New solution to Gamespot reviews?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ultimate_123
ultimate_123

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ultimate_123
Member since 2008 • 129 Posts
Some games do not get the score they deserve here on gamespot that makes everyone mad. But I may have found a solution for it! Why cant they split it up into 3 mini reviews and then 3 people put their opinion into it. At the end of the review they say their score and then average it out and for the proper score. This way then fanboys cant scream: OMG it teh one man opinion.
Avatar image for Krigon
Krigon

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Krigon
Member since 2005 • 5591 Posts
Would still be opinions.
Avatar image for Dr-Doctor
Dr-Doctor

707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Dr-Doctor
Member since 2006 • 707 Posts

I think gamespot reverting back to their accurate scoring is the only good solution. I seriously can't get over gamespot reviews ending up with 0s or 5s. It's not accurate.

Anyway, if you want averaged scores, go to Gamerankings.

Avatar image for hongkingkong
hongkingkong

9368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 hongkingkong
Member since 2006 • 9368 Posts

Would still be opinions.Krigon

you'd be surprised what 3 seperately minded people can come up with if they are reasonably intelligent and open-minded.

This reminds me of the "Bonus Round" discussions on GameTrailers, far better than anything on GS.

Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#5 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts

I think gamespot reverting back to their accurate scoring is the only good solution. I seriously can't get over gamespot reviews ending up with 0s or 5s. It's not accurate.

Anyway, if you want averaged scores, go to Gamerankings.

Dr-Doctor
Yep, old gamespot reviews own

3 man reviews don't work better then one man reviews anyway, look no furthur then EGM

It actually leaves me confused on who to believe
Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts

No review can ever be precisely accurate. If they were, then how would they score them? Since to score them they have to measure them with competition, what would happen in the graphics departments between 360/PS3 and Wii, or PSP and DS? How fare would it be that a DS game that still use almost the same graphics as the GBA gets a 9 and a PSP game with almost PS2 graphics gets an 8?

Or how would any Wii game score high considering their low graphics?.

Its impossible to have a fair review system, even current gen games wouldnt be able to be unbias. Beacuse, in the end, the score they give, its the score they wanted the game to have, even if it has crappy graphics, even if it has midi tunes.

Avatar image for Krigon
Krigon

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Krigon
Member since 2005 • 5591 Posts

[QUOTE="Krigon"]Would still be opinions.hongkingkong

you'd be surprised what 3 seperately minded people can come up with if they are reasonably intelligent and open-minded.

This reminds me of the "Bonus Round" discussions on GameTrailers, far better than anything on GS.

Doesn't suit game journalist. :P

Avatar image for hongkingkong
hongkingkong

9368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 hongkingkong
Member since 2006 • 9368 Posts
[QUOTE="hongkingkong"]

[QUOTE="Krigon"]Would still be opinions.Krigon

you'd be surprised what 3 seperately minded people can come up with if they are reasonably intelligent and open-minded.

This reminds me of the "Bonus Round" discussions on GameTrailers, far better than anything on GS.

Doesn't suit game journalist. :P

ignorant and bias sums a lot of them up i know but there are a few good ones out there. not on here of course.

Avatar image for crunchUK
crunchUK

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 crunchUK
Member since 2007 • 3050 Posts
they need to make them SW-proof dont they? :P
Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

No review can ever be precisely accurate. If they were, then how would they score them? Since to score them they have to measure them with competition, what would happen in the graphics departments between 360/PS3 and Wii, or PSP and DS? How fare would it be that a DS game that still use almost the same graphics as the GBA gets a 9 and a PSP game with almost PS2 graphics gets an 8?

Or how would any Wii game score high considering their low graphics?.

Its impossible to have a fair review system, even current gen games wouldnt be able to be unbias. Beacuse, in the end, the score they give, its the score they wanted the game to have, even if it has crappy graphics, even if it has midi tunes.

kenshinhimura16

You rate the game in relation to the system its on. They pretty much do that now. A game that pushes wii technically will never look as good as say, an average PC game, the fact it is great for the wii would give it 9/10 for graphics. The Pc game, although it looks so much better is not that great for PC so would get 5/10 for graphics. This is normal gamespot practice.

Look at lots of multiplat reviews, they actually score superior versions less because of the system it is on.

Avatar image for mr_mozilla
mr_mozilla

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 mr_mozilla
Member since 2006 • 2381 Posts
They would need 3 people to play through the game, and considering that they tend to lag behind in their reviews even now, I'm not so sure if it's such a good idea. And I don't know if I want the guy who reviews EA sports games to give his opinion on Sins Of A Solar Empire etc. Tho that might be the case already. :P
Avatar image for Kez1984
Kez1984

4548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 Kez1984
Member since 2007 • 4548 Posts
Video-game media is a joke. Especially gamespot and G4. When a guy is referring to his guest as "dude" you know your watching the video-gaming equivilent of mtv.
Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

They would need 3 people to play through the game, and considering that they tend to lag behind in their reviews even now, I'm not so sure if it's such a good idea. And I don't know if I want the guy who reviews EA sports games to give his opinion on Sins Of A Solar Empire etc. Tho that might be the case already. :Pmr_mozilla

This, for me is half the problem here. Its why i love PC gamer uk. They have genre reviewers. That way they get accurate and fair reviews of all games. GS seem to give reviews to whoever is avaiiable.

Then again it only seems to affect a few games a year as their scores are pretty consistent with other major sites. I do however get the feeling they need a couple of PC gamers to review PC games.