[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="uRan_Ehr"] And where's the problem with that? Do you really think Google will come up with something completely different than Windows or Linux or Mac OS?uRan_Ehr
They've already made it clear that they are going to be making a different operating system. It's open-source with a Linux basis, so it's not dramatically different there, however, all the applications are going to be web-based and centered around the browser. This means that Google's success in the desktop market revolves around the success of their browser and the development of web-based applications. Linux is not even remotely similar in that sense. For Linux to be successful you have to have graphics applications coded for OpenGL and applications generally coded for the Linux kernel, which means porting. With Chrome OS, you're going to be virtually entirely dependent on web apps, which are cross-platform and can be accessed by other operating systems, meaning it's going to be easier to get the software required to break into the market. Linux' biggest problem right now is development. Well so a operating system that only works with with mainly Google programs? Sure you say it's open source ... but do you really think so many people will limit themselves? Mac OS, Linux and Windows have been around for a very long time. This will be a gimmick at first and if Google works hard it may compete with Linux but I don't see many companies like Adobe for example to switch to Google. There's a hell lot of programs on Mac OS for instance I really need for my daily "work" as a student and most of them aren't even on Windows so why should all these companies switch to Google? This Google OS will be more like a more improved OS of the iPad if you get what I mean ... it's more for browsing the web, checking your mails and stuff like that but I don't see it doing the hard work my PC and my MacBook do. What are you talking about?I said Chrome OS is going to be centered around web-apps, meaning that they are entirely independent of the operating system. This means any browser and any OS can access them. Platform independent....this means you can make a web-app and its accessible to all platforms, including Chrome and the more established platforms. This is what will help Chrome where Linux has failed, it will make software development/porting less painful because you can strike all markets at once.
"This will be a gimmick at first and if Google works hard it may compete with Linux but I don't see many companies like Adobe for example to switch to Google. "
Interesting that you say that considering the following article:
http://venturebeat.com/2010/04/29/adobe-ceo-apple/
Reporters at the Wall Street Journal lined up an interview with Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen to respond to Jobs' claims.
"I've met him on a number of occasions," Narayen said. But he disagreed with most of what Jobs wrote.
"We have different views of the world," he said. "Our view of the world is multiplatform."
- On Jobs' characterization of Apple as an open platform for software developers, and Adobe as closed: "I find it amusing, honestly. Flash is an open specification."
- On Apple's rules that require iPhone OS apps to be written exclusively for iPhone OS, rather than converted from Flash to the H.264 format Apple supports: "It doesn't benefit Apple, and that's why you see this reaction" from software developers who balk at creating apps for Apple gadgets. "It would be better if you could use one set" of development tools.
http://www.iphonealley.com/current/adobe-ceo-apple-banned-flash-to-preserve-app-store
Narayen said Apple's decision likely had everything to do with its business model as it tries to keep a proprietary, closed system so everything goes through its iTunes store, and has nothing to do with the Flash technology. He said about 85 of the top 100 Web sites in the world use Flash, and 75% of the video on the Web today is in Flash, including Google Inc.'s (GOOG) YouTube, News Corp.'s (NWS) Hulu and broadcasters such as ABC and Fox.
The guy said right there he supports multiplatform development and that Apple completely ****ed them by closing their platform to Adobe products. Apple has a long-standing ban on flash in favor of HTML5. Google does not ban flash.....flash is used entirely to run their subsidiary Youtube.com.
If anything, Adobe has about a thousand reasons to prefer Google over Apple. Apple has been feuding with Adobe for a good while now, just like they've been feuding with Google.
Log in to comment