Just 2 or 3 seconds of new footage, but it's looking good:
http://www.eurogamer.pt/articles/2013-07-18-novo-video-de-infamous-second-son
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Blabadon"]7.5 incoming!handssssMcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, people
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
Mcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, people[QUOTE="handssss"][QUOTE="Blabadon"]7.5 incoming!Pikminmaniac
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
First infamous didn't deserve 9.0 at all, god knows what mcshea was thinking. Probably a fat check from SonyMcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, people[QUOTE="handssss"][QUOTE="Blabadon"]7.5 incoming!Pikminmaniac
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
In what dimension was Infamous 2 worse than 1?? 2 was much better than 1, improved in almost every area. I do think he series is a bit overrated as a whole, its a solid 8ish range, but not AAA.Mcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, people[QUOTE="handssss"][QUOTE="Blabadon"]7.5 incoming!Pikminmaniac
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
:lol:
No offense to Tom McShea but his inFamous 2 review was kinda crap. No, the game didn't deserve a 10. But his complaints were stupid. "Laughable morality system"... uhh, Tom, it's the same system as the first. You know, that game you gave a 9/10?
[QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"][QUOTE="handssss"] Mcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, peopleRR360DD
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
First infamous didn't deserve 9.0 at all, god knows what mcshea was thinking. Probably a fat check from Sony inFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life.[QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"][QUOTE="handssss"] Mcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, peoplelockjaw333
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
In what dimension was Infamous 2 worse than 1?? 2 was much better than 1, improved in almost every area. I do think he series is a bit overrated as a whole, its a solid 8ish range, but not AAA.Exactly,after giving the first one a 9,they could'nt bring themselves to give the second one a higher score even though it was a better game.:?
Also,both games have the same fade to black health system that Mcshea hated so much in the second review.
And we are supposed to take them seriously as reviewers,its a joke.:(
In what dimension was Infamous 2 worse than 1?? 2 was much better than 1, improved in almost every area. I do think he series is a bit overrated as a whole, its a solid 8ish range, but not AAA.[QUOTE="lockjaw333"][QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
OneInchMan99
Exactly,after giving the first one a 9,they could'nt bring themselves to give the second one a higher score even though it was a better game.:?
Also,both games have the same fade to black health system that Mcshea hated so much in the second review.
And we are supposed to take them seriously as reviewers,its a joke.:(
That made me laugh. I remember watching that review when it first released and said, "Ummm, that's in the original game too yet you never complained."
Honestly though, after replaying both, I don't think the original inFamous game deserves a 9/10. It's more of a respectable 8/10. Great game and one of my personal favorite series this generation but the combat isn't great, power-ups are limited (compared to the sequel), enemy AI is unbalanced (almost ate my controller on hard mode), graphics aren't great (before Sucker Punch used motion capture technology for their games, etc.
The sequel, in my opinion, fixed everything wrong with the original game. Only regret is that they removed regaining health and power by grinding on power lines and rail road tracks. That was great for a quick getaway.
As much as I didn't agree with the review, I did find that infamous was better than infamous 2. Both are amazing games though
[QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"][QUOTE="handssss"] Mcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, peoplelockjaw333
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
In what dimension was Infamous 2 worse than 1?? 2 was much better than 1, improved in almost every area. I do think he series is a bit overrated as a whole, its a solid 8ish range, but not AAA.The dimension where standards change over time? Personally, I'd give infamous 2 a 8-8.5 and Infamous 1 a 6, but that's just my opinion. Just as Tom has his.[QUOTE="OneInchMan99"]
[QUOTE="lockjaw333"] In what dimension was Infamous 2 worse than 1?? 2 was much better than 1, improved in almost every area. I do think he series is a bit overrated as a whole, its a solid 8ish range, but not AAA.DrRockso87
Exactly,after giving the first one a 9,they could'nt bring themselves to give the second one a higher score even though it was a better game.:?
Also,both games have the same fade to black health system that Mcshea hated so much in the second review.
And we are supposed to take them seriously as reviewers,its a joke.:(
That made me laugh. I remember watching that review when it first released and said, "Ummm, that's in the original game too yet you never complained."
Honestly though, after replaying both, I don't think the original inFamous game deserves a 9/10. It's more of a respectable 8/10. Great game and one of my personal favorite series this generation but the combat isn't great, power-ups are limited (compared to the sequel), enemy AI is unbalanced (almost ate my controller on hard mode), graphics aren't great (before Sucker Punch used motion capture technology for their games, etc.
The sequel, in my opinion, fixed everything wrong with the original game. Only regret is that they removed regaining health and power by grinding on power lines and rail road tracks. That was great for a quick getaway.
not to mention that there are MANY other games with color-fading screens depending on health. Uncharted does it and he reviewed 3 which came out after Infamous 2 and didn't have a problem with it again. and health in infamous hardly ever mattered because electricity (or at least metal objects that could hold it) were almost EVERYWHERE. even in the powered down areas in 2, it was still pretty easy to just quickly recharge health. just zap a mailbox a few times then just the energy back up. basic trick in both the games.[QUOTE="OneInchMan99"]
[QUOTE="lockjaw333"] In what dimension was Infamous 2 worse than 1?? 2 was much better than 1, improved in almost every area. I do think he series is a bit overrated as a whole, its a solid 8ish range, but not AAA.DrRockso87
Exactly,after giving the first one a 9,they could'nt bring themselves to give the second one a higher score even though it was a better game.:?
Also,both games have the same fade to black health system that Mcshea hated so much in the second review.
And we are supposed to take them seriously as reviewers,its a joke.:(
That made me laugh. I remember watching that review when it first released and said, "Ummm, that's in the original game too yet you never complained."
Honestly though, after replaying both, I don't think the original inFamous game deserves a 9/10. It's more of a respectable 8/10. Great game and one of my personal favorite series this generation but the combat isn't great, power-ups are limited (compared to the sequel), enemy AI is unbalanced (almost ate my controller on hard mode), graphics aren't great (before Sucker Punch used motion capture technology for their games, etc.
The sequel, in my opinion, fixed everything wrong with the original game. Only regret is that they removed regaining health and power by grinding on power lines and rail road tracks. That was great for a quick getaway.
They were both 8s in my book. I also had to lol at him complaining over a game feature that he completely neglect to mention in the review to the first game.
[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]First infamous didn't deserve 9.0 at all, god knows what mcshea was thinking. Probably a fat check from Sony inFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life. You two are crazyinFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
Blabadon
[QUOTE="Blabadon"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]First infamous didn't deserve 9.0 at all, god knows what mcshea was thinking. Probably a fat check from SonyChuteboxinFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life. You two are crazy
Im not saying it was crap (graphics were atrocious though) but certainly not an AAA game. It deserves a 7.5 more than the second one
[QUOTE="Blabadon"][QUOTE="RR360DD"]First infamous didn't deserve 9.0 at all, god knows what mcshea was thinking. Probably a fat check from SonyChuteboxinFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life. You two are crazy No, you.:P
Â
Infamous 1 was a steaming pile of excrement. Such a disappointing game, but I'm glad they fixed most of my complaints in the sequel.Â
You two are crazy No, you.:P[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Blabadon"] inFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life.MFDOOM1983
Â
Infamous 1 was a steaming pile of excrement. Such a disappointing game, but I'm glad they fixed most of my complaints in the sequel.Â
Except for better graphics, they created new complaints for me.
The game was just too easy, it offered next to no challenge at the hardest difficulty.Â
The boss fights all sucked, without exception. Infamous amazing boss fights.
The story was not really interesting. Just the twist they had in the first one was better than the entire story of the second one.
The missions were soso. Just the mission were you have to take down the blimps in infamous one was more epic than any of the missions infamous 2 had.
Obviously it's my opinion, those are not facts, so it's debatable. I still did enjoy infamous 2 and I even refinished infamous after finishing infamous 2 to compare them.Â
[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]First infamous didn't deserve 9.0 at all, god knows what mcshea was thinking. Probably a fat check from Sony inFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life. That moment when you have the perfect response, but it will get you banned....inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
Blabadon
7.5 incoming!BlabadonYou always seem to be slamming Sony games.. and yet your sig and avatar are from Gravity Rush.. a Vita exclusive.
[QUOTE="Clock-w0rk"]
Also, inFAMOUS 1 > 2.
PhazonBlazer
Is there any arguement to this?
Both have their merits. Though Infamous 1 had that better atmosphere and story. INF2 is just fun to dick around in.[QUOTE="Clock-w0rk"]
Also, inFAMOUS 1 > 2.
PhazonBlazer
Is there any arguement to this?
No need to argue something that's wrong, inFAMOUS 2 blew the first out of the water :cool:.
[QUOTE="Clock-w0rk"]
Also, inFAMOUS 1 > 2.
PhazonBlazer
Is there any argument to this?
Yh but there really shouldn't be.
[spoiler] Dammit XV :evil:Â [/spoiler]
[QUOTE="RR360DD"][QUOTE="Pikminmaniac"]First infamous didn't deserve 9.0 at all, god knows what mcshea was thinking. Probably a fat check from Sony inFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life. No more credibility left, please insert more coins.inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
Blabadon
Infamous 2 had a pretty bad story for the most part, but the combat was definitley better than 1.
PhazonBlazer
I loved the story in Infamous 2 :(
You two are crazy[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="Blabadon"] inFamous 1 was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life.RR360DD
Im not saying it was crap (graphics were atrocious though) but certainly not an AAA game. It deserves a 7.5 more than the second one
I can't believe it butÂ
I AGREE WITH THIS GUY!!
Infamous 2 >>>>> Infamous 1Â
[QUOTE="Blabadon"]7.5 incoming!Rattlesnake_8You always seem to be slamming Sony games.. and yet your sig and avatar are from Gravity Rush.. a Vita exclusive.
maybe he/she is just a playstation fan, but not fanboy or cow:? I also agree that Infamous 1 was just good not great. infamous 2 was the better game. I really hope that it will have more interaction with npcs and explorable houses in this sequel.
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]
[QUOTE="Chutebox"] You two are crazyPelon208
Im not saying it was crap (graphics were atrocious though) but certainly not an AAA game. It deserves a 7.5 more than the second one
I can't believe it butÂ
I AGREE WITH THIS GUY!!
Infamous 2 >>>>> Infamous 1Â
same here ;)
[QUOTE="Rattlesnake_8"] You always seem to be slamming Sony games.. and yet your sig and avatar are from Gravity Rush.. a Vita exclusive.BlabadonI'm in the Vita and PS3 forums helping out other users all the time, not to mention I give Sony exclusives credit where due as I give any game.
No more credibility left, please insert more coins.Mr-Kutaragihttp://psnprofiles.com/LifeSONG If you're going to get hacked Mr. Kutaragi, I suggest you give out better games in return.
you should really try out infamous2, a much better game ;)
[QUOTE="PhazonBlazer"]
Infamous 2 had a pretty bad story for the most part, but the combat was definitley better than 1.
XVision84
I loved the story in Infamous 2 :(
The ending was good, everything else was quite meh.
Mcshea vs Infamous round 3 place your bets, people[QUOTE="handssss"][QUOTE="Blabadon"]7.5 incoming!Pikminmaniac
inFAMOUS: 9/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 2: 7.5/10 Mcshea
inFAMOUS 3: ?
I'd love Mcshea to review it and applaud the regen health system in the third game. That would make my day.
According to logic, it'll end up 6/10. But since it's McShea, who knows.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment