now this is a nice comparison

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for amourkiss
amourkiss

1751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#1 amourkiss
Member since 2003 • 1751 Posts

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

Avatar image for danneswegman
danneswegman

12937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 danneswegman
Member since 2005 • 12937 Posts
the 360 versions look better in almost every case here...... why is that so hard to see/ admit.. games will get better on PS3?>....
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts
A bit hard to tell when the images are microscopic.
Avatar image for greg_splicer
greg_splicer

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 greg_splicer
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

amourkiss
Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

A bit hard to tell when the images are microscopic.goblaa

click on the "original version" link for the 720p images. 

Avatar image for AgentVX
AgentVX

1160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AgentVX
Member since 2006 • 1160 Posts
Usually the PS3 gets dinged for worse frame rates, no online options, and in some cases, just plain bad graphics.
Avatar image for XboxUnderground
XboxUnderground

20965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 XboxUnderground
Member since 2003 • 20965 Posts

wow

NHL 2k7 looks so much better on 360 :o

 

 

and I was just about to buy it on PS3 too :o

 

looks like I'll be buying it on 360 instead 

Avatar image for gogeta242
gogeta242

1085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 gogeta242
Member since 2006 • 1085 Posts
[QUOTE="amourkiss"]

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

greg_splicer

Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures

pics>>>>>>>>>>>>>your 360-loving-idiotic-fanboy opinion.

Avatar image for greg_splicer
greg_splicer

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 greg_splicer
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
[QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="amourkiss"]

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

gogeta242

Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures

pics>>>>>>>>>>>>>your 360-loving-idiotic-fanboy opinion.

???? 360 pics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS3 ones, in case you are blind, PLEASE stop posting about things you can't see 720p pics are HORRIBLE on PS3, in Fear everything is blurry, textures half the 360 resolution, in Splinter Cell 4 PS3 has no shaders at all, they forgot to put them in, in Oblivion most textures are half the 360 resolution, colors are washed out, in Enchanted Arms all background geometry has been REMOVED, shaders are horrible, textures half the resolution, and colors blackened , everything is rendered bad I fear that FF13 will look like total garbage on PS3, as all its future games, those graphics are just HORRIBLE
Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts
[QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="amourkiss"]

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

greg_splicer

Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures

pics>>>>>>>>>>>>>your 360-loving-idiotic-fanboy opinion.

???? 360 pics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS3 ones, in case you are blind, PLEASE stop posting about things you can't see 720p pics are HORRIBLE on PS3, in Fear everything is blurry, textures half the 360 resolution, in Splinter Cell 4 PS3 has no shaders at all, they forgot to put them in, in Oblivion most textures are half the 360 resolution, colors are washed out, in Enchanted Arms all background geometry has been REMOVED, shaders are horrible, textures half the resolution, and colors blackened , everything is rendered bad I fear that FF13 will look like total garbage on PS3, as all its future games, those graphics are just HORRIBLE

whooooooa First off Xbox plays games in 1080i which is crap compared to 720p. As for the pics...every game that matters is better on PS3...that being oblivion :P I'm a FPS fan and I thought FEAR sucked on PC....soo...hmm.. IN time PS3 will catch and Pass 360 for now...it will be just like 2001 when Xbox ports sucked hard..
Avatar image for TheSpidren
TheSpidren

2565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 TheSpidren
Member since 2005 • 2565 Posts

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

amourkiss


"now this is a nice comparison"

It's only 'nice' for you since it's in your favour.

But the truth is, it's not nice, and learn to deal with it, most (if not all) existing multiplat games look better on 360.
The end.
Avatar image for amourkiss
amourkiss

1751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#14 amourkiss
Member since 2003 • 1751 Posts

I'm not trying to argue here

just say what I see from this pic comparison

for CoD3, just see the second pic (from the left)

I really think PS3 version looks better, the building in the far end looks more clear, and there are backpack on soldiers, which X360 did not

CoD 3

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts

I'm not trying to argue here

just say what I see from this pic comparison

for CoD3, just see the second pic (from the left)

I really think PS3 version looks better, the building in the far end looks more clear, and there are backpack on soldiers, which X360 did not

CoD 3

amourkiss
And therein lies the problem. It's cleaner but has a choppy framerate which brings it down and in motion the 360 version looks slightly better. NHL though looks better on the PS3. I don't know why the guy on the first page doesn't think so.
Avatar image for greg_splicer
greg_splicer

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 greg_splicer
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
[QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="amourkiss"]

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

NextGenNow

Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures

pics>>>>>>>>>>>>>your 360-loving-idiotic-fanboy opinion.

???? 360 pics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS3 ones, in case you are blind, PLEASE stop posting about things you can't see 720p pics are HORRIBLE on PS3, in Fear everything is blurry, textures half the 360 resolution, in Splinter Cell 4 PS3 has no shaders at all, they forgot to put them in, in Oblivion most textures are half the 360 resolution, colors are washed out, in Enchanted Arms all background geometry has been REMOVED, shaders are horrible, textures half the resolution, and colors blackened , everything is rendered bad I fear that FF13 will look like total garbage on PS3, as all its future games, those graphics are just HORRIBLE

whooooooa First off Xbox plays games in 1080i which is crap compared to 720p. As for the pics...every game that matters is better on PS3...that being oblivion :P I'm a FPS fan and I thought FEAR sucked on PC....soo...hmm.. IN time PS3 will catch and Pass 360 for now...it will be just like 2001 when Xbox ports sucked hard..

Hahaha, nice answer, in games that matter PS3 is better ? And seems that no game matters since PS3 is worst in EVERY game so far, Oblivion included, yes it does have better AF, but has lower res textures in most places, especially in rocks and trees As for when PS3 will surpass 360 ?? Never of course, things just get worst for PS3, see Splinter Cell 4, PS3 has no shaders at all, Enahncted Arms looks like total garbage on PS3, and Oblivon has no AA, worst HDR, washed out colors, lower resolution textures overall Hope you did not really buy a PS3, if you did, i can only feel sorry for you, expect games like Colin, Assains, DMC4, FF13, to look VASTLY better on 360, Colin developers can't even run the game yet on PS3, it is moved months later on PS3 !!!! Imagine what a garbage hardware it has inside
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
[QUOTE="amourkiss"]

I'm not trying to argue here

just say what I see from this pic comparison

for CoD3, just see the second pic (from the left)

I really think PS3 version looks better, the building in the far end looks more clear, and there are backpack on soldiers, which X360 did not

CoD 3

Ibacai

And therein lies the problem. It's cleaner but has a choppy framerate which brings it down and in motion the 360 version looks slightly better. NHL though looks better on the PS3. I don't know why the guy on the first page doesn't think so.

To me NHL 2K7 looks kinda blurry on the 360, like it was upscaled to that resolution.  It's definitely sharper on the PS3, although that also makes the aliasing a bit more apparent.  The reflections on the ice look more detailed on the 360 though, and the adds on the side look like they're a bit higher resolution. 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#18 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts
[QUOTE="amourkiss"]

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

greg_splicer

Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures

Sorry dude but you fail. I have ALL versions of Oblivion and if you want the best go PC, otherwise the PS3 version is way better graphically, console wise. Were exactly are the low res textures?  Every professional review that matters for Oblivion on the PS3 states it has better textures than the 360 version. So I guess all the profesional reviews are wrong right? The 360s textures are good but looking at them side by side Im sorry the PS3 verison wins, get over it. It does everything better, and runs ALOT smoother. Washed out colors..Please those are acurate colors compared to the colors that are so dark they almost bleed out of everything on the 360 version.

This is why system wars should be for idiots only. Why the hell I even post here baffles me. Its like 360 fanbots just have to win. Obliivon is better on the PS3 PERIOD. All the other ports though go to the 360 hands down. But saying they look like N64 graphics? Have you ever even seen a PS3 game up close? Your parents should have never been allowed to have children.....Just look at the end result. Friggin sad is what it is.

Avatar image for amourkiss
amourkiss

1751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#19 amourkiss
Member since 2003 • 1751 Posts

after seeing all the comparisons

I really do found CoD3 and Blazing Angels looks a bit better on PS3

well, yeah maybe the framerate sux I'm not sure, but from the pics I saw you know ...

 

Avatar image for RabbidDawg
RabbidDawg

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#20 RabbidDawg
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts
[QUOTE="NextGenNow"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="amourkiss"]

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

greg_splicer

Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures

pics>>>>>>>>>>>>>your 360-loving-idiotic-fanboy opinion.

???? 360 pics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS3 ones, in case you are blind, PLEASE stop posting about things you can't see 720p pics are HORRIBLE on PS3, in Fear everything is blurry, textures half the 360 resolution, in Splinter Cell 4 PS3 has no shaders at all, they forgot to put them in, in Oblivion most textures are half the 360 resolution, colors are washed out, in Enchanted Arms all background geometry has been REMOVED, shaders are horrible, textures half the resolution, and colors blackened , everything is rendered bad I fear that FF13 will look like total garbage on PS3, as all its future games, those graphics are just HORRIBLE

whooooooa First off Xbox plays games in 1080i which is crap compared to 720p. As for the pics...every game that matters is better on PS3...that being oblivion :P I'm a FPS fan and I thought FEAR sucked on PC....soo...hmm.. IN time PS3 will catch and Pass 360 for now...it will be just like 2001 when Xbox ports sucked hard..

Hahaha, nice answer, in games that matter PS3 is better ? And seems that no game matters since PS3 is worst in EVERY game so far, Oblivion included, yes it does have better AF, but has lower res textures in most places, especially in rocks and trees As for when PS3 will surpass 360 ?? Never of course, things just get worst for PS3, see Splinter Cell 4, PS3 has no shaders at all, Enahncted Arms looks like total garbage on PS3, and Oblivon has no AA, worst HDR, washed out colors, lower resolution textures overall Hope you did not really buy a PS3, if you did, i can only feel sorry for you, expect games like Colin, Assains, DMC4, FF13, to look VASTLY better on 360, Colin developers can't even run the game yet on PS3, it is moved months later on PS3 !!!! Imagine what a garbage hardware it has inside

Rocks and trees lower res in Oblivion for the PS3? Has fanboyism blinded you that much? Now I know you have never seen the game upclose. As I said in my other post Every Professional review has said that the PS3 has better, sharper, crisper textures. The Rocks and trees look SO much better on the PS3 version. I know I can see them side by side on my 2 LCD TVS. Ive dontethe comparisson, I own both versions. You are by far the worst the leemings have to offer. You lose just get over it :lol:

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="amourkiss"]

I'm not trying to argue here

just say what I see from this pic comparison

for CoD3, just see the second pic (from the left)

I really think PS3 version looks better, the building in the far end looks more clear, and there are backpack on soldiers, which X360 did not

CoD 3

Teufelhuhn

And therein lies the problem. It's cleaner but has a choppy framerate which brings it down and in motion the 360 version looks slightly better. NHL though looks better on the PS3. I don't know why the guy on the first page doesn't think so.

To me NHL 2K7 looks kinda blurry on the 360, like it was upscaled to that resolution. It's definitely sharper on the PS3, although that also makes the aliasing a bit more apparent. The reflections on the ice look more detailed on the 360 though, and the adds on the side look like they're a bit higher resolution.

I guess I just don't see it. I think the refelections on the ice look better on the PS3 and I can see the ads more clearly on the PS3 as well. The audience is better in the 360 version though.
Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
They look slightly better on the 360, but nothing to really complain about as long as they play well.
Avatar image for greg_splicer
greg_splicer

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 greg_splicer
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
[QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="NextGenNow"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="gogeta242"][QUOTE="greg_splicer"][QUOTE="amourkiss"]

some other game site do the comparison, too

but is it just me, or the PS3 version just looks as good as the 360 ?

so, I really don't know why people just keep saying miltiplatform games are "way better" on the 360 ?

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=75856&page=1

RabbidDawg

Are you kidding, the PS3 versions of Enchanted Arms, Splinter Cell 4 and Fear are like rendered in N64, they are THAT blurry and without any detail Oblivion is way behind as well, ith far lower res textures, flat ground shaders or no ground shaders at all, terrible washed out colors, no AA, worst HDR, a pure disaster comparing to 360 vivid and smooth looking version with crisp textures

pics>>>>>>>>>>>>>your 360-loving-idiotic-fanboy opinion.

???? 360 pics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS3 ones, in case you are blind, PLEASE stop posting about things you can't see 720p pics are HORRIBLE on PS3, in Fear everything is blurry, textures half the 360 resolution, in Splinter Cell 4 PS3 has no shaders at all, they forgot to put them in, in Oblivion most textures are half the 360 resolution, colors are washed out, in Enchanted Arms all background geometry has been REMOVED, shaders are horrible, textures half the resolution, and colors blackened , everything is rendered bad I fear that FF13 will look like total garbage on PS3, as all its future games, those graphics are just HORRIBLE

whooooooa First off Xbox plays games in 1080i which is crap compared to 720p. As for the pics...every game that matters is better on PS3...that being oblivion :P I'm a FPS fan and I thought FEAR sucked on PC....soo...hmm.. IN time PS3 will catch and Pass 360 for now...it will be just like 2001 when Xbox ports sucked hard..

Hahaha, nice answer, in games that matter PS3 is better ? And seems that no game matters since PS3 is worst in EVERY game so far, Oblivion included, yes it does have better AF, but has lower res textures in most places, especially in rocks and trees As for when PS3 will surpass 360 ?? Never of course, things just get worst for PS3, see Splinter Cell 4, PS3 has no shaders at all, Enahncted Arms looks like total garbage on PS3, and Oblivon has no AA, worst HDR, washed out colors, lower resolution textures overall Hope you did not really buy a PS3, if you did, i can only feel sorry for you, expect games like Colin, Assains, DMC4, FF13, to look VASTLY better on 360, Colin developers can't even run the game yet on PS3, it is moved months later on PS3 !!!! Imagine what a garbage hardware it has inside

Rocks and trees lower res in Oblivion for the PS3? Has fanboyism blinded you that much? Now I know you have never seen the game upclose. As I said in my other post Every Professional review has said that the PS3 has better, sharper, crisper textures. The Rocks and trees look SO much better on the PS3 version. I know I can see them side by side on my 2 LCD TVS. Ive dontethe comparisson, I own both versions. You are by far the worst the leemings have to offer. You lose just get over it :lol:

You mean they are crisper as the distance goes further, this is due to better AF in PS3 version, NOT due to high res textures, in fact PS3 uses lower res ones, but since you have two LCD's, oblige us with a photo to make your point at least believable I have tons other users saying 360 has better resolution textures all over the game
Avatar image for fresherfish
fresherfish

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 fresherfish
Member since 2007 • 159 Posts

I guess I just don't see it. I think the refelections on the ice look better on the PS3 and I can see the ads more clearly on the PS3 as well. The audience is better in the 360 n though.

What reflections on the ps3 version are you talking about? Ps3 version lacks reflections except the crash boards.

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts

I guess I just don't see it. I think the refelections on the ice look better on the PS3 and I can see the ads more clearly on the PS3 as well. The audience is better in the 360 n though.fresherfish

What reflections on the ps3 version are you talking about? Ps3 version lacks reflections except the crash boards.

You can see them here.
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#26 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
someone posted this earlier in the week claiming the ps3 had the better multiplats ofcourse everyone around here tore him to shreds..
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
someone posted this earlier in the week claiming the ps3 had the better multiplats ofcourse everyone around here tore him to shreds..daveg1
Yeah but didn't he say everything looked better on the PS3? Hehe
Avatar image for fresherfish
fresherfish

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 fresherfish
Member since 2007 • 159 Posts
[QUOTE="fresherfish"]

I guess I just don't see it. I think the refelections on the ice look better on the PS3 and I can see the ads more clearly on the PS3 as well. The audience is better in the 360 n though.Ibacai

What reflections on the ps3 version are you talking about? Ps3 version lacks reflections except the crash boards.

You can see them here.

If those pics are accurate then yes, the ps3 version does indeed look better.

Avatar image for venture00
venture00

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 venture00
Member since 2004 • 1060 Posts
I think i should put an end to this thread..

Enchanted Arms :

''clearly evident is a lower frame rate on PS3, fewer visual effects and a distinct paring down of detail - both in graphical effects and geometry. An additional grain effect included in the PS3 version can't disguise the graphical shortcomings.''

Blazing Angels :

''Not much has changed graphically since the launch of the Xbox 360 version. Some minor visual tinkering sees differences in the lighting effects, more concussive-looking explosions (as opposed to the orange puffs seen in the 360 game) and Ubisoft has made a ham-fisted attempt at suppressing the god-awful v-sync tearing that ruined the look of the 360 game. That it's still there at all in the PlayStation 3 code is unforgivable, but curiously the effect is somewhat lessened compared to its ubiquity in the Xbox rendition. This is offset by some awful lag - essentially the scenes that slowed down the 360 game can sometimes be reduced to a slideshow on PS3''

NHL 2K7 :

''There's little to add to the original Eurogamer review because the PS3 and Xbox 360 games are extremely close both in terms of features and technical performance, but one element where the PS3 version does offer something new and different is in a couple of interesting implementations of the Sixaxis's motion sensor.''

WSC :

''Blade Interactive Studios have effectively taken everything in the Xbox 360 version and plonked it onto the PlayStation 3 with nothing in the way of enhancements. While still shots make it difficult to discern much difference between the two versions (they are both equally underwhelming visually - borderline ugly in fact) in motion the PS3 version disappoints with choppier motion compared to the 360 version.''

PGA :

''There are no complaints either from a technical perspective. Tiger Woods PGA 2007 is essentially identical on PlayStation 3 when put up against its more mature Xbox 360 sibling. The screenshot comparisons we've included aren't just close - they're effectively identical.''

Call of Duty 3 :

''One thing we were keen to check out was why exactly the PS3 version runs slower than the Xbox game. As the tech-obsessed have debated already, Treyarch's 360 code does some very cunning things behind the scenes - rendering a 1040x620 framebuffer as opposed to the usual 1280x720, thus relying on the 360's ANA chip to make up the difference with a spot of bilinear scaling. As far as we know, the PS3's SDK isn't quite so flexible with resolutions - so in theory it should be running at native 720p, offering almost 30% more detail than the Xbox 360 game.In short, Call of Duty 3 is a solid enough game on PlayStation 3, but it's obvious that the Xbox 360 version was (and is) the lead platform for development and the Sony console is getting sloppy seconds. In this respect, it's simply not good enough.''

F.E.A.R :

''Somewhat overlooked on console where the 3D visuals didn't quite match the original GPU-annihilating PC version's, FEAR is something of a gem on the Xbox 360 - a first-person shooter that genuinely advances the genre and provides a consistently thrilling, suspenseful experience. There's little from a gameplay perspective that diminishes that viewpoint with the PlayStation 3 rendition, as aside from the odd glitch and bug it seems to play just like its older brother on 360.However, from a technical perspective, PS3 FEAR is very poor compared to the Xbox 360 version. The screenshot galleries give the game away - on PS3 the graphics are heavily blurred compared to the 360 code, with aliasing on edges far more pronounced. The blur is so blatant that I initially thought that the game's opening cinematics had moved to video sequences as opposed to using the 3D engine, but the fuzzy haze remains as the player takes control. I then had to double-check the capture equipment to make sure that the game really was visually handicapped to this extent, but on closer inspection, FEAR's HUD display was as crystal clear as you would expect from a lossless HDMI grab. The PS3 genuinely was producing this lacklustre picture.

Graphically then, FEAR is clearly a disappointment compared to the Microsoft version and the news does not improve when taking into account the game's loading times - FEAR takes longer to ingest its disc-based data on PS3 than it does on 360.

Despite the game's video shortcomings, it's still a quality title and the gameplay excels in a genre that has become pedestrian and predictable. It's just a shame that a title synonymous with graphical excellence looks quite poor on the Sony console and perhaps even more lamentable that such a cool game will be seized upon by some for the sole purpose of poking fun at the PS3.''

/thread


Avatar image for greg_splicer
greg_splicer

2053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 greg_splicer
Member since 2007 • 2053 Posts
I think i should put an end to this thread..

Enchanted Arms :

''clearly evident is a lower frame rate on PS3, fewer visual effects and a distinct paring down of detail - both in graphical effects and geometry. An additional grain effect included in the PS3 version can't disguise the graphical shortcomings.''

Blazing Angels :

''Not much has changed graphically since the launch of the Xbox 360 version. Some minor visual tinkering sees differences in the lighting effects, more concussive-looking explosions (as opposed to the orange puffs seen in the 360 game) and Ubisoft has made a ham-fisted attempt at suppressing the god-awful v-sync tearing that ruined the look of the 360 game. That it's still there at all in the PlayStation 3 code is unforgivable, but curiously the effect is somewhat lessened compared to its ubiquity in the Xbox rendition. This is offset by some awful lag - essentially the scenes that slowed down the 360 game can sometimes be reduced to a slideshow on PS3''

NHL 2K7 :

''There's little to add to the original Eurogamer review because the PS3 and Xbox 360 games are extremely close both in terms of features and technical performance, but one element where the PS3 version does offer something new and different is in a couple of interesting implementations of the Sixaxis's motion sensor.''

WSC :

''Blade Interactive Studios have effectively taken everything in the Xbox 360 version and plonked it onto the PlayStation 3 with nothing in the way of enhancements. While still shots make it difficult to discern much difference between the two versions (they are both equally underwhelming visually - borderline ugly in fact) in motion the PS3 version disappoints with choppier motion compared to the 360 version.''

PGA :

''There are no complaints either from a technical perspective. Tiger Woods PGA 2007 is essentially identical on PlayStation 3 when put up against its more mature Xbox 360 sibling. The screenshot comparisons we've included aren't just close - they're effectively identical.''

Call of Duty 3 :

''One thing we were keen to check out was why exactly the PS3 version runs slower than the Xbox game. As the tech-obsessed have debated already, Treyarch's 360 code does some very cunning things behind the scenes - rendering a 1040x620 framebuffer as opposed to the usual 1280x720, thus relying on the 360's ANA chip to make up the difference with a spot of bilinear scaling. As far as we know, the PS3's SDK isn't quite so flexible with resolutions - so in theory it should be running at native 720p, offering almost 30% more detail than the Xbox 360 game.In short, Call of Duty 3 is a solid enough game on PlayStation 3, but it's obvious that the Xbox 360 version was (and is) the lead platform for development and the Sony console is getting sloppy seconds. In this respect, it's simply not good enough.''

F.E.A.R :

''Somewhat overlooked on console where the 3D visuals didn't quite match the original GPU-annihilating PC version's, FEAR is something of a gem on the Xbox 360 - a first-person shooter that genuinely advances the genre and provides a consistently thrilling, suspenseful experience. There's little from a gameplay perspective that diminishes that viewpoint with the PlayStation 3 rendition, as aside from the odd glitch and bug it seems to play just like its older brother on 360.However, from a technical perspective, PS3 FEAR is very poor compared to the Xbox 360 version. The screenshot galleries give the game away - on PS3 the graphics are heavily blurred compared to the 360 code, with aliasing on edges far more pronounced. The blur is so blatant that I initially thought that the game's opening cinematics had moved to video sequences as opposed to using the 3D engine, but the fuzzy haze remains as the player takes control. I then had to double-check the capture equipment to make sure that the game really was visually handicapped to this extent, but on closer inspection, FEAR's HUD display was as crystal clear as you would expect from a lossless HDMI grab. The PS3 genuinely was producing this lacklustre picture.

Graphically then, FEAR is clearly a disappointment compared to the Microsoft version and the news does not improve when taking into account the game's loading times - FEAR takes longer to ingest its disc-based data on PS3 than it does on 360.

Despite the game's video shortcomings, it's still a quality title and the gameplay excels in a genre that has become pedestrian and predictable. It's just a shame that a title synonymous with graphical excellence looks quite poor on the Sony console and perhaps even more lamentable that such a cool game will be seized upon by some for the sole purpose of poking fun at the PS3.''

/thread


venture00
At last, the truth is here
Avatar image for d_40
d_40

966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#31 d_40
Member since 2005 • 966 Posts
multiplats are not an indication of the power of the console