This topic is locked from further discussion.
seriously? 3d gamings been around for awhile on pc's, there was an old windows registry hack iirc that displayed red/blue and let you use normal old school 3d glasses which proves it can be done without the special monitor (as does avatar and the other 3d movies that use dual image projection) anyways, i spent alot on my pc / tv combo im not buying a 3d monitor now 6 months later. they lost a customer with even more unnecessary hardware.
Nvidia's glasses aren't regular cheap 3d glasses, Red/Blue glasses=anagylph which is not TRUE 3d, Nvidia's 3d glasses are electronic, they use LCD lenses, and have 40 hour battery life per 3 hour charge. High power wireless infrared communication Fully untethered solution, offering free range of motion and up to 15 feet of wireless 3D viewing via infrared communication. And multiple users can use the same IR receiver for a multi-user experience. Game for more than forty hours on a single charge Easily recharge your 3D glasses over a standard USB cable without frequently replacing batteries, and game for an entire week without needing to recharge your glasses. Intelligent circuit design automatically shuts off after 10 minutes when not in use to preserve battery life.seriously? 3d gamings been around for awhile on pc's, there was an old windows registry hack iirc that displayed red/blue and let you use normal old school 3d glasses which proves it can be done without the special monitor (as does avatar and the other 3d movies that use dual image projection) anyways, i spent alot on my pc / tv combo im not buying a 3d monitor now 6 months later. they lost a customer with even more unnecessary hardware.
z4twenny
I'm with you on this. There's not enough evidence to suggest that this much hardware and that steep of a price is really required to pull off this effect.seriously? 3d gamings been around for awhile on pc's, there was an old windows registry hack iirc that displayed red/blue and let you use normal old school 3d glasses which proves it can be done without the special monitor (as does avatar and the other 3d movies that use dual image projection) anyways, i spent alot on my pc / tv combo im not buying a 3d monitor now 6 months later. they lost a customer with even more unnecessary hardware.
z4twenny
[QUOTE="z4twenny"]Nvidia's glasses aren't regular cheap 3d glasses, Red/Blue glasses=anagylph which is not TRUE 3d, Nvidia's 3d glasses are electronic, they use LCD lenses, and have 40 hour battery life per 3 hour charge. High power wireless infrared communication Fully untethered solution, offering free range of motion and up to 15 feet of wireless 3D viewing via infrared communication. And multiple users can use the same IR receiver for a multi-user experience. Game for more than forty hours on a single charge Easily recharge your 3D glasses over a standard USB cable without frequently replacing batteries, and game for an entire week without needing to recharge your glasses. Intelligent circuit design automatically shuts off after 10 minutes when not in use to preserve battery life. This screams advertisement. There was just nothing personal about what you just wrote...I havent heard of affiliate possibilities in linking from forums but I would not be surprised if they exist...seriously? 3d gamings been around for awhile on pc's, there was an old windows registry hack iirc that displayed red/blue and let you use normal old school 3d glasses which proves it can be done without the special monitor (as does avatar and the other 3d movies that use dual image projection) anyways, i spent alot on my pc / tv combo im not buying a 3d monitor now 6 months later. they lost a customer with even more unnecessary hardware.
Instashot
Once they can figure out a way to make it add something to the game aside from being "OH EM GEE STUFF IS OUTSIDE OF THE SCREEN INSTEAD OF INSIDE!" and also make it work without any glasses....no, sorry, it isn't going to be very appealing. Unless games are going to be dumbed down for it to be beaten in around 2 hours, the glasses and 3D will cause severe eye strain after prolonged use.
Just an fyi, they had a koisk demoing the Nvidia 3D glasses. I tried it and found it disorienting and unappealing to use.
[QUOTE="mtradr43"]lol 600 dollars for the monitor and glasses on the site, i think ill pass.salxisPretty much this, I am sure 3D gaming is great, but it's not cheap enough for your average gamers sadly :( Seriously, some of us are broke :x
Dude, its not about the pop out, pop out= convergance which can be adjusted and if you want things to have DEPTH you can adjust that as well. Know what you're talking about first before you hate on something, I use my Nvidia 3D glasses for hours on end with 0 eye strains or anything of that matter. Your brain adjust to the way the 3d is being done and demo'ing a Kios doesn't do them justice as they set them to 15% Depth which is 2D and no convergence. 3D Vision has great things to offer, especially Native Nvidia 3D titles, like RE5, Batman, and soon to be BF BC2 which will be sick in 3D. Every game works very good in 3D, even DX8 old games.Once they can figure out a way to make it add something to the game aside from being "OH EM GEE STUFF IS OUTSIDE OF THE SCREEN INSTEAD OF INSIDE!" and also make it work without any glasses....no, sorry, it isn't going to be very appealing. Unless games are going to be dumbed down for it to be beaten in around 2 hours, the glasses and 3D will cause severe eye strain after prolonged use.
Just an fyi, they had a koisk demoing the Nvidia 3D glasses. I tried it and found it disorienting and unappealing to use.
Pixel-Pirate
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]Dude, its not about the pop out, pop out= convergance which can be adjusted and if you want things to have DEPTH you can adjust that as well. Know what you're talking about first before you hate on something, I use my Nvidia 3D glasses for hours on end with 0 eye strains or anything of that matter. Your brain adjust to the way the 3d is being done and demo'ing a Kios doesn't do them justice as they live them on 15% Depth which is 2D and no convergence. Are you SURE you're not working for nVidia?Once they can figure out a way to make it add something to the game aside from being "OH EM GEE STUFF IS OUTSIDE OF THE SCREEN INSTEAD OF INSIDE!" and also make it work without any glasses....no, sorry, it isn't going to be very appealing. Unless games are going to be dumbed down for it to be beaten in around 2 hours, the glasses and 3D will cause severe eye strain after prolonged use.
Just an fyi, they had a koisk demoing the Nvidia 3D glasses. I tried it and found it disorienting and unappealing to use.
Instashot
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]Dude, its not about the pop out, pop out= convergance which can be adjusted and if you want things to have DEPTH you can adjust that as well. Know what you're talking about first before you hate on something, I use my Nvidia 3D glasses for hours on end with 0 eye strains or anything of that matter. Your brain adjust to the way the 3d is being done and demo'ing a Kios doesn't do them justice as they set them to 15% Depth which is 2D and no convergence. 3D Vision has great things to offer, especially Native Nvidia 3D titles, like RE5, Batman, and soon to be BF BC2 which will be sick in 3D. Every game works very good in 3D, even DX8 old games.Once they can figure out a way to make it add something to the game aside from being "OH EM GEE STUFF IS OUTSIDE OF THE SCREEN INSTEAD OF INSIDE!" and also make it work without any glasses....no, sorry, it isn't going to be very appealing. Unless games are going to be dumbed down for it to be beaten in around 2 hours, the glasses and 3D will cause severe eye strain after prolonged use.
Just an fyi, they had a koisk demoing the Nvidia 3D glasses. I tried it and found it disorienting and unappealing to use.
Instashot
This is why the virtual boy worked so well, amirite, folks?!
If it isn't about pop out then what is it about? I don't feel 3D adds anything to my games and would just feel out of place in alot of them.
And I'm happy for you that the glasses do not cause strain for you, but plenty get eyestrain from 3D effects after prolonged time.
Also why do they set the koisks to purpiusley not display well thus making sure no one cares about it? Is there an anti-Nvidia conspiracy?
[QUOTE="Pixel-Pirate"]Dude, its not about the pop out, pop out= convergance which can be adjusted and if you want things to have DEPTH you can adjust that as well. Know what you're talking about first before you hate on something, I use my Nvidia 3D glasses for hours on end with 0 eye strains or anything of that matter. Your brain adjust to the way the 3d is being done and demo'ing a Kios doesn't do them justice as they set them to 15% Depth which is 2D and no convergence. 3D Vision has great things to offer, especially Native Nvidia 3D titles, like RE5, Batman, and soon to be BF BC2 which will be sick in 3D. Every game works very good in 3D, even DX8 old games.Once they can figure out a way to make it add something to the game aside from being "OH EM GEE STUFF IS OUTSIDE OF THE SCREEN INSTEAD OF INSIDE!" and also make it work without any glasses....no, sorry, it isn't going to be very appealing. Unless games are going to be dumbed down for it to be beaten in around 2 hours, the glasses and 3D will cause severe eye strain after prolonged use.
Just an fyi, they had a koisk demoing the Nvidia 3D glasses. I tried it and found it disorienting and unappealing to use.
Instashot
This guy absolutely works for Nvidia.... how else would he know that kiosks set the depth to 15%... I was pretty sure he was a salesman b4... but now I know...
Anyway... I'd already have the 3D Vision glasses if they made a freaking compatible monitor bigger than 22"
Funny yet no one who has used Nvidia's glasses specifically said anything about eyestrain and all the reviewers seem to be raving about it. 2d gaming sucks, too flat. 3D is the way to go but then again you look like a Nintendo fan so your not used to up to date technologyI don't need eyestrain and gimmicky 3D to play L4D.
FamiBox
[QUOTE="z4twenny"]Nvidia's glasses aren't regular cheap 3d glasses, Red/Blue glasses=anagylph which is not TRUE 3dseriously? 3d gamings been around for awhile on pc's, there was an old windows registry hack iirc that displayed red/blue and let you use normal old school 3d glasses which proves it can be done without the special monitor (as does avatar and the other 3d movies that use dual image projection) anyways, i spent alot on my pc / tv combo im not buying a 3d monitor now 6 months later. they lost a customer with even more unnecessary hardware.
Instashot
3D is 3D. One is using colored glasses to combine the two images, the other is using shutter glasses to do this. The effect is identical. The only plus with shutter glasses is you don't get a reddish, blueish tint to everything. so how the heck are colored glassess not true 3D?
3D is 3D. One is using colored glasses to combine the two images, the other is using shutter glasses to do this. The effect is identical. The only plus with shutter glasses is you don't get a reddish, blueish tint to everything. so how the heck are colored glassess not true 3D?FamiBoxYou can't adjust depth/convergence or anything 3D related without electronic LCD shutter glasses. Big difference kid, read the actual reviews and get informed on this.
[QUOTE="FamiBox"]Funny yet no one who has used Nvidia's glasses specifically said anything about eyestrain and all the reviewers seem to be raving about it. 2d gaming sucks, too flat. 3D is the way to go but then again you look like a Nintendo fan so your not used to up to date technologyI don't need eyestrain and gimmicky 3D to play L4D.
Instashot
(mouth opens with disbelief)
lmao? wow. (facepalm)
[QUOTE="FamiBox] 3D is 3D. One is using colored glasses to combine the two images, the other is using shutter glasses to do this. The effect is identical. The only plus with shutter glasses is you don't get a reddish, blueish tint to everything. so how the heck are colored glassess not true 3D?InstashotYou can't adjust depth/convergence or anything 3D related without electronic LCD shutter glasses. Big difference kid, read the actual reviews and get informed on this.
complete bull.
You can't adjust depth/convergence or anything 3D related without electronic LCD shutter glasses. Big difference kid, read the actual reviews and get informed on this.[QUOTE="FamiBox"] 3D is 3D. One is using colored glasses to combine the two images, the other is using shutter glasses to do this. The effect is identical. The only plus with shutter glasses is you don't get a reddish, blueish tint to everything. so how the heck are colored glassess not true 3D?
Instashot
LOL, fail! You don't even know the basic principle of operation of 3D. The depth depends on the difference in position for the left and the right eye. The glasses are only filters (polarization, color or shutter).
LOL, fail! You don't even know the basic principle of operation of 3D. The depth depends on the difference in position for the left and the right eye. The glasses are only filters (polarization, color or shutter).
The glasses are infared and connect to the IR emitter which allows for customizable 3d options, depth, convergence, and etc. IR emitter= the black shaped pyramid object in this image. http://ces.cnet.com/i/bto/20090107/Nvidia_GeForce_Vision_3D_610x444.jpg[QUOTE="FamiBox"] complete bullInstashotYes, "complete bull" because you have these Nvidia 3d glasses, aimirite? I recommened you read this article which explains the differences among other 3d techniques. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/multimedia/display/nvidia-gf-3d-vision.html
Yes complete bull.
edit:
The link you gave me did nothing but confirm that the only difference with color glasses is (as that article puts it) lack of perfection with the colors.
[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]The glasses are infared and connect to the IR emitter which allows for customizable 3d options, depth, convergence, and etc. IR emitter= the black shaped pyramid object in this image. http://ces.cnet.com/i/bto/20090107/Nvidia_GeForce_Vision_3D_610x444.jpgLOL, fail! You don't even know the basic principle of operation of 3D. The depth depends on the difference in position for the left and the right eye. The glasses are only filters (polarization, color or shutter).
Instashot
The glasses have nothing to do with the depth! Their only function is to provide separate images for the left and the right eyes. The depth comes from the software that renders the scene which sets the displacement of objects based on their z-value. Thus, on any of the 3D technologies - anaglyph, polarization, shutter or helmet with 2 monitors, you can vary the depth if you have the software ...
The glasses are infared and connect to the IR emitter which allows for customizable 3d options, depth, convergence, and etc. IR emitter= the black shaped pyramid object in this image. http://ces.cnet.com/i/bto/20090107/Nvidia_GeForce_Vision_3D_610x444.jpg[QUOTE="Instashot"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]
LOL, fail! You don't even know the basic principle of operation of 3D. The depth depends on the difference in position for the left and the right eye. The glasses are only filters (polarization, color or shutter).
KiZZo1
The glasses have nothing to do with the depth! Their only function is to provide separate images for the left and the right eyes. The depth comes from the software that renders the scene which sets the displacement of objects based on their z-value. Thus, on any of the 3D technologies - anaglyph, polarization, shutter or helmet with 2 monitors, you can vary the depth if you have the software ...
yep.. 3D is the same old 3D it's always been. It may have better colors now or look smoother, but it's still the same gimmicky pointless effect.
It may be fun from time to time with movies, but to play all your games wearing goofy glasses that cause eyestrain and add nothing to the game play?
No thanks. I've tried it and I'm far, far from impressed.
So you've tried Nvidia 3d vission? Find it hard to believe. I've also played on the Snes with those red/blue glasses but this is nothing like that.Revan_911
Yea, it's like switching from VHS to DVD in 3D.
Anyway, yea it's expensive, still it better to implement 3D now then later. If it's more implement it will go cheap faster
Until we have 3D without the need for blimmin glasses it's just never going to go mainstream enough to really bother with imo.
I've actually got over the whole recent 3D gimmick at the cinema now, after watching a few films in both 2D and 3D then comparing them and realising the difference really isn't worth the hassle of having to pay for and wear glasses all the time and also sometimes lose the picutre focus a little bit, and I think I'll just not bother in the future and save myself a few bob in the process.
I don't understand all the hate for 3D to be honest. Maybe there are a lot of Luddites in the family history.
Even if it IS an advert, so what. If Toms Hardware says it's good, it's prolly worth a look. Like a lot of people I wear glasses everyday, and could not care less, if I look goofy *while playing a video game*.
I don't understand all the hate for 3D to be honest. Maybe there are a lot of Luddites in the family history.
Even if it IS an advert, so what. If Toms Hardware says it's good, it's prolly worth a look. Like a lot of people I wear glasses everyday, and could not care less, if I look goofy *while playing a video game*.
hywel69
If not adopting every piece of technology that appears no matter how useless or unappealing it is makes me a luddite then sure. I'm sorry but I don't feel a gimmick from the 60's is really going to be the way we watch TV from now on or play games. I don't want to watch my news in 3D and I don't want to get eyestrain from hours of play on a game.
[QUOTE="FamiBox"]Funny yet no one who has used Nvidia's glasses specifically said anything about eyestrain and all the reviewers seem to be raving about it. 2d gaming sucks, too flat. 3D is the way to go but then again you look like a Nintendo fan so your not used to up to date technologyI don't need eyestrain and gimmicky 3D to play L4D.
Instashot
How much does Nvidia pay you anyways? I'm looking for a job and going to forums praising Nvidia sounds easy enough.
Also radracer and virtualboy predate Nvidia 3D by a couple of decades.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment