[QUOTE="SolidTy"]
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]That's true we can't play every game, but reviews are just opinions, and in no way superior to any of us "regular" people. And as I said they have made so many baseless points and can be very off that they are simply untrustable.
Anyone that would say they are professional therefor better prepared to determine the value of a game than us everyday folks I would strongly disagree. They are professional in writing skills perhaps but based on the thousands of reviews I've read they are in no way any more capable of judging a game than I am.
Bigboi500
While that is certainly true, they aren't more qualified that us, sure.
Your arguement could be said of anything from Art to Books to Movies to TV...then, everything is exactly equal, and we don't know what quality is until we get around to trying it? That's just not going to happen.
If I want to get a good Chick Flick on Blu-Ray for my lady, I am not going to just guess, I am going to do research, not buy watching it, but by reviews, reading reviews especially by reviewers that see the world the way I do....or I will just go by a mass review system like Metacritic.
In any event, to determine QUALITY Games, we have to have more than just personal preference, although obviously that's one way.
How would I have known about Madworld, De Blob, or Okami at all, if I didn't read anything about it?
Sometimes it's nice to hear about a Quality game from left field, because it may get you to play it, but if there wasn't a reviews in place, none of us would have been exposed by the game's QUALITY.
:)
Well if based on the poor quality of the majority of game reviews is the best we have to determine quality it's no wonder that society still views gaming as a niche form of entertainment and don't take the industry very seriously.What we need is some form of socialized game reviews to squeeze out individual human bias and peronal vested interest. Something similar to Kotaku that uses four reviewers opinions and averages them out, but more along the lines of a group of regular gamers.
Until then trust them if you like but I don't think they can be allowed the benifit of the doubt as the unified entity of gaming quality.
That would be a dream come true!
This review system isn't just used for gaming, this system permeates a lot of entertainment, unfortunately.
That's what I liked about EGM's old reviews, they had Four Reviewers per game.
I don't trust what the media screams as Quality for me personally, but I don't knock the game either. I will just find what suits me, like you. :)
I do use reviews to expose myself to something I may never have heard of though.
Log in to comment