New ARMA 3 screens. Soon to be New Graphics King?

Looks pretty nice. This probably the first person shooter I'm most excited about for this year.

People play this? The only thing I like arma for was setting up some super huge night time battles.

Will the new graphics make the game fun to play?

Those do look awfully pretty though.

Will the new graphics make the game fun to play?

Those do look awfully pretty though.

MLBknights58

Arma have always looked fantastic on picture but they've always run poorly.

Meh :P

Looking good. This is coming out in the summer, right?

too bad gameplay sucks

They've got the lighting and shaders down to be almost photorealistic.

The Arma games are fantastic, one of the few truly interesting first person shooters of the decade.

too bad gameplay sucks

wewantdoom4now

Because its not COD? Or because its not available on consoles?

ShadowDeathX

Loved Arma2, so am definately looking forward to Arma3... But am worried how my current PC will handle the game !!

Photo-realism blows,

soo bland

What tank is that, it looks like a Merkava...:?

Photo-realism blows,

soo bland

Zaibach

Yep.

Shamefully,I must admit I never played an Arma game before.But I think 3 will be my first experience with the franchise,the game looks great,and I want an good FPS that isn't some arcade and scripted 4 hours long crap...

I hope they can actually optimize the game this time. I might need a new processor though.

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

Photo-realism blows,

soo bland

MLBknights58

Yep.

Why are people just saying bland? When Forza screens, or GT screens come out everyone goes "Oooooo looks amazing! So realistic!" but a photorealistic military shooter? Nah that's bland. Your also forgetting this is a simulator, they're hardly gonna make the graphic style anything other than realistic are they?

Those screens are simply fantastic, although my 6870 might cry when I start the game...gonna need to upgrade....

Damn...

Generic fps

I like the idea of Arma, but can't stand the lack of polish. It's as though they don't want me to enjoy their games.lowe0

That's the exact reason why they've delayed ArmA 3 even longer. They want to really hit the bugs this time around.

ArmA 2 Operation Arrowhead in it's current state is very stable and doesn't have many bugs at all. However that took them sevearl years after launch to get it to that state. Good thing the engine they are using is just the same and a large part of their team has been working on the actual graphical rendering side of things to implement a lot of new and awesome features.

Generic fps

backtowar

lol, no

[QUOTE="MLBknights58"]

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

Photo-realism blows,

soo bland

II_Seraphim_II

Yep.

I agree,well said.Some games work best with more artisticly orriented visuals,while some games that are focusing on more realistic settings work best with attempting photorealism.Also,I like how Arma 3 still has plenty of colors,instead of drab and washed out grey with some ugly shade of blue that is present in most military shooter games nowdays...

Meh you cant polish a turd. games are gonna keep looking the same until the next consoles come out. Those pics look like ps vita quality.

Meh you cant polish a turd. games are gonna keep looking the same until the next consoles come out. Those pics look like ps vita quality.

slipknot0129

lolno. Not anywhere near it.

Why are people just saying bland? When Forza screens, or GT screens come out everyone goes "Oooooo looks amazing! So realistic!" but a photorealistic military shooter? Nah that's bland. Your also forgetting this is a simulator, they're hardly gonna make the graphic style anything other than realistic are they?

Those screens are simply fantastic, although my 6870 might cry when I start the game...gonna need to upgrade....

Majistrate

The problem is that there is so many grey coloured modern military shooter this gen. The graphics might look fantastic but after MW1, 2, 3, Black ops, Ama 2, Modal of Honor, BF: BC, BC2 and BF3 this game looks bland. At least Arma 3 has realistic colours.

Vanilla milkshake might be my favourite taste but I won't deny it's vey bland.

[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]

Meh you cant polish a turd. games are gonna keep looking the same until the next consoles come out. Those pics look like ps vita quality.

ChubbyGuy40

lolno. Not anywhere near it.

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]

Meh you cant polish a turd. games are gonna keep looking the same until the next consoles come out. Those pics look like ps vita quality.

slipknot0129

lolno. Not anywhere near it.

You are wrong.

[QUOTE="lowe0"]I like the idea of Arma, but can't stand the lack of polish. It's as though they don't want me to enjoy their games.Wasdie

That's the exact reason why they've delayed ArmA 3 even longer. They want to really hit the bugs this time around.

ArmA 2 Operation Arrowhead in it's current state is very stable and doesn't have many bugs at all. However that took them sevearl years after launch to get it to that state. Good thing the engine they are using is just the same and a large part of their team has been working on the actual graphical rendering side of things to implement a lot of new and awesome features.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"]I like the idea of Arma, but can't stand the lack of polish. It's as though they don't want me to enjoy their games.lowe0

That's the exact reason why they've delayed ArmA 3 even longer. They want to really hit the bugs this time around.

ArmA 2 Operation Arrowhead in it's current state is very stable and doesn't have many bugs at all. However that took them sevearl years after launch to get it to that state. Good thing the engine they are using is just the same and a large part of their team has been working on the actual graphical rendering side of things to implement a lot of new and awesome features.

They also need to work on a more realistic Ai.

[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

lolno. Not anywhere near it.

R4gn4r0k

You are wrong.

When I took a cursory glance at the first screenshot I thought it was a photo at first.

[QUOTE="R4gn4r0k"]

[QUOTE="slipknot0129"]

Thats what it look like to me.

slipknot0129

You are wrong.

You best be trolling

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

Photo-realism blows,

soo bland

MLBknights58

Yep.

[QUOTE="Majistrate"]

Why are people just saying bland? When Forza screens, or GT screens come out everyone goes "Oooooo looks amazing! So realistic!" but a photorealistic military shooter? Nah that's bland. Your also forgetting this is a simulator, they're hardly gonna make the graphic style anything other than realistic are they?

Those screens are simply fantastic, although my 6870 might cry when I start the game...gonna need to upgrade....

JLF1MarkII

The problem is that there is so many grey coloured modern military shooter this gen. The graphics might look fantastic but after MW1, 2, 3, Black ops, Ama 2, Modal of Honor, BF: BC, BC2 and BF3 this game looks bland. At least Arma 3 has realistic colours.

Vanilla milkshake might be my favourite taste but I won't deny it's vey bland.

No. It looks good tho. Too bad they aren't porting it over to the consoles for more people to enjoy it but I guess the current consoles can't handle it (also no mod support).

The environment models look great, but not so much the people. Uncharted 3 is still the current graphics king right now obviously, The Last of Us might change that though.