New Gears Of War screenshots (PC)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts


u can find the rest here..

http://screenshots.teamxbox.com/screen/66873/Gears-of-War-PC/
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
I think that these are old, still nice too look at though.
Avatar image for groudyogre
groudyogre

1661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 groudyogre
Member since 2006 • 1661 Posts
It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!
Avatar image for M0rph0_o
M0rph0_o

305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 M0rph0_o
Member since 2007 • 305 Posts

1920x1200res, 8xAA 16xAF, KB/M

YES PLEASE

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!groudyogre
Mods are the main attraction for me. I already played the hell out of this game on the 360, but I will do the same with the PC.
Avatar image for SpaceDragonMan
SpaceDragonMan

1502

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SpaceDragonMan
Member since 2007 • 1502 Posts

When Gears of War 2 gets announced, I will immediately think of it as a 360/Pc game no matter what big fat mark rein says. Epic needs to stop insulting our intelligence and come right out and say Gears 2 will go to the PC.

Not that I want it for the pc, my computer couldn't run it anyways...

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts

It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!groudyogre

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?

Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!Cubs360

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:
Avatar image for ocdog45
ocdog45

9072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#9 ocdog45
Member since 2005 • 9072 Posts
i just hope there is a patch for the 360 or something to get whatever the pc is gonna get.
Avatar image for KirbyFan10101
KirbyFan10101

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KirbyFan10101
Member since 2005 • 890 Posts
[QUOTE="Cubs360"]

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!-wii60-

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:

High resolutions only increase fidelity, not the quality of the effects themselves.

Avatar image for ZanuffC
ZanuffC

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ZanuffC
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts
[QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Cubs360"]

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!KirbyFan10101

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:

High resolutions only increase fidelity, not the quality of the effects themselves.

Who cares, it makes it look better anyways, by a lot. ;)

AA and AF will only add to it, to make an overall much better looking game.

Avatar image for KirbyFan10101
KirbyFan10101

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 KirbyFan10101
Member since 2005 • 890 Posts
[QUOTE="KirbyFan10101"][QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Cubs360"]

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!ZanuffC

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:

High resolutions only increase fidelity, not the quality of the effects themselves.

Who cares, it makes it look better anyways, by a lot. ;)

AA and AF will only add to it, to make an overall much better looking game.

No, it doesn't. Running tetris in ten billion by ten billion resolution won't make the game look any better. It comes down to the quality of the textures and whatever else in the game itself.

Avatar image for ZanuffC
ZanuffC

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ZanuffC
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts
[QUOTE="ZanuffC"][QUOTE="KirbyFan10101"][QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Cubs360"]

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!KirbyFan10101

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:

High resolutions only increase fidelity, not the quality of the effects themselves.

Who cares, it makes it look better anyways, by a lot. ;)

AA and AF will only add to it, to make an overall much better looking game.

No, it doesn't. Running tetris in ten billion by ten billion resolution won't make the game look any better. It comes down to the quality of the textures and whatever else in the game itself.

Yes, because using a primitive 2D game really gets your point across.

You can run most PS1 and N64 games in larger resolutions, and that by default makes them look sharper, and if you take any game, drop the resolution but nothing else, you'd have to be blind not to notice the difference, I'm not adding any technical facts to the conversation, just the obvious stuff anyone would understand, go play any game within the last like 10 years that isn't already 2D, and look at two different resolutions (not ones within like a couple hundred of each other) and tell me theres 0 difference.

Avatar image for Meu2k7
Meu2k7

11809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Meu2k7
Member since 2007 • 11809 Posts
[QUOTE="Cubs360"]

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!-wii60-

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:

Your right, it is barely different... oh wait that was sarcastic?

Avatar image for AdolescentDon
AdolescentDon

9081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 AdolescentDon
Member since 2005 • 9081 Posts

Is this game on Live on Vista? Wonder if there will be cross platform play.

Avatar image for anshul89
anshul89

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 anshul89
Member since 2006 • 5705 Posts
[QUOTE="-wii60-"][QUOTE="Cubs360"]

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!Meu2k7

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:

Your right, it is barely different... oh wait that was sarcastic?


no that wasnt sarcastic :P
Avatar image for KirbyFan10101
KirbyFan10101

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 KirbyFan10101
Member since 2005 • 890 Posts

Yes, because using a primitive 2D game really gets your point across.

You can run most PS1 and N64 games in larger resolutions, and that by default makes them look sharper, and if you take any game, drop the resolution but nothing else, you'd have to be blind not to notice the difference, I'm not adding any technical facts to the conversation, just the obvious stuff anyone would understand, go play any game within the last like 10 years that isn't already 2D, and look at two different resolutions (not ones within like a couple hundred of each other) and tell me theres 0 difference.

ZanuffC

Whats true of tetris is true of any game, they are all simply pixels on a screen.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="Cubs360"]

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!-wii60-

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?



1920x1200 isnt a barely different :roll:

there isn't on a normal screen.... you can roll eyes all you want, but upping the resolution doesn't mean it gets double the detail..

You're exaterating.

Avatar image for ZanuffC
ZanuffC

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ZanuffC
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts
[QUOTE="ZanuffC"]

Yes, because using a primitive 2D game really gets your point across.

You can run most PS1 and N64 games in larger resolutions, and that by default makes them look sharper, and if you take any game, drop the resolution but nothing else, you'd have to be blind not to notice the difference, I'm not adding any technical facts to the conversation, just the obvious stuff anyone would understand, go play any game within the last like 10 years that isn't already 2D, and look at two different resolutions (not ones within like a couple hundred of each other) and tell me theres 0 difference.

KirbyFan10101

Whats true of tetris is true of any game, they are all simply pixels on a screen.

Thats is the shallowest way I have ever heard anyone look at something, obviously they are pixels, but the amount matters, the FACT is, if you run GeoW in 800x600, 1280x720, or 1900x1200, there will be major jumps between each resolution, and it will look significantly better.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45561 Posts

I wont ruin the ending for the Hermits as I could since those of us with 360's have played this game to death and it's so old hat but enjoy the ride; it's a great game.

Can't wait for Gears 2 on 360! ;)

Avatar image for KirbyFan10101
KirbyFan10101

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 KirbyFan10101
Member since 2005 • 890 Posts
[QUOTE="KirbyFan10101"][QUOTE="ZanuffC"]

Yes, because using a primitive 2D game really gets your point across.

You can run most PS1 and N64 games in larger resolutions, and that by default makes them look sharper, and if you take any game, drop the resolution but nothing else, you'd have to be blind not to notice the difference, I'm not adding any technical facts to the conversation, just the obvious stuff anyone would understand, go play any game within the last like 10 years that isn't already 2D, and look at two different resolutions (not ones within like a couple hundred of each other) and tell me theres 0 difference.

ZanuffC

Whats true of tetris is true of any game, they are all simply pixels on a screen.

Thats is the shallowest way I have ever heard anyone look at something, obviously they are pixels, but the amount matters, the FACT is, if you run GeoW in 800x600, 1280x720, or 1900x1200, there will be major jumps between each resolution, and it will look significantly better.

Obviously my point has going completely over your head. A game is only going to look as good as the resolutions it is designed for.

Simply spouting some random high resolution doesn't mean its going to make the game look significantly better. Whether its Tetris or Crysis the point remains.

Avatar image for ZanuffC
ZanuffC

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ZanuffC
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts
[QUOTE="ZanuffC"][QUOTE="KirbyFan10101"][QUOTE="ZanuffC"]

Yes, because using a primitive 2D game really gets your point across.

You can run most PS1 and N64 games in larger resolutions, and that by default makes them look sharper, and if you take any game, drop the resolution but nothing else, you'd have to be blind not to notice the difference, I'm not adding any technical facts to the conversation, just the obvious stuff anyone would understand, go play any game within the last like 10 years that isn't already 2D, and look at two different resolutions (not ones within like a couple hundred of each other) and tell me theres 0 difference.

KirbyFan10101

Whats true of tetris is true of any game, they are all simply pixels on a screen.

Thats is the shallowest way I have ever heard anyone look at something, obviously they are pixels, but the amount matters, the FACT is, if you run GeoW in 800x600, 1280x720, or 1900x1200, there will be major jumps between each resolution, and it will look significantly better.

Obviously my point has going completely over your head. A game is only going to look as good as the resolutions it is designed for.

Simply spouting some random high resolution doesn't mean its going to make the game look significantly better. Whether its Tetris or Crysis the point remains.

Well, thats true to a point, but I mean, I got like Half Life 2, and who knows what the highest resolution was 3 or nearly 4 years ago, but I can make it run in 1680x1050 and it looks better then in like the 1280x720 that was probably the highest it was designed for. (I'm not going to look this up, numbers aren't meant to make the point, just general idea).

Considering when GeoW is being released, it should have at least the ability to play in 1900x1200, I understand your point, but if he said like 2500x1600 or w/e the 30" resolution is, then it would be very valid, but when you mention a pretty basic resolution, it doesn't stand so strongly.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45561 Posts

I wont ruin the game for the hermits as I could since those of us with 360's have played this game to death and it's so old hat but enjoy the ride; it's a great game.

Can't wait for Gears 2 on 360! :D

PS: Oh wait you do get a new ending I think - hmm - tell me if it was worth waiting - though I would rather have it when 360 owners got it then waiting a year & the new ending will be a DL for 360. :)

Avatar image for KirbyFan10101
KirbyFan10101

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 KirbyFan10101
Member since 2005 • 890 Posts
[QUOTE="KirbyFan10101"][QUOTE="ZanuffC"][QUOTE="KirbyFan10101"][QUOTE="ZanuffC"]

Yes, because using a primitive 2D game really gets your point across.

You can run most PS1 and N64 games in larger resolutions, and that by default makes them look sharper, and if you take any game, drop the resolution but nothing else, you'd have to be blind not to notice the difference, I'm not adding any technical facts to the conversation, just the obvious stuff anyone would understand, go play any game within the last like 10 years that isn't already 2D, and look at two different resolutions (not ones within like a couple hundred of each other) and tell me theres 0 difference.

ZanuffC

Whats true of tetris is true of any game, they are all simply pixels on a screen.

Thats is the shallowest way I have ever heard anyone look at something, obviously they are pixels, but the amount matters, the FACT is, if you run GeoW in 800x600, 1280x720, or 1900x1200, there will be major jumps between each resolution, and it will look significantly better.

Obviously my point has going completely over your head. A game is only going to look as good as the resolutions it is designed for.

Simply spouting some random high resolution doesn't mean its going to make the game look significantly better. Whether its Tetris or Crysis the point remains.

Well, thats true to a point, but I mean, I got like Half Life 2, and who knows what the highest resolution was 3 or nearly 4 years ago, but I can make it run in 1680x1050 and it looks better then in like the 1280x720 that was probably the highest it was designed for. (I'm not going to look this up, numbers aren't meant to make the point, just general idea).

Considering when GeoW is being released, it should have at least the ability to play in 1900x1200, I understand your point, but if he said like 2500x1600 or w/e the 30" resolution is, then it would be very valid, but when you mention a pretty basic resolution, it doesn't stand so strongly.

The other point is that PC gamers generally sit up close, whereas consoles are more commonly played from TV's. The sitting difference makes a big difference, as does the fact that HD TV's can't do more than 1080p and reasonably priced ones sit comfortably at 720p. GeOW will look better on PC's, but that isn't just because you can slap on some insane resolution and call it a night.

Avatar image for tccavey2
tccavey2

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 tccavey2
Member since 2007 • 1559 Posts

God PC people are all about resolution and sound and Geforce tenbillion chips. So stupid...

MAN my Graphics Card and screen resolution beats yours!! GOD... PCs are so gay

Avatar image for ZanuffC
ZanuffC

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ZanuffC
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts

God PC people are all about resolution and sound and Geforce tenbillion chips. So stupid...

MAN my Graphics Card and screen resolution beats yours!! GOD... PCs are so gay

tccavey2

:lol:

I don't even know what to say, it sounds too hilarious to be a troll, but I guess I just won't say anything. :lol:

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#27 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts
This is going to be a fun game to play on my PC.
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="tccavey2"]

God PC people are all about resolution and sound and Geforce tenbillion chips. So stupid...

MAN my Graphics Card and screen resolution beats yours!! GOD... PCs are so gay

ZanuffC

:lol:

I don't even know what to say, it sounds too hilarious to be a troll, but I guess I just won't say anything. :lol:

he's right. on the first part

Avatar image for Philmon
Philmon

1454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Philmon
Member since 2003 • 1454 Posts
[QUOTE="ZanuffC"][QUOTE="tccavey2"]

God PC people are all about resolution and sound and Geforce tenbillion chips. So stupid...

MAN my Graphics Card and screen resolution beats yours!! GOD... PCs are so gay

Always-Honest

:lol:

I don't even know what to say, it sounds too hilarious to be a troll, but I guess I just won't say anything. :lol:

he's right. on the first part

To be fair 360/PS3 owners can be a lot worse, especially to Wii owners when it comes to graphics. You can garantee that any post about a Wii game or the console itself will contain at least one person who will put down the Wii because it does not support HD like the 360/PS3.

What I find funny is that this same people will complain when PC owners put down the 360/PS3 because it can not achieve the graphical or resolutions that a PC can. Oh well....

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

God PC people are all about resolution and sound and Geforce tenbillion chips. So stupid...

MAN my Graphics Card and screen resolution beats yours!! GOD... PCs are so gay

tccavey2
I think your PC likes you, I wouldn't turn my back on it.
Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

Looks noticeably better than the console version, IMO.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

Looks noticeably better than the console version, IMO.

Zeliard9
I agree. This game is looking better than ever.
Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts

Looks noticeably better than the console version, IMO.

Zeliard9

yeah nice console shot. why bother finding the worst console shot if the pc version looks clearlybetter anyway?

Avatar image for Innovazero2000
Innovazero2000

3159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 Innovazero2000
Member since 2006 • 3159 Posts

1920x1200res, 8xAA 16xAF, KB/M

YES PLEASE

M0rph0_o

lol on what planet, I'd love to see it tried on anything less then a 8800 SLI'd...

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

Looks noticeably better than the console version, IMO.

marklarmer

yeah nice console shot. why bother finding the worst console shot if it looks better anyway?

Funny thing is these maps are not on the Xbox 360. So a PS3 version maybe? Or Wii?
Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts

yeah nice console shot. why bother finding the worst console shot ifthe pc versionlooks better anyway?

marklarmer

Those pics are from the PC version.

Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts
[QUOTE="marklarmer"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

Looks noticeably better than the console version, IMO.

smokeydabear076

yeah nice console shot. why bother finding the worst console shot if it looks better anyway?

Funny thing is these maps are not on the Xbox 360. So a PS3 version maybe? Or Wii?

wait is the bottom one pc aswell?i honestly thought it was the 360 version cos it looked so bad. top one does look clearly better than 360 version though.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="marklarmer"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

Looks noticeably better than the console version, IMO.

marklarmer

yeah nice console shot. why bother finding the worst console shot if it looks better anyway?

Funny thing is these maps are not on the Xbox 360. So a PS3 version maybe? Or Wii?

wait is the bottom one pc aswell?i honestly thought it was the 360 version cos it looked so bad. top one does look clearly better than 360 version though.

They are both PC screenshots. Not every screenshot will look amazing.
Avatar image for marklarmer
marklarmer

3883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 marklarmer
Member since 2004 • 3883 Posts
[QUOTE="marklarmer"]

yeah nice console shot. why bother finding the worst console shot ifthe pc versionlooks better anyway?

Zeliard9

You've never even played Gears. Those pics are from the PC version, and anyone who's played Gears would be able to instantly tell simply because the gameplay icons are different.

last time i played gears was about 6 months ago. it was an honest mistake as i just said. the bottom one looks so bad.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="marklarmer"][QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

Looks noticeably better than the console version, IMO.

marklarmer

yeah nice console shot. why bother finding the worst console shot if it looks better anyway?

Funny thing is these maps are not on the Xbox 360. So a PS3 version maybe? Or Wii?

wait is the bottom one pc aswell?i honestly thought it was the 360 version cos it looked so bad. top one does look clearly better than 360 version though.

How does it look bad? You know there's some motion blur/depth of field going on, right? Look at how sharp the first enemy model is.

Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#42 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts
Looks about the same....but you will need a $2000 PC to run it at a high resolution.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45561 Posts
Looks about the same....but you will need a $2000 PC to run it at a high resolution.turgore
Pretty much and to think this is a OLD 360 title going to the PC !
Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts

[QUOTE="groudyogre"]It'll look a bazillion times better on pc. And MODS!!!Cubs360

There is barely a difference, What are talking about?

Here, read this. ;) http://www.shacknews.com/featuredarticle.x?id=606&page=2
Avatar image for l-_-l
l-_-l

6718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 l-_-l
Member since 2003 • 6718 Posts
Looks about the same....but you will need a $2000 PC to run it at a high resolution.turgore
Na, my $1,300 PC will kill this game. ;)