Namco Bandai or Capcom for Smash Bros. collaboration?

With the way Capcom is now, I'd prefer if they weren't included in anything.

Bamco has Klonoa, Tales, SoulCalibur, Xenosaga and other franchises that could mesh well with the SSB roster.

Excluding Devil May Cry and Megaman, what exactly does Capcom have to offer? Street Fighter characters would seem pretty awkward in SSB IMO.

I want the one with no day one DLC.

Pretty happy with Namcokhoofia_pika

doesnt namco have DBZ?Nengo_Flow

I almost forgot. :o

They have the license for DBZ and Naruto.....

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]doesnt namco have DBZ?Tikeio

I almost forgot. :o

They have the license for DBZ and Naruto.....

The day a DBZ or Naruto character makes it into Smash is the day I don't buy a Smash game for the first time.

SNK would have been the ultimate. Maybe another time.awakeningland

LOL they went bankrupt like twice already. SNK Playmore is a bottom feeder.

[QUOTE="Tikeio"]

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]doesnt namco have DBZ?DJ-Lafleur

I almost forgot. :o

They have the license for DBZ and Naruto.....

The day a DBZ or Naruto character makes it into Smash is the day I don't buy a Smash game for the first time.

[QUOTE="awakeningland"]SNK would have been the ultimate. Maybe another time.Tikeio

LOL they went bankrupt like twice already. SNK Playmore is a bottom feeder.

[QUOTE="DJ-Lafleur"]

[QUOTE="Tikeio"]

I almost forgot. :o

They have the license for DBZ and Naruto.....

darkspineslayer

The day a DBZ or Naruto character makes it into Smash is the day I don't buy a Smash game for the first time.

It wouldn't make SSB any more of a joke FG than it already is.

Still fun though.....

I don't want Capcom getting involved in just about anything; especially the new SSB.

I don't want Capcom getting involved in just about anything; especially the new SSB.

Demonjoe93

I don't want Capcom getting involved in just about anything; especially the new SSB.

Demonjoe93

I really would like to see some tales champs in their, I don't think anime champs are a bad thing either. Pit Ike Marth are all anime characters. 2 are done right 1 is a floaty annoying **** So yeah >.>

[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]

I don't want Capcom getting involved in just about anything; especially the new SSB.

5NYP3R-OO7

Because I totally don't remember you... :lol:

i'll take Namco. imagine Super Smash Bros: Capcom Edition with day 1 DLC including unlockable skins, characters, and stages

then 9 months later Ultra Smash Bros: Super Capcom Special Edition this time we fixed all the balancing issues

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]doesnt namco have DBZ?Tikeio

I almost forgot. :o

They have the license for DBZ and Naruto.....

Besides, Namco Bandai doesn't have the Naruto license for Nintendo consoles, they do Sony consoles.

I'm ok with Namco helpping out Nintendo with Smash Bros.

Smash Bros is a 2D fighter. Capcom is one of the best, if not the best 2D fighter developer. I might be wrong, but Namco has never made a 2D fighter and if they have, it's been like 15+ years and it made little to no positive impact on the fighting world. You're asking who do I want: 1) People great at the genre or 2) people with no experience or a terrible track record in the genre. Pretty easy answer imo.

[QUOTE="DJ-Lafleur"]

[QUOTE="Tikeio"]

I almost forgot. :o

They have the license for DBZ and Naruto.....

darkspineslayer

The day a DBZ or Naruto character makes it into Smash is the day I don't buy a Smash game for the first time.

*Looks at Pokemon characters in the very first Smash Bros game and each one since then*

*Laughs at idiots thinking anime characters would be a brand new thing for Smash Bros*

Smash Bros is a 2D fighter. Capcom is one of the best, if not the best 2D fighter developer. I might be wrong, but Namco has never made a 2D fighter and if they have, it's been like 15+ years and it made little to no positive impact on the fighting world. You're asking who do I want: 1) People great at the genre or 2) people with no experience or a terrible track record in the genre. Pretty easy answer imo.

[QUOTE="darkspineslayer"][QUOTE="DJ-Lafleur"]

The day a DBZ or Naruto character makes it into Smash is the day I don't buy a Smash game for the first time.

Senor_Kami

*Looks at Pokemon characters in the very first Smash Bros game and each one since then*

*Laughs at idiots thinking anime characters would be a brand new thing for Smash Bros*

capcom are better fighting developers. Should have gone with them (and use their characters for 3rd party entries too)campzor

lol

Smash Bros is a 2D fighter. Capcom is one of the best, if not the best 2D fighter developer. I might be wrong, but Namco has never made a 2D fighter and if they have, it's been like 15+ years and it made little to no positive impact on the fighting world. You're asking who do I want: 1) People great at the genre or 2) people with no experience or a terrible track record in the genre. Pretty easy answer imo.

[QUOTE="darkspineslayer"][QUOTE="DJ-Lafleur"]

The day a DBZ or Naruto character makes it into Smash is the day I don't buy a Smash game for the first time.

Senor_Kami

*Looks at Pokemon characters in the very first Smash Bros game and each one since then*

*Laughs at idiots thinking anime characters would be a brand new thing for Smash Bros*

Okay, first of all, Capcom may release a good game every once in awhile, but seriously? They brought that whole day one DLC debacle into the videogame business, and they're so large now that they don't concentrate on their games nearly as much as they used to. Seriously, what games have they made since Street Fighter 2 that have "revolutionized" anything? Atleast Soul Calibur was and still is the best Arcade Fighter available on the consoles. Oh yeah, and there's a difference between a furry critter and a spiky haired d-bag with purple hair.

[QUOTE="Tikeio"]

[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"]doesnt namco have DBZ?DJ-Lafleur

I almost forgot. :o

They have the license for DBZ and Naruto.....

The day a DBZ or Naruto character makes it into Smash is the day I don't buy a Smash game for the first time.

Yeah pretty much. I'm still steamed about this "collaboration" with Namco/Bandai. Capcom has important experience with not only the core fighting game concepts, but with online functions and connectivity. I'll take that over pretty much anything that Nam/Ban could possibly offer.

If a bunch of stupid licensed BS anime characters get into the next Smash Bros., I will not be buying it. I bought my Wii for Smash Bros., but if the next one that comes out is garbage, I will not be buying it or the next Nintendo console.

Did you guys forget that Namco did a Smash Bros. right off in 2006 for the PS2 and Gamecube called Battle Stadium D.O.N.

It was Smash Bro but with characters from Dragonball Z, One Peice, and Naruto.

capcom are better fighting developers. Should have gone with them (and use their characters for 3rd party entries too)campzor

If they did that we would have gotten a bunch of on-disc DLC and other BS Capcom likes to pull.

[QUOTE="campzor"]capcom are better fighting developers. Should have gone with them (and use their characters for 3rd party entries too)Demonjoe93

If they did that we would have gotten a bunch of on-disc DLC and other BS Capcom likes to pull.

[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]

[QUOTE="campzor"]capcom are better fighting developers. Should have gone with them (and use their characters for 3rd party entries too)thom_maytees

If they did that we would have gotten a bunch of on-disc DLC and other BS Capcom likes to pull.

I still don't trust Capcom being involved with anything.

[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]

[QUOTE="campzor"]capcom are better fighting developers. Should have gone with them (and use their characters for 3rd party entries too)thom_maytees

If they did that we would have gotten a bunch of on-disc DLC and other BS Capcom likes to pull.

i'll take Namco. imagine Super Smash Bros: Capcom Edition with day 1 DLC including unlockable skins, characters, and stages

then 9 months later Ultra Smash Bros: Super Capcom Special Edition this time we fixed all the balancing issues

Masterx1220

I wouldn't trust Capcom.

But I do want MEGAMAN

They should do a Nintendo vs Sony Smash Bros. Mario and Nathan Drake teaming up to fight Bowser and Ganon = hell ya! Rachet and Link vs Cole Mcgrath and Pikachu!

Never will happen though, never.

They should do a Nintendo vs Sony Smash Bros. Mario and Nathan Drake teaming up to fight Bowser and Ganon = hell ya! Rachet and Link vs Cole Mcgrath and Pikachu!

Never will happen though, never.

ShadowMoses900

And it shouldn't.

Im cool with it ;)

They should do a Nintendo vs Sony Smash Bros. Mario and Nathan Drake teaming up to fight Bowser and Ganon = hell ya! Rachet and Link vs Cole Mcgrath and Pikachu!

Never will happen though, never.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

They should do a Nintendo vs Sony Smash Bros. Mario and Nathan Drake teaming up to fight Bowser and Ganon = hell ya! Rachet and Link vs Cole Mcgrath and Pikachu!

Never will happen though, never.

BrunoBRS

I think it is a good Idea Nintendo and Sony have the best first party titles in the industry IMO. Sony is getting better still not as good as Nintendo but they are getting better.

Some Sony villains are

Radec (Killzone)
Clockwerk (Sly Cooper 1; Sly 2 had Clock-La; Sly 3 had Doctor M)
Kessler (inFAMOUS)

I believe Bamco did develop a game similar to smash on PS2 witha ll their characters + snake and some other guest characters I dont remember that game name.

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

They should do a Nintendo vs Sony Smash Bros. Mario and Nathan Drake teaming up to fight Bowser and Ganon = hell ya! Rachet and Link vs Cole Mcgrath and Pikachu!

Never will happen though, never.

Nintendo_Ownes7

I think it is a good Idea Nintendo and Sony have the best first party titles in the industry IMO. Sony is getting better still not as good as Nintendo but they are getting better.

Some Sony villains are

Radec (Killzone)
Clockwerk (Sly Cooper 1; Sly 2 had Clock-La; Sly 3 had Doctor M)
Kessler (inFAMOUS)

LOL Capcom. I'd keep them far away from any franchise you don't milked and ran into the ground. They are the Japanese EA.

Okay, first of all, Capcom may release a good game every once in awhile, but seriously? They brought that whole day one DLC debacle into the videogame business, and they're so large now that they don't concentrate on their games nearly as much as they used to. Seriously, what games have they made since Street Fighter 2 that have "revolutionized" anything? Atleast Soul Calibur was and still is the best Arcade Fighter available on the consoles. Oh yeah, and there's a difference between a furry critter and a spiky haired d-bag with purple hair.

conkertheking1

Who do I want, the guys making great 2D fighters making a 2D fighters or guys with little to no experience in 2D fighters who made a bunch of mediocre 3D fighter for the past decade or so trying to make a 2D fighter? I rather locked DLC in a good game than unlocked content in a mediocre one. A mediocre game is one I'm not interested in no matter how much unlocked content is there. It should also be mentioned that what... 1 out of like 300 Capcom games have had locked content? Let's not spin like it's actually 299/300.

As for the last part, someone said anime characters would ruin Smash Bros. Anime characters have been in it since day one. What is the difference between an anime character and an anime character? Do the like 500+ Pokemon anime episodes and like 8+ anime movies somehow not count as anime? Does Pikachu's few hundred hours of anime appearances not count?