Nintendo clubs baby seals.

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts
Well, not really. But Greenpeace has rated Nintendo as the worst electronic manufacturer in terms of being environmentally friendly. Probably won't even faze them, but it can't be good for PR.
Avatar image for elbow2k
elbow2k

1645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 elbow2k
Member since 2007 • 1645 Posts

That's pretty sad.

Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

They are being stupid. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts

They are being retarded. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

laughingman42

Did you read the article? They listed their reasons, and Nintendo withholding info wasn't one of them.

And yes, FOX could do better. They could say that Nintendo clubs baby seals or something.

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts
Actually, I once saw Miyamoto do terrible things to a puppy. Terrible things. Ken Kuttaragi approves this message.
Avatar image for RAZZY_B
RAZZY_B

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RAZZY_B
Member since 2005 • 1709 Posts

Actually, I once saw Miyamoto do terrible things to a puppy. Terrible things. Ken Kuttaragi approves this message.The_Ish

rofl

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

The only reason Sony is winning is because the PS3 doubles as a barbecue.

It is delicious for outdoor, homegrilled cook-outs.

The power of the cell results in tender cow meat.

Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts
[QUOTE="laughingman42"]

They are being retarded. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

Zeke129

Did you read the article? They listed a few reasons.

And yes, FOX could do better. They could say that Nintendo clubs baby seals or something.

someone posted the origional artical earlier. They gave nintendo a zero in every catigory because they didnt give them any info.

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#9 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts

someone posted the origional artical earlier. They gave nintendo a zero in every catigory because they didnt give them any info.

laughingman42

Do you still have the link?

Avatar image for Sir_Crocidile
Sir_Crocidile

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Sir_Crocidile
Member since 2004 • 389 Posts
[QUOTE="laughingman42"]

They are being retarded. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

Zeke129

Did you read the article? They listed their reasons, and Nintendo withholding info wasn't one of them.

And yes, FOX could do better. They could say that Nintendo clubs baby seals or something.

Did you read the source thats cited, the actual report from greenpeace? They cite lack of information for every single one of the criteria as to why they gave them a 0. Link

Avatar image for osirisomeomi
osirisomeomi

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 osirisomeomi
Member since 2007 • 3100 Posts

Just a side note. Seals are overpopulated in the arctic, and are wiping out whole species of fish, which we need to eat. Clubbing the babies means that you stop them from breeding too much and wrecking the environment. Shooting them is less humane, as they can lie there dying for hours.

Not saying it's 'good', but just because something is 'cute' doesn't make it a purely good thing.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#12 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="Zeke129"][QUOTE="laughingman42"]

They are being retarded. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

laughingman42

Did you read the article? They listed a few reasons.

And yes, FOX could do better. They could say that Nintendo clubs baby seals or something.

someone posted the origional artical earlier. They gave nintendo a zero in every catigory because they didnt give them any info.

[QUOTE="Zeke129"][QUOTE="laughingman42"]

They are being retarded. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

laughingman42

Did you read the article? They listed a few reasons.

And yes, FOX could do better. They could say that Nintendo clubs baby seals or something.

someone posted the origional artical earlier. They gave nintendo a zero in every catigory because they didnt give them any info.

Very secretive...

I wonder what is actually in my Wii-Mote.

Avatar image for iunderstand
iunderstand

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 iunderstand
Member since 2006 • 3201 Posts
[QUOTE="laughingman42"]

They are being retarded. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

Zeke129

Did you read the article? They listed their reasons, and Nintendo withholding info wasn't one of them.

And yes, FOX could do better. They could say that Nintendo clubs baby seals or something.

http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/greener-electronics-nintendo-r.pdf


At the bottom.

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts

Just a side note. Seals are overpopulated in the arctic, and are wiping out whole species of fish, which we need to eat. Clubbing the babies means that you stop them from breeding too much and wrecking the environment. Shooting them is less humane, as they can lie there dying for hours.

Not saying it's 'good', but just because something is 'cute' doesn't make it a purely good thing.

osirisomeomi

They also eat penguins, they're total monsters.

Avatar image for Sapph0
Sapph0

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Sapph0
Member since 2006 • 139 Posts

They are being stupid. They gave them a 0 because nintendo didnt give them any info. Fox news couldnt have spun it any worse more than that.

laughingman42

Greenpeace suck, I'm all for recycling and careful waste disposal, but according to Greenpeace humans ARE the waste. :(

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts

Very secretive...

I wonder what is actually in my Wii-Mote.

princeofshapeir

Baby seal blood.

And I know why the seals are hunted. I LIVE in Canada, I think I'm familiar with something that happens in my backyard. (Not literally)

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
Its a Japanese company so its like automatically better than European ones at least.
Avatar image for Zenfoldor
Zenfoldor

1775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Zenfoldor
Member since 2003 • 1775 Posts

Well, not really. But Greenpeace has rated Nintendo as the worst electronic manufacturer in terms of being environmentally friendly. Probably won't even faze them, but it can't be good for PR. Zeke129

I, personally think it's great that Nintendo is standing up to hippie enviromentalist peace lovers. In my mind, I would just as soon kill a man as look at him, so I LOVE destroying childrens futures. I think it's fantastic.

Contributing to eventually killing everyone all of you care about makes me love Nintendo even more than I already did.

Anyway, honestly, enviromentalism and greenpeace are, in my minds, far left loons who think that not recycling plastic off the cutting room floor will kill every child in the world, inside of 10 years. If your a political activist into "enviromentalism" I can see why you would care, but if your a gamer, honestly, its PC to say we care about the enviroment, but I would club 10 baby seals myself to help Nintendo sell one more Wii this holiday, just so I could laugh at the Lemmings.

You, me, and all our kids will be long dead before any pollution Nintendo does, will have any effect on the enviroment whatsoever. Protesting companies for non-enviromental conformity is bullcrap, and I guarntee you they will make a much larger profit not caring what the enviromentalist think, than they would if they conformed to their ultra strict and pointless regulations. The end.

Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts
[QUOTE="laughingman42"]

someone posted the origional artical earlier. They gave nintendo a zero in every catigory because they didnt give them any info.

Zeke129

Do you still have the link?

here is a link to the thread

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26068508

the report bases all of its info off of this little section of nitnendo's site.

http://www.nintendo.com/corp/faq.jsp#environment

Avatar image for EmpCom
EmpCom

3451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 EmpCom
Member since 2005 • 3451 Posts
Wow did that title mislead me , i thought maybe nintendo had a new game out had images of wiimote connecting to a club shaped object
Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#21 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts

I, personally think...

RANT

...The end.

Zenfoldor

...

I posted this because it was funny, not because I honestly believe Nintendo is killing our children.

I think you've drank a bit too much baby seal blood, it's making you angry.

Avatar image for Video_Game_King
Video_Game_King

27545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#22 Video_Game_King
Member since 2003 • 27545 Posts

The only reason Sony is winning is because the PS3 doubles as a barbecue.

It is delicious for outdoor, homegrilled cook-outs.

The power of the cell results in tender cow meat.

princeofshapeir

Other reasons include it running solely on dust. Sony knew that the PS3 would collect it, so why not power the PS3 with dust :P?

Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts
I would club 10 baby seals myself to help Nintendo sell one more Wii this holiday, just so I could laugh at the Lemmings.Zenfoldor

LMAO! Good lord this is one of the funniest things I have ever read on SW. and there has been some funny stuff.

Avatar image for iunderstand
iunderstand

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 iunderstand
Member since 2006 • 3201 Posts

http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/7639/hippypower1pv3.gif

http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/7782/hippypower2cg7.gif

This is it.

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts
Only 4 of those were "no info". The other ones refer to the fact Nintendo doesn't have a policy or guidelines on said substance or action.
Avatar image for iunderstand
iunderstand

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 iunderstand
Member since 2006 • 3201 Posts

Only 4 of those were "no info". The other ones refer to the fact Nintendo doesn't have a policy or guidelines on said substance or action. Zeke129

Or they don't have info on the policies or guidelines which is the logical assumption.

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#27 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts

Or they don't have info on the policies or guidelines which is the logical assumption.

iunderstand

Well, if they don't have a policy on a certain substance we can logically assume they're probably using it.

Avatar image for iunderstand
iunderstand

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 iunderstand
Member since 2006 • 3201 Posts
[QUOTE="iunderstand"]

Or they don't have info on the policies or guidelines which is the logical assumption.

Zeke129

Well, if they don't have a policy on a certain substance we can logically assume they're probably using it.

Furthermore, when you click on "more information". This is the link it redirects you to, aka their evidence.

Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts

http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/7639/hippypower1pv3.gif

http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/7782/hippypower2cg7.gif

This is it.

iunderstand

based off of this

http://www.nintendo.com/corp/faq.jsp#environment

Avatar image for iunderstand
iunderstand

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 iunderstand
Member since 2006 • 3201 Posts

based off of this

http://www.nintendo.com/corp/faq.jsp#environment

laughingman42

Yes, this meter makes me want to pollute.

Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#32 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts

they base their info on what they read in an FAQ section of their website. yea thats obviously all of their policies listed right there.:roll:

laughingman42

Well, you show me their policies. A company so environmentally-committed as Nintendo must post them somewhere, right?

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60812

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60812 Posts
That is a surprise to say the least.
Avatar image for iunderstand
iunderstand

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 iunderstand
Member since 2006 • 3201 Posts
[QUOTE="laughingman42"]

they base their info on what they read in an FAQ section of their website. yea thats obviously all of their policies listed right there.:roll:

Zeke129

Well, you show me their policies. A company so environmentally-committed as Nintendo must post them somewhere, right?

You don't think that maybe they could have contacted the company first before publicly slandering them?

Avatar image for caje47
caje47

2298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 caje47
Member since 2005 • 2298 Posts
Greenpeace is a joke.
Avatar image for Art_424
Art_424

1745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Art_424
Member since 2004 • 1745 Posts
This messege was brought to you by Sony Playstation! Please BUY ME!!:lol:
Avatar image for Zeke129
Zeke129

11176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#37 Zeke129
Member since 2003 • 11176 Posts

This messege was brought to you by Sony Playstation! Please BUY ME!!:lol:Art_424

This message was brought to you by the Wii section of IGN, actually.

Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#38 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
They critisized them for not having a takeback policy for their products? No one throws out Nintendo products...
Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts
Good, I hate seals.
Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts

Just a side note. Seals are overpopulated in the arctic, and are wiping out whole species of fish, which we need to eat. Clubbing the babies means that you stop them from breeding too much and wrecking the environment. Shooting them is less humane, as they can lie there dying for hours.

Not saying it's 'good', but just because something is 'cute' doesn't make it a purely good thing.

osirisomeomi

And the most humane option is to club them to death? :|

Avatar image for antiredcap
antiredcap

1757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 antiredcap
Member since 2007 • 1757 Posts
Ha Ha!!! Everyone always goes off about how kiddie friendly and soft hearted Nintendo is..now everyones moaning because there way to bad ass!!!
Avatar image for laughingman42
laughingman42

8730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 laughingman42
Member since 2007 • 8730 Posts
[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"]

Just a side note. Seals are overpopulated in the arctic, and are wiping out whole species of fish, which we need to eat. Clubbing the babies means that you stop them from breeding too much and wrecking the environment. Shooting them is less humane, as they can lie there dying for hours.

Not saying it's 'good', but just because something is 'cute' doesn't make it a purely good thing.

manningbowl135

And the most humane option is to club them to death? :|

Yes.

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeke129"]Well, not really. But Greenpeace has rated Nintendo as the worst electronic manufacturer in terms of being environmentally friendly. Probably won't even faze them, but it can't be good for PR. Zenfoldor

and I guarntee you they will make a much larger profit not caring what the enviromentalist think, than they would if they conformed to their ultra strict and pointless regulations. The end.

That's true. The problem with that is all that money they're earning to have a good life and provide their kids with one will indeed give them a good life, but when those kids grow up and they see that their kids have to grow up in a polluted, unsanitary world partially b/c their father wanted to make a few extra bucks, no matter how much money you make for them, they'll still hate you.

Avatar image for hiho24
hiho24

4052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#44 hiho24
Member since 2005 • 4052 Posts

Well, not really. But Greenpeace has rated Nintendo as the worst electronic manufacturer in terms of being environmentally friendly. Probably won't even faze them, but it can't be good for PR. Zeke129

Woot another reason for me to support Nintendo. :D

I'm not against the environment, I'm against those global agencies that like to poke and prod at companies to produce study results that have absolutely no influence.

A takeback plan gives marks against them? How about people themselves dispose of things properly! Nintendo sells it they arent a recycling plant..

Avatar image for monkeysrfat
monkeysrfat

1789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 monkeysrfat
Member since 2007 • 1789 Posts
If I were greenpeace I would be more worried about the 360 causing bushfires. jks jks
Avatar image for albi321
albi321

1552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 albi321
Member since 2007 • 1552 Posts

[QUOTE="Zeke129"]Well, not really. But Greenpeace has rated Nintendo as the worst electronic manufacturer in terms of being environmentally friendly. Probably won't even faze them, but it can't be good for PR. Zenfoldor

I, personally think it's great that Nintendo is standing up to hippie enviromentalist peace lovers. In my mind, I would just as soon kill a man as look at him, so I LOVE destroying childrens futures. I think it's fantastic.

Contributing to eventually killing everyone all of you care about makes me love Nintendo even more than I already did.

Anyway, honestly, enviromentalism and greenpeace are, in my minds, far left loons who think that not recycling plastic off the cutting room floor will kill every child in the world, inside of 10 years. If your a political activist into "enviromentalism" I can see why you would care, but if your a gamer, honestly, its PC to say we care about the enviroment, but I would club 10 baby seals myself to help Nintendo sell one more Wii this holiday, just so I could laugh at the Lemmings.

You, me, and all our kids will be long dead before any pollution Nintendo does, will have any effect on the enviroment whatsoever. Protesting companies for non-enviromental conformity is bullcrap, and I guarntee you they will make a much larger profit not caring what the enviromentalist think, than they would if they conformed to their ultra strict and pointless regulations. The end.

:|

Avatar image for PhoebusFlows
PhoebusFlows

2050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 PhoebusFlows
Member since 2007 • 2050 Posts

All of this ridiculous hippie name-calling towards Greenpeace is not so much a blast against Greenpeace and their cause (I hope not), but a sheep reaction against something bad said about Nintendo. If they ranked Nintendo last in anything, they attack the entire organization, one that has involved decades of research, volunteer work, charity, andtireless efforts to educate a dull-minded and slow-moving public. But these Sheep get angry and want Nintendo first in everything, like a soccer mom. Newsflash, if you get ranked, especially ranked last, work on improving instead of just crossing your arms in petulance.

Think next time what you're saying. It's okay to kill the seals? What is wrong with some of you people? But then, I shouldn't expect much deep thought since this is the same forum that created an explosive riot when Metroid Prime Corruption got a 9.0 and they were angry even about that. It seems they care more for prestige and high numbers instead of quality and the product itself.

Once in a while, put down the video games and think of broader subjects in life. Not Metroid Prime, not SMG, where you collect imaginary stars. And you're the ones making fun of Greenpeace who is right now doing exhaustive field work and research while you wiggle your arms to collect starbits in front of a TV? Get out more, jeez.

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts
[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"]

Just a side note. Seals are overpopulated in the arctic, and are wiping out whole species of fish, which we need to eat. Clubbing the babies means that you stop them from breeding too much and wrecking the environment. Shooting them is less humane, as they can lie there dying for hours.

Not saying it's 'good', but just because something is 'cute' doesn't make it a purely good thing.

manningbowl135

And the most humane option is to club them to death? :|

Well, maybe not, but it sure is fun. :D

Avatar image for hiho24
hiho24

4052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#49 hiho24
Member since 2005 • 4052 Posts
whatever. "teh uneducated public"... Its called the internet where people find stupid things funny and the majority dont mean what they say.

And MP3 got an 8.5.

Avatar image for iunderstand
iunderstand

3201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 iunderstand
Member since 2006 • 3201 Posts

All of this ridiculous hippie name-calling towards Greenpeace is not so much a blast against Greenpeace and their cause (I hope not), but a sheep reaction against something bad said about Nintendo. If they ranked Nintendo last in anything, they attack the entire organization, one that has involved decades of research, volunteer work, charity, andtireless efforts to educate a dull-minded and slow-moving public. But these Sheep get angry and want Nintendo first in everything, like a soccer mom. Newsflash, if you get ranked, especially ranked last, work on improving instead of just crossing your arms in petulance.

Think next time what you're saying. It's okay to kill the seals? What is wrong with some of you people? But then, I shouldn't expect much deep thought since this is the same forum that created an explosive riot when Metroid Prime Corruption got a 9.0 and they were angry even about that. It seems they care more for prestige and high numbers instead of quality and the product itself.

Once in a while, put down the video games and think of broader subjects in life. Not Metroid Prime, not SMG, where you collect imaginary stars. And you're the ones making fun of Greenpeace who is right now doing exhaustive field work and research while you wiggle your arms to collect starbits in front of a TV? Get out more, jeez.

PhoebusFlows

I posted the link to Greenpeace's exhausting research they did on Nintendo's policies. Here is the link if you are curious as to how they got their findings.

I could also say the same for you. Rather than acknowledge that Greenpeace's allegations have no factual basis and have done nothing to properly research the company's environmental policies, you immediately agree with anything bashing Nintendo.