[QUOTE="SoulKillah"] Nintendo. One of the oldest and most acclaimed gaming companies ever made. I used to own all of their consoles and portables up to the N64 era, but that was just my choice, so jumping ship to PS & Xbox didn't really change the way i think and i will always think about them. Here are the main 3 reasons why they should be respected by fans and haters:
1) Innovation: Nintendo was the company that brought gamers access to the NES and SNES, two consoles that introduced revolutionary games like Mario, Zelda and Metroid, in which gave birth to many new genres of games. They introduced gamers to the GameBoy, the first successful handheld that popularized portable gaming. During the N64 era they made controllers which supported Analog and Rumble. In 2004 they took portable gaming to the next level by including a stylus-responsive touch-screen on their NDS (Nintendo Dual Screen) handheld to appeal even more to casuals and hardcore gamers alike. Recently they revolutionized casual gaming by introducing the Wii with its motion-based controller,expanding the ever-growing videogames business even more.
2) Reliability: Practically, no Nintendo console or handheld had any noticeable manufacturing problems such as PS2's DRE, PSP's dead pixels and the X360's RROD issues. Nintendo is very accurate and has a very clean track-record that the opposition should envy. They know how to evade these problems through accurate-manufacture and various testing.
3) Legacy: Nintendo was established way back in September 23 1889, being a Trading-Cards company (Explaining their success with their Pokemon series). As a young man should respect his elder, companies new to their market should learn to heavily respect Nintendo for what they are, just like SEGA started doing a while back.
In the end, a console generation wouldn't be the same without the big N, no matter which kind of fanboy you might be:)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2515f/2515f2d2f7d50417d8f0b141a1c414fb8282e0dd" alt=""
mgs_freak91
i think everybody was doing fine with just playing the ps2 early last gen.
and and and:
Seeing as we're talking about game companies that HELPED BRING good games to us. how about microsoft and the MSX?? that bought us bomberman, metal gear, final fantasy, castlevania.
Some earlier and later revisions of the GameCube consoles developed disc read problems with the optical pickup becoming thermally sensitive over time, causing read errors when the console reached normal operating temperature. Failures of this sort require replacement of the optical pickup. Affected consoles have sometimes been serviced free of charge by Nintendo even after the expiration of the warranty period.
so i busted two of your points - but you are correct about ur 3rd point. though when sony came with the ps1 and p2. nintendo fell back. so sony took that position - and no nintendo is risin agen already taken that position, sales wise - which at the end basicly means everything. think about it. if they didnt have good hardware sales, they mite not even continue with the whole company nintendo!! they might go back to makin pokemon cards!! hopefully non nintendo, sony and microsoft dont die out in the console manufacturaing part. the only thing that needs to die are fanboys and pathetic argueing.
:)
1 one mans innovation is another mans gimmick: examples: ROB the robot, light gun, U FORCE, power pad, power glove, super scope, wii mote (wii nunchuck sold seperately to milk even more) , wii wheel, wii arcade pad (really if they made the gamecube backwards compatible with gamecube controllers the only reason they made these is to milk people because you could use the gamecube controller on any snes or N64 game), gamecube using gameboy as a controller, stylus, i agree they are innovative, in more ways than you listed: they also sued during the nes era taito and tecmo for not purchasing a license from them to make games that would work on the nes, nintendo lost the lawsuit, but this was the first sign nintendo might not be 3rd party developer friendly (unless you payed them to make games for their system, which, is why its nintendos 3rd party is in the shape its in now, and the sony playstation was in fact going to be an addon to the snes (i think if memory serves me correctly, codenamed dolphin) nintendo backed out on the deal and sony released it as the PSX. ( i think this was a mistake on nintendos part, because it would have been the only system after sega tanked)
also the most innovative thing i think nintendo has going for it: its online gaming plan. to this reggie tells us nintendo has pokemon, (sigh of relief) and that loveable 15 digit number code you have to enter to play with someone.
2. reliability: this i disagree with, because the original nes we had to use the blow trick on, the original nes consoles had a problem with the cartidge slot not locking or breaking ( the front loading ones) game freezes and cartridge batteries only last like 5 years, snes was fine and N64 was better but had hardly any good games other than the 1st party games. gamecube was reliable as far as i know and the wii so far is also. so i guess each system has had 1 lemon model.
3. legacy: if you really want to count all those years nintendo wasnt into videogames then shouldnt we count sonys also? sony has been around a long time too, the only one thats really a new kid is microsoft.
actually if nintendo doesnt get its act together with the 3rd parties, reguardless of how much its hardware sales, i see it going the route of sega (which i think would be win/win.)
Log in to comment