MW2 PS3 runs and looks better than PC version? Looks like another case of lazy..

PC dev's.

But how can you blame them? Why put effort into the PC version when it won't even sell?

i believe the original source is from the playstation.com forum so ofcourse they will say the ps3 version will look better than the pc:|

Wow you're topics are just getting worse.

Do you honestly think this to be true?

Wow you're topics are just getting worse.

Do you honestly think this to be true?

lundy86_4

Its just how the trend has always been. You have to be in denial to not think its true...

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Wow you're topics are just getting worse.

Do you honestly think this to be true?

Emaldon117

Its just how the trend has always been. You have to be in denial to not think its true...

Ahhh that PC titles are lower in quality to console titles? Oh wait! It's the other way round.

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Wow you're topics are just getting worse.

Do you honestly think this to be true?

lundy86_4

Its just how the trend has always been. You have to be in denial to not think its true...

Ahhh that PC titles are lower in quality to console titles? Oh wait! It's the other way round.

Yes. PC has much more shovelware and much less big titles.

Lack of optimization is also a big problem for a platform with no set standards...

This isn't the 90's anymore either, PC game quality has dropped like a rock.

This isn't the 90's anymore either, PC game quality has dropped like a rock.

Emaldon117

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

This isn't the 90's anymore either, PC game quality has dropped like a rock.

big_orc

Says some site that gets paid to review. Plus most of those AA-AAA's aren't even known to gamers.

Also PC has no AAAA's while consoles do.

Quality >>>>>>>> quanitity.

[QUOTE="big_orc"][QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

This isn't the 90's anymore either, PC game quality has dropped like a rock.

Emaldon117

Says some site that gets paid to review. Plus most of those AA-AAA's aren't even known to gamers.

Also PC has no AAAA's while consoles do.

Quality >>>>>>>> quanitity.

Wow, why are you so misinformed? I guess different strokes for different folks. Doesn't make you right though.

Says some site that gets paid to review. Plus most of those AA-AAA's aren't even known to gamers.

Also PC has no AAAA's while consoles do.

Quality >>>>>>>> quanitity.

Emaldon117

First you try to discount the amount of great reviews PC gaming had got by saying that sites get paid off, then use reviews to try to show PC gaming is doing horrible. Makes sense :|

Also you don't always play AAAA, For what the PC lacks in AAAA it more than makes up for that with AA and AAA games.

Quality+Quanitiy>>>Quality.

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

[QUOTE="big_orc"] thats why pc gets the most AA and AAA exclusives every year right?lundy86_4

Says some site that gets paid to review. Plus most of those AA-AAA's aren't even known to gamers.

Also PC has no AAAA's while consoles do.

Quality >>>>>>>> quanitity.

Wow, why are you so misinformed? I guess different strokes for different folks. Doesn't make you right though.

I can't be misinformed when I'm telling you all there is to know about this.

On a side note, why do you pc guys put all your hardware in your sig? Just put the video card because thats the only relevent piece.

"

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

Says some site that gets paid to review. Plus most of those AA-AAA's aren't even known to gamers.

Also PC has no AAAA's while consoles do.

Quality >>>>>>>> quanitity.

Emaldon117

Wow, why are you so misinformed? I guess different strokes for different folks. Doesn't make you right though.

I can't be misinformed when I'm telling you all there is to know about this.

On a side note, why do you pc guys put all your hardware in your sig? Just put the video card because thats the only relevent piece.

That right there shows you how misinformed you are. "Just put the video card because thats the only relevent piece.", the GPU is not the only relevant piece. That was awesome.

I can't be misinformed when I'm telling you all there is to know about this.

On a side note, why do you pc guys put all your hardware in your sig? Just put the video card because thats the only relevent piece.

Emaldon117

No, the video card is not the only relevent piece. The RAM, and CPU are also important.

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

:lol:

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Chaos_HL21

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this. This why you don't have to upgrade as much as some poeple say.

As for Crysis though, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this.

As for, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

Ever heard of a bottleneck? No, I guess not. Also if you don't have enough RAM, doesn't matter how powerful the GPU is, that gme ain't gonna run.

Sorry to break it to you, but I don't think it's possible to be more wrong.

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this. This why you don't have to upgrade as much as some poeple say.

As for Crysis though, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this. This why you don't have to upgrade as much as some poeple say.

As for Crysis though, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]Man you don't quit do you? This thread is in bad taste even by your piss poor standards.Emaldon117

I wanna get my user level up somehow, and dropping bombs of truth in this land of the ignorant is the funnest way : D

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

RAM? Nope, its just an amount.

CPU? Not for gaming. For design and data complation, yes. But then you're on the wrong website.

Emaldon117

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this. This why you don't have to upgrade as much as some poeple say.

As for Crysis though, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

http://www.poland.us/strona,33,3816,0.html

So, why can't Crysis work on consoles?
Simple. It isn't the processor (either the 360's tri-core or PS3's cell can handle enough of the physics calculations) or the graphics unit that is holding the two most powerful consoles back: it's the RAM. Memory is a big part of what makes Crysis what it is. When you render enormous levels that are inhabited by hundreds of physics objects and are being patrolled by always-active AI, you need somewhere for all that "stuff" to be easily accessed in real-time. 1 gigabyte is the bare minimum that Crysis needs for most of its levels, and even then the game will be choppy on rigs that have the latest Intel Core i7 processor and NVIDIA GTX 295 graphics cards. 2 GB is the least that you need for the game to run at a smooth clip, almost regardless of the graphics settings that you are using.

:roll:

[QUOTE="mo0ksi"]Man you don't quit do you? This thread is in bad taste even by your piss poor standards.Emaldon117

I wanna get my user level up somehow, and dropping bombs of truth in this land of the ignorant is the funnest way : D

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

lundy86_4

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this.

As for, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

Ever heard of a bottleneck? No, I guess not. Also if you don't have enough RAM, doesn't matter how powerful the GPU is, that gme ain't gonna run.

Sorry to break it to you, but I don't think it's possible to be more wrong.

Who says I'm wrong? Not people living in the real world who actually have experience.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this.

As for, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

Emaldon117

Ever heard of a bottleneck? No, I guess not. Also if you don't have enough RAM, doesn't matter how powerful the GPU is, that gme ain't gonna run.

Sorry to break it to you, but I don't think it's possible to be more wrong.

Who says I'm wrong? Not people living in the real world who actually have experience.

I don't live in the real world? Damn so this whole 22 years has been a lie? :cry:

You are wrong, you aren't right, you aren't semi-right, you are flat out wrong. Just admit it and we can all move on.

This thread is going places. :lol:

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

Ok you have no idea what you are talking about, the amount of RAM and the CPU are as important for gaming than the GPU, and with the RAM it is one huge reason that Crysis (init curent state)could not work on consoles.

HenriH-42

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this. This why you don't have to upgrade as much as some poeple say.

As for Crysis though, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

http://www.poland.us/strona,33,3816,0.html

So, why can't Crysis work on consoles?
Simple. It isn't the processor (either the 360's tri-core or PS3's cell can handle enough of the physics calculations) or the graphics unit that is holding the two most powerful consoles back: it's the RAM. Memory is a big part of what makes Crysis what it is. When you render enormous levels that are inhabited by hundreds of physics objects and are being patrolled by always-active AI, you need somewhere for all that "stuff" to be easily accessed in real-time. 1 gigabyte is the bare minimum that Crysis needs for most of its levels, and even then the game will be choppy on rigs that have the latest Intel Core i7 processor and NVIDIA GTX 295 graphics cards. 2 GB is the least that you need for the game to run at a smooth clip, almost regardless of the graphics settings that you are using.

:roll:

Ah man I almost forgot about Poland! :o

Thanks for this link but like I said before, the console versions will just be lower resoulation. Besides its not like the A.I. or the physics are particularly impressive in the game anyway, its all just eye candy.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this.

As for, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

Emaldon117

Ever heard of a bottleneck? No, I guess not. Also if you don't have enough RAM, doesn't matter how powerful the GPU is, that gme ain't gonna run.

Sorry to break it to you, but I don't think it's possible to be more wrong.

Who says I'm wrong? Not people living in the real world who actually have experience.

dude, if you are a pc gamer then this is a very sad thread.

This thread is going places. :lol:

agentfred

If it doesn't i'd be shocked. It's actually really funny :P

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Ever heard of a bottleneck? No, I guess not. Also if you don't have enough RAM, doesn't matter how powerful the GPU is, that gme ain't gonna run.

Sorry to break it to you, but I don't think it's possible to be more wrong.

lundy86_4

Who says I'm wrong? Not people living in the real world who actually have experience.

I don't live in the real world? Damn so this whole 22 years has been a lie? :cry:

You are wrong, you aren't right, you aren't semi-right, you are flat out wrong. Just admit it and we can all move on.

I'm sorry you wasted your money on unnecessary high end parts : (

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

Who says I'm wrong? Not people living in the real world who actually have experience.

Emaldon117

I don't live in the real world? Damn so this whole 22 years has been a lie? :cry:

You are wrong, you aren't right, you aren't semi-right, you are flat out wrong. Just admit it and we can all move on.

I'm sorry you wasted your money on unnecessary high end parts : (

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

Who says I'm wrong? Not people living in the real world who actually have experience.

Emaldon117

I don't live in the real world? Damn so this whole 22 years has been a lie? :cry:

You are wrong, you aren't right, you aren't semi-right, you are flat out wrong. Just admit it and we can all move on.

I'm sorry you wasted your money on unnecessary high end parts : (

Explain to me how they are unnecessary? If you can do that, using actual facts, I will concede the point. Truth is it's impossible, because you are wrong.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

Who says I'm wrong? Not people living in the real world who actually have experience.

Emaldon117

I don't live in the real world? Damn so this whole 22 years has been a lie? :cry:

You are wrong, you aren't right, you aren't semi-right, you are flat out wrong. Just admit it and we can all move on.

I'm sorry you wasted your money on unnecessary high end parts : (

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

I don't live in the real world? Damn so this whole 22 years has been a lie? :cry:

You are wrong, you aren't right, you aren't semi-right, you are flat out wrong. Just admit it and we can all move on.

PC360Wii

I'm sorry you wasted your money on unnecessary high end parts : (

Link me to where you got that!

[QUOTE="PC360Wii"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

I'm sorry you wasted your money on unnecessary high end parts : (

Emaldon117

Link me to where you got that!

[QUOTE="HenriH-42"]

[QUOTE="Emaldon117"]

If you have a good video card, you can get away with crap RAM and CPU. Every good PC'r should know this. This why you don't have to upgrade as much as some poeple say.

As for Crysis though, its just an inefficient resource hog. Although it would easily run on consoles because the resolution would be 720p or lower.

Emaldon117

http://www.poland.us/strona,33,3816,0.html

So, why can't Crysis work on consoles?
Simple. It isn't the processor (either the 360's tri-core or PS3's cell can handle enough of the physics calculations) or the graphics unit that is holding the two most powerful consoles back: it's the RAM. Memory is a big part of what makes Crysis what it is. When you render enormous levels that are inhabited by hundreds of physics objects and are being patrolled by always-active AI, you need somewhere for all that "stuff" to be easily accessed in real-time. 1 gigabyte is the bare minimum that Crysis needs for most of its levels, and even then the game will be choppy on rigs that have the latest Intel Core i7 processor and NVIDIA GTX 295 graphics cards. 2 GB is the least that you need for the game to run at a smooth clip, almost regardless of the graphics settings that you are using.

:roll:

Ah man I almost forgot about Poland! :o

Thanks for this link but like I said before, the console versions will just be lower resoulation. Besides its not like the A.I. or the physics are particularly impressive in the game anyway, its all just eye candy.

Memory is a big part of what makes Crysis what it is. When you render enormous levels that are inhabited by hundreds of physics objects and are being patrolled by always-active AI, you need somewhere for all that "stuff" to be easily accessed in real-time. 1 gigabyte is the bare minimum that Crysis needs for most of its levels, and even then the game will be choppy on rigs that have the latest Intel Core i7 processor and NVIDIA GTX 295 graphics cards. 2 GB is the least that you need for the game to run at a smooth clip, almost regardless of the graphics settings that you are using.

Lowering the resolution sure would help :roll: Face it, consoles don't have enough RAM and CAN'T run Crysis in it's current state. So much for games only depending on the graphics card for performance.