http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/microsoft/5395500/Microsoft-signs-deal-with-Sky-to-show-TV-programmes-on-Xbox-360.html
Good news for the UK users.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/microsoft/5395500/Microsoft-signs-deal-with-Sky-to-show-TV-programmes-on-Xbox-360.html
Good news for the UK users.
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
... ... Do you honestly believe that?LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
Yes, because the back catalogue and 5 or so exclusives this year, just up and walked out the door.
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
u are so quoted and put in my sig
No games, you mean 2009? If you mean overall throughout the years, then that's hilarious considering that I'm playing it a lot nowadays. And why are you complaining about avatars when PS3 had that failure known as Home?LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
No games, you mean 2009? If you mean overall throughout the years, then that's hilarious considering that I'm playing it a lot nowadays. And why are you complaining about avatars when PS3 had that failure known as Home? Failure? I guess you failed to notice that 6.5M people are using Home, and that after like a month Sony had made 2M from purchases made by users in Home. The only failure here is your argument.[QUOTE="bethwo"]
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
mitu123
Of course. Microsoft think they can compensate for their lack of games this year by offering TV shows? A move clearly aimed at the casual filth.bethwo1. Lack of exclusives this year =/= lack of games. It's not like the backlog of the multiplats disapear. 2. E3 is one week. How do you know that MS "is trying to compensate" the lack of exclusives with it, and not just offering an additional service?
I have Sky and Freeview and that sorts out all my tv needs.
Why would i want to watch tv on a games console?
[QUOTE="bethwo"]Of course. Microsoft think they can compensate for their lack of games this year by offering TV shows? A move clearly aimed at the casual filth.IronBass1. Lack of exclusives this year =/= lack of games. It's not like the backlog of the multiplats disapear. 2. E3 is one week. How do you know that MS "is trying to compensate" the lack of exclusives with it, and not just offering an additional service? 1. That old crap? Like anybody cares about any of that anymore. 2. Because it's Microsoft, they will just be all "WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, OH AND NOW WE HAVE TV SHOWS, AND WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, ERRR PRICE DROP? BRILLIANT IDEA. BTW WE SOLD MORE THAN SONY! OH AND HERES A PORT OF A PS3 EXCLUSIVE EVERYBODY HAS ALREADY BOUGHT, AND REMEMBER, MORE THAN SONY!"
[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]Well looks like Sony's Play TV has got some competition lolAdoringFan_
Its actually Vidzone lol
Well looks like Sony's Play TV has got some competition lolSwift_Boss_A
lol sonys play tv wasn't ever a competitor.
[QUOTE="mitu123"]No games, you mean 2009? If you mean overall throughout the years, then that's hilarious considering that I'm playing it a lot nowadays. And why are you complaining about avatars when PS3 had that failure known as Home? Failure? I guess you failed to notice that 6.5M people are using Home, and that after like a month Sony had made 2M from purchases made by users in Home. The only failure here is your argument.[QUOTE="bethwo"]
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
6.5million people that logged in then instantly got back off cause home is crappy.
[QUOTE="mitu123"]No games, you mean 2009? If you mean overall throughout the years, then that's hilarious considering that I'm playing it a lot nowadays. And why are you complaining about avatars when PS3 had that failure known as Home? Failure? I guess you failed to notice that 6.5M people are using Home, and that after like a month Sony had made 2M from purchases made by users in Home. The only failure here is your argument. Why, it's not even that great, until it gets a lot more interesting features, I don't see the appeal to it.[QUOTE="bethwo"]
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="bethwo"]Of course. Microsoft think they can compensate for their lack of games this year by offering TV shows? A move clearly aimed at the casual filth.bethwo1. Lack of exclusives this year =/= lack of games. It's not like the backlog of the multiplats disapear. 2. E3 is one week. How do you know that MS "is trying to compensate" the lack of exclusives with it, and not just offering an additional service? 1. That old crap? Like anybody cares about any of that anymore. 2. Because it's Microsoft, they will just be all "WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, OH AND NOW WE HAVE TV SHOWS, AND WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, ERRR PRICE DROP? BRILLIANT IDEA. BTW WE SOLD MORE THAN SONY! OH AND HERES A PORT OF A PS3 EXCLUSIVE EVERYBODY HAS ALREADY BOUGHT, AND REMEMBER, MORE THAN SONY!" 1. I'm sure a lot of gamers care about those games. Most of them (like Halo 3, Bioshock, CoD4, and, more recent Fable II and Gears 2) are still among the best games this gen. If you don't care about them and only play games one month old, it's perfectly fine. But we are talking in very general terms. 2. Since neither you nor me have a time machine, let's leave the speculation for later.
i got sky in my living room so does this mean i will be able to watch sky in my room (where 360 is) or would i have to pay again :/
[QUOTE="mitu123"]No games, you mean 2009? If you mean overall throughout the years, then that's hilarious considering that I'm playing it a lot nowadays. And why are you complaining about avatars when PS3 had that failure known as Home? Failure? I guess you failed to notice that 6.5M people are using Home, and that after like a month Sony had made 2M from purchases made by users in Home. The only failure here is your argument.[QUOTE="bethwo"]
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
Yes, and we all know Home wasn't designed for the myspace (AKA casual) crowd. No, Home oozes so much hardcore appeal that just picking up the controller to use it causes rampant thumb blistering. :roll:
LOLOLLOLLOLLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOL
This should be on off topic forums, titled " YLYL " :D
if 6 million people USE home, I will not only quit system wars, but i will shave my head, then marry my cat.
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="bethwo"]Of course. Microsoft think they can compensate for their lack of games this year by offering TV shows? A move clearly aimed at the casual filth.bethwo1. Lack of exclusives this year =/= lack of games. It's not like the backlog of the multiplats disapear. 2. E3 is one week. How do you know that MS "is trying to compensate" the lack of exclusives with it, and not just offering an additional service? 1. That old crap? Like anybody cares about any of that anymore. 2. Because it's Microsoft, they will just be all "WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, OH AND NOW WE HAVE TV SHOWS, AND WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, ERRR PRICE DROP? BRILLIANT IDEA. BTW WE SOLD MORE THAN SONY! OH AND HERES A PORT OF A PS3 EXCLUSIVE EVERYBODY HAS ALREADY BOUGHT, AND REMEMBER, MORE THAN SONY!"You forgot the Zune "master plan" :lol:
[QUOTE="mitu123"]No games, you mean 2009? If you mean overall throughout the years, then that's hilarious considering that I'm playing it a lot nowadays. And why are you complaining about avatars when PS3 had that failure known as Home? Failure? I guess you failed to notice that 6.5M people are using Home, and that after like a month Sony had made 2M from purchases made by users in Home. The only failure here is your argument. My scanners are decting a fakeboy, but a level 17 seems too high... :? Anyway, home is casual. It's a cash in for people who like to play house, virtual online house.[QUOTE="bethwo"]
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
[QUOTE="mitu123"]No games, you mean 2009? If you mean overall throughout the years, then that's hilarious considering that I'm playing it a lot nowadays. And why are you complaining about avatars when PS3 had that failure known as Home? Failure? I guess you failed to notice that 6.5M people are using Home, and that after like a month Sony had made 2M from purchases made by users in Home. The only failure here is your argument.[QUOTE="bethwo"]
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
LOLOLLOLLOLLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOL
This should be on off topic forums, titled " YLYL "
if 6 million people USE home, I will not only quit system wars, but i will shave my head, then marry my cat.
[QUOTE="bethwo"][QUOTE="IronBass"] 1. Lack of exclusives this year =/= lack of games. It's not like the backlog of the multiplats disapear. 2. E3 is one week. How do you know that MS "is trying to compensate" the lack of exclusives with it, and not just offering an additional service?IronBass1. That old crap? Like anybody cares about any of that anymore. 2. Because it's Microsoft, they will just be all "WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, OH AND NOW WE HAVE TV SHOWS, AND WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, ERRR PRICE DROP? BRILLIANT IDEA. BTW WE SOLD MORE THAN SONY! OH AND HERES A PORT OF A PS3 EXCLUSIVE EVERYBODY HAS ALREADY BOUGHT, AND REMEMBER, MORE THAN SONY!" 1. I'm sure a lot of gamers care about those games. Most of them (like Halo 3, Bioshock, CoD4, and, more recent Fable II and Gears 2) are still among the best games this gen. If you don't care about them and only play games one month old, it's perfectly fine. But we are talking in very general terms. 2. Since neither you nor me have a time machine, let's leave the speculation for later.Lems are still talking about Halo,Gears, and Fable :lol:
1. I'm sure a lot of gamers care about those games. Most of them (like Halo 3, Bioshock, CoD4, and, more recent Fable II and Gears 2) are still among the best games this gen. If you don't care about them and only play games one month old, it's perfectly fine. But we are talking in very general terms. 2. Since neither you nor me have a time machine, let's leave the speculation for later.Lems are still talking about Halo,Gears, and Fable :lol:[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="bethwo"] 1. That old crap? Like anybody cares about any of that anymore. 2. Because it's Microsoft, they will just be all "WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, OH AND NOW WE HAVE TV SHOWS, AND WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, ERRR PRICE DROP? BRILLIANT IDEA. BTW WE SOLD MORE THAN SONY! OH AND HERES A PORT OF A PS3 EXCLUSIVE EVERYBODY HAS ALREADY BOUGHT, AND REMEMBER, MORE THAN SONY!"furomaster_99
So? I mean I like PS3 games more but they are still fun to play ;)
Lems are still talking about Halo,Gears, and Fable :lol:furomaster_99Firstly, I hope with "Lems" you didn't adress me. Secondly, what's wrong with Gears 2? It's a -wow- six months old games played by thousands every day... Tha same applies to Halo 3, in a far bigger scale. Games don't stop being good some months after they are released. In fact, a lot of games are still great years after they are released.
[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]Lems are still talking about Halo,Gears, and Fable :lol:IronBassFirstly, I hope with "Lems" you didn't adress me. Secondly, what's wrong with Gears 2? It's a -wow- six months old games played by thousands every day... Tha same applies to Halo 3, in a far bigger scale. Games don't stop being good some months after they are released. In fact, a lot of games are still great years after they are released. Especially when there is nothing new and exciting to play.
Especially when there is nothing new and exciting to play.furomaster_99Subjectivity is everyone's friend ;)
Firstly, I hope with "Lems" you didn't adress me. Secondly, what's wrong with Gears 2? It's a -wow- six months old games played by thousands every day... Tha same applies to Halo 3, in a far bigger scale. Games don't stop being good some months after they are released. In fact, a lot of games are still great years after they are released. Especially when there is nothing new and exciting to play. All the Lems got so far are 4 As and a flop this year, I agree until the fall when Halo 3: ODST and Forza 3 comes out along with a few more 360 exclusives.[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="furomaster_99"]Lems are still talking about Halo,Gears, and Fable :lol:furomaster_99
Especially when there is nothing new and exciting to play. All the Lems got so far are 4 As and a flop this year, I agree until the fall when Halo 3: ODST and Forza 3 comes out along with a few more 360 exclusives.On a serious note, I think MS has switched focus to a Wii/iPod audience and isn't as concerned about bringing many new games.[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]
[QUOTE="IronBass"] Firstly, I hope with "Lems" you didn't adress me. Secondly, what's wrong with Gears 2? It's a -wow- six months old games played by thousands every day... Tha same applies to Halo 3, in a far bigger scale. Games don't stop being good some months after they are released. In fact, a lot of games are still great years after they are released. mitu123
1. I'm sure a lot of gamers care about those games. Most of them (like Halo 3, Bioshock, CoD4, and, more recent Fable II and Gears 2) are still among the best games this gen. If you don't care about them and only play games one month old, it's perfectly fine. But we are talking in very general terms. 2. Since neither you nor me have a time machine, let's leave the speculation for later.Lems are still talking about Halo,Gears, and Fable :lol:[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="bethwo"] 1. That old crap? Like anybody cares about any of that anymore. 2. Because it's Microsoft, they will just be all "WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, OH AND NOW WE HAVE TV SHOWS, AND WE'VE SOLD MORE THAN SONY, ERRR PRICE DROP? BRILLIANT IDEA. BTW WE SOLD MORE THAN SONY! OH AND HERES A PORT OF A PS3 EXCLUSIVE EVERYBODY HAS ALREADY BOUGHT, AND REMEMBER, MORE THAN SONY!"furomaster_99
umm i hate to break it to you, but cows were talking about MGSIV being the 2nd coming of christ for about 2 years straight, yet GEOW2 came out 8months ago and you lol at that? i love fanyboy logic.
LOL
Xbox is so casual, first avatars and now TV shows? I suppose that's all they can do when they have no games.
bethwo
I think you misspelled xbox360 with ps3, the blu ray player disquised as a video game system
Lems are still talking about Halo,Gears, and Fable :lol:[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]
[QUOTE="IronBass"] 1. I'm sure a lot of gamers care about those games. Most of them (like Halo 3, Bioshock, CoD4, and, more recent Fable II and Gears 2) are still among the best games this gen. If you don't care about them and only play games one month old, it's perfectly fine. But we are talking in very general terms. 2. Since neither you nor me have a time machine, let's leave the speculation for later.Fizzman
umm i hate to break it to you, but cows were talking about MGSIV being the 2nd coming of christ for about 2 years straight, yet GEOW2 came out 8months ago and you lol at that? i love fanyboy logic.
Oh, okay...Yeah...Ya got me there! :lol:All the Lems got so far are 4 As and a flop this year, I agree until the fall when Halo 3: ODST and Forza 3 comes out along with a few more 360 exclusives.On a serious note, I think MS has switched focus to a Wii/iPod audience and isn't as concerned about bringing many new games. If they don't announce more games, then I'm giving my 360 to my brother and buy a PS3.:P Seriously, that would be lame and proof that 2009 is 360's worst year.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]Especially when there is nothing new and exciting to play.
furomaster_99
Oh Microsoft, why are you so mean :( I want TEH GAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!angelkimne
You have a PS3?! :shock:
[QUOTE="angelkimne"]Oh Microsoft, why are you so mean :( I want TEH GAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!AdoringFan_
You have a PS3?! :shock:
Yes, and I'm actually on level 3, not 2! :P The trophy site isn't updating.well with Alan Wake, Splinter Cell, Forza, Halo ODST, Rare games (Perfect Dark), (Killer Instinct), and another Lionhead game it doesnt look like the 360 will have a shortage of great games to play this holiday season.FizzmanI really want Perfect Dark 2 and Killer Instinct 3 to be announced, or other Rare games at least.
On a serious note, I think MS has switched focus to a Wii/iPod audience and isn't as concerned about bringing many new games. If they don't announce more games, then I'm giving my 360 to my brother and buy a PS3.:P Seriously, that would be lame and proof that 2009 is 360's worst year. Your gaming revolves around exclusives right, you play them regardless if you even like them. I don't see any exclusives on either side that I really would even purchase, I'm more than happy with the mass amount of good multiplats. I haven't once not had multiple games to play nor multiple games I wanted to play, so no matter how anyone may put it there is plenty of gaming to be done.[QUOTE="furomaster_99"]
[QUOTE="mitu123"] All the Lems got so far are 4 As and a flop this year, I agree until the fall when Halo 3: ODST and Forza 3 comes out along with a few more 360 exclusives.
mitu123
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment