NHL 08: 60fps on 360 and 30fps on PS3

The up and coming NHL 08 will be 60 frames-per-secound on 360 and 30fps on PS3. And the framrate is stated to look like that of NHL 07 on 360.Alexander22Redn

o well NHL 08 isnt that amazing neways also its form EA sports who BTW also screwed up big time with glitches on the 360 MADDEN 08

so i dont expect them to work extra hard on a game thats main focus is on canada, lol most ppl in USA dont like hockey... for that matter most ppl dont even know who the origianl 6 teams are... lol but w/e

This isn't news at all. By the way, its hockey. taken off the air for a year and only a few people noticed.WOWZORS

Go away troll.

Hockey's a kickass sport. Who cares which people mock it.

Soccer's the biggest sport in the world but it's little in American, you think anyone cares around the world that Amercia doesn't like it? Cause we in Canada could care less if you don't like Hockey. And honestly with our rising dollar I don't see why we need the NHL in many U.S. cities. Our economy is rising

Anywho.... I can't wait for this game. Online leagues and team play with more than one person per team!! SWEEEEET

[QUOTE="WOWZORS"]This isn't news at all. By the way, its hockey. taken off the air for a year and only a few people noticed.kcpp2b

Go away troll.

Hockey's a kickass sport. Who cares which people mock it.

Soccer's the biggest sport in the world but it's little in American, you think anyone cares around the world that Amercia doesn't like it? Cause we in Canada could care less if you don't like it. And honestly with our rising dollar I don't see why we need the NHL in many U.S. cities. Our economy is rising

Anywho.... I can't wait for this game. Online leagues and team play with more than one person per team!! SWEEEEET

[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]

[QUOTE="WOWZORS"]This isn't news at all. By the way, its hockey. taken off the air for a year and only a few people noticed.ssjgoku808

Go away troll.

Hockey's a kickass sport. Who cares which people mock it.

Soccer's the biggest sport in the world but it's little in American, you think anyone cares around the world that Amercia doesn't like it? Cause we in Canada could care less if you don't like it. And honestly with our rising dollar I don't see why we need the NHL in many U.S. cities. Our economy is rising

Anywho.... I can't wait for this game. Online leagues and team play with more than one person per team!! SWEEEEET

heres a link....http://www.n4g.com/News-60107.aspx

It's EA's fault though...

EA=USA=360

NHL=USA=EA

360=USA=EA

so, you got it?

no?

no....?

.....

.........

bye!

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

[QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

DarkGodZeus

Better check your glasses, COD4 on the 360 looks better (Noticeably).

But nice try at swing the actual topic. 60fps fo the 360, and 30fps for the PS3. PS3 is "OWN3D" yet again by the 360.

[QUOTE="DarkGodZeus"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

Better check your glasses, COD4 on the 360 looks better (Noticeably).

But nice try at swing the actual topic. 60fps fo the 360, and 30fps for the PS3. PS3 is "OWN3D" yet again by the 360.

[QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

Sprintata1

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Graw2 looks way better on the 360, RSX is inferior to Xenos, and PS3 Cell is a crippled version of a real "Cell" chip.

Nice try at avoided the topic though, 60 fps for the 360 version and 30 fps for the PS3 version. PS3 yet "OWN3D" again by the 360.

Not only that, PS3 is in dead last place in the console race, worse gaming library and is still selling the worse month after month. (Since fanboy's don't want to deal with the question, I will throw out some stuff also.)

[QUOTE="AgentVX"][QUOTE="DarkGodZeus"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

ssjgoku808

Better check your glasses, COD4 on the 360 looks better (Noticeably).

But nice try at swing the actual topic. 60fps fo the 360, and 30fps for the PS3. PS3 is "OWN3D" yet again by the 360.

Just what I thought!!!...........LOL. 60fps sure shut your month up fast, didn't it!!!

[QUOTE="Sprintata1"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Graw2 looks way better on the 360, RSX is inferior to Xenos, and PS3 Cell is a crippled version of a real "Cell" chip.

Nice try at avoided the topic though, 60 fps for the 360 version and 30 fps for the PS3 version. PS3 yet "OWN3D" again by the 360.

Not only that, PS3 is in dead last place in the console race, worse gaming library and is still selling the worse month after month. (Since fanboy's don't want to deal with the question, I will throw out some stuff also.)

It was built on XBOX 360 hardware and developers at EA give no effort in port. GRAW developers, DiRT developers, Oblivion devs, and some others know how to port games. EA needs to step up their game.Albanian_Killa

Don't know why your bring up Dirt, it looks noticeably better on the 360. As for Oblivion, I sure hope that extra year they could slightly improve the game graphics, and give kudos to them, they were working with the inferior PS3.

[QUOTE="Sprintata1"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Graw2 looks way better on the 360, RSX is inferior to Xenos, and PS3 Cell is a crippled version of a real "Cell" chip.

Nice try at avoided the topic though, 60 fps for the 360 version and 30 fps for the PS3 version. PS3 yet "OWN3D" again by the 360.

Not only that, PS3 is in dead last place in the console race, worse gaming library and is still selling the worse month after month. (Since fanboy's don't want to deal with the question, I will throw out some stuff also.)

Ignorant fanboy. I play many games. PSN titles, and PS3 titles. You can't say the PlayStation 3 has no titles because it has an awesome library. DiRT looks better, GRAW is better because it includes exclusives. The horsepower on the PlayStation 3 is superior to any other console. By now, if you don't know that, then you must live in a cave. Stanford University said the XBOX 360 can't handle Folding@home. The PlayStation 3 can fold much faster than most PCs.

[QUOTE="Albanian_Killa"]It was built on XBOX 360 hardware and developers at EA give no effort in port. GRAW developers, DiRT developers, Oblivion devs, and some others know how to port games. EA needs to step up their game.AgentVX

Don't know why your bring up Dirt, it looks noticeably better on the 360. As for Oblivion, I sure hope that extra year they could slightly improve the game graphics, and give kudos to them, they were working with the inferior PS3.

You are officially blind for saying that about DiRT.

[QUOTE="AgentVX"][QUOTE="Sprintata1"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

ssjgoku808

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Graw2 looks way better on the 360, RSX is inferior to Xenos, and PS3 Cell is a crippled version of a real "Cell" chip.

Nice try at avoided the topic though, 60 fps for the 360 version and 30 fps for the PS3 version. PS3 yet "OWN3D" again by the 360.

Not only that, PS3 is in dead last place in the console race, worse gaming library and is still selling the worse month after month. (Since fanboy's don't want to deal with the question, I will throw out some stuff also.)

Step One - Pull off the Fanboy goggles first.

Step Two - Didn't know you had the actual game to compare yet. Which leads me to step 2, pull off the fanboy goggles.

Step Three - Don't avoid the actual topic at the 360 running TWICE as fast as the PS3 version of NHL. Just like Madden, 360 owners yet again, get the best version.

[QUOTE="AgentVX"]

[QUOTE="Albanian_Killa"]It was built on XBOX 360 hardware and developers at EA give no effort in port. GRAW developers, DiRT developers, Oblivion devs, and some others know how to port games. EA needs to step up their game.Albanian_Killa

Don't know why your bring up Dirt, it looks noticeably better on the 360. As for Oblivion, I sure hope that extra year they could slightly improve the game graphics, and give kudos to them, they were working with the inferior PS3.

You are officially blind for saying that about DiRT.

Bahahahaha!!! Truth hurt's fanboys, doesn't it.

Just admitt it and move along, just cause the PS3 is selling the worst, you really don't have to defend it. Nobody really cares.

60 fps for the 360, 30 fps for the PS3 version of NHL 08. Double ownage on Hockey and Football.

[QUOTE="ssjgoku808"][QUOTE="AgentVX"][QUOTE="Sprintata1"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Graw2 looks way better on the 360, RSX is inferior to Xenos, and PS3 Cell is a crippled version of a real "Cell" chip.

Nice try at avoided the topic though, 60 fps for the 360 version and 30 fps for the PS3 version. PS3 yet "OWN3D" again by the 360.

Not only that, PS3 is in dead last place in the console race, worse gaming library and is still selling the worse month after month. (Since fanboy's don't want to deal with the question, I will throw out some stuff also.)

Step One - Pull off the Fanboy goggles first. Lol @ you

Step Two - Didn't know you had the actual game to compare yet. Which leads me to step 2, pull off the fanboy goggles. We all know it look's better whether you can accept it or not

Step Three - Don't avoid the actual topic at the 360 running TWICE as fast as the PS3 version of NHL. Just like Madden, 360 owners yet again, get the best version. EA....

[QUOTE="ssjgoku808"][QUOTE="AgentVX"][QUOTE="Sprintata1"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Graw2 looks way better on the 360, RSX is inferior to Xenos, and PS3 Cell is a crippled version of a real "Cell" chip.

Nice try at avoided the topic though, 60 fps for the 360 version and 30 fps for the PS3 version. PS3 yet "OWN3D" again by the 360.

Not only that, PS3 is in dead last place in the console race, worse gaming library and is still selling the worse month after month. (Since fanboy's don't want to deal with the question, I will throw out some stuff also.)

Step One - Pull off the Fanboy goggles first.

Step Two - Didn't know you had the actual game to compare yet. Which leads me to step 2, pull off the fanboy goggles.

Step Three - Don't avoid the actual topic at the 360 running TWICE as fast as the PS3 version of NHL. Just like Madden, 360 owners yet again, get the best version.

Step 1 leave dude alone that his opinion.

Step 2 its obvious that other poeple went off topic.

Funny oiler fan Let me guess you think there gonna make the playoff's?ssjgoku808

Nope, they suck!

See, we are actual both alike, I back a losing hockey team, you back a losing console.:D

[QUOTE="Alexander22Redn"]The up and coming NHL 08 will be 60 frames-per-secound on 360 and 30fps on PS3. And the framrate is stated to look like that of NHL 07 on 360.JAMES_L_BROOKS

o well NHL 08 isnt that amazing neways also its form EA sports who BTW also screwed up big time with glitches on the 360 MADDEN 08

so i dont expect them to work extra hard on a game thats main focus is on canada, lol most ppl in USA dont like hockey... for that matter most ppl dont even know who the origianl 6 teams are... lol but w/e

:lol: You think no one cares about hockey? More people like hockey then they do football, cause no one but American's likes football, same with NASCAR which no one outside the USA gives a damn about that stupid sport where people drive in a circle for 4 hours. Seriously, there are more international hockey teams then there are football teams, so hockey is the second biggest sport in terms of countries who produce teams for things like the Olympics. I am pretty sure a lot of Europe care about hockey, considering countries like Sweden and Russiaproduce some of the best players of all time.

Don't lie, even the developers said the PS3 version will have HDR lighting and be at 60 fps. While the Xbox360 version will have no HDR and Anti Aliasing only running at 22 fps.Sprintata1

Right like Madden. :lol:

Earlier in the week I wrote a piece about the PS3 Frame Rate Disaster. Cows swore the problem had been solved and now here's another black eye for the PS3. Its incapable of handling the gorgeous vistas the game developers manage to get zooming on the 360. Sony gota lot of 'splaining to do!JiveT

Fanboys believe fanboys. :lol: Keep up the good work soldier!

is this confirmed?Mystery_Writer

No source = no confirmation. It's just flamebait for now.

[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]is this confirmed?DementedDragon

No source = no confirmation. It's just flamebait for now.

I bet it's true. Look at Madden for example.

This isn't news at all. By the way, its hockey. taken off the air for a year and only a few people noticed.WOWZORS

Anyway, as long as the PS3 version had motion blur you wouldn't b able to tell the difference ..

I bet it's true. Look at Madden for example. PS3_3DO

I wouldn't be surprised if it were, this is EA we're talking about; but until then, it's speculation.

[QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

Sprintata1

Graw2 looks way better on the PS3 than it does on the 360.

The RSX is based on the G80, Geforce 8800 Ultra. The Xenos is based on the X800 XL, which is 2 gens behind the RSX.

So the RSX is way better than the 360 GPU, and everyone knows that the Cell destroys the 360's stripped down 3 core cpu already.

RSX based on 8800 Ultra? It would be good if it could compete with a 7900GTX.

Don't lie, even the developers said the PS3 version will have HDR lighting and be at 60 fps. While the Xbox360 version will have no HDR and Anti Aliasing only running at 22 fps.Sprintata1

[QUOTE="ssjgoku808"][QUOTE="AgentVX"][QUOTE="DarkGodZeus"][QUOTE="AgentVX"]

"Bu....bu....bu....buu....the power of the cell......"

LOL, PS3 takes a beating yet again. Looks like the inferior RSX and crippled Cell just can't match the 360.

Oh, one dent after another on the PS3, this isn't even funny anymore......

AgentVX

Better check your glasses, COD4 on the 360 looks better (Noticeably).

But nice try at swing the actual topic. 60fps fo the 360, and 30fps for the PS3. PS3 is "OWN3D" yet again by the 360.

Just what I thought!!!...........LOL. 60fps sure shut your month up fast, didn't it!!!

Agent, it is ok to humble your self rather then look stupid some times. Graw has better AA and shading look it up, or think outside of the box. Elder Scrolls, Dirt COD4 all look better on the PS3. COD4 was rumored 30 fps on 360 and 60 fps on PS3 or was that Dirt. I believe its Dirt.

NHL07 was the best sports game last year and 08 looks to

kick some #$^, Hockey fans win either way

[QUOTE="Sprintata1"]Don't lie, even the developers said the PS3 version will have HDR lighting and be at 60 fps. While the Xbox360 version will have no HDR and Anti Aliasing only running at 22 fps.johnusabeis

I didn't know a Hockey game could be that demanding in graphics and physics.

[QUOTE="johnusabeis"][QUOTE="Sprintata1"]Don't lie, even the developers said the PS3 version will have HDR lighting and be at 60 fps. While the Xbox360 version will have no HDR and Anti Aliasing only running at 22 fps.DementedDragon

I didn't know a Hockey game could be that demanding in graphics and physics.

[QUOTE="WOWZORS"]This isn't news at all. By the way, its hockey. taken off the air for a year and only a few people noticed.kcpp2b

Go away troll.

Hockey's a kickass sport. Who cares which people mock it.

Soccer's the biggest sport in the world but it's little in American, you think anyone cares around the world that Amercia doesn't like it? Cause we in Canada could care less if you don't like Hockey. And honestly with our rising dollar I don't see why we need the NHL in many U.S. cities. Our economy is rising

Anywho.... I can't wait for this game. Online leagues and team play with more than one person per team!! SWEEEEET

Well I am from America and I would like to laugh at you and Canada for getting beat at their own sport for what like 5 years now??? Okay now that I said that, back to not caring about hockey.