Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.asdasd
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree.
Looks the same, but there are some differences in contrast (which can be adjusted on your display.) Overall, it's nothing worth arguing over. Cool remix though, who does it?
[QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.Heith
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cables
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.
[QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.ChopperDave1
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cablesDunno
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.Felous1
It seems like you were focusing entirely on the PS3 version. They're virtually identical, you just have to look both ways.
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.Felous1
Wow you're right! Damn Sony's been lying to me all along. I can't believe I was so blind.
[QUOTE="Felous1"]Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.KeyWii
It seems like you were focusing entirely on the PS3 version. They're virtually identical, you just have to look both ways.
i think he used a microscope to find those diffrents, cause i didn't noticed any differents.
Everyone who is saying that the basket doesn't look any diffrent, yeah it's barely noticable, but the palm tree at the beginning of the video is easily distinguishable between the two..
[QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.ChopperDave1
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cables is that a joke ?
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.Felous1
theres more jaggies on the 360 one especially on the tree the other guy mentioned, the blur-effect makes it look nicer gets rid of teh jaggies.
They look bout the same, which is bad if the target version is the 360. The PS3 is strong enough to pull off similar graphics as the target, lets see if 360 can do the same when PS3 is the target.
[QUOTE="ChopperDave1"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.Me-Ur-Daddy
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cables is that a joke ?
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.Felous1
theres more jaggies on the 360 one especially on the tree the other guy mentioned, the blur-effect makes it look nicer gets rid of teh jaggies.This is definetly untrue.. it's because the tree is rendered without anti-aliasing on the PS3's backboard and tree that causes jaggies, which are NOT there on the 360 version.. I think the jaggies you are seeing are the actual tree leaves.. which are .. suppose .. to be there..
[QUOTE="ChopperDave1"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.Me-Ur-Daddy
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cables is that a joke ? nope
The ONE obvious difference I saw between the two, that you'd need to have both running side by side to notice was just the palm tree was blurrier on the PS3. Slightly, that was it.
[QUOTE="pminooei"]i think he used a microscope to find those diffrents, cause i didn't noticed any differents.
Felous1
Pay attention when it starts. You can clearly see the jaggies on the backboard. (PS3) I can see jaggies on the 360 version too. You obviously aren't looking enough on that version. *Shocked*
The ONE obvious difference I saw between the two, that you'd need to have both running side by side to notice was just the palm tree was blurrier on the PS3. Slightly, that was it. -Pale
I disagree. Everything on the PS3 version is more blurry, not just the tree. The 360 version is definitely sharper...
[QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="ChopperDave1"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.Heith
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cables is that a joke ?
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.Felous1
theres more jaggies on the 360 one especially on the tree the other guy mentioned, the blur-effect makes it look nicer gets rid of teh jaggies. This is definetly untrue.. it's because the tree is rendered without anti-aliasing on the PS3's backboard and tree that causes jaggies, which are NOT there on the 360 version.. I think the jaggies you are seeing are the actual tree leaves.. which are .. suppose .. to be there.. i just wanna let you know i am simply not paying attention to you because big fonts dont make you more important, fix ur post and maybe we'll take you more serious. i dont read big fonts they give me and many other people on here headaches
[QUOTE="-Pale"]The ONE obvious difference I saw between the two, that you'd need to have both running side by side to notice was just the palm tree was blurrier on the PS3. Slightly, that was it. -GeordiLaForge-
I disagree. Everything on the PS3 version is more blurry, not just the tree. The 360 version is definitely sharper... Actually, yeah it is.
[QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="ChopperDave1"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.Me-Ur-Daddy
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cables is that a joke ?
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.Felous1
theres more jaggies on the 360 one especially on the tree the other guy mentioned, the blur-effect makes it look nicer gets rid of teh jaggies. This is definetly untrue.. it's because the tree is rendered without anti-aliasing on the PS3's backboard and tree that causes jaggies, which are NOT there on the 360 version.. I think the jaggies you are seeing are the actual tree leaves.. which are .. suppose .. to be there.. i just wanna let you know i am simply not paying attention to you because big fonts dont make you more important, fix ur post and maybe we'll take you more serious. i dont read big fonts they give me and many other people on here headachesexplaining logic to you gives me headaches..
[QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="-Pale"]I can see jaggies on the 360 version too. You obviously aren't looking enough on that version. *Shocked*-Pale
Tell me what minute and second. I'm using quicktime ffs. WMV ftl. There's no way in hell that anyone will see a difference in person. We don't even know if they were using HDMI cables for the PS3 version which would make it look a little bit different compared to the 360 version which does not include HDMI support. Both games look pretty much identical except one is darker and one is a tad brighter. Big whup!
On first glance it looks like the PS3 version is using that lower quality HDR again. The range is narrower again so the lighting is more uniform and less natures.
The 360 version definitely has better lighting, darks are darker, brights are brighter and the blends between light and dark are butter smooth. The 360 version looking "darker" as people are saying is a result of the higher contrast between what is being lit and what is shadowed, which is far more natural.
Video quality is too low to point out any other differences in my opinion.
[QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="Me-Ur-Daddy"][QUOTE="ChopperDave1"][QUOTE="Heith"][QUOTE="asdasd"]Only difference I see is that the 360 version is a bit darker than the PS3 version. No big deal though.Heith
That "darker" effect that you see is actually a sharper color contrast. PS3's version also looked to be using a barely perceptible motion blur effect on moving objects, a hallmark of PS2 games versus their counterparts due to inferior hardware ala GTA series.
The best way to tell the diffrence is at the beginning, watch the tree. Were they using a HDMI cable for the PS3? There have been reports of richer colors using componant cables than with HDMI cables is that a joke ?
Watch carefully at the beginning. You will see that the backboard/basket looks really unclear and jagged compared to the 360. From there, only thing I could really notice was the color, and there was one dunk animation on the PS3 that was really choppy.Felous1
theres more jaggies on the 360 one especially on the tree the other guy mentioned, the blur-effect makes it look nicer gets rid of teh jaggies. This is definetly untrue.. it's because the tree is rendered without anti-aliasing on the PS3's backboard and tree that causes jaggies, which are NOT there on the 360 version.. I think the jaggies you are seeing are the actual tree leaves.. which are .. suppose .. to be there.. i just wanna let you know i am simply not paying attention to you because big fonts dont make you more important, fix ur post and maybe we'll take you more serious. i dont read big fonts they give me and many other people on here headachesexplaining logic to you gives me headaches.. "This is definetly untrue.. it's because the tree is rendered without anti-aliasing on the PS3's backboard and tree that causes jaggies, which are NOT there on the 360 version.. I think the jaggies you are seeing are the actual tree leaves.. which are .. suppose .. to be there.." you call that logic ? it doesnt even make sense as a legible sentence, and the tree is full of jaggies buddy you need to watch it again.
[QUOTE="-Pale"][QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="-Pale"]I can see jaggies on the 360 version too. You obviously aren't looking enough on that version. *Shocked*DaddyDC650
Tell me what minute and second. I'm using quicktime ffs. WMV ftl. There's no way in hell that anyone will see a difference in person. We don't even know if they were using HDMI cables for the PS3 version which would make it look a little bit different compared to the 360 version which does not include HDMI support. Both games look pretty much identical except one is darker and one is a tad brighter. Big whup! exactly right, the lems are tryin to say "ooh teh jaggies on teh backboardz, 360 wins LAWL, 360 has absolutely no jaggies its teh jaggie free machinez !111!"
i don'tlike basketball games, but somehow this one grabs my attention. i like it!!! And the video is compressed, but i can't tell much difference.. not form a compressed video.
The 360 version looks darker and the colours are slightly richer looking and the PS3 version looks a bit washed out. Although the difference isnt that big.
Just two different graphical filters, Playstation always had a more drawn look, while Xbox always goes for the more shiney plastic look (I don't want to offend any-one, I know a lot of people who prefer the first and a lot who prefer the second)
Just two different graphical filters, Playstation always had a more drawn look, while Xbox always goes for the more shiney plastic look (I don't want to offend any-one, I know a lot of people who prefer the first and a lot who prefer the second)animation_imp
The lighting looks a little bit stronger on the Xbox 360 and mabye a little bit better texture's but idk, its kinda hard to compair them when they are moving in diffrent spots and stuff. Overall if you played one then played the other you wouldnt be able to tell, only if you sit it side by side and play them I think is the only way to tell.
Log in to comment