Second star to the right, and straight on until morning.
Treky alert..... lol, jk, I'm a fan of the original and the movies myself. :P
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Second star to the right, and straight on until morning.
Treky alert..... lol, jk, I'm a fan of the original and the movies myself. :P
Only on playstation!
*also on PC
Sony and its cheap/funny tactics... Never get old.
It will take billions of years to explore but only a few hours to get bored of.
Still looking forward to it, nice of them to not make it completely exclusive to PS4.
Second star to the right, and straight on until morning.
Treky alert..... lol, jk, I'm a fan of the original and the movies myself. :P
My first thought was Peter Pan.
It just makes me warm and fuzzy that you dont own a gaming PC and I do.. :)
Why the hell would I want to play a game with a bunch of computer generated random worlds? I want a personal touch made with human hands.
Usually console gets Batman'd.
Console games are usually broken to a point where they pull the game from the marketplace?
No.
A lot of people are going to be very disappointed by this game. This game has no soul. It's all just pointless procedurally generated planets. Very little of the game will be designed to be fun. It will just be generic objectives and mission structures. I am not hyped for this game. Star Citizen will destroy this game.
A lot of people are going to be very disappointed by this game. This game has no soul. It's all just pointless procedurally generated planets. Very little of the game will be designed to be fun. It will just be generic objectives and mission structures. I am not hyped for this game. Star Citizen will destroy this game.
I'm still open minded when it comes to No Man's Sky and want it to be a great game because devs look like bunch of nice dudes,,, but not hyped or excited at all. I always prefer small handcrafted worlds over big procedurally generated ones. That's why since the beginning when everyone was announcing their Space Sims, I was only excited for Star Citizen/Squadron 42.
A lot of people are going to be very disappointed by this game. This game has no soul. It's all just pointless procedurally generated planets. Very little of the game will be designed to be fun. It will just be generic objectives and mission structures. I am not hyped for this game. Star Citizen will destroy this game.
I'm still open minded when it comes to No Man's Sky and want it to be a great game because devs look like bunch of nice dudes,,, but not hyped or excited at all. I always prefer small handcrafted worlds over big procedurally generated ones. That's why since the beginning when everyone was announcing their Space Sims, I was only excited for Star Citizen/Squadron 42.
I definitely don't want the game to fail, but I see through all the BS and this game just doesn't look impressive. I like the core idea, but this game will lack any meaning or significance. All these planets to explore, but nothing worthwhile to do on them. It will get repetitive real quick.
A lot of people are going to be very disappointed by this game. This game has no soul. It's all just pointless procedurally generated planets. Very little of the game will be designed to be fun. It will just be generic objectives and mission structures. I am not hyped for this game. Star Citizen will destroy this game.
I'm still open minded when it comes to No Man's Sky and want it to be a great game because devs look like bunch of nice dudes,,, but not hyped or excited at all. I always prefer small handcrafted worlds over big procedurally generated ones. That's why since the beginning when everyone was announcing their Space Sims, I was only excited for Star Citizen/Squadron 42.
I definitely don't want the game to fail, but I see through all the BS and this game just doesn't look impressive. I like the core idea, but this game will lack any meaning or significance. All these planets to explore, but nothing worthwhile to do on them. It will get repetitive real quick.
Yup,,, that's one of the big reasons why I couldn't get into Elite Dangerous as well. Waiting for couple of big expansions to roll out before jumping back in.
@Guy_Brohski: A billion milliseconds is over a full day by my calculations. So not exactly an epic amount of time but certainly not an inconsequential amount of time to be playing one game.
@DocSanchez: Dude, you read into that comment way too much. My point was simply that people will probably get bored with the game in a few days.
@Guy_Brohski: They might. I think there's potential there though, it depends on whether the developers realise it. You should be able to colonise your planets and set up shops in order to flog your mined materials and crafted equipment. They should just keep adding to it like minecraft. There should be pre made planets which are special and clues to find them. I could go on. Basically, its up to them. I think it could be a winner. If its a lifeless random world as some suspect, it wont be. Still interested in it.
Maybe it will be better , maybe it won't.
90% chance in my favor.
lol maybe.
Usually console gets Batman'd.
Console games are usually broken to a point where they pull the game from the marketplace?
No.
Yes. They just don't get pulled because lolconsolegamers are drones.
DriveClub, Skyrim, MCC, etc.
Yes. They just don't get pulled because lolconsolegamers.
DriveClub, Skyrim, MCC, etc.
No, because they're not as bad as the Arkham Knight deal.
@-God-:
Maybe it will be better , maybe it won't.
One thing i'm sure is , you can't play it because you don't have a PC.
Why do you cut out the rest of my post?
Yes. They just don't get pulled because lolconsolegamers.
DriveClub, Skyrim, MCC, etc.
No, because they're not as bad as the Arkham Knight deal.
lol what, some of those weren't even playable.....AK can be played just some textures are low after a .ini tweak.
lol what, some of those weren't even playable.....AK can be played just some textures are low after a .ini tweak.
They were. Not every part of the game worked. For example, the MCC's online. Meanwhile, AK is capped at 30FPS, and even then it gives people trouble. Missing assets. Looks worse than the console versions. If you try to unlock it, it goes apeshit.
It's so bad they took the game down. Don't pretend this stuff is standard on consoles by doing the whole "consoles get batman'd" all the time.
Yeah. If bad textures and fps are bad, then consoles get bad almost always.
They are just so used to it that you don't get this kind of uproar.
Yeah, those are the only things wrong with AK. Jank, pls.
@StealthMonkey4: It is but I cant play it on two units at once now can I. Holding off on the pc version until my new build next year unless it takes that long to release anyway.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment