Nintendo must haved based the philosophy of the Wii on the movie 300

  • 82 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.  Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada 

Avatar image for ZinkOxide
ZinkOxide

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ZinkOxide
Member since 2006 • 633 Posts
They must've used a time machine, then.
Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

jedigemini
The Spartans were strong, wii is not.
Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth.  They relied more on strategy.

Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#5 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts
wii is 279$ puls tax witch is 318$ in ontario
Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337
The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

then why is it beating the crap out of its competitors?
Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
They must've used a time machine, then.ZinkOxide
The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,
Avatar image for Koolsen
Koolsen

8054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 Koolsen
Member since 2004 • 8054 Posts
Um so your saying a bunch of ha;f naked men are gonna come running out of my Wii and kill my 360 and PS3?
Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts

[QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.jedigemini
The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
Um so your saying a bunch of ha;f naked men are gonna come running out of my Wii and kill my 360 and PS3? Koolsen
No Im not saying that at all. Get your sick mind out of the gutter.
Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

slothboyadvance

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.
Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.slothboyadvance

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:
Avatar image for thirstychainsaw
thirstychainsaw

3761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 thirstychainsaw
Member since 2007 • 3761 Posts
So who is going to betray Nintendo?
Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

jedigemini
The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

then why is it beating the crap out of its competitors?

Week CPU.
Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.jedigemini

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

It is quite possible to have a fictional movie based on true events. 

Besides, I don't remember Persians being 8 feet tall and having goats that can play flutes.

Avatar image for Son_of_Some
Son_of_Some

1458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Son_of_Some
Member since 2006 • 1458 Posts

[QUOTE="Koolsen"]Um so your saying a bunch of ha;f naked men are gonna come running out of my Wii and kill my 360 and PS3? jedigemini
No Im not saying that at all. Get your sick mind out of the gutter.

 Well, does sony have a giant ogre they are going to release upon the Wii, then?

Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

then why is it beating the crap out of its competitors?

Week CPU.

Youre getting too technical and ruining my analogy with your nerdy comparisions.

 

Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.Redmoonxl2

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

It is quite possible to have a fictional movie based on true events. 

Besides, I don't remember Persians being 8 feet tall and having goats that can play flutes.

Maybe because you weren't born?

Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

slothboyadvance

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.slothboyadvance

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

The story 300 is actually based on a true story of Sparta history.
Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

But we're comparing it to the fictional movie, not the actual Spartans.  Read the topic title.

Avatar image for Shiftfallout
Shiftfallout

2635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#23 Shiftfallout
Member since 2006 • 2635 Posts
anyone else realize this is the most retarded thread ever? The OP should get a medal or something, there were some left overs from last years special olympics.
Avatar image for geist117
geist117

4419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 geist117
Member since 2006 • 4419 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.Redmoonxl2

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

It is quite possible to have a fictional movie based on true events. 

Besides, I don't remember Persians being 8 feet tall and having goats that can play flutes.

The loberster claw guy was real and the only thing inaccurate about Xerxes was he wasn't bald according to history he had a 4 foot tall green mohawk.
Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.jedigemini

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

Do you honestly believe that 300 men actually held back an army of Persians. Frank Miller wrote it. Or maybe, just maybe, the Ancient Greek historians are doing something their well known to do, exaggerate stories to a degree to which history looks at them in an almost sycophantic light. It's just like the story of Alexander at Arbela, supposedly killing 1 million Persians and losing a few hundred. Let's stop using these stories for consoles. The Wii is the Wii, the 360 is the 360, and the PS3 is the PS3.
Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.shungokustasu

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

The story 300 is actually based on a true story of Sparta history.

The movie 300 is based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller, not the ACTUAL SPARTANS.

Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.shungokustasu

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

The story 300 is actually based on a true story of Sparta history.

A truely exaggerated story probably.
Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[QUOTE="Redmoonxl2"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.slothboyadvance

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

It is quite possible to have a fictional movie based on true events.

Besides, I don't remember Persians being 8 feet tall and having goats that can play flutes.

Maybe because you weren't born?

What do you mean? I visited Ancient Greece last week on my Dalaran.

Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

jedigemini

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.
Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="Redmoonxl2"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.Redmoonxl2

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

It is quite possible to have a fictional movie based on true events.

Besides, I don't remember Persians being 8 feet tall and having goats that can play flutes.

Maybe because you weren't born?

What do you mean? I visited Ancient Greece last week on my Dalaran.

lol

Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.
Avatar image for Shiftfallout
Shiftfallout

2635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#33 Shiftfallout
Member since 2006 • 2635 Posts
To clear up some confusion. 300 was based off a graphic novel. The graphic novel was based off an historical event where a small number of spartans prevented the persian army from getting through a pass for about a year.
Avatar image for darkodonnie
darkodonnie

2384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 darkodonnie
Member since 2007 • 2384 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.Redmoonxl2

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

It is quite possible to have a fictional movie based on true events.

Besides, I don't remember Persians being 8 feet tall and having goats that can play flutes.

the height may be exaggerated for effect, but they did have the flute-playing goats :P
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.slothboyadvance

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

The story 300 is actually based on a true story of Sparta history.

The movie 300 is based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller, not the ACTUAL SPARTANS.

The movie 300 was base of the 1962 flim "300 Spartans" and that movie was base off history of the Peloponnesian War.
Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.Danm_999

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

Do you honestly believe that 300 men actually held back an army of Persians. Frank Miller wrote it. Or maybe, just maybe, the Ancient Greek historians are doing something their well known to do, exaggerate stories to a degree to which history looks at them in an almost sycophantic light. It's just like the story of Alexander at Arbela, supposedly killing 1 million Persians and losing a few hundred. Let's stop using these stories for consoles. The Wii is the Wii, the 360 is the 360, and the PS3 is the PS3.

It was more than 300 men. it was the whole army of Athens, 300 Spartans, 1000 other Creek men. The battle was fought on a narrow passage.
Avatar image for slothboyadvance
slothboyadvance

12596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 slothboyadvance
Member since 2003 • 12596 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.shungokustasu

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

The story 300 is actually based on a true story of Sparta history.

The movie 300 is based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller, not the ACTUAL SPARTANS.

The movie 300 was base of the 1962 flim "300 Spartans" and that movie was base off history of the Peloponnesian War.

Touche

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.shungokustasu

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

The story 300 is actually based on a true story of Sparta history.

The movie 300 is based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller, not the ACTUAL SPARTANS.

The movie 300 was base of the 1962 flim "300 Spartans" and that movie was base off history of the Peloponnesian War.

 

Incorrect. Frank Miller was inspired by the "300 Spartans" movie and created his version of "300" in 1998, which was published by Dark Horse Comics. The "300" currently out is based on Frank Miller's version of "300". 

Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

jedigemini

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.
Avatar image for bloodychimp
bloodychimp

933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#40 bloodychimp
Member since 2006 • 933 Posts

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.slothboyadvance

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

 

The story of 300 is based on the Battle of Thermopylae.

 

Avatar image for taker42
taker42

1614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 taker42
Member since 2007 • 1614 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.

If Atari still are making consoles, you are correct. Seeing as they aren't... :roll:
Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.

Is that all you have to comeback at me with? :lol: Or did you miss the part where I also said that Nintendo has the highest rated games, and is among the top selling software manufacturers (way ahead of Sony and MS... not even close)

pathetic.

Avatar image for Danm_999
Danm_999

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 Danm_999
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.shungokustasu

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

The story 300 is actually based on a true story of Sparta history.

The movie 300 is based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller, not the ACTUAL SPARTANS.

The movie 300 was base of the 1962 flim "300 Spartans" and that movie was base off history of the Peloponnesian War.

No, the Peloponesian War was years later....
[QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"]

[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="ZinkOxide"]They must've used a time machine, then.squirrel337

The story of Sparta is a couple thousand years old,

But the movie 300 is fictional.

Which is based on the story of Sparta... which is a couple thousand years old :roll:

Do you honestly believe that 300 men actually held back an army of Persians. Frank Miller wrote it. Or maybe, just maybe, the Ancient Greek historians are doing something their well known to do, exaggerate stories to a degree to which history looks at them in an almost sycophantic light. It's just like the story of Alexander at Arbela, supposedly killing 1 million Persians and losing a few hundred. Let's stop using these stories for consoles. The Wii is the Wii, the 360 is the 360, and the PS3 is the PS3.

It was more than 300 men. it was the whole army of Athens, 300 Spartans, 1000 other Creek men. The battle was fought on a narrow passage.

Yes, accounts of even 10, 000 against a supposed army of 100,000 to 500, 000 seems extremely unreasonable in any light.

The Ancient Greeks had a nasty habit of glorifying their military victories, especially when Persia was involved. Of course, neither of us really know, I'm just saying it was assinine for the TC to base this thread on something which is partly fictionalised by our modern culture, and was probably partly fictionalised by ancient culture.

Avatar image for gamerguy31315
gamerguy31315

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 gamerguy31315
Member since 2005 • 532 Posts
[QUOTE= The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

taker42

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.

If Atari still are making consoles, you are correct. Seeing as they aren't... :roll:

So the oldest company that makes a system is the best.
Avatar image for shungokustasu
shungokustasu

7190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 shungokustasu
Member since 2004 • 7190 Posts
[QUOTE="shungokustasu"] The movie 300 was base of the 1962 flim "300 Spartans" and that movie was base off history of the Peloponnesian War.Redmoonxl2

 

 

Incorrect. Frank Miller was inspired by the "300 Spartans" movie and created his version of "300" in 1998, which was published by Dark Horse Comics. The "300" currently out is based on Frank Miller's version of "300".

Gee...If the 300 was based on Frank Miller book and than Frank Miller book was base on the 1962 300. Isn't fair to say that the 2007 movies is based on the 1962 one?
Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

jedigemini

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.

Is that all you have to comeback at me with? :lol: Or did you miss the part where I also said that Nintendo has the highest rated games, and is among the top selling software manufacturers (way ahead of Sony and MS... not even close)

pathetic.

Okay fine they have good first party games. So stop making systems and just become a developer.
Avatar image for jedigemini
jedigemini

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 jedigemini
Member since 2007 • 2483 Posts
[QUOTE="taker42"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.

If Atari still are making consoles, you are correct. Seeing as they aren't... :roll:

So the oldest company that makes a system is the best.

1. I was talking about software.

2. Obviously Nintendo is the best in this regard as thier first party offerings completely annhilate Micorsoft and Sonys first party offerings in terms of rating and in terms of sales. Go home.

Avatar image for bloodychimp
bloodychimp

933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#49 bloodychimp
Member since 2006 • 933 Posts
[QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

squirrel337

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.

Is that all you have to comeback at me with? :lol: Or did you miss the part where I also said that Nintendo has the highest rated games, and is among the top selling software manufacturers (way ahead of Sony and MS... not even close)

pathetic.

Okay fine they have good first party games. So stop making systems and just become a developer.

But they make more money of their systems than the other two. Why would they throw away profit?

 You got owned by the guy you were argueing with. Take it like a man and stop damage controlling.

Avatar image for squirrel337
squirrel337

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 squirrel337
Member since 2007 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="taker42"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="slothboyadvance"][QUOTE="squirrel337"][QUOTE="jedigemini"]

Nintendo is like sparta. They knew they couldnt compete in terms of firepower so they used the next best thing, ingenuity to stagger their befuddled opponents.

PS. The Wii costs 300 dollars here in Canada

jedigemini

The Spartans were strong, wii is not.

But the Spartans in 300 didn't just rely on pure stregth. They relied more on strategy.

But the reason they could hold the pass was because they could hole there own. The Persians had week weapons (CPU). The Spartans had the best tech just like the 360.

Actually persians had the best tech (bombs) and the most soldiers, like the 360.

WTF watch the history channel the Spartans had best body armor, Spear, swords.

No. Spartas true strength is that they knew thier craft (war) better than anybody else... just like Nintendo knows games better than anyone else.

Just like you Lemmings and Cows, thinking the best armor will win you a war :lol: That's why your in this mess in the first place ;)

Nintendo dose not know games better than anyone else.

They''ve been in the business the longest. Have the highest rated first party games. And are the top selling software manufacturer of the big three. go home.

Atari is older so by your logic they are the best right.

If Atari still are making consoles, you are correct. Seeing as they aren't... :roll:

So the oldest company that makes a system is the best.

1. I was talking about software.

2. Obviously Nintendo is the best in this regard as thier first party offerings completely annhilate Micorsoft and Sonys first party offerings in terms of rating and in terms of sales. Go home.

OK so just make games and stop making systems.