PC gamer infinite warfare Review

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 26181 Posts

http://www.pcgamer.com/call-of-duty-infinite-warfare-pc-review/?utm_content=buffer4e36b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=buffer_pcgamerfb

A beautiful action movie that punishes improvisation, with under-populated multiplayer that can’t compete with a nine-year-old game.

and they gave it 4.8. lowest i have seen in COD and finally an honest review.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49120 Posts

Every review that fits your agenda is an "honest review"

Gotcha !

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#3 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 26181 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:

Every review that fits your agenda is an "honest review"

Gotcha !

no reviewer other than mack has guts to call cinematic games as action movie. if they work on IGN. they would have fired.

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ConanTheStoner  Online
Member since 2011 • 23838 Posts

Man I'm surprised that you actually bought and played this game.

Avatar image for and1salttape
AND1SALTTAPE

861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AND1SALTTAPE
Member since 2015 • 861 Posts

The reviewer is literally crying about the game being too hard. How is this a good review?

Avatar image for so_hai
so_hai

4385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#6 so_hai
Member since 2007 • 4385 Posts

@and1salttape said:

The reviewer is literally crying about the game being too hard. How is this a good review?

Literally?

Avatar image for and1salttape
AND1SALTTAPE

861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AND1SALTTAPE
Member since 2015 • 861 Posts

@so_hai said:
@and1salttape said:

The reviewer is literally crying about the game being too hard. How is this a good review?

Literally?

Ok. Literarily.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c18005f903a1
deactivated-5c18005f903a1

4626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5c18005f903a1
Member since 2016 • 4626 Posts

Giantbomb gave it a 3/5 which seems about right. Poor MP but with a surprisingly good SP.

Avatar image for vfighter
VFighter

11031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 VFighter
Member since 2016 • 11031 Posts

The MP does suck, the engine is way to old (no matter how updated) to handle the jumps and wall running. It's felt really bad ever since AW. Factor in the smaller maps and horrendous spawns and its just a cluster f*ck to play.

This series needs a new engine and new netcode if it's going to survive, but I think it might be to late.

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#10 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 26181 Posts
@vfighter said:

The MP does suck, the engine is way to old (no matter how updated) to handle the jumps and wall running. It's felt really bad ever since AW. Factor in the smaller maps and horrendous spawns and its just a cluster f*ck to play.

This series needs a new engine and new netcode if it's going to survive, but I think it might be to late.

COD is finally getting score it deserve.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

People STILL care/whine about COD reviews?

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

18747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 233

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 18747 Posts

48/100 seems a bit extreme. As much as I dislike what COD represents, I judge each game based on its own merits. Infinite Warfare does have an enjoyable campaign. That makes the game at least a 6. MP is shit as always.

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#14 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 26181 Posts

@BassMan said:

48/100 seems a bit extreme. As much as I dislike what COD represents, Infinite Warfare does have an enjoyable campaign. That would make the game at least a 6. MP is shit as always.

if modern warfare got this kind of score and panned all over critics. we would not have yearly iteration. and not many FPS games ruined by them.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

18747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 233

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 18747 Posts

@ghosts4ever said:
@BassMan said:

48/100 seems a bit extreme. As much as I dislike what COD represents, Infinite Warfare does have an enjoyable campaign. That would make the game at least a 6. MP is shit as always.

if modern warfare got this kind of score and panned all over critics. we would not have yearly iteration. and not many FPS games ruined by them.

Modern Warfare was a great game when it came out. I have enjoyed all of the COD campaigns except for BO3 and MW3 was questionable too. I don't go into them with high expectations. It is like going to see a dumb action movie for me. I am not expecting an Oscar worthy movie, but I know it should be entertaining. COD has always done a great job with spectacle, intensity and production values. It has just been milked to death and they have barely changed up the formula. So, Modern Warfare might have been a 9 game back then, but the series is trending more towards the 6-7 range now IMO. It needs a proper reboot.

I do agree that COD has had a very negative influence on the industry though.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#17 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 26181 Posts

@BassMan said:
@ghosts4ever said:
@BassMan said:

48/100 seems a bit extreme. As much as I dislike what COD represents, Infinite Warfare does have an enjoyable campaign. That would make the game at least a 6. MP is shit as always.

if modern warfare got this kind of score and panned all over critics. we would not have yearly iteration. and not many FPS games ruined by them.

Modern Warfare was a great game when it came out. I have enjoyed all of the COD campaigns except for BO3 and MW3 was questionable too. I don't go into them with high expectations. It is like going to see a dumb action movie for me. I am not expecting an Oscar worthy movie, but I know it should be entertaining. COD has always done a great job with spectacle, intensity and production values. It has just been milked to death and they have barely changed up the formula. So, Modern Warfare might have been a 9 game back then, but the series is trending more towards the 6-7 range now IMO. It needs a proper reboot.

I do agree that COD has had a very negative influence on the industry though.

modern warfare was not even 9 when it was released. Crysis 1 and Stalker also released same year. former is scripted, linear and walking in straight line where you cant even open door. later are exact opposite.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

18747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 233

User Lists: 0

#18 BassMan
Member since 2002 • 18747 Posts

@ghosts4ever said:
@BassMan said:
@ghosts4ever said:
@BassMan said:

48/100 seems a bit extreme. As much as I dislike what COD represents, Infinite Warfare does have an enjoyable campaign. That would make the game at least a 6. MP is shit as always.

if modern warfare got this kind of score and panned all over critics. we would not have yearly iteration. and not many FPS games ruined by them.

Modern Warfare was a great game when it came out. I have enjoyed all of the COD campaigns except for BO3 and MW3 was questionable too. I don't go into them with high expectations. It is like going to see a dumb action movie for me. I am not expecting an Oscar worthy movie, but I know it should be entertaining. COD has always done a great job with spectacle, intensity and production values. It has just been milked to death and they have barely changed up the formula. So, Modern Warfare might have been a 9 game back then, but the series is trending more towards the 6-7 range now IMO. It needs a proper reboot.

I do agree that COD has had a very negative influence on the industry though.

modern warfare was not even 9 when it was released. Crysis 1 and Stalker also released same year. former is scripted, linear and walking in straight line where you cant even open door. later are exact opposite.

Modern Warfare was very fun at the time. It was a different take on FPS and it was done really well. There is room for different types of FPS.

Avatar image for PinchySkree
PinchySkree

1342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#19 PinchySkree
Member since 2012 • 1342 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:

Every review that fits your agenda is an "honest review"

Gotcha !

Every review that fits your agenda is an "honest review"

Gotcha !

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49120 Posts

@PinchySkree said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Every review that fits your agenda is an "honest review"

Gotcha !

Every review that fits your agenda is an "honest review"

Gotcha !

Shots fired !

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

I am a bit buffled by the score as the reviewer himself says that the sp campaign is very good an graphics are amazing and perform well. Mp alone shouldnt drive the score so low.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

Nobody bought the new COD for Infinite Warfare. Everybody bought it for MW remastered. If you did on the other hand...i'm sorry.

Avatar image for jhonMalcovich
jhonMalcovich

7090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By jhonMalcovich
Member since 2010 • 7090 Posts

After having played the IW single player campaign I actually agree with PCGAMER review more than with GS's 8. Really awful campaign. And God knows I am pretty tolerant on COD. I could list my rant but I am too tired right now. But be warned, NO BUY. The PC port is good, everything is OK, but SP narrative is bad as hell.

Avatar image for deactivated-583c85dc33d18
deactivated-583c85dc33d18

1619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-583c85dc33d18
Member since 2016 • 1619 Posts

Every review from Ghosts4ever fits my agenda.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

@jhonMalcovich said:

I am a bit buffled by the score as the reviewer himself says that the sp campaign is very good an graphics are amazing and perform well. Mp alone shouldnt drive the score so low.

Well, it might have something to do with the campaign being a short 6 hour romp with a muddled script full of plot holes. Of course, I'm just guessing, but it was true about every other campaign for CoD. :P

The MP is the main draw of the series, and 60 dollars for a 6 hour campaign? Well, that's a worse ratio of dollar/hour entertainment than going to see a crappy Hollywood movie.

If the MP is crap, then I can understand why it was scored so low.

Avatar image for ghosts4ever
Ghosts4ever

26181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#26 Ghosts4ever
Member since 2015 • 26181 Posts

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

The MP is the main draw of the series,

and also by far worst part of series too.

even COD1 has better SP than its MP.

never liked COD MP anyways.

Avatar image for mr_huggles_dog
Mr_Huggles_dog

7805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27 Mr_Huggles_dog
Member since 2014 • 7805 Posts

Am I the only one with this mouse acceleration problem as well as choppy cutscenes?

I'm waiting for the patch this week to play it.

If the patch doesn't fix it I'm going to have to redownload the game.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

Lol PCgamer reviews, they're up there with the trash like Kotaku.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#29 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@Ballroompirate said:

Lol PCgamer reviews, they're up there with the trash like Kotaku.

Really? I thought they were well respected. Maybe only the UK version...