Never in my life did I think....

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DrPepper1998
DrPepper1998

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DrPepper1998
Member since 2006 • 374 Posts

....That after getting a 4.8 on the Xbox360 (IGN), Sonic would sink to a 4.2 on the almighty Ps3 console. I mean, I could be wrong, but I'm going to take a wild guess and say Happy Feet got a better score than that.Feeling proud that I dodged that bullet as a Wii user, I took a test run on the Ps3 version at Gamestop this weekend.

I didn't have to play for 10 seconds to realize why this game got such a pitiful score. The graphics were suffering from what I call Next-Genism (When developers make the graphics glossy and shiney but fail to make them crisp). Back to my first point, I started the level and sittig in front of me was a pile of boxes. What the hell? Isn't the point of Sonic games to go fast? How in the name of Christ am I supposed to go fast if there's a pile of boxes every 3 seconds? The level was slow, painful, and unimpressive. I can't believe how far Sonic has fallen, and I'd love to say Sonic and The Secret Rings will be good, but I won't get my hopes up, thank god it has its own team working on the game. The last Sonic game I enjoyed was the side scrolling "Sonic Rush" for the NDS, it was 2D, and blazing fast, the way the series should be.

Avatar image for Imallvol7
Imallvol7

7566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Imallvol7
Member since 2003 • 7566 Posts
i would be happy to see a good sonic game. I miss my genesis!
Avatar image for DrPepper1998
DrPepper1998

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DrPepper1998
Member since 2006 • 374 Posts
Bump
Avatar image for 16bitkevin
16bitkevin

3962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 16bitkevin
Member since 2005 • 3962 Posts
Lol, yeah I felt the same way after playing Sonic 360.
Avatar image for DrPepper1998
DrPepper1998

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DrPepper1998
Member since 2006 • 374 Posts
Bump
Avatar image for Ptolemaueus
Ptolemaueus

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 Ptolemaueus
Member since 2006 • 947 Posts

....That after getting a 4.8 on the Xbox360 (IGN), Sonic would sink to a 4.2 on the almighty Ps3 console. I mean, I could be wrong, but I'm going to take a wild guess and say Happy Feet got a better score than that.Feeling proud that I dodged that bullet as a Wii user, I took a test run on the Ps3 version at Gamestop this weekend.

I didn't have to play for 10 seconds to realize why this game got such a pitiful score. The graphics were suffering from what I call Next-Genism (When developers make the graphics glossy and shiney but fail to make them crisp). Back to my first point, I started the level and sittig in front of me was a pile of boxes. What the hell? Isn't the point of Sonic games to go fast? How in the name of Christ am I supposed to go fast if there's a pile of boxes every 3 seconds? The level was slow, painful, and unimpressive. I can't believe how far Sonic has fallen, and I'd love to say Sonic and The Secret Rings will be good, but I won't get my hopes up, thank god it has its own team working on the game. The last Sonic game I enjoyed was the side scrolling "Sonic Rush" for the NDS, it was 2D, and blazing fast, the way the series should be.

DrPepper1998

I have faith in Secret Rings.  The whole point of that game is to go blazing fast, which is why it's on rails, no crappy secondary characters or stupid camera included.

Avatar image for Pokemon266
Pokemon266

369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Pokemon266
Member since 2009 • 369 Posts

so sad :(