MOHH2 is a huge disapointment

I got this game for christmas and it is just horrible, i don't understand how its been recieved so well. The graphics are ps1, the gameplay is mediocre and the online is so damn laggy i cant look at it for more than a few minutes at a time. Its one of the only games i have and i have chosen not to beat just because its so damn bad, this is the second worst game ive ever gotten. The first is some crappy yugioh game that i played once and have never touched since. I would really rather pay 50 dollars a year to microsoft for decent online than wiis crap, I really hope ssbb doesnt suck so hard. Anyone else think that moh sucked?

I got this game for christmas and it is just horrible, i don't understand how its been recieved so well. The graphics are ps1, the gameplay is mediocre and the online is so damn laggy i cant look at it for more than a few minutes at a time. Its one of the only games i have and i have chosen not to beat just because its so damn bad, this is the second worst game ive ever gotten. The first is some crappy yugioh game that i played once and have never touched since. I would really rather pay 50 dollars a year to microsoft for decent online than wiis crap, I really hope ssbb doesnt suck so hard. Anyone else think that moh sucked?

Gator08

its the sheep's first online FPS ... dont ruin it for them.

[QUOTE="Gator08"]

I got this game for christmas and it is just horrible, i don't understand how its been recieved so well. The graphics are ps1, the gameplay is mediocre and the online is so damn laggy i cant look at it for more than a few minutes at a time. Its one of the only games i have and i have chosen not to beat just because its so damn bad, this is the second worst game ive ever gotten. The first is some crappy yugioh game that i played once and have never touched since. I would really rather pay 50 dollars a year to microsoft for decent online than wiis crap, I really hope ssbb doesnt suck so hard. Anyone else think that moh sucked?

humber_matus

its the sheep's first online FPS ... dont ruin it for them.

Did we play the same game? I found the controls fantastic making the otherwise average gameplay more enjoyable and had no problem at all with lag. No lag, no problems, just Nazi shooting funtimes. And the graphics are much better than PS1 level. I gave it an 8.5 in my review and I stand behind that score. It's a great game, one of the best the Wii has, and the best online experience the Wii has right now.Hoffgod

i feel the exact same way for the game, its really fun, been playing it for hours

The wii always gets the second hand games.

the real consoles got CoD4.

Every Medal of Honour after Allied Assault was utter garbage, do us all a favour and stop buying this trashy franchise.Meu2k7

Frontline was good for it's time...

ps1 graphics? you're post would be close to credible without that, but that just makes it look like trolling.beast667

Can it really be trolling if i actually have the game and honestly think it stinks horribly, and has very very bad graphics?

[QUOTE="beast667"]ps1 graphics? you're post would be close to credible without that, but that just makes it look like trolling.Gator08

Can it really be trolling if i actually have the game and honestly think it stinks horribly, and has very very bad graphics?

Yes.

Maybe since i was playing so much halo and cod4 my standards were raised and thats why moh looked and felt so bad when i played it.Gator08

PLEASE, stop saying Wii games have PS1 graphics. Let's do a comparison. MGS, one of the PS1's best looking games, compared to MOH:H2.

Please, if you feel my shots misrepresent either game, feel free to post your own.

MGS:

MOH:H2:

So shut up!

The wii always gets the second hand games.

the real consoles got CoD4.

JPOBS

PLEASE, stop saying Wii games have PS1 graphics. Let's do a comparison. MGS, one of the PS1's best looking games, compared to MOH:H2.

Please, if you feel my shots misrepresent either game, feel free to post your own.

MGS:

MOH:H2:

So shut up!

Jimmi323

I wasnt bashing all wii games, i mean smg looks amazing, and yes, i may have exaggerated a bit by saying ps1, but that still doesnt fix the fact the mohh2 looks like garbage by this gens standards.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]

The wii always gets the second hand games.

the real consoles got CoD4.

Erkidu

they are both WW2 themed games, one is exclusive to wii, and one is on every console BUT the wii. To me, this points to the fact that the wii isnt considered "good enough" because it didnt get a game that is otherwise completely multiplat. And also, the devs of mohh didnt put it on the other consoles because they knew it would be trash next to cod4.

so, in essence, the real consoles got cod4, the wii got a wanna be.

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="JPOBS"]

The wii always gets the second hand games.

the real consoles got CoD4.

JPOBS

they are both WW2 themed games, one is exclusive to wii, and one is on every console BUT the wii. To me, this points to the fact that the wii isnt considered "good enough" because it didnt get a game that is otherwise completely multiplat. And also, the devs of mohh didnt put it on the other consoles because they knew it would be trash next to cod4.

so, in essence, the real consoles got cod4, the wii got a wanna be.

The wanna be turned out to be Great... (according to GS) So i don't see why anyone should complain much.

The Xbox 360 got Hour of Victory... ... XD

so, in essence, the real consoles got cod4, the wii got a wanna be.

JPOBS

So, in essence, the real console (Wii) got SMG, the rest got nothing.

Who cares about shooters?

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="JPOBS"]

The wii always gets the second hand games.

the real consoles got CoD4.

JPOBS

they are both WW2 themed games, one is exclusive to wii, and one is on every console BUT the wii. To me, this points to the fact that the wii isnt considered "good enough" because it didnt get a game that is otherwise completely multiplat. And also, the devs of mohh didnt put it on the other consoles because they knew it would be trash next to cod4.

so, in essence, the real consoles got cod4, the wii got a wanna be.

[QUOTE="JPOBS"]

so, in essence, the real consoles got cod4, the wii got a wanna be.

Jimmi323

So, in essence, the real console (Wii) got SMG, the rest got nothing.

Who cares about shooters?

"Good enough" is subjective. The FACT is - Activision didn't port CoD4 to the Wii because it simply isn't powerful enough to handle it. CoD4 was built for 360/PS3 and MoHH2 was built for the Wii. They are completely unrelated - and shouldn't be used as "teh proof" that Wii always gets "second-hand" software. On another note, MoHH2 is a "great" game, according to GS. I can reverse that too - why didn't No More Heroes go to the 360 or PS3? Is it because they aren't "good enough"? No, thus it doesn't make sense to use that as "teh proof" that they are somehow "inferior" to the Wii. On a final note, GundamGuy made a great point. We Wii owners are so upset that we didn't get Hour of Victory. It's a shame that the Wii couldn't handle it.Erkidu

[QUOTE="Erkidu"] "Good enough" is subjective. The FACT is - Activision didn't port CoD4 to the Wii because it simply isn't powerful enough to handle it. CoD4 was built for 360/PS3 and MoHH2 was built for the Wii. They are completely unrelated - and shouldn't be used as "teh proof" that Wii always gets "second-hand" software. On another note, MoHH2 is a "great" game, according to GS. I can reverse that too - why didn't No More Heroes go to the 360 or PS3? Is it because they aren't "good enough"? No, thus it doesn't make sense to use that as "teh proof" that they are somehow "inferior" to the Wii. On a final note, GundamGuy made a great point. We Wii owners are so upset that we didn't get Hour of Victory. It's a shame that the Wii couldn't handle it.JPOBS

[QUOTE="Erkidu"] "Good enough" is subjective. The FACT is - Activision didn't port CoD4 to the Wii because it simply isn't powerful enough to handle it. CoD4 was built for 360/PS3 and MoHH2 was built for the Wii. They are completely unrelated - and shouldn't be used as "teh proof" that Wii always gets "second-hand" software. On another note, MoHH2 is a "great" game, according to GS. I can reverse that too - why didn't No More Heroes go to the 360 or PS3? Is it because they aren't "good enough"? No, thus it doesn't make sense to use that as "teh proof" that they are somehow "inferior" to the Wii. On a final note, GundamGuy made a great point. We Wii owners are so upset that we didn't get Hour of Victory. It's a shame that the Wii couldn't handle it.JPOBS

[QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="Erkidu"] "Good enough" is subjective. The FACT is - Activision didn't port CoD4 to the Wii because it simply isn't powerful enough to handle it. CoD4 was built for 360/PS3 and MoHH2 was built for the Wii. They are completely unrelated - and shouldn't be used as "teh proof" that Wii always gets "second-hand" software. On another note, MoHH2 is a "great" game, according to GS. I can reverse that too - why didn't No More Heroes go to the 360 or PS3? Is it because they aren't "good enough"? No, thus it doesn't make sense to use that as "teh proof" that they are somehow "inferior" to the Wii. On a final note, GundamGuy made a great point. We Wii owners are so upset that we didn't get Hour of Victory. It's a shame that the Wii couldn't handle it.Erkidu

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="JPOBS"][QUOTE="Erkidu"] "Good enough" is subjective. The FACT is - Activision didn't port CoD4 to the Wii because it simply isn't powerful enough to handle it. CoD4 was built for 360/PS3 and MoHH2 was built for the Wii. They are completely unrelated - and shouldn't be used as "teh proof" that Wii always gets "second-hand" software. On another note, MoHH2 is a "great" game, according to GS. I can reverse that too - why didn't No More Heroes go to the 360 or PS3? Is it because they aren't "good enough"? No, thus it doesn't make sense to use that as "teh proof" that they are somehow "inferior" to the Wii. On a final note, GundamGuy made a great point. We Wii owners are so upset that we didn't get Hour of Victory. It's a shame that the Wii couldn't handle it.JPOBS

But it also doesn't undermine the key point he's trying to make. CoD4 was made specifically for the hardware power the 360 and PS3 have, something the Wii just doesn't have. That doesn't mean the Wii will always get second-hand games. If anything, it shows it doesn't. If Activision had thrown together at the last minute a CoD4 for the Wii, like they did for CoD3, then it would be the Wii getting second-hand games. But it didn't. Instead, it got something different, a game tailored to the strengths of the system, just like how CoD4 was tailored to the strengths of the 360/PS3/PC. If a console getting a game designed to take advantage of it's strengths is somehow bad, then you need to reconsider your definition of bad.Hoffgod

it looks alright but i doubt it compares to a real FPSthe_h_bomb

this has nothing to do with cod4 and 360 standards, mohh2 is bad in wii standards.Gator08

Gamespot gave it an 8... maybe they weren't playing the same game as you.

Im not arguing that developers agreed on doing anything, im just saying that the real consoles got a better WW2 shooter and the wii, because it isnt strong enough, got a lesser game. thats all really...
JPOBS

JPOBS, I usually try to be reasonable, but your logic is flawed.

Medal of Honor: Airborn - 7.0

Medal of Honor Heroes 2 (Wii) - 8.0

Medal of Honor Heroes 2 (PSP) - 7.0

Happy?

Did we play the same game? I found the controls fantastic making the otherwise average gameplay more enjoyable and had no problem at all with lag. No lag, no problems, just Nazi shooting funtimes. And the graphics are much better than PS1 level. I gave it an 8.5 in my review and I stand behind that score. It's a great game, one of the best the Wii has, and the best online experience the Wii has right now.Hoffgod

I second that.

The graphics are good. Not the best that Wii can do, but they're better than COD3 and the other MoH game and they run at a silky smooth framerate.

Controls are the best FPS control on consoles period. Anybody that dissagrees either hasn't played it or is too much of a fanboy (god I hate using that word) to admit that speedy, unincumbered aiming is ideal. The graphics might not be able to wow you like Bioshock or COD4... but this was honestly the first time I said WOW to controls.

And I NEVER had a single laggy online experience playing this game. Yes weapons are twitchy in peoples (other players) hands... but does that remind you of anything... oh yeah, PC online games... another nod to the controls

[QUOTE="the_h_bomb"]it looks alright but i doubt it compares to a real FPSHoffgod

an AAA classic. I'd probably buy it at a budget price because it looks like a good second tier FPS but i'd chose COD4, Orange Box or Halo 3 over it in a heartbeat

[QUOTE="Hoffgod"][QUOTE="the_h_bomb"]it looks alright but i doubt it compares to a real FPSthe_h_bomb

an AAA classic. I'd probably buy it at a budget price because it looks like a good second tier FPS but i'd chose COD4, Orange Box or Halo 3 over it in a heartbeat

I wish a developer would use this control system for a really cool original Wii IP. Of course... who in their right mind would do that? Right?

The Future of gaming isn't ruined because of the Wii. It is ruined because of the Publishers.

[QUOTE="Hoffgod"][QUOTE="the_h_bomb"]it looks alright but i doubt it compares to a real FPSthe_h_bomb

an AAA classic. I'd probably buy it at a budget price because it looks like a good second tier RPG but i'd chose COD4, Orange Box or Halo 3 over it in a heartbeat

[QUOTE="Hoffgod"][QUOTE="the_h_bomb"]it looks alright but i doubt it compares to a real FPSthe_h_bomb

an AAA classic. I'd probably buy it at a budget price because it looks like a good second tier FPS but i'd chose COD4, Orange Box or Halo 3 over it in a heartbeat

The wii always gets the second hand games.

the real consoles got CoD4.

JPOBS

Guess that means the DS is a real game system and the PSP isn't, cuz it got MoH:H2 and DS got CoD4... one issue out the window.

how does being AAA make a shooter a real FPS? beast667

because it'll be far better quality and have a fuly realised single and multiplayer mode

I wish a developer would use this control system for a really cool original Wii IP. Of course... who in their right mind would do that? Right?

The Future of gaming isn't ruined because of the Wii. It is ruined because of the Publishers.

kansasdude2009

I want them to do this as wel (just to see what it'd be like)l but what can you do? At the end of the day publishers are scared of Nintendo and relations have never been good for third parties. For a serious gaming experience this gen you can't survive with just the Wii. There are simply too many multiplatform titles to ignore

[QUOTE="beast667"]how does being AAA make a shooter a real FPS? the_h_bomb

because it'll be far better quality and have a fuly realised single and multiplayer mode

[QUOTE="humber_matus"][QUOTE="Gator08"]

I got this game for christmas and it is just horrible, i don't understand how its been recieved so well. The graphics are ps1, the gameplay is mediocre and the online is so damn laggy i cant look at it for more than a few minutes at a time. Its one of the only games i have and i have chosen not to beat just because its so damn bad, this is the second worst game ive ever gotten. The first is some crappy yugioh game that i played once and have never touched since. I would really rather pay 50 dollars a year to microsoft for decent online than wiis crap, I really hope ssbb doesnt suck so hard. Anyone else think that moh sucked?

Erkidu

its the sheep's first online FPS ... dont ruin it for them.

That would make you a SHERMIT.

Geez

Every Medal of Honour after Allied Assault was utter garbage, do us all a favour and stop buying this trashy franchise.Meu2k7

Medal of Honour has been garbage since it was released, much like Call of Duty, the premise of war shooters has become extremely over done and boring to the point where none of those franchises are innovative. I rented the latest Wii release and thought it was pretty good, not a great offering graphically compared to Metroid, but the online was impressive for being on a console with such technology and on a free online service as well. While World War 2 shooters are overdone, I figure it's worth at least a rental if you want to play something online that will satisfy your shooter desires using the Wiimote.

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="humber_matus"][QUOTE="Gator08"]

I got this game for christmas and it is just horrible, i don't understand how its been recieved so well. The graphics are ps1, the gameplay is mediocre and the online is so damn laggy i cant look at it for more than a few minutes at a time. Its one of the only games i have and i have chosen not to beat just because its so damn bad, this is the second worst game ive ever gotten. The first is some crappy yugioh game that i played once and have never touched since. I would really rather pay 50 dollars a year to microsoft for decent online than wiis crap, I really hope ssbb doesnt suck so hard. Anyone else think that moh sucked?

SSCyborg

its the sheep's first online FPS ... dont ruin it for them.

That would make you a SHERMIT.

Geez

Yes, I know. However, alot of the "sheep" on this board are actually "shemits". They simply identify more with their Nintendo side. I'm actually more of a shemmermit. (Own Wii, 360 and gaming PC) :PErkidu

Yay Shemmermits! I don't own a Wii, but I've been supporting Nintendo since I got my SNES and ALttP. :P

Maybe since i was playing so much halo and cod4 my standards were raised and thats why moh looked and felt so bad when i played it.Gator08