This sounds familiar but no matter how many times it's said, cows still won't accept it.
"Bell: If there's an overflow of bonus material, we'll just go to another disc. That's not an issue for consumers. In some cases, they consider that it has more value. It's done routinely in DVD. Why put every single title on a high-capacity disc if it doesn't need it?"
there just doing it for money once Sony gets more PS3 in home trust me they will switch back. anyways, i would love to see 24 on blueray, rather than a 6 disc set just 1 blueray.
sum up: the bigger 50gig doesn't matter in the long run because 95% of movies are 2.25 hours long less than the 30 gig hd-dvd max disk. The code for blue ray is hard. Hd-dvd is cheaper to manufacture. Basically all the reasons they went with hd-dvd.
there just doing it for money once Sony gets more PS3 in home trust me they will switch back. anyways, i would love to see 24 on blueray, rather than a 6 disc set just 1 blueray. Oh yes, obviously they are doing it for the money, i mean why else would they NOT release on BOTH platforms, and instead limit themselves to a platform that as far as I know, hasn't even sold nearly as much hardware as its competition. On a more serious note, whether they got paid to go exclusive to HD-DVD or not, they are still going to lose money in the long run by NOT selling on both mediums, unless of course they are confident that HD-DVD will surpass and ultimately end Blu-ray's run.
Bu ray is out selling HDDVD movies 2 to 1. Blu-ray is better and will win ultimately if things keep going the way they are. Its sad that Microsoft is keeping this format war going on simply because they have the money. Other wise the consumers have already spoken and Blu ray it is.Â
did any of you know that HD-DVD players were $800-900 when they first came out? The whole price point is ridiculous. this war just started and blu-ray has already dropped 50% in 6 months.Â
Log in to comment