OnLive sounds great but...

http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/107/1070283p1.html

I don't want to pay a monthly subscription fee just to use the service.

I'd rather they had a free model where I had to put up with occassional adverts or something.

There's just too many different services these days all asking for a monthly fee and it's adds up to me potentially spending way too much money to be blunt.

I don't like the idea of paying for how much I play. After so many hours, you'd been better off just buying the game.

Artifacting, input lag, low resolutions, high bandwidth usage and no mods or customization makes me think you aren't missing much without OnLive.

I am not going to pass judgement yet, I think it could be great. Unfortunately there seems to be too much negativity around it though, at least in sites like this. I would like to see more and go from there.

I think the current digital distribution model stinks, and it benefits the companies rather than the consumer when compared to hard copies.

This product takes it a step further.

I'm just not interested.

http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/107/1070283p1.html

I don't want to pay a monthly subscription fee just to use the service.

I'd rather they had a free model where I had to put up with occassional adverts or something.

There's just too many different services these days all asking for a monthly fee and it's adds up to me potentially spending way too much money to be blunt.

amaneuvering

Here is why I think it isn't soo great:

When the internet is slow, laggy or completely dead...

Xbox 360 / PS3 = Play single player games

OnLive = { Totally Screwed [Black Screen] }