New Failure Rate numbers released!!!

  • 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts

Just thought everyone would love to know the new numbers. Looks as though MS is making great strides to lower they failure rate, and Nintendo continues to lead the way. Please discuss these numbers, and THESE NUMBERS ONLY.

Highlights of the study include:
-
Looking at the first 2 years of ownership, 2.7% of Wii owners reported a system failure to SquareTrade, compared with 10.0% of PlayStation 3 owners, and 23.7% for Xbox 360 owners.
-
Excluding "Red Ring of Death" failures, which are covered by Microsoft's 3-year warranty, 11.7% of Xbox 360 owners reported a failure.
-
While the RROD problem continued to be the major issue for Xbox 360s purchased through 2008, early indications point to the problem abating in 2009.
-
The most common types of problems seen with the PS3 and Xbox 360 were disc read errors and output issues. The Wii had more power and remote control issues than the other 2 systems.

As you can see, even WITH RROD, 360 stands around 24%, and excluding it (because warranty covers it) its about 12%

LINKY

Avatar image for punkrocker163
punkrocker163

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 punkrocker163
Member since 2006 • 2087 Posts
Exclude RROD? lol I still think there is no real way to ever find out these numbers.
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts
[QUOTE="punkrocker163"]Exclude RROD? lol I still think there is no real way to ever find out these numbers.

why is that funny when the gave both numbers??
Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts
The 360 numbers are way lower than what I would guess, but still unjustifiable.
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

PS3 and Xbox 360 are both too high, electronics should be trying to hitting around 5% error. These numbers seem reasonable give or take a couple % numbers.

Edit: Just to clarify, I am not saying the study's numbers are too high but as pieces of electronics they are too high.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

Good stuff. Its still embarassingly high but atleast its improving. The PS3 one is also way higher than I thought. Seems off to me but yeah, interesting numbers.

Avatar image for bronxxbombers
bronxxbombers

2840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 bronxxbombers
Member since 2009 • 2840 Posts
When was it taken?
Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
Square Trade again? Their sample size has to be a fraction of the people who own 360s....
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts
You might want to try reading the report .......
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts
You might want to try reading the report .......micky4889
Is that aimed at me?? Because im not sure i follow..................
Avatar image for punkrocker163
punkrocker163

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 punkrocker163
Member since 2006 • 2087 Posts
[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="punkrocker163"]Exclude RROD? lol I still think there is no real way to ever find out these numbers.

why is that funny when the gave both numbers??

I just find it dumb to even include the exclude part. I think these numbers are most likely wrong anyways and i dont care for them. (thats just me)
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#12 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts
[QUOTE="punkrocker163"][QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="punkrocker163"]Exclude RROD? lol I still think there is no real way to ever find out these numbers.

why is that funny when the gave both numbers??

I just find it dumb to even include the exclude part. I think these numbers are most likely wrong anyways and i dont care for them. (thats just me)

Why do you think they are wrong?
Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

Why do you think they are wrong?navyguy21
They aren't wrong, but they probably aren't accurate.

SquareTrade can only look at the consoles they cover.. Most consoles are covered by MS, Sony, and Nintendo themselves. Their sample size includes only 16,000 consoles, out of over 100,000,000 on in peoples homes right now.

Avatar image for gamefan274
gamefan274

1863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 gamefan274
Member since 2007 • 1863 Posts
23.7!? I'm calling BS! I got RROD during my first month of ownership. After asking around who DIDN'T get RROD? Its got to be atleast 35% but 40% was always my guess.
Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

Square Trade again? Their sample size has to be a fraction of the people who own 360s....Couth_

Square Trade also covers buyers from ebay and other websites.....so a lot of these consumers are buying preowned consoles which can lead to the higher deficiency rate.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

What's interesting about PS3s YLOD is BBC watchdog managed to repair all the PS3s they were given within 30 minutes, all had the same problem as well. However for Sony to repair them after warranty it costs you a 100 odd.

Clip of the show

Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="micky4889"]You might want to try reading the report .......navyguy21
Is that aimed at me?? Because im not sure i follow..................

"In a survey of SquareTrade customers with Xbox 360s conducted by email, SquareTrade found that over half of our customers who experienced a RROD error reported their problem directly to Microsoft without contacting SquareTrade. Email survey respondents tend to be a self-selecting group, so the data should be used directionally rather than definitively, particularly because we did not survey PS3 and Wii owners with the same question. With that caveat in mind, applying the survey data to the analysis shows that the Xbox 360 failure rate could be as high as 35%."

Avatar image for santoron
santoron

8584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 santoron
Member since 2006 • 8584 Posts

Interesting, for what they are worth. I suppose we'll never have extremely accurate figures, but these at least give a frame of reference when thinking about a purchase.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#20 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

So according to these numbers, the RROD only consists of 12%. So Ps3 is now 10%. That pretty much says that there should be as many ps3 failures as there are 360 ones. And we all know that is not the case.

Why is everyone still vigorously trying to perform damage control for M$? RRODs are happening left and right andyou still believe that 12% crap. And that's just RROD. Other kinds of failures constitute a whopping 24% failure rate. No electronic device on the market should have that kind of failure rate...ever.

Avatar image for Leejjohno
Leejjohno

13897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Leejjohno
Member since 2005 • 13897 Posts

Now, why would anybody in the right mind exclude the RROD? Mine wasn't replaced for free.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#22 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="micky4889"]You might want to try reading the report .......micky4889

Is that aimed at me?? Because im not sure i follow..................

"In a survey of SquareTrade customers with Xbox 360s conducted by email, SquareTrade found that over half of our customers who experienced a RROD error reported their problem directly to Microsoft without contacting SquareTrade. Email survey respondents tend to be a self-selecting group, so the data should be used directionally rather than definitively, particularly because we did not survey PS3 and Wii owners with the same question. With that caveat in mind, applying the survey data to the analysis shows that the Xbox 360 failure rate could be as high as 35%."

lol, and?? So what would be your excuse for the non-RROD numbers??
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#23 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts

Now, why would anybody in the right mind exclude the RROD? Mine wasn't replaced for free.

Leejjohno
They gave both numbers, 23.7 with, 11.7 excluding it
Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
[QUOTE="Leejjohno"]

Now, why would anybody in the right mind exclude the RROD? Mine wasn't replaced for free.

navyguy21
They gave both numbers, 23.7 with, 11.7 excluding it

And their sample size was only 16 thousand out of 100 million. No one knows the real numbers
Avatar image for todd2r
todd2r

2615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 todd2r
Member since 2009 • 2615 Posts
Any percentage over 1% is terrible. All the money we spend on these consoles, they shouldnt fail at all. Bad hardware designs and little product research equals a crappy console. I love the xbox but it was a horrible design and they knew it. They just had to beat Sony to the shelves first, they didnt care what they built. And we all fell for it. Me included.
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#26 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts
[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Leejjohno"]

Now, why would anybody in the right mind exclude the RROD? Mine wasn't replaced for free.

Couth_
They gave both numbers, 23.7 with, 11.7 excluding it

And their sample size was only 16 thousand out of 100 million. No one knows the real numbers

i agree no one knows the real numbers, but why is it that so many people (cows) gave so much weight to the gameinformer poll, yet question this one??
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

So according to these numbers, the RROD only consists of 12%. So Ps3 is now 10%. That pretty much says that there should be as many ps3 failures as there are 360 ones. And we all know that is not the case.

Why is everyone still vigorously trying to perform damage control for M$? RRODs are happening left and right andyou still believe that 12% crap. And that's just RROD. Other kinds of failures constitute a whopping 24% failure rate. No electronic device on the market should have that kind of failure rate...ever.

well to be fair there were a line of video cards from ati and nvidia for pcs that hit really high failure rates at the time, basicly its an engineering fault, one that M$ had to live with due to the nature of fixed hardware, they can't change the material being used easily without compeltly changing the performance of the chip, which to get teh same performance on that chip they'd have to completely remake. It was easy for nvidia and ati to make those cards dissapear since just made it with the new material that didn't heat and break so easily, small hit in performance. I remember reading about this a while ago, but if it really was just something easy to fix i doubt it would have gone on this long.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="Couth_"][QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Leejjohno"]

Now, why would anybody in the right mind exclude the RROD? Mine wasn't replaced for free.

They gave both numbers, 23.7 with, 11.7 excluding it

And their sample size was only 16 thousand out of 100 million. No one knows the real numbers

it might be a sample size but its still alot of consoles, its not like they did a pole and asked people if their system broke.... but for the most part, aside from the fact that they admitted that their 360's might be a little low since people sent them directly to M$, it can give you a good accurate view of things.
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="micky4889"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]Is that aimed at me?? Because im not sure i follow..................navyguy21

"In a survey of SquareTrade customers with Xbox 360s conducted by email, SquareTrade found that over half of our customers who experienced a RROD error reported their problem directly to Microsoft without contacting SquareTrade. Email survey respondents tend to be a self-selecting group, so the data should be used directionally rather than definitively, particularly because we did not survey PS3 and Wii owners with the same question. With that caveat in mind, applying the survey data to the analysis shows that the Xbox 360 failure rate could be as high as 35%."

lol, and?? So what would be your excuse for the non-RROD numbers??

Not only is the sample size extremely small (something heavily criticised about the game informer poll) but it still shows the 360 to be more faulty then the PS3 even excluding the 360's biggest problem, that's laughable.

A failure is a failure, period. I wonder what the PS3's failure is if we start to deduct things off ??

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts

[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

"In a survey of SquareTrade customers with Xbox 360s conducted by email, SquareTrade found that over half of our customers who experienced a RROD error reported their problem directly to Microsoft without contacting SquareTrade. Email survey respondents tend to be a self-selecting group, so the data should be used directionally rather than definitively, particularly because we did not survey PS3 and Wii owners with the same question. With that caveat in mind, applying the survey data to the analysis shows that the Xbox 360 failure rate could be as high as 35%."

micky4889

lol, and?? So what would be your excuse for the non-RROD numbers??

Not only is the sample size extremely small (something heavily criticised about the game informer poll) but it still shows the 360 to be more faulty then the PS3 even excluding the 360's biggest problem, that's laughable.

A failure is a failure, period. I wonder what the PS3's failure is if we start to deduct things off ??

Ok dude, "go trey brotherhood" right :roll:
Avatar image for Synthz
Synthz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Synthz
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Systems shouldn't be failing full stop. We pay good money for these things and to have them break down is just disappointing. Although I'm not surprised with Microsoft getting the higher numbers ( Including the RROD ), It was a rushed system in an attempt to beat the competitors a year early, If Microsoft had taken their time with it then the figures could have been lower and now Microsoft's got bad rep with customers who want to buy an Xbox 360 since they're paranoid that It will break on them. Although on Sony's part thats pretty damn ridiculous considering most people forked out alot of money on those things and It had more time in development, my 40GB PS3 wouldn't ready any type of disks anymore which was a letdown considering I spent $700 ( AUD ) on it, so I switched over to the Xbox 360 since I could just easily swap it over and not pay for anything and so far its going fine, great to hear that Microsoft is starting to get around from the failures but in the process It's caused them alot of hassle from something that shouldn't have been there in the first place.
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts
[QUOTE="micky4889"]

[QUOTE="navyguy21"]lol, and?? So what would be your excuse for the non-RROD numbers??navyguy21

Not only is the sample size extremely small (something heavily criticised about the game informer poll) but it still shows the 360 to be more faulty then the PS3 even excluding the 360's biggest problem, that's laughable.

A failure is a failure, period. I wonder what the PS3's failure is if we start to deduct things off ??

Ok dude, "go trey brotherhood" right :roll:

Ah i see anyone who disagrees with you must be part of the " trey brotherhood" nice attempt at trolling there bro.
Avatar image for LemmingReborn
LemmingReborn

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LemmingReborn
Member since 2009 • 37 Posts
[QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Couth_"][QUOTE="navyguy21"] They gave both numbers, 23.7 with, 11.7 excluding it

And their sample size was only 16 thousand out of 100 million. No one knows the real numbers

i agree no one knows the real numbers, but why is it that so many people (cows) gave so much weight to the gameinformer poll, yet question this one??

because their cows
Avatar image for 110million
110million

14910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 110million
Member since 2008 • 14910 Posts
Was expecting 100%. :( Nah, I've been RROD-free with my 360. :D
Avatar image for TheCoreGamer_
TheCoreGamer_

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 TheCoreGamer_
Member since 2009 • 767 Posts
Exclude RROD? lol I still think there is no real way to ever find out these numbers.punkrocker163
exactly how would they keep track of everyones system. i mean some ppl throw it out, ALOT of ppl exchange, alot of different stories so i just find it VERY HARD TO BELIEVE its ONLY 23.7%. plz. every single person i know so far has got RROD so i just dont know how to believe this.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

FALSE! BOOO game informer was the gospel truth! boo!!

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#37 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17914 Posts

FALSE! BOOO game informer was the gospel truth! boo!!

WilliamRLBaker
lol, it seems as if thats the way it goes lol..................at least with cows anyway lol, look above your post :P
Avatar image for guardofdead
guardofdead

284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 guardofdead
Member since 2008 • 284 Posts
[QUOTE="LemmingReborn"][QUOTE="navyguy21"][QUOTE="Couth_"] And their sample size was only 16 thousand out of 100 million. No one knows the real numbers

i agree no one knows the real numbers, but why is it that so many people (cows) gave so much weight to the gameinformer poll, yet question this one??

because their cows

no. i do believe they are people. :)
Avatar image for real45
real45

548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 real45
Member since 2006 • 548 Posts

So dont matter which console I buy wii ps3 xbox360. and xbox 360 is twice as high as ps3 failure rate.

Avatar image for Meltedweasel
Meltedweasel

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Meltedweasel
Member since 2009 • 489 Posts
A little too late MS. WAAAAAAAAAYYYY too late actually. The damage has already been done.
Avatar image for TehSonofUgly
TehSonofUgly

1643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 TehSonofUgly
Member since 2008 • 1643 Posts

I still think there is no real way to ever find out these numbers.punkrocker163
There isn't.

I will say that I only know 1 person IRL whos 360 hasen't RRODed (out of atleast 10, excluding both of mine that have RRODed)

And that none of my friends' ps3 (albiet only 2 of my friends have ps3s) have had issued (although mine has)

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#42 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

So according to these numbers, the RROD only consists of 12%. So Ps3 is now 10%. That pretty much says that there should be as many ps3 failures as there are 360 ones. And we all know that is not the case.

Why is everyone still vigorously trying to perform damage control for M$? RRODs are happening left and right andyou still believe that 12% crap. And that's just RROD. Other kinds of failures constitute a whopping 24% failure rate. No electronic device on the market should have that kind of failure rate...ever.

savagetwinkie

well to be fair there were a line of video cards from ati and nvidia for pcs that hit really high failure rates at the time, basicly its an engineering fault, one that M$ had to live with due to the nature of fixed hardware, they can't change the material being used easily without compeltly changing the performance of the chip, which to get teh same performance on that chip they'd have to completely remake. It was easy for nvidia and ati to make those cards dissapear since just made it with the new material that didn't heat and break so easily, small hit in performance. I remember reading about this a while ago, but if it really was just something easy to fix i doubt it would have gone on this long.

More damage control I see. How bout this....Microsoft rushed out their console out of negligence of that which you just mentioned. If the failure of the GPU was as you say inevitable due to its fundamental design flaws, then surely Microsoft's QC and testing team would have picked it up.

There are only 3 possibilities:

1. Microsoft discovered the problem and swept it under the carpet
2. Microsoft didn't do enough testing, or a long enough test
3. By some miracle, all the tested 360 just didn't break down during testing, in a way that it doesn't fall under category number 2

Which you think of the above is the case?

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#43 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
Numbers are propably a bit skewed. MS offers a free 3 year warranty that most people use, Wii and PS3 do not, so to me it would seem that Wii/PS3 owners are more likely to use their repair service than xbox owners.
Avatar image for majestix1988
majestix1988

822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 majestix1988
Member since 2006 • 822 Posts

because of its owner...its increasing...dramatically....damn too many Halo 3 Marathon or Fable Marathon or etc.....

becuae 360 are for addicted users..who play...many hours...who do not care his/her system

Avatar image for magnax1
magnax1

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#45 magnax1
Member since 2007 • 4605 Posts

I had a hard drive failure in my xbox andRROD. They didn't even cover the hard drive under the warranty, because it was an accessory. My Wii has frozen a fair amount, and is not nearly as durable as my Cube was, but its still much better than my Xbox (If it freezes in the middle of a game one more time I will go insane!)

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#46 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
24% within two years is still pretty crummy.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#47 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

because of its owner...its increasing...dramatically....damn too many Halo 3 Marathon or Fable Marathon or etc.....

becuae 360 are for addicted users..who play...many hours...who do not care his/her system

majestix1988
I have never seen someone be so out of breath that it entered into their typing. Easy on the ellipses.
Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127731 Posts
I'm surprised Ps3 numbers were that high. I knew that MS was lowering the failurate of x360 and that it actually worked. Nintendo is the only one out of those 3 with acceptable numbers in my opinion.
Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
Square Trade again? Their sample size has to be a fraction of the people who own 360s....Couth_
It's a lot larger than the 5,000 that were polled by Game Informer. Funny how a lot of people had no problem believing them, when they said the failure rate is 54%, without question. But, the same people have a problem believing an actual warranty company.