Ok I as a LEM. Will bow and give praise to Sony on this. DRUM ROLL!!!!!!!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HR_Puff-N-Stuff
HR_Puff-N-Stuff

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 HR_Puff-N-Stuff
Member since 2009 • 96 Posts

I have to admit Sony has clearly been kicking ass in the exclusives dept. Way to go Sony you do have some sweet first party games. They are tied now with 360 in AAA's And I assume will be in the lead with UC2 very soon.

To bad they will never get out of 3rd place though.

Hey is Demon Souls that good:roll: I plan to get Dragon Age. But man do I really need to get this Demon Soul game or what?

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Well, I read Sony has larger 1st party than M$ and Nintendo combined :shock: :o , so that's probably how SONY has accomplished this amazing AAA catch up feat.

We will have to wait and see if these fantastic 1st Party games result in the PS3 sales Sony want in the long run.

In the meantime, I will let Sony worry about their PS3 sales, and I will keep soaking up the fun games! :)

Avatar image for SonyIsh6Fotta
SonyIsh6Fotta

658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SonyIsh6Fotta
Member since 2007 • 658 Posts

I have to admit Sony has clearly been kicking ass in the exclusives dept. Way to go Sony you do have some sweet first party games. They are tied now with 360 in AAA's And I assume will be in the lead with UC2 very soon.

To bad they will never get out of 3rd place though.

Hey is Demon Souls that good:roll: I plan to get Dragon Age. But man do I really need to get this Demon Soul game or what?

HR_Puff-N-Stuff

Do you play sales? I don't, I play games :P and how do you know they will always be in 3rd place?

Avatar image for whatisazerg
whatisazerg

2371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 whatisazerg
Member since 2009 • 2371 Posts

Only get Demons Souls if you like your games hard. Apparently its easier depending on the type of character you make.... but as a thief its wicked hard.

Avatar image for HR_Puff-N-Stuff
HR_Puff-N-Stuff

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 HR_Puff-N-Stuff
Member since 2009 • 96 Posts

[QUOTE="HR_Puff-N-Stuff"]

I have to admit Sony has clearly been kicking ass in the exclusives dept. Way to go Sony you do have some sweet first party games. They are tied now with 360 in AAA's And I assume will be in the lead with UC2 very soon.

To bad they will never get out of 3rd place though.

Hey is Demon Souls that good:roll: I plan to get Dragon Age. But man do I really need to get this Demon Soul game or what?

SonyIsh6Fotta

Do you play sales? I don't, I play games :P and how do you know they will always be in 3rd place?

I think It would takes like 6-8 years for them to catch the 360 they are only on par with month sales and in most months losing to 360 in month to month sales.

Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts

Well, I read Sony has larger 1st party than M$ and Nintendo combined, so that's probably how SONY does it.

We will ahve to wait and seeif this results in the sales they want in the longrun.

SolidTy

it's the other way round. Nintendo has more 1st party devs than Ms and Sony combined

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

The moral of the story is you cant buy everything....or maybe you can:P

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, I read Sony has larger 1st party than M$ and Nintendo combined :shock: :o , so that's probably how SONY has accomplished this amazing AAA catch up feat.

We will have to wait and see if these fantastic 1st Party games result in the PS3 sales Sony want in the long run.

In the meantime, I will let Sony worry about their PS3 sales, and I will keep soaking up the fun games! :)

aia89

it's the other way round. Nintendo has more 1st party devs than Ms and Sony combined

That's what I thought a long while back, but that just a perception in our minds.:P

LINK AWAY.:)

Anyways, with Nintendo's 1st Parties being divided for Nintendo's new Blue Ocean (Nongaming & Casual market), that doesn't leave much for the old Hardcore love we used to get as gamers, as you may have noticed this entire generation when you game on your Wii.

That's off topic anywho, since this thread is about a 360 fan who recognizing Sony's 1st Party efforts, and the PS3's ability to actually catch up to the year older 360 in AAA exclusive quality games.

Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts

[QUOTE="aia89"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, I read Sony has larger 1st party than M$ and Nintendo combined :shock: :o , so that's probably how SONY has accomplished this amazing AAA catch up feat.

We will have to wait and see if these fantastic 1st Party games result in the PS3 sales Sony want in the long run.

In the meantime, I will let Sony worry about their PS3 sales, and I will keep soaking up the fun games! :)

SolidTy

it's the other way round. Nintendo has more 1st party devs than Ms and Sony combined

That's what I thought a long while back, but that just a perception in our minds.:P

LINK AWAY.:)

Anyways, with Nintendo's 1st Parties being divided for Nintendo's new Blue Ocean (Nongaming & Casual market), that doesn't leave much for the old Hardcore love we used to get as gamers, as you may have noticed this entire generation on Wii.

That's off topic anywho, since this thread is about a 360 fan who recognizing Sony's 1st Party efforts, and the PS3's ability to actually catch up to the year older 360 in AAA quality games.

then they contradict themselves..because I also read this:

""Microsoft is too dependent on the third-party community, and Nintendo is too depended on first-party. We like to feel that we got a pretty good mix.""

Avatar image for good_sk8er7
good_sk8er7

4327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#10 good_sk8er7
Member since 2009 • 4327 Posts

Demon's Souls ISSSS that good. You need it.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="aia89"]

it's the other way round. Nintendo has more 1st party devs than Ms and Sony combined

aia89

That's what I thought a long while back, but that just a perception in our minds.

LINK AWAY.

Anyways, with Nintendo's 1st Parties being divided for Nintendo's new Blue Ocean (Nongaming & Casual market), that doesn't leave much for the old Hardcore love we used to get as gamers, as you may have noticed this entire generation when you game on your Wii.

That's off topic anywho, since this thread is about a 360 fan who recognizing Sony's 1st Party efforts, and the PS3's ability to actually catch up to the year older 360 in AAA exclusive quality games.

then they contradict themselves..because I also read this:

""Microsoft is too dependent on the third-party community, and Nintendo is too depended on first-party. We like to feel that we got a pretty good mix.""

How is that a contradiction? That's a different statement altogether. I don't know where and when Sony said that, but just reading your paraphrase of the situation :

It means Sony perception is that Sony themselves are not RELYING on Sony's very own giant 1st Party as much as Nintendo relies on their 1st Party.

Those two statements can work in parallel, easily.

--------

When you look at 3rd Party games like :

Resident Evil 5, Fallout 3, Oblivion, Street Fighter 4, Lost Planet 2, or whatever, you can see these 3rd Party games are NOT on Wii, which is clearly what Sony means.

Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts

[QUOTE="aia89"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

That's what I thought a long while back, but that just a perception in our minds.

LINK AWAY.

Anyways, with Nintendo's 1st Parties being divided for Nintendo's new Blue Ocean (Nongaming & Casual market), that doesn't leave much for the old Hardcore love we used to get as gamers, as you may have noticed this entire generation when you game on your Wii.

That's off topic anywho, since this thread is about a 360 fan who recognizing Sony's 1st Party efforts, and the PS3's ability to actually catch up to the year older 360 in AAA exclusive quality games.

SolidTy

then they contradict themselves..because I also read this:

""Microsoft is too dependent on the third-party community, and Nintendo is too depended on first-party. We like to feel that we got a pretty good mix.""

How is that a contradiction? That's a different statement altogether. I don't know where and when Sony said that, but just reading your paraphrase of the situation :

It means Sony perception is that Sony themselves are not RELYING on Sony's very own giant 1st Party as much as Nintendo relies on their 1st Party.

Those two statements can work in parallel, easily.

look I don't know the exact number, but it's a huge list of first party titles Nintendo has. After all, if they didn't have them, they'd suck so badly this gen, because of the lack of third party support.

I can agree that Sony has mainly first party devs that focus on quality games, while Nintendo's are a mix of quantity and quality..maybe there's more quantity, but anyway, you have countless games that are not third parties.

Instead Ms sucks when it comes to 1st party games.. they really count too much on third support, they're always writing cheques in order to get the game, therefore they don't show the same passion for gamings as Sony and Nintendo do.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="aia89"]

then they contradict themselves..because I also read this:

""Microsoft is too dependent on the third-party community, and Nintendo is too depended on first-party. We like to feel that we got a pretty good mix.""

aia89

How is that a contradiction? That's a different statement altogether. I don't know where and when Sony said that, but just reading your paraphrase of the situation :

It means Sony perception is that Sony themselves are not RELYING on Sony's very own giant 1st Party as much as Nintendo relies on their 1st Party.

Those two statements can work in parallel, easily.

--------

When you look at 3rd Party games like :

Resident Evil 5, Fallout 3, Oblivion, Street Fighter 4, Lost Planet 2, or whatever, you can see these 3rd Party games are NOT on Wii, which is clearly what Sony means.

look I don't know the exact number, but it's a huge list of first party titles Nintendo has. After all, if they didn't have them, they'd suck so badly this gen, because of the lack of third party support.

I can agree that Sony has mainly first party devs that focus on quality games, while Nintendo's are a mix of quantity and quality..maybe there's more quantity, but anyway, you have countless games that are not third parties.

Instead Ms sucks when it comes to 1st party games.. they really count too much on third support, they're always writing cheques in order to get the game, therefore they don't show the same passion for gamings as Sony and Nintendo do.

I'm not saying anything bad about Nintendo, I was only explaining to the TC how Sony managed this feat. I'm sure that in the M$ and Nintendo combined statement, most likely it would be a 90% Nintendo, 5=10% M$ kinda balance.

I'm not saying who has the Most 1st Party IP's, just what I read about how many studios Sony has cranking to manage a feat of getting so many AAAE's out in such a short time.

M$ check writing for timed DLC & timedgames certainly allowed Sony this leverage, but M$ seems content with their money, so Sony's Gaming catalog may not matter overall to M$. The gamers ultimately decide the fate of all three companies gaming divisions in the sales arena. :)

Avatar image for Blixxed
Blixxed

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 Blixxed
Member since 2009 • 1800 Posts

Took a little while for Sonys 1st party to greas the chain, but it's greased now.

Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts

then they contradict themselves..because I also read this:

""Microsoft is too dependent on the third-party community, and Nintendo is too depended on first-party. We like to feel that we got a pretty good mix.""

aia89

That's not what they meant. What Sony is refering too is the fact Nintendo's 3rd party lineup is horrible (and we all know it). Nintendo basically depends on it's 1st party titles to sale their console. I've heard this directly from 3rd party developers, they HATE competing with Nintendo because they always lose. MS on the other hand is now way too dependent on 3rd party games (after they basically have scaled down their developed on 1st party titles). Sony has the best mix of games, 1st party games are up there with Nintendo BUT 3rd party multiplats balance it out.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#16 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, I read Sony has larger 1st party than M$ and Nintendo combined, so that's probably how SONY does it.

We will ahve to wait and seeif this results in the sales they want in the longrun.

aia89

it's the other way round. Nintendo has more 1st party devs than Ms and Sony combined

I don't know enough to comment about your statement. But my personal opinion is that Nintendo has more first party games. Doesn't mean they have more first party devs. If so, they would have more games which doesn't just have the damn Mario or Zelda name stamped onto it.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#17 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts

I have to admit Sony has clearly been kicking ass in the exclusives dept. Way to go Sony you do have some sweet first party games. They are tied now with 360 in AAA's And I assume will be in the lead with UC2 very soon.

To bad they will never get out of 3rd place though.

Hey is Demon Souls that good:roll: I plan to get Dragon Age. But man do I really need to get this Demon Soul game or what?

HR_Puff-N-Stuff
Demon Souls isn't the only game that is that good.
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

SONY is definitely the largest development house of the three.

Japan

  • Japan StudioApe Escape, Siren, LocoRoco, Patapon
  • Team ICOShadow of the Colossus, ICO, The Last Guardian
  • Polyphony DigitalGran Turismo

North America

  • Naughty Dog - Crash Bandicoot, Jak & Daxter, Uncharted: Drakes Fortune, Uncharted 2: Among Thieves
  • Santa Monica StudioKinetica, God of War series, Warhawk with Incognito Entertainment
  • San Diego StudioNBA, MLB: The Show
  • Sony BendSyphon Filter
  • Sony Online Entertainment LLC.EverQuest
  • Incognito EntertainmentWarhawk with SCE Studios Santa Monica, Twisted Metal series, Downhill Domination, Calling All Cars
  • Zipper InteractiveSOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs series, MAG

Europe

  • London StudioSingStar, Eyetoy, PlayStation Home with SCE Studio Cambridge
  • Studio CambridgeMediEvil, PlayTV, PlayStation Home with SCE London Studio
  • Studio LiverpoolWipeout, F1
  • Guerrilla GamesKillzone series
  • Evolution StudiosMotorStorm, World Rally Championship
  • Bigbig StudiosPursuit Force, MotorStorm: Arctic Edge

Microsoft:

  • 343 Industries: A studio set up to develop future Halo related productions[6].
  • BigPark: Joy Ride.
  • Lionhead Studios: Black & White series, Fable series.
  • Rare Ltd.: Banjo-Kazooie series, Conker series, Perfect Dark series, Viva Piñata series.
  • Turn 10 Studios: Forza Motorsport series.
  • Xbox Live Productions: Fable II Pub Games, South Park Let's Go Tower Defense Play!
  • Wingnut Interactive: A studio set up in partnership with Peter Jackson to produce "filmic games".

Nintendo:

Its hard to find individual studio's within Nintendo since their team, these are the ones I know:

  • Nintendo EAD
  • Intelligent systems
  • Brownie Brown
  • Monolith Soft
  • Project Sora
  • NST
  • Retro Studios
  • Game Freaks (2nd)
  • HAL LAB (2nd)

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
No you don't NEED to get Demon's Souls.
Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts

I always ponder which will happen first: M$ fixing RROD permanently or Sony getting out of 3rd place? Either way the PS3 has exclusives that justify the purchase if you were interested.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
No you don't NEED to get Demon's Souls.siLVURcross
stop lying to the TC :x
Avatar image for Ratchet_Fan8
Ratchet_Fan8

5574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 Ratchet_Fan8
Member since 2008 • 5574 Posts

[QUOTE="siLVURcross"]No you don't NEED to get Demon's Souls.Jandurin
stop lying to the TC :x

yarh,from what i seen,Demon souls looks very challenging and fun

Also,i cant wait 'till the price drops,Is it out in America yet? cuz im going to america in December and i wanted to pick up Gow Collection and Demons soul and the 50$ US PSN card =)

Was wondering,any chance DS is gonna get a price drop in Dec.? i cant look for online unfortunately /RANT

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"]No you don't NEED to get Demon's Souls.Ratchet_Fan8

stop lying to the TC :x

yarh,from what i seen,Demon souls looks very challenging and fun

Also,i cant wait 'till the price drops,Is it out in America yet? cuz im going to america in December and i wanted to pick up Gow Collection and Demons soul and the 50$ US PSN card =)

Was wondering,any chance DS is gonna get a price drop in Dec.? i cant look for online unfortunately /RANT

yeah, it came out yesterday in the US
Avatar image for MizFitAwesome
MizFitAwesome

2745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 MizFitAwesome
Member since 2009 • 2745 Posts

I have to admit Sony has clearly been kicking ass in the exclusives dept. Way to go Sony you do have some sweet first party games. They are tied now with 360 in AAA's And I assume will be in the lead with UC2 very soon.

To bad they will never get out of 3rd place though.

Hey is Demon Souls that good:roll: I plan to get Dragon Age. But man do I really need to get this Demon Soul game or what?

HR_Puff-N-Stuff

You have to realize that cows somehow beleive critical acclaim somehow equates to a reson for winning. Too bad the majority of people outside of here see through the acclaim and then realize what a waste PS3 is....