Microsoft should bite the bullet or rewrite the royality fees to 3 discs

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Metsvideogame
Metsvideogame

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Metsvideogame
Member since 2008 • 1145 Posts
John Carmack is a good american game designer. Doom 4 should be 3 discs on the 360 and thats that. Just do it, btw Carmack says the 360 is the best console to design for, and he is right.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
No, they shouldn't wimp out just cos big mean Carmack said so.
Avatar image for Metsvideogame
Metsvideogame

1145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Metsvideogame
Member since 2008 • 1145 Posts

No, they shouldn't wimp out just cos big mean Carmack said so. locopatho

Carmack is a legend.

Avatar image for bdhoff
bdhoff

4104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 bdhoff
Member since 2003 • 4104 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"]No, they shouldn't wimp out just cos big mean Carmack said so. Metsvideogame

Carmack is a legend.

A legend that suffers from unwarranted self importance.
Avatar image for doobie1975
doobie1975

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 doobie1975
Member since 2003 • 2806 Posts

John Carmack is a good american game designer. Doom 4 should be 3 discs on the 360 and thats that. Just do it, btw Carmack says the 360 is the best console to design for, and he is right.Metsvideogame

as im not a game developer i dont feel qualified to anwer that

Avatar image for xxastrocreepxx
xxastrocreepxx

810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 xxastrocreepxx
Member since 2008 • 810 Posts
Too bad the last couple of games he's done have been huge piles of brown.
Avatar image for KrazyKenKutarag
KrazyKenKutarag

1905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 KrazyKenKutarag
Member since 2007 • 1905 Posts

Too bad the last couple of games he's done have been huge piles of brown. xxastrocreepxx

Quake 3 was one of the best competitive multiplayer games of all time. How can you call that bad?

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts

This needs to be the best FPS ever. If it doesn't push the genre farther than ever, what the hell is he doing? A 3 disc game being gimped compared to 1 disc games. I actually want to see how this turns out. I'm assuming the PS3 version should look like Crysis and the 360 will look like Quake 1 if you have to drop graphic quality from something that needs 3 dvds to something that can fit on 1.

[QUOTE="xxastrocreepxx"]Too bad the last couple of games he's done have been huge piles of brown. KrazyKenKutarag

Quake 3 was one of the best competitive multiplayer games of all time. How can you call that bad?

Quake 3 came out almost a decade ago. LOL @ suggesting his recent games aren't bad by bringing up Quake 3... rather than Quake 4. >_<

Avatar image for Jamex1987
Jamex1987

2187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Jamex1987
Member since 2008 • 2187 Posts

Why would you need 3 discs for Doom? I don't think hermits waant to download a 20Gb game.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
but bluray dont matter one dvd is fine.:)
Avatar image for KrazyKenKutarag
KrazyKenKutarag

1905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 KrazyKenKutarag
Member since 2007 • 1905 Posts

[QUOTE="KrazyKenKutarag"]

[QUOTE="xxastrocreepxx"]Too bad the last couple of games he's done have been huge piles of brown. Senor_Kami

Quake 3 was one of the best competitive multiplayer games of all time. How can you call that bad?

Quake 3 came out almost a decade ago. LOL @ suggesting his recent games aren't bad by bringing up Quake 3... rather than Quake 4. >_<

ID didn't make Quake 4, at least research the subject before discussing it.

Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]

[QUOTE="KrazyKenKutarag"]

[QUOTE="xxastrocreepxx"]Too bad the last couple of games he's done have been huge piles of brown. KrazyKenKutarag

Quake 3 was one of the best competitive multiplayer games of all time. How can you call that bad?

Quake 3 came out almost a decade ago. LOL @ suggesting his recent games aren't bad by bringing up Quake 3... rather than Quake 4. >_<

ID didn't make Quake 4, at least research the subject before discussing it.

Lets look at some of his modern classics:

Orcs & Elves (NDS) 2007... 68

Quake 4 is (360) 2005... 74 and it is by iD... unless you know something that Gamespot and IGN don't... which you don't. 360... not to mention that a 74 is actually a higher grade than the last game they made.

Doom 3 (XB) 2005... 77

Yeah, iD has a strong history with console games. They have some high ranked PC titles, but since this thread is clearly about the 360 I think the quality of their console games is a more important factor.

Avatar image for KrazyKenKutarag
KrazyKenKutarag

1905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 KrazyKenKutarag
Member since 2007 • 1905 Posts

[QUOTE="KrazyKenKutarag"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]

[QUOTE="KrazyKenKutarag"]

[QUOTE="xxastrocreepxx"]Too bad the last couple of games he's done have been huge piles of brown. Senor_Kami

Quake 3 was one of the best competitive multiplayer games of all time. How can you call that bad?

Quake 3 came out almost a decade ago. LOL @ suggesting his recent games aren't bad by bringing up Quake 3... rather than Quake 4. >_<

ID didn't make Quake 4, at least research the subject before discussing it.

Lets look at some of his modern classics:

Orcs & Elves (NDS) 2007... 68

Quake 4 is (360) 2005... 74 and it is by iD... unless you know something that Gamespot and IGN don't... which you don't. 360... not to mention that a 74 is actually a higher grade than the last game they made.

Doom 3 (XB) 2005... 77

Yeah, iD has a strong history with console games. They have some high ranked PC titles, but since this thread is clearly about the 360 I think the quality of their console games is a more important factor.

Quake 4 was developed by Raven Software, ID just provided the engine and supervised.

Orcs and Elves is a handheld game, developed by Fountainhead Entertainment and John Carmack, ID didn't have much to do with it, and it was pretty decent considering how far it was from Carmacks comfort zone.

Doom 3 on consoles looked and played worse, the only thing going for it was the co-op mode. But doom 3 was a good game, but it didn't meet it's potential.

Since when are we only talking about console versions?

Avatar image for spliffstar12
spliffstar12

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 spliffstar12
Member since 2008 • 1281 Posts
[QUOTE="KrazyKenKutarag"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]

[QUOTE="KrazyKenKutarag"]

[QUOTE="xxastrocreepxx"]Too bad the last couple of games he's done have been huge piles of brown. Senor_Kami

Quake 3 was one of the best competitive multiplayer games of all time. How can you call that bad?

Quake 3 came out almost a decade ago. LOL @ suggesting his recent games aren't bad by bringing up Quake 3... rather than Quake 4. >_<

ID didn't make Quake 4, at least research the subject before discussing it.

Lets look at some of his modern classics:

Orcs & Elves (NDS) 2007... 68

Quake 4 is (360) 2005... 74 and it is by iD... unless you know something that Gamespot and IGN don't... which you don't. 360... not to mention that a 74 is actually a higher grade than the last game they made.

Doom 3 (XB) 2005... 77

Yeah, iD has a strong history with console games. They have some high ranked PC titles, but since this thread is clearly about the 360 I think the quality of their console games is a more important factor.

doom 3 and quake 4 were good games. i couldnt care less about their scores.

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#15 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

doom 3 and quake 4 were good games. i couldnt care less about their scores.

spliffstar12

I actually loved both of them as well. I thought Raven did a great job with Quake 4 especially. It just felt so old school, but looked decent enough for an early 360 game, and was just plain fun. It had a nice, long single player experience against a classic and awesome enemy in the Strogg. You got to be armed to the teeth with a great selection of weapons, you had vehicle levels, and boss fights. And how can any shooter fan not dig the dark matter gun for crying out loud?

Avatar image for Not-A-Stalker
Not-A-Stalker

5165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Not-A-Stalker
Member since 2006 • 5165 Posts

Microsoft isn't going to do that for Rage.

A game like... Halo 4 or something big like that, but not Rage.

Avatar image for diped
diped

2005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 diped
Member since 2008 • 2005 Posts
who/what is a carmack?
Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts
Tip for Carmack: Stick to PC's