http://www.gametrailers.com/video/bad-day-red-steel-2/61987
looks great! I love the art
So whats the hype for ths one?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/bad-day-red-steel-2/61987
looks great! I love the art
So whats the hype for ths one?
Great trailer, but the game itself doesn't look all that great, imo. Here's the first 10 minutes,and for comparison, here's what was shown at E3.
im not sure what you were expecting it to look like lol.Great trailer, but the game itself doesn't look all that great, imo. Here's the first 10 minutes,and for comparison, here's what was shown at E3.
windsquid9000
Every bit of actual gameplay I've seen from this game has looked weak and uninspired. Seems to me like just one more case of Ubisoft promoting style over substance, and "cool ****" over quality gameplay.
But hey, you guys feel free to trust them. I, for one, am finished with Ubisoft entirely.
assassins creed 2 was good so they may be able to make at least one more good gameEvery bit of actual gameplay I've seen from this game has looked weak and uninspired. Seems to me like just one more case of Ubisoft promoting style over substance, and "cool ****" over quality gameplay.
But hey, you guys feel free to trust them. I, for one, am finished with Ubisoft entirely.
jethrovegas
[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]im not sure what you were expecting it to look like lol.More like what was shown at E3. I don't like the changes.Great trailer, but the game itself doesn't look all that great, imo. Here's the first 10 minutes,and for comparison, here's what was shown at E3.
toast_burner
Why are people hyping this game? Red Steel 1 got horrible reviews Not even a A.. 5..5 on Game Spot and 6.5 average.Shielder7
Why are people hyping this game? Red Steel 1 got horrible reviews Not even a A.. 5..5 on Game Spot and 6.5 average.Shielder7Because the 1st installment was lousy doesnt mean the 2nd will be. Best example is Killzone 2. Killzone 1 was suppose to suck but #2 got alot of praise.
[QUOTE="Shielder7"]Why are people hyping this game? Red Steel 1 got horrible reviews Not even a A.. 5..5 on Game Spot and 6.5 average.Dibdibdobdobo
Why are people hyping this game? Red Steel 1 got horrible reviews Not even a A.. 5..5 on Game Spot and 6.5 average.Shielder7Because the 1st installment was lousy doesnt mean the 2nd will be. Best example is Killzone 2. Killzone 1 was suppose to suck but #2 got alot of praise.
beat me too it and i thought KZ1 was a playable enjoyable yet forgettable experience much like Red Steel 1.Good but not good enough and overhyped but still fun to play for a weekend if you pick em up on thecheap.
Looks good graphically, still iffy on the gameplay. I'll just wait til reviews are out and what not. Red Steel wasn't as bad, imo, of how everyone portrayed it, but I bought it brand new, the anger still lingers in me.
But I think Nintendo should head in the direction of this game graphically for the next zelda game. I think this looks better than TP and me enjoying windwaker art style, I believe this is a good mix between TP and WW that woulnt get fans angry.
Ubi didnt make NMH, only published it. Anyways I hope this game is good, being cautiously optimistic.is it just me or is splinter cell and NMH not bad games?
ubisoft does make great games occasionally...i'm sure they can pull it off this time since they're using M+
CDUB316
[QUOTE="CDUB316"]Ubi didnt make NMH, only published it. Anyways I hope this game is good, being cautiously optimistic.is it just me or is splinter cell and NMH not bad games?
ubisoft does make great games occasionally...i'm sure they can pull it off this time since they're using M+
Scythes777
either way... a lot of people seem to think that anything with an Ubi logo on it somewhere just won't be good
I was hyping it then I heard some rumours of tone downs and remembered Ubisoft is making it.
Im very skeptical as of now.
They did not make No More Heroes, and Splinter Cell: Double Agent was garbage, so I fail to see your point.is it just me or is splinter cell and NMH not bad games?
ubisoft does make great games occasionally...i'm sure they can pull it off this time since they're using M+
CDUB316
is it just me or is splinter cell and NMH not bad games?
ubisoft does make great games occasionally...i'm sure they can pull it off this time since they're using M+
They did not make No More Heroes, and Splinter Cell: Double Agent was garbage, so I fail to see your point. Ubi Shanghai made Double Agent. Ubi Montreal makes some of the most awesome games on the planet, like their last Splinter Cell, Chaos Theory. And let's not forget Assassin's Creed 2. That game was badass. Red Steel 2 looks fantastic to me. It's going to be my first Wii game purchase in about a year. I'm so stoked. Thrilled to try the swordplay (I don't have a Motion Plus yet, though, so I'm excited to try that as well. Didn't want to play golf as a sex addict or go to a Mii resort, I guess.)[QUOTE="Shielder7"]Why are people hyping this game? Red Steel 1 got horrible reviews Not even a A.. 5..5 on Game Spot and 6.5 average.Dibdibdobdobo
Why are people hyping this game? Red Steel 1 got horrible reviews Not even a A.. 5..5 on Game Spot and 6.5 average.Shielder7Because the 1st installment was lousy doesnt mean the 2nd will be. Best example is Killzone 2. Killzone 1 was suppose to suck but #2 got alot of praise.
KZ2 is actually a pretty poor example as there was abosloutely no way it could fail. GG had unlimited funding and around 5 years to work on the game. They also pretty much copied the standard FPS template (on the HD systems), the minimum it could have been was great.
Red Steel 2 on the other hand is alot more dearing. Not just with the setting/gameplay but the fact that it implements new technology. I know Motion+ makes motions better, just being first on a tech is likely to cause some problems.
Then theres the whole aspect of a first party Sony dev versus a 3rd party Wii dev that stated they use the Wii for a quick buck to fund their HD game (im not comparing the games).
I personally think the game wont be broken like the first Red Steel, but from what i've seen, it may suffer from repetitive and tedious gameplay. With Red Steel 1, ubisoft mixed east and west, with the second it looks all west. I hope Red Steel 3 (if it happens) is set in feudal Japan.
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/bad-day-red-steel-2/61987
looks great! I love the art
So whats the hype for ths one?
toast_burner
I'm sorry, but this game looks like crap. The graphics in that video looked ok, too bad they are not gameplay graphics... I'm thinking this game will do better than the first, but will still suck in terms of overall quality.
"Ubisoft" and "Wii" is a bad combination. I don't think this game will be good. I hope I'm wrong.IronBassThat's true, but this game looks like it actually had effort put into it. I mean Ubisoft can do well on the Wii (Rabbids Go Home, Shawn White Snowboarding)
As long as the gameplay works, then I'll be getting this.
Plus, the artstyle of the game is really cool.
this is bad man
i love the original red steel
but this is not red steel
they should make new ip for this new game
yeah it looks good, but IT'S NOT RED STEEL
m64
well there's really only been ONE red steel...so i think the developers can change it if they want and still call it red steel
when WW was first shown with it's cel shaded look everyone said it wasn't zelda....but god damn was it zelda...it was a beast of a zelda at that
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment