i wish these wre on the 360.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I wish the 360 would at least have a game kind of like this one. Action Adventure is my favorite genre (along with platformers) and the 360 lacks these... it has Too Human, DMC4 and... Dead Rising? I don't want to buy a PS3 but I just might have too :cry:AHUGECAT
i know what you mean all the 360 action adventure game are gitty and use the unreal engine, why cant they have one with an artstyle like this.
10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
DoctorBunny
Then why do you hold out for Bioshock?
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
Kalias
thats if you had a ps3 then you can actually buy it ( =
I guess if someone doesn't agree with you, they must not own a console. teh logic??!?!
I actually purchased 2 on launch day, kept one and ebayed, well put on craigslist, the other one. Still have the pictures I used saved :)
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
R-Dot-Yung
Whoa, besides the multiplayer point
sounds alot like gears Of war to me, just, Uncharted is prettier and has better animation
Except for the fact that every ps2/ps3 only owners bashed GeOW for that, even with its multiplayer yet most are praising this for the same faults? Even with GeOW proven to be a AAA
Did anyone else get some Crash Bandicoot nostalgia from that first pic? Because I sure as hell did.lantus
Yeah, I kinda felt that when I was watching a vid of this game a couple of days ago. Naughty Dog being the devs of this game really builds up my excitement for it, cause they've made some awesome games in the past.
[QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
DoctorBunny
thats if you had a ps3 then you can actually buy it ( =
I guess if someone doesn't agree with you, they must not own a console. teh logic??!?!
I actually purchased 2 on launch day, kept one and ebayed, well put on craigslist, the other one. Still have the pictures I used saved :)
whatever u say. i wont believe you. put your username next to it, ill say photoshop or some other thing. your a lem, and its clear as water to anyone that looks at your previous posts.
this is exactly what the next-gen console needs ! im sorry but Ms SHOULD step UP and make ORIGINAL games intead of filling Xbox 360 with FPSs.
excuse my bad english.
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
Kalias
thats if you had a ps3 then you can actually buy it ( =
I guess if someone doesn't agree with you, they must not own a console. teh logic??!?!
I actually purchased 2 on launch day, kept one and ebayed, well put on craigslist, the other one. Still have the pictures I used saved :)
whatever u say. i wont believe you. put your username next to it, ill say photoshop or some other thing. your a lem, and its clear as water to anyone that looks at your previous posts.
Because I enjoy one console over the other? i'm sorry you feel that way, but unlike the child you are, I as an adult don't have to stoop to such low things on a internet forum. enjoy your day
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
R-Dot-Yung
Whoa, besides the multiplayer point
sounds alot like gears Of war to me, just, Uncharted is prettier and has better animation
Except for the fact that every ps2/ps3 only owners bashed GeOW for that, even with its multiplayer yet most are praising this for the same faults? Even with GeOW proven to be a AAA
the point was, WHATS THE DIFFERENCE, GeOW is a AAA amazing game
so the points you made are invalid
The multiplayer is what made GeOW, Uncharted has no multiplayer to fall back on.
How is a fact invalid?
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanksFrozenLiquid
Since when was it established that EVERY game has to have online?
I suggest you re-read this comment and point out to yourself that bs nonsense you are stating here just to make your self feel better and to satisfy the measly little fanboy brain of yours.
Please refrain from owning yourself in the future. Makes me pitty people like you, those who cannot see obvious things that should be appreciated.
[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanksOmnisystem
Since when was it established that EVERY game has to have online?
I suggest you re-read this comment and point out to yourself that bs nonsense you are stating here just to make your self feel better and to satisfy the measly little fanboy brain of yours.
Please refrain from owning yourself in the future. Makes me pitty people like you, those who cannot see obvious things that should be appreciated.
This is part of what Miyamoto was saying before... It's a nice and short game, but with a decent lenght, that's unique, different, and you will play multiple times...
Just watch a video of this game... Screenshots not only look much worse than video footage, they don't tell you much...
[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanksOmnisystem
Since when was it established that EVERY game has to have online?
I suggest you re-read this comment and point out to yourself that bs nonsense you are stating here just to make your self feel better and to satisfy the measly little fanboy brain of yours.
Please refrain from owning yourself in the future. Makes me pitty people like you, those who cannot see obvious things that should be appreciated.
so 10-12 hours of gameplay that usually turns out to be 8 with no multiplayer and linear gameplay is worth $60? Sorry but you are the one owning himself. Not every game needs multiplayer, but with 10 hours of gameplay and a $60 pricetag it better as hell have it
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanksDoctorBunny
Since when was it established that EVERY game has to have online?
I suggest you re-read this comment and point out to yourself that bs nonsense you are stating here just to make your self feel better and to satisfy the measly little fanboy brain of yours.
Please refrain from owning yourself in the future. Makes me pitty people like you, those who cannot see obvious things that should be appreciated.
so 10-12 hours of gameplay that usually turns out to be 8 with no multiplayer and linear gameplay is worth $60? Sorry but you are the one owning himself. Not every game needs multiplayer, but with 10 hours of gameplay and a $60 pricetag it better as hell have it
This game is one of those that doesn't need multiplayer... Replay value and an authentically good game would be worth the price tag...
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
R-Dot-Yung
Whoa, besides the multiplayer point
sounds alot like gears Of war to me, just, Uncharted is prettier and has better animation
Except for the fact that every ps2/ps3 only owners bashed GeOW for that, even with its multiplayer yet most are praising this for the same faults? Even with GeOW proven to be a AAA
the point was, WHATS THE DIFFERENCE, GeOW is a AAA amazing game
so the points you made are invalid
The multiplayer is what made GeOW, Uncharted has no multiplayer to fall back on.
How is a fact invalid?
Multiplayer MADE GeOW?!?!?!?!?
no sir, you are VERY wrong, i freaking own the game
Really now? so do I and every single person on live will tell you the same thing. Also nice to see you spoting your GC for ps3 and not 360 hm?
[QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
DoctorBunny
thats if you had a ps3 then you can actually buy it ( =
I guess if someone doesn't agree with you, they must not own a console. teh logic??!?!
I actually purchased 2 on launch day, kept one and ebayed, well put on craigslist, the other one. Still have the pictures I used saved :)
whatever u say. i wont believe you. put your username next to it, ill say photoshop or some other thing. your a lem, and its clear as water to anyone that looks at your previous posts.
Because I enjoy one console over the other? i'm sorry you feel that way, but unlike the child you are, I as an adult don't have to stoop to such low things on a internet forum. enjoy your day
no, because you bash a game that you haven't even touched yet. its funny as a ps3 owner you would probably be excited for another exclusive and game that will most likely turn out to be fun. but you must bash a game for being linear?, 10-12 hours?.. its like saying a game with those qualities is not enjoyable and not worth 60 bucks. if not worth 60, then you can always get it another time. yet you bash it.. it makes no sense at all.. especially if your a ps3 owner. you def dont own a ps3. people who own 2 of the next-gen consoles are usually neutral and anticipate and look forward to exclusives from both consoles. at least im not making up lame excuses like you about owning both.
10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
DoctorBunny
u can always rent it
[QUOTE="Omnisystem"][QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanksDoctorBunny
Since when was it established that EVERY game has to have online?
I suggest you re-read this comment and point out to yourself that bs nonsense you are stating here just to make your self feel better and to satisfy the measly little fanboy brain of yours.
Please refrain from owning yourself in the future. Makes me pitty people like you, those who cannot see obvious things that should be appreciated.
so 10-12 hours of gameplay that usually turns out to be 8 with no multiplayer and linear gameplay is worth $60? Sorry but you are the one owning himself. Not every game needs multiplayer, but with 10 hours of gameplay and a $60 pricetag it better as hell have it
Alright I want to see what you say when games like Bioshock and Fable 2 are released. I am only naming 360 games here (I know they will eventually be on PC) since you reek of pure lemming-ism.
BTW, how do you know its only 10-12 hours long? Also, Resident Evil was about 10-12 hours long and still is one of the best games to date.
So please...
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]10-12 hour gameplay, extremely linear and no multiplayer at a $60 price point? no thanks
Kalias
thats if you had a ps3 then you can actually buy it ( =
I guess if someone doesn't agree with you, they must not own a console. teh logic??!?!
I actually purchased 2 on launch day, kept one and ebayed, well put on craigslist, the other one. Still have the pictures I used saved :)
whatever u say. i wont believe you. put your username next to it, ill say photoshop or some other thing. your a lem, and its clear as water to anyone that looks at your previous posts.
Because I enjoy one console over the other? i'm sorry you feel that way, but unlike the child you are, I as an adult don't have to stoop to such low things on a internet forum. enjoy your day
no, because you bash a game that you haven't even touched yet. its funny as a ps3 owner you would probably be excited for another exclusive and game that will most likely turn out to be fun. but you must bash a game for being linear?, 10-12 hours?.. its like saying a game with those qualities is not enjoyable and not worth 60 bucks. if not worth 60, then you can always get it another time. yet you bash it.. it makes no sense at all.. especially if your a ps3 owner. you def dont own a ps3. people who own 2 of the next-gen consoles are usually neutral and anticipate and look forward to exclusives from both consoles. at least im not making up lame excuses like you about owning both.
I'm not excited for every 360 exclusive, so why would I be excited for every ps3 exclusive that come off as a major rip off and goes against everything I dislike in a game? With good multiplayer, 10 hours of gameplay is easily tolerable, even with linear gameplay.
I never said the game would be trash would I? I said the value is terrible for it.
[QUOTE="rpgfan360"][QUOTE="l1mIt"]looks better than anything on 360Kalias
lets not get crazy.
360 is good with games that are dark and grey looking. like mass effect, and gears..
Viva Pinata? Kameo?
And Mass Effect is dark and grey-looking? Wtf? The art style in that game is amazing, and the color palette is widely varied. And it certainly kicks the crap out of anything the PS3 has to offer, in every imaginable way.
Can't really bash this game graphically. This is really impressive. The textures, and lighting are probably the best on console. Also this is a huge update in graphics from gdc 07. It is really much more polished up. This game may not have the graphic prowess of crysis but, still it looks amazin artstyle wise. Much better looking to me then gears of war
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment