NEW! Medal of Honor Warfigther Multiplayer Trailer.

Just released a few minutes ago...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1chLNTEUuVI&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fl.php%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fbit.ly%252FMVUg6n%26h%3D6AQHgZ8aMAQGBiY-mfnNnhWfPGkMkGC0Yzkp1jsghWVYeUw

Looks alright. Looks like it is more closed down than Battlefield 3. Me thinking a 32 player cap on PC, 24 player on Consoles.

Aside from the graphics (which are amazing) the game looks like your derivative military FPS. Nothing to really set it apart. Other games do the same thing and probably do it better.

Looks okay. Doesn't appear to be something I'll play for hours on end.

Looks okay. Doesn't appear to be something I'll play for hours on end.

The_Capitalist

basically they took the maps from bf2MC on the xbox and ps2 and then ported them to frostbite 3, added destructible environments and then tossed in some cool new toys to make satisfying bang noises everytime you push the fire button.

XD

Looks okay. Doesn't appear to be something I'll play for hours on end.

The_Capitalist

Agreed I would just rent it.

Aside from the graphics (which are amazing) the game looks like your derivative military FPS. Nothing to really set it apart. Other games do the same thing and probably do it better.

Wasdie

Yeah,I can agree with that,would say the same...

Looks good but a little too similar to Battlefield 3. Maybe if they slowed downed the gameplay a bit.AcidSoldner

Yuck, looks like a CQ BF3 which was awful

Meh! this will be a good purchase at $9 ( just like the first MoH )

At least the graphics are better than BF3!

Might be something I buy down the road, but that looks like nothing different.

Looking at this, I REALLY want jungles in BF3. But maybe Bad Company 3 will do it =)

amazing graphics in a sh***y concept.

WUB WUB WUB GAME OF THE YEAR WUB WUB WUB SO ORIGINAL WUB WUB WUB INNUVASHON WUB WUB WUB

Looks like Bad Company 2, which is a good thing!

I love how the MoH 2010 kids think they're hardcore veteran gamers in the Youtube comments. "durrr MoH came before CoDz huurrrrr"Jebus213

more unconnected action imagrey slammed in your face, with no idea of how great the teamplay is, or if you're even going to be able to live for five seconds before getting killed yourself by those fancy explosive turret guns, air strikes, and grenade launchers in all those sweet chokepoints.

if it doesn't at least have more cIasses than BF3, how will complement a shooter's collection? BF3 has operation metro and CQ maps for this type of playstyle.

Aside from the graphics (which are amazing) the game looks like your derivative military FPS. Nothing to really set it apart. Other games do the same thing and probably do it better.

Wasdie

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Aside from the graphics (which are amazing) the game looks like your derivative military FPS. Nothing to really set it apart. Other games do the same thing and probably do it better.

metal_zombie

Well aside from the terrible bottle necking in the multiplayer and the campaign that felt completely uninspired and lacked the fun of CoD campaigns, pretty much ever CoD game was more fun than Medal of Honor, Battlefield Bad Company 1 and 2 had better multiplayer and single player as well.

Medal of Honor in 2010 was an attempt at making CoD more believable. However the fun with CoD lies in the super-solider status of your character, the crazy and over-the-top set pieces, and some rather diverse multiplayer with a lot of modes and distractions. Medal Of Honor had none of that. I was completely disappointed in the extremely lackluster campaign and the horrid multiplayer.

You can tell the thing was put together by two studios, one being very inexperianced, extremely quickly to make EA a profit.

[QUOTE="metal_zombie"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Aside from the graphics (which are amazing) the game looks like your derivative military FPS. Nothing to really set it apart. Other games do the same thing and probably do it better.

Wasdie

Well aside from the terrible bottle necking in the multiplayer and the campaign that felt completely uninspired and lacked the fun of CoD campaigns, pretty much ever CoD game was more fun than Medal of Honor, Battlefield Bad Company 1 and 2 had better multiplayer and single player as well.

Medal of Honor in 2010 was an attempt at making CoD more believable. However the fun with CoD lies in the super-solider status of your character, the crazy and over-the-top set pieces, and some rather diverse multiplayer with a lot of modes and distractions. Medal Of Honor had none of that. I was completely disappointed in the extremely lackluster campaign and the horrid multiplayer.

You can tell the thing was put together by two studios, one being very inexperianced, extremely quickly to make EA a profit.

two different "main" menus seperated by a loading screen pretty much sums it up.

Visually, very impressive. My first impression is the HUD is much better than BF3. Beyond that though I wish they would let a trailer be a trailer without having to make it a montage of action clips and critics' praise flashing across the screen. Mildly intrigued, hopefully the maps are similar in size to the likes of BF3 or Tribes.

Looked about as I expected it would. The visuals were fantastic, but the gameplay was something we have all seen countless times before. Not saying that it wont be fun to mess around with for a while (like the last one), but in the long run it will do nothing to encourage people to leave established multiplayer experiences like Call of Duty and Battlefield.

I still wish they slowed it down a bit, and focused more on the Combat Mission gametype from the last game. Maybe it's just me, but I really enjoyed the concept of varied, objective based scenarios instead of just typical deathmatch and capture the flag. If they molded the game around that, and varied the scenarios and objectives up a bit, I'd spend a lot of time with it.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="metal_zombie"] I really liked moh so was wondering what games are betterMordred19

Well aside from the terrible bottle necking in the multiplayer and the campaign that felt completely uninspired and lacked the fun of CoD campaigns, pretty much ever CoD game was more fun than Medal of Honor, Battlefield Bad Company 1 and 2 had better multiplayer and single player as well.

Medal of Honor in 2010 was an attempt at making CoD more believable. However the fun with CoD lies in the super-solider status of your character, the crazy and over-the-top set pieces, and some rather diverse multiplayer with a lot of modes and distractions. Medal Of Honor had none of that. I was completely disappointed in the extremely lackluster campaign and the horrid multiplayer.

You can tell the thing was put together by two studios, one being very inexperianced, extremely quickly to make EA a profit.

two different "main" menus seperated by a loading screen pretty much sums it up.