MW3 is definetly going to have the best FPS gameplay....

and multiplayer, guaranteed......everthing that rises to the top, people want to fall down just so they can support again and hate on the next thing on top.

I have never overly enjoyed the Call of Duty gameplay(gunplay) that much -- its too cut and dry, too straight forward. I think its because of how linear Call of Duty is, so much so that it is nearly a rail game.

The best gameplay and multiplayer compared to what?

Call of Duty is so far behind the curve on so many things when compared to the games that sit at the top of the genre it's pathetic.

At this point, it looks like even Battlefield is going to have better gunplay than MW3.

and multiplayer, guaranteed......everthing that rises to the top, people want to fall down just so they can support again and hate on the next thing on top.

youngmurk911

At this point, it looks like even Battlefield is going to have better gunplay than MW3.

ActionRemix

BF3 wins graphics, and probably scale(supposedly IW 5.0 can allow for much larger maps), but gunplay? I played the BF3 alpha, there are a good number of games between BF3 and MW3 in terms of gunplay. As for what I'll be playing, I'll play BF3 simply because I have a PC that can run it at over 60 FPS on max at 1080p+ but when I'm off and my friends are playing games, I'll be playing MW3 on X360(unless the PC version is at least as good as MW2 was on PC). It's worth noting however, BF3 has full joystick support and strafing and more than half-decent controls unlike BFBC2(I hope the guys responsible for these things got fired).

Gameplay wise, MW3 is untouchable for modern military tacticool FPS, sorry, and I say this as someone who is a pure PC gamer knowing that MW3's lead platform is X360 :cry: It's a real shame they couldn't make it a PC exclusive, it would be infinitely better, but that's for a whole different discussion. Red Orchestra 2 is pretty much FPS gameplay king this year, probably even above MW3, but it's practically in a different genre(non-military, non-tacticool[unlocking tons of attachments, ground/vehicle perks, etc]).

Sorry, no. The CoD gameplay is alright but not some godly thing that alot of people make it out to be.

Sorry, no. The CoD gameplay is alright but not some godly thing that alot of people make it out to be.

turtlethetaffer

B-but...the 60 fps!

I enjoy the gameplay in COD but it's far from the best and the best MP will be BF3.

[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]

Sorry, no. The CoD gameplay is alright but not some godly thing that alot of people make it out to be.

ActionRemix

B-but...the 60 fps!

I know you be joking but seriously, graphics don't make a game. Sure, the games look good, but a game can have the greatest graphics in the world and, without gameplay to back it up, it will still suck.

You're just saying that cause it's cool to say it.

I'll give it credit for its tight controls, but just about everything else about the game is pi$$-poor. At this point I just begin to understand how it remains so popular, other than people buying into the hyped up marketing? I mean really, has there EVER been a game that gets the hype that MW gets?

Sorry, no. The CoD gameplay is alright but not some godly thing that alot of people make it out to be.

turtlethetaffer

The thing with COD is that it's a hyper competitive game, and none of its competitors are, hence why it's the only modern military FPS that has actual pro gamers that play it, with the exception of Valve games.

There's a sticky and best is a matter of opinion.