I find it sad that cows always have to use the price excuse. Yet, at the same time, they argue that the PS3 is a better value than the Wii. If it was a better value, then it would be selling more.
Put it this way, by cows logic, Wrigley could start selling sticks of gum for $80 a piece, and it should sell better than Honda Civics, which cost $15,000+. After all, $80 is less than $15,000 right?
Of course not, if console A is selling better than console B, it means that more people think Console A is worth whatever they are charging for it than console B. Cows using the price excuse is basically a tacit admission (though they don't realize it), that the PS3 is NOT worth what it costs. Well, that's exactly what us sheep are saying. The Wii is worth it's $250 retail cost, which is proven by it's sales numbers, and the PS3 is not worth it's $500-$600 retail cost, except by diehard Sony fanboys, which is proven by it's weak sales.
Number_1_Gamer
   Terrible comparison. Gum to a car?
   A better one would be a Honda (Wii) to a BMW (PS3), since they are both cars (systems). They do, basically, the same thing (play games), but you pay more for one than the other.Â
   Why? Features and luxuries. Can you live without heated leather seats (Blu-Ray)? Yeah sure you can. Do you need a premium sound system (HD graphics)? Absolutely not.
   But some people are willing to pay the added costs for those features, while others are not. See how easy the comparison can be done when you do it accurately?
Log in to comment