[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
Yawn.
The only reason I'm interested in BF4 is because I much prefer the Battlefield style of game. That said I'm still getting sick of these modern military shooters all together. We've just had too many in a row.
I did not like Black Ops 2 at all. I thought it was just bad.
jamejame
What was so bad about Blops 2? I'm hardly a CoD apologist, MW3 was trash, and the orignal Blops, while fun, was an imbalanced mess but Black Ops 2 has some of the most immaculate weapon/perk balancing in the series. I think the maps are fairly mediocre, but other than that, what is so bad about the game? It's the most balanced a CoD game has been since 4, in my opinion.Black Ops 2 just bored me. The gun balance isn't really good in the long run. It's all about high rate of fire weapons. That's boring. It's balanced becuase there is no one gun that's blatently OP becuase so many do the same exact thing.
The single player for Black Ops 2 was just flat out boring. It held my hand more than I could play. I was constantly forced to slow down and participate in some in-game cutscene or wait for an NPC to tell me when to go. I couldn't stand it. It took me out of the game far more than Black Ops and MW3 did despite their insane amounts hand holding.
Games need to realize that forcing a player to stop and wait for NPCs or arbitrarily slowing them down to pick up an ally or something constantly is not fun. Just don't constrain me.Â
Just note, BF4 looks to make all of the same mistakes with its campaign as well. Too much cutscenes and handholding, not enough straight up gameplay. I don't mind linear shooters, never have. Shooters have been linear since the days of Doom, but Doom never forced you to lose control of your character 2-3 times a level.Â
Log in to comment