-
-
-
-
-
-
----
LINK
Looks pretty good. I'd rather hear more about the gameplay though. x_x The first was pretty repetitive. Sorry if old!!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
-
-
-
-
-
-
----
LINK
Looks pretty good. I'd rather hear more about the gameplay though. x_x The first was pretty repetitive. Sorry if old!!
Those are crappy bullshots then because they have jaggies.those are bullshots. AC2 has the same graphics as the first
Revolution316
Ew. AC2 doesn't look nice...aaronmullan:\ It has that fuzzy and washed out look the first one had which I really hate.
assasins creed had a very underrated graphics.. too bad the game breaks with its repetitive gameplay.
Yes those are bullshots but AC2 does look a lot better than the first title.those are bullshots. AC2 has the same graphics as the first
Revolution316
Looks really good.
I've actually been on this bridge (and the white one with arches as well:
killab2oo5
Seening it in-game will be interesting.
I see jaggies on the buildings, definitely that last pic.:|a couple of them are paintings..[QUOTE="Revolution316"]
those are bullshots. AC2 has the same graphics as the first
mitu123
I see jaggies on the buildings, definitely that last pic.:|a couple of them are paintings.. Hmm, they might be incosistent, or devs are using that trick to use AA at certain times,it happens in a lot of games.[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="Revolution316"]
those are bullshots. AC2 has the same graphics as the first
Revolution316
Resident Evil 5 is a perfect example of this, using up to 4xAA sometimes and have jaggies other times.
Yeah, totally. I mean, did you see that E3 Demo of gameplay, that looked just as good as that? And bullshots are always full of jaggies... /s Anyway, you don't have to worry about it hurting your precious Uncharted 2, and it's status as Graphics King...those are bullshots. AC2 has the same graphics as the first
Revolution316
those are bullshots. AC2 has the same graphics as the first
Revolution316
Well, AC1 wasn't a bad looking game. It was just boring.
those are bullshots. AC2 has the same graphics as the first
Revolution316
but AC looks still very nice at least on SLI
AC2 it will be the new Graphics King.The graphics look amazing and better that U2.Panosola
I don't think so..
Crysis has that spot.
a couple of them are paintings.. Hmm, they might be incosistent, or devs are using that trick to use AA at certain times,it happens in a lot of games.[QUOTE="Revolution316"]
[QUOTE="mitu123"] I see jaggies on the buildings, definitely that last pic.:|
mitu123
Resident Evil 5 is a perfect example of this, using up to 4xAA sometimes and have jaggies other times.
Possibly. All of Capcoms current gen games (aside from SFIV) does that, and it's smart. These screens are noticeably compressed too which makes the edges of everything look worse.:( Apparently it's "realistic".I don't get why so many games this gen are so desaturated and fuzzy/blurry/filled with bloom.
t3hTwinky
[QUOTE="t3hTwinky"]:( Apparently it's "realistic". Its more about how they want to edit their graphics. They are going for a bleak depressing old look. I personally don't like it but again im so getting sick of seeing super vibrant colors.I don't get why so many games this gen are so desaturated and fuzzy/blurry/filled with bloom.
killab2oo5
I actually was thinking the same thing. The first screen, I was like meh graphics are alright. One time last gen I was playing video games longer then usual then I decided to take a brake and turned on the tv and surprised how the graphics in real life looks so good. Then I realized it was real life and thats why it looked so good. So im not surprised by my mistake this time around.I'm going to be honest, at first I thought the very first picture was ingame and I was thinking it looked crappy. I don't know why but the bird flying in that picture looks fake to me.
topgunmv
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment