More evidence of Crysis going to PS3?

  • 58 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

 Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

killab2oo5

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

True_Gamer_

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

You and a few other "hermits" rant about how a 7800GTX and AMD 3800+ can run Crysis maxed on DX9,and yet a PS3 cant?:roll:Hehe...I was inspired bew a few posts,and now see no reason to argue with a "fanboy",so thats all ill say.
Avatar image for mohammad112388
mohammad112388

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mohammad112388
Member since 2006 • 609 Posts
The ps3 seems as if it would be the perfect console to port crysis to. It has the most advanced processor on the market. And lets face it, in a game like crysis, calculations...such as the motion anddistance blur viewing may not be able to have been done on a 360. Althouugh there probably will be a graphical downgrade of course. But still, this is where ps3 starts showing off why Sony went with cell...
Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

killab2oo5

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

You and a few other "hermits" rant about how a 7800GTX and AMD 3800+ can run Crysis maxed on DX9,and yet a PS3 cant?:roll:Hehe...I was inspired bew a few posts,and now see no reason to argue with a "fanboy",so thats all ill say.

My 7800GTX and AMD 3500+ runs oblivion better than the ps3 or 360

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#7 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Crysis can run on consoles, incredibly downgraded. You can't have a fully persistant world with fully destructible enviroments on a machine with such little ram. The mere logistics outweigh the plausibility. The only reason these rumors persist is because of console fanboys wishing they had Crysis. Look, Crytek THEMSELVES stated they have no intention to bring Crysis to consoles. They only ported the engine. Engine =/= game.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#8 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
Before they used to deny it...
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

Marka1700

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

You and a few other "hermits" rant about how a 7800GTX and AMD 3800+ can run Crysis maxed on DX9,and yet a PS3 cant?:roll:Hehe...I was inspired bew a few posts,and now see no reason to argue with a "fanboy",so thats all ill say.

My 7800GTX and AMD 3500+ runs oblivion better than the ps3 or 360

The 360 runs R6:Vegas,GRAW 1 and 2 better in looks and performance than what your pc could...whats your point?
Avatar image for PaintballinDude
PaintballinDude

1092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 PaintballinDude
Member since 2004 • 1092 Posts

TLHBO! (if true)

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
Crysis can run on consoles, incredibly downgraded. You can't have a fully persistant world with fully destructible enviroments on a machine with such little ram. The mere logistics outweigh the plausibility. The only reason these rumors persist is because of console fanboys wishing they had Crysis. Look, Crytek THEMSELVES stated they have no intention to bring Crysis to consoles. They only ported the engine. Engine =/= game.Vandalvideo
Killzone 2 is supposed to have fully destructible enviroments...but ill wait on that one.Surely consoles could produce fully destructible enviroments if old old PC games(forgot the names,but read on here in 1 of them you could make caves with rockets)could,it might not be as good as a game requiring 2gigs of RAM,but it could pull it off.Consoles could produce graphics that would take 2x the requirements on PC,like with the original Halo on Xbox only needed 64MB of system RAM,but on PC it needs 128mb(minimum)of RAM.It didnt look better than what it did on Xbox either with the minimum hardware,and yet still needed 2x more RAM.
Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
[QUOTE="Marka1700"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

killab2oo5

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

You and a few other "hermits" rant about how a 7800GTX and AMD 3800+ can run Crysis maxed on DX9,and yet a PS3 cant?:roll:Hehe...I was inspired bew a few posts,and now see no reason to argue with a "fanboy",so thats all ill say.

My 7800GTX and AMD 3500+ runs oblivion better than the ps3 or 360

The 360 runs R6:Vegas,GRAW 1 and 2 better in looks and performance than what your pc could...whats your point?

PC version of Graw one is a completly different build by a different team, (gameplay sucks compared to the 360 version) But the graphics are better on PC version on for anyone who can run it on medium.  I dont know about Graw 2 cause I havent played it yet.  But compaering 360 vegas to how it run on my PC.  360 version as a better framerate.  On my PC the charecter models look better and so does the lighting, but everything else is better on 360

Avatar image for squallff8_fan
squallff8_fan

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#14 squallff8_fan
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

True_Gamer_

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

Even if it was a downgrade, there are tons of other better games then this out there. I will admit crysis looks good but thats about it, it is graphically a great looking game, but has nothing new to offer if I am correct, it is just another shooter.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#15 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Crysis can run on consoles, incredibly downgraded. You can't have a fully persistant world with fully destructible enviroments on a machine with such little ram. The mere logistics outweigh the plausibility. The only reason these rumors persist is because of console fanboys wishing they had Crysis. Look, Crytek THEMSELVES stated they have no intention to bring Crysis to consoles. They only ported the engine. Engine =/= game.killab2oo5
Killzone 2 is supposed to have fully destructible enviroments...but ill wait on that one.Surely consoles could produce fully destructible enviroments if old old PC games(forgot the names,but read on here in 1 of them you could make caves with rockets)could,it might not be as good as a game requiring 2gigs of RAM,but it could pull it off.Consoles could produce graphics that would take 2x the requirements on PC,like with the original Halo on Xbox only needed 64MB of system RAM,but on PC it needs 128mb(minimum)of RAM.It didnt look better than what it did on Xbox either with the minimum hardware,and yet still needed 2x more RAM.

Fully destructible blocks of pixels and fully destructible, highly detailed graphics with physics are INCREDIBLY different. The sheer ammount of calculating power and stuff stored in secondary storage is massive. That kind of thing is nearly IMPOSSIBLE on such a grandiose scale on a console. They would surrely have to put in intermitent loading screens or chop up the levels.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Marka1700"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

Marka1700

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

You and a few other "hermits" rant about how a 7800GTX and AMD 3800+ can run Crysis maxed on DX9,and yet a PS3 cant?:roll:Hehe...I was inspired bew a few posts,and now see no reason to argue with a "fanboy",so thats all ill say.

My 7800GTX and AMD 3500+ runs oblivion better than the ps3 or 360

The 360 runs R6:Vegas,GRAW 1 and 2 better in looks and performance than what your pc could...whats your point?

PC version of Graw one is a completly different build by a different team, (gameplay sucks compared to the 360 version) But the graphics are better on PC version on for anyone who can run it on medium.  I dont know about Graw 2 cause I havent played it yet.  But compaering 360 vegas to how it run on my PC.  360 version as a better framerate.  On my PC the charecter models look better and so does the lighting, but everything else is better on 360

I guess you would be right about GRAW 1...x.x excuse my ignorance.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Crysis can run on consoles, incredibly downgraded. You can't have a fully persistant world with fully destructible enviroments on a machine with such little ram. The mere logistics outweigh the plausibility. The only reason these rumors persist is because of console fanboys wishing they had Crysis. Look, Crytek THEMSELVES stated they have no intention to bring Crysis to consoles. They only ported the engine. Engine =/= game.Vandalvideo
Killzone 2 is supposed to have fully destructible enviroments...but ill wait on that one.Surely consoles could produce fully destructible enviroments if old old PC games(forgot the names,but read on here in 1 of them you could make caves with rockets)could,it might not be as good as a game requiring 2gigs of RAM,but it could pull it off.Consoles could produce graphics that would take 2x the requirements on PC,like with the original Halo on Xbox only needed 64MB of system RAM,but on PC it needs 128mb(minimum)of RAM.It didnt look better than what it did on Xbox either with the minimum hardware,and yet still needed 2x more RAM.

Fully destructible blocks of pixels and fully destructible, highly detailed graphics with physics are INCREDIBLY different. The sheer ammount of calculating power and stuff stored in secondary storage is massive. That kind of thing is nearly IMPOSSIBLE on such a grandiose scale on a console. They would surrely have to put in intermitent loading screens or chop up the levels.

I was only stating that the next-gen consoles could certainly do it,but not as good as a high-end PC.Guess we could possibly see when games in the future comes out.
Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#18 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts
did you also forget that there had been job offerings for the wii and 360 (most likely filled by now).  Also if you look at cryteks history they don't port the exact game for consoles they port a different they probably want to port these games now themselves instead of relying on ubisoft.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#19 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Crysis can run on consoles, incredibly downgraded. You can't have a fully persistant world with fully destructible enviroments on a machine with such little ram. The mere logistics outweigh the plausibility. The only reason these rumors persist is because of console fanboys wishing they had Crysis. Look, Crytek THEMSELVES stated they have no intention to bring Crysis to consoles. They only ported the engine. Engine =/= game.killab2oo5
Killzone 2 is supposed to have fully destructible enviroments...but ill wait on that one.Surely consoles could produce fully destructible enviroments if old old PC games(forgot the names,but read on here in 1 of them you could make caves with rockets)could,it might not be as good as a game requiring 2gigs of RAM,but it could pull it off.Consoles could produce graphics that would take 2x the requirements on PC,like with the original Halo on Xbox only needed 64MB of system RAM,but on PC it needs 128mb(minimum)of RAM.It didnt look better than what it did on Xbox either with the minimum hardware,and yet still needed 2x more RAM.

Fully destructible blocks of pixels and fully destructible, highly detailed graphics with physics are INCREDIBLY different. The sheer ammount of calculating power and stuff stored in secondary storage is massive. That kind of thing is nearly IMPOSSIBLE on such a grandiose scale on a console. They would surrely have to put in intermitent loading screens or chop up the levels.

I was only stating that the next-gen consoles could certainly do it,but not as good as a high-end PC.Guess we could possibly see when games in the future comes out.

And you have totally not disproven me by stating such. Consoles can handle destructible enviroments, but let me reitterat esomething. Crysis is on a much larger scale that requires ENOURMOUS mathmatical calculations this CAN NOT be done to the same extent on consoles. We could very well eventually see a sequal to Crysis on consoles like Far Cry Instincts, but there is NO evidence of Crysis going to consoles PERIOD. If it did, it would be incredibly downgraded.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#20 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
did you also forget that there had been job offerings for the wii and 360 (most likely filled by now).  Also if you look at cryteks history they don't port the exact game for consoles they port a different they probably want to port these games now themselves instead of relying on ubisoft.jrhawk42
The responsibilites listed in reference ot porting are revolving around porting the engine itself, not a particular game. This is what they said. Stating anything else is mere inference, and can't raelly be proven. There is no tangible evidence stating that it will be on consoles.
Avatar image for baddog121390
baddog121390

4335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 baddog121390
Member since 2005 • 4335 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

squallff8_fan

Downgrade FTW!!!!

Even if it was a downgrade, there are tons of other better games then this out there. I will admit crysis looks good but thats about it, it is graphically a great looking game, but has nothing new to offer if I am correct, it is just another shooter.

You are not correct.

 

And BTW, this is just news recirculation. They've had the job listings back in summer 2006. And "no comment" is to only keep the entire gaming industry fixed on Crysis. We all know when it's just PC, console gamers just say "all graphics, no substance" or whatever. Still is only PC, people.  

Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts
I'm sure they're super-eager to port Crysis to the one console that selling worse than a new Creed album.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Crysis can run on consoles, incredibly downgraded. You can't have a fully persistant world with fully destructible enviroments on a machine with such little ram. The mere logistics outweigh the plausibility. The only reason these rumors persist is because of console fanboys wishing they had Crysis. Look, Crytek THEMSELVES stated they have no intention to bring Crysis to consoles. They only ported the engine. Engine =/= game.Vandalvideo
Killzone 2 is supposed to have fully destructible enviroments...but ill wait on that one.Surely consoles could produce fully destructible enviroments if old old PC games(forgot the names,but read on here in 1 of them you could make caves with rockets)could,it might not be as good as a game requiring 2gigs of RAM,but it could pull it off.Consoles could produce graphics that would take 2x the requirements on PC,like with the original Halo on Xbox only needed 64MB of system RAM,but on PC it needs 128mb(minimum)of RAM.It didnt look better than what it did on Xbox either with the minimum hardware,and yet still needed 2x more RAM.

Fully destructible blocks of pixels and fully destructible, highly detailed graphics with physics are INCREDIBLY different. The sheer ammount of calculating power and stuff stored in secondary storage is massive. That kind of thing is nearly IMPOSSIBLE on such a grandiose scale on a console. They would surrely have to put in intermitent loading screens or chop up the levels.

I was only stating that the next-gen consoles could certainly do it,but not as good as a high-end PC.Guess we could possibly see when games in the future comes out.

And you have totally not disproven me by stating such. Consoles can handle destructible enviroments, but let me reitterat esomething. Crysis is on a much larger scale that requires ENOURMOUS mathmatical calculations this CAN NOT be done to the same extent on consoles. We could very well eventually see a sequal to Crysis on consoles like Far Cry Instincts, but there is NO evidence of Crysis going to consoles PERIOD. If it did, it would be incredibly downgraded.

T.T The debat is turning into an arguement,why get so defensive?I already said consoles cant pull off "fully destructible enviroments of such a massive scale" like it could be done on a high end PC...whihc is basically what your saying.I wasnt trying to disprove you,I was actualyl agreeing with you.Well anyways im going to sleep,1:12AM here.

P.S.-Any idea on what the required RAM is for Crysis in DX9?T.T Just a question,dont get hostile.

Avatar image for baddog121390
baddog121390

4335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 baddog121390
Member since 2005 • 4335 Posts
I'm sure they're super-eager to port Crysis to the one console that selling worse than a new Creed album.Michael85
FarCry sold about three million copies on the PC. Last I checked Halo only sold 2 million more than that.
Avatar image for Michael85
Michael85

3971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Michael85
Member since 2005 • 3971 Posts

[QUOTE="Michael85"]I'm sure they're super-eager to port Crysis to the one console that selling worse than a new Creed album.baddog121390
FarCry sold about three million copies on the PC. Last I checked Halo only sold 2 million more than that.

Your point being? 

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#26 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
u do realize that if they can put it downgraded on PS3, they can just do the same with 360. u know the system that is basically a little brother to the PC when it comes to the types of games that come to the 360. trust me if this even went to PS3. it will make it on 360 and look just as good if not better. not that it would matter since, it would be so inferior to the PC.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

True_Gamer_

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

plus the lems would cry if ps3 got it but x360 didn't and ea tends to make games for playstation and port to the rest which would be a problem for x360

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

killab2oo5

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

You and a few other "hermits" rant about how a 7800GTX and AMD 3800+ can run Crysis maxed on DX9,and yet a PS3 cant?:roll:Hehe...I was inspired bew a few posts,and now see no reason to argue with a "fanboy",so thats all ill say.

a 7800gtx and a amd 3800+ is more powerful than any game console

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="Marka1700"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]

Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

killab2oo5

Downgrade FTW!!!! 

You and a few other "hermits" rant about how a 7800GTX and AMD 3800+ can run Crysis maxed on DX9,and yet a PS3 cant?:roll:Hehe...I was inspired bew a few posts,and now see no reason to argue with a "fanboy",so thats all ill say.

My 7800GTX and AMD 3500+ runs oblivion better than the ps3 or 360

The 360 runs R6:Vegas,GRAW 1 and 2 better in looks and performance than what your pc could...whats your point?

my 7800gt runs all those games maxed and gs said r6v looks best on pc so your point?

Avatar image for baddog121390
baddog121390

4335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 baddog121390
Member since 2005 • 4335 Posts

[QUOTE="baddog121390"][QUOTE="Michael85"]I'm sure they're super-eager to port Crysis to the one console that selling worse than a new Creed album.Michael85

FarCry sold about three million copies on the PC. Last I checked Halo only sold 2 million more than that.

Your point being?

Nevermind, read the post wrong.
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
could you play that game at decent levels on a 7800 gpu??
Avatar image for Pangster007
Pangster007

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#32 Pangster007
Member since 2004 • 4426 Posts

No comment is a 'standard' response for loads of things. It's along the lines of 'never say never'.

As for the programmer job, it's just an engine, not the Crysis game itself. 

Avatar image for Core0
Core0

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Core0
Member since 2006 • 159 Posts
It's pretty much what the others have said: they need a programmer for the engine, since they plan on licensing not only the PC version of it but the console ones as well.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#34 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

could you play that game at decent levels on a 7800 gpu??daveg1

Of course. In fact, depending on what else you've got in your system, you can probably max it out in Dx9 mode. 

Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
wasn't this rumor put down like 6 or 7 months ago, in fact it is the same job listing, so WTH is everyone jumping on the same rumor, it has been disproven.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

wasn't this rumor put down like 6 or 7 months ago, in fact it is the same job listing, so WTH is everyone jumping on the same rumor, it has been disproven.muscleserge

People enjoy recycling rumours. 

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#37 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

[QUOTE="daveg1"]could you play that game at decent levels on a 7800 gpu??Danm_999

Of course. In fact, depending on what else you've got in your system, you can probably max it out in Dx9 mode. 

im ok cause ive got a 8800gts:)

im guessing you'l only get mid low levels in that game with a 7800 gpu at 1366 x 720p.

 

Avatar image for solidgamer
solidgamer

7542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 solidgamer
Member since 2005 • 7542 Posts
it will look like ass if it came to the ps3 or 360
Avatar image for S1xSh0t
S1xSh0t

529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 S1xSh0t
Member since 2007 • 529 Posts
I think i heard crysis being confirmed for the 360 late o7 release
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
I think i heard crysis being confirmed for the 360 late o7 release S1xSh0t
Where did you hear that?
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
Who would want to even play Crysis on a console? It's going to be using DX9, and it will probably be as bad as the Far Cry ports were. Crysis is all about the breathtaking visuals, and once you take those away then you ruin the game.
Avatar image for S1xSh0t
S1xSh0t

529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 S1xSh0t
Member since 2007 • 529 Posts

 

htt://www..msxbox-world.com/xbox360/games/games/183/Crysis.html

this website is for mag that is published every month and its very reliable  

Avatar image for malikmmm
malikmmm

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 malikmmm
Member since 2003 • 2235 Posts

 Crytek has no comment:Crysis for console rumor persist

The latest gossip about the hot-cold, alive-then-dead Crysis for console rumor is rooted on the pack of a job listing for a PS3 programmer on Crytek's official website. The juicy bit here is that listed among the responsibilities of the position is "cross platform code development." Crytek's response? ComputerAndVideoGames reports that it's quite typical.

When they managed to contact Crytek CEO Cervat Yerli, all he had to say was: "Nope, no comment on this."

He adds though that they're hiring for CryEgnine 2 Development at the moment. Whatever that means and however that connects with the PS3 programmer job listing is still up in the air.

One thing for certain though, given the fact that the Crysis for consoles rumor just refuses to die, it seems that Crytek is missing out on a large market. That or there are just a lot of people who are miffed with all the "next-gen consoles can't handle Crysis" hype.

We'll update you as soon as a PR person gets sacked er... we mean, as soon as more info on this rumor, is made public.

LINK

----------

Sorry if old.

killab2oo5

 

ANOTHER CONSOLE KID  :roll: :roll:

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts
Old and wrong
Avatar image for Acenso
Acenso

2355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Acenso
Member since 2006 • 2355 Posts

Funny thing is...Why are people saying TLHBO? If it goes to PS3 you know dam well it is going to 360 also lol. They just do not need to hire new developers is all for it^^

And seriously...This is like Unreal 2K7 on Consules. A Joke. 

Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts
There will probably be downgraded console spin offs of Crysis after the PC version is released. The actual version that PC gamers get will most likely never be seen on consoles.
Avatar image for latinrage69
latinrage69

2649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 latinrage69
Member since 2003 • 2649 Posts

here's an exerpt from the crytek site:

"Next Generation Real-Time Renderer: Our renderer provides seamless support for both indoor and outdoor environments on DirectX9 and 10, as well as support for next generation consoles such as the Xbox360 and PS3 (under development)."

that means the cryengine 2 is coming to xbox 360 and the ps3, not the game itself. if the game does come out for consoles, it will be for both the 360 and ps3, not just the ps3.

link

Avatar image for baddog121390
baddog121390

4335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 baddog121390
Member since 2005 • 4335 Posts
Who would want to even play Crysis on a console? It's going to be using DX9, and it will probably be as bad as the Far Cry ports were. Crysis is all about the breathtaking visuals, and once you take those away then you ruin the game.BioShockOwnz
No, and Crytek themselves had made sure that the core gameplay will keep people playing for ages.
Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts

here's an exerpt from the crytek site:

"Next Generation Real-Time Renderer: Our renderer provides seamless support for both indoor and outdoor environments on DirectX9 and 10, as well as support for next generation consoles such as the Xbox360 and PS3 (under development)."

that means the cryengine 2 is coming to xbox 360 and the ps3, not the game itself. if the game does come out for consoles, it will be for both the 360 and ps3, not just the ps3.

link

latinrage69

This has been known for a long time. They are selling their engine to whoever wants to use it for their games. You can expect more games to use the CryEngine2.  

Avatar image for latinrage69
latinrage69

2649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 latinrage69
Member since 2003 • 2649 Posts
[QUOTE="latinrage69"]

here's an exerpt from the crytek site:

"Next Generation Real-Time Renderer: Our renderer provides seamless support for both indoor and outdoor environments on DirectX9 and 10, as well as support for next generation consoles such as the Xbox360 and PS3 (under development)."

that means the cryengine 2 is coming to xbox 360 and the ps3, not the game itself. if the game does come out for consoles, it will be for both the 360 and ps3, not just the ps3.

link

trix5817

This has been known for a long time. They are selling their engine to whoever wants to use it for their games. You can expect more games to use the CryEngine2.

yea i know. i'm trying to inform the TC that the engine is going to the consoles not the game. at least not yet. if crysis does in fact come out for the console market, it will be for both the 360 and the ps3, not just the ps3 like what he was insinuating.