 2 are just bogus.

Avatar image for hammerofcrom
hammerofcrom

1323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 hammerofcrom
Member since 2009 • 1323 Posts

[QUOTE="hammerofcrom"]

you're all wrong

it's because of THIS vid (language warning).

ULTIMATEZWARRIO

lol, well it is kinda useless to have an rrod 360 in the desert

oh hey I didn't say I blamed 'em. if that was the only xbox around, and it got RROD, I'd do the exact same thing.

Avatar image for Mordred19
Mordred19

8259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Mordred19
Member since 2007 • 8259 Posts

are they really that worried about their reputation? profitability I understand though.

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

the only reason that can be even slightly validated is the third one, the first 2 are just bogus.

Dead-Memories

Like I said earlier in the thread, this story is based on talks from 2006. At the time the 360 wasn't in good supply and MS was losing money on each 360 sold.