Who is going to perfect Motion Control.....
Nintendo introduced it
Sony tried it
Microsoft is re-vamping it
who will win? and why
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Sony's looks more impressive than any of the others imo.
Too much can go wrong with M$'s.. like what happens if someone walks behind you while your playing? If the camer picks it up.. it could fubar you.. or maybe even your clothes blending in with the background.. etc..
If by war you mean battle for second place between MS and Sony, then I agree.tbone29I agree with this guy. Sony and M$ were backed into a corner when Nintendo introduced motion control. Nintendo has two advantages over M$ and Sony: Their video games are 10 dollars cheaper, and they have a head start when it comes to motion control.
oh sony by far and the wii.............LOL and there graphs still with the mega drive NO HOPE. XBOX AND SONY
this makes me want to go back and watch beast warsredmetal86
YESS... beast wars = ... oh wait thats right beast wars has no equal
Agreed.well.... nintendos because you wont have to pay 200$ for it and it will actually be supported
masterdante
I'm hoping both Sony's and Microsoft's fail, I've never been a fan of motion control, and these new peripherals don't convince me. If they do take off, well then I guess its off to PC gaming for me.
[QUOTE="masterdante"]
well.... nintendos because you wont have to pay 200$ for it and it will actually be supported
FamiBox
Is it actually 100% confirmed from a reliable source to cost $200?
i dont know for sure, but i mean, ms charges 100$ for wifi.. so i highly doubt it will be any cheaper
I really don't think that both sony and microsoft need these new controllers. If I were to pick the one controller that could have the most potential it would probably be the sony one. With the PSEYE the system can read your leg and other body movements just like natal, There is and input controller you can hold, and it seems to be as percise as the wii motion plus. I think that natal will be the next eye toy with few games and few opprotunities to stand out. Sony could actually implement this into many of their upcoming titles.
actually the ps eye is not nearly as advanced as natal..also, ms could easily add a controllerI really don't think that both sony and microsoft need these new controllers. If I were to pick the one controller that could have the most potential it would probably be the sony one. With the PSEYE the system can read your leg and other body movements just like natal, There is and input controller you can hold, and it seems to be as percise as the wii motion plus. I think that natal will be the next eye toy with few games and few opprotunities to stand out. Sony could actually implement this into many of their upcoming titles.
killerkane246
[QUOTE="killerkane246"]actually the ps eye is not nearly as advanced as natal..also, ms could easily add a controllerI really don't think that both sony and microsoft need these new controllers. If I were to pick the one controller that could have the most potential it would probably be the sony one. With the PSEYE the system can read your leg and other body movements just like natal, There is and input controller you can hold, and it seems to be as percise as the wii motion plus. I think that natal will be the next eye toy with few games and few opprotunities to stand out. Sony could actually implement this into many of their upcoming titles.
wolverine4262
They could add a controller but adding a contoller would destroy the purpose of image capture which was their original plan. I think that Natal will be more focused toward the casual audience while Sony's will be able to implement these controls in their real blockbuster titles.
actually the ps eye is not nearly as advanced as natal..also, ms could easily add a controller[QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="killerkane246"]
I really don't think that both sony and microsoft need these new controllers. If I were to pick the one controller that could have the most potential it would probably be the sony one. With the PSEYE the system can read your leg and other body movements just like natal, There is and input controller you can hold, and it seems to be as percise as the wii motion plus. I think that natal will be the next eye toy with few games and few opprotunities to stand out. Sony could actually implement this into many of their upcoming titles.
killerkane246
They could add a controller but adding a contoller would destroy the purpose of image capture which was their original plan. I think that Natal will be more focused toward the casual audience while Sony's will be able to implement these controls in their real blockbuster titles.
I dont see why they cant use image capture AND a controller...Who cares about these silly gimmicky controllers really? Certainly not me... Let the wii do the motion thing, and let 360 and PS3 stick to the great games maximized to take advantage of the controllers and it's attributes, that the damn machines shipped with.
I can't believe lemmings and cows would be silly enough to bother using MAJOR CORPORATION MILKAGE as a system wars weapon. All PS3 and 360 gamers should work in harmony and unison to NOT buy these tacked on peripherals, so these companies learn to incorporate them from the start, so the machine is bulit with them in mind and functions to it's utmost potential...or not bother at all.
Me, I've played the Wii, didn't enjoy the nunchuka motion thing, and thought the graphics were primitive to the point of laughter. I'd rather stick with my tradition controllers...And just let Sony and MS try to optimize there ergonomics, comfort and button setups each time they release a new console.
[QUOTE="killerkane246"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"] actually the ps eye is not nearly as advanced as natal..also, ms could easily add a controllerwolverine4262
They could add a controller but adding a contoller would destroy the purpose of image capture which was their original plan. I think that Natal will be more focused toward the casual audience while Sony's will be able to implement these controls in their real blockbuster titles.
I dont see why they cant use image capture AND a controller... MS themselves claimed the controller was limiting them. If they wanted a controller, they would have included it in the demo. They didnt and they made it clear the controller is YOU. Ironically enough, a lack of controller is the clear limitationPlease Log In to post.
Log in to comment