This topic is locked from further discussion.
There are 2 PS3 exclusives I find interesting MGS4 and Killzone 2- the previous Killzones games I was not to impressed with.
Crysis exemplifies some of the finest things about FPS on the PC with it's rich and almost photorealistic details (if you have the monster rig to do that)
and huge Island to roam and tackle situations with a great deal of freedom.
I think Killzone2 has a rich and dark artisic look about it and I say this without Bias I can really appreciate what Guerrila are managing to pull out of the PS3 with the lighting and some of the smooth animation. It has a really immersive atmosphere. Crysis I also looks good but to me it doesn't really stand out or look that unique, maybe because there have been so many FPS on the PC that standards are higher, and with PS3 there are not that many FPS to compare.
Technically Crysis > Killzone 2
but I like Killzone 2's artistic direction and foreboding atmosphere judging by the videos I've seen
regardless I think it looks great I can admit that.
Let's just see if the gameplay can match it
Crysis will be in a league of its own for at least another 2-3 years I predict. Games will come close, but will miss the mark. jfcundiffYeah, there really isn't a reason to push graphics to the limit of current technology (or past them). As Crytek learned, limiting your audience like that isn't always the best idea.
LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
LOL your name is flopzone2 yet you say KZ2 kills Crysis. Ironic isn't it?crysis and killzone2 both have crappy texture work...but i think i seen better textures in killzone2.
i think the actual levels in killzone2 are alot more pretty to look at..
Thanks flopzone2. Care to post on your actual account?LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
flopzone2_429
:lol: Killzone 2 has PS2 textures, you just dont notice them because the game is 70% blur.LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
flopzone2_429
Crysis destroys any console game.
The fail is strong in this one.LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
flopzone2_429
the textures on the peoples cloths on character probley look better on crysis.
but the face's on killzone2 look more realistic...crysis the faces kinda look fake .
[QUOTE="flopzone2_429"]The fail is strong in this one.LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
princeofshapeir
Ok....so why am i running crysis warhead on enthusiast settings that's max and it still has crappy textures?
the game just suffers from crappy texture syndrome.
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="flopzone2_429"]The fail is strong in this one.LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
flopzone2_429
Ok....so why am i running crysis warhead on enthusiast settings that's max and it still has crappy textures?
the game just suffers from crappy texture syndrome.
Screenshot some of the "crappy texture syndrome" and post it here. That is, if you even have the game.Why is everyone in such denial? crysis really isnt impressive....but neither is killzone2.
in crysis it doesnt matter if you got the texture settings on max....all of the moutain wall textures are low resolution lack gen textures.
You didn't respond to either one of my previous posts. Give us a screenshot of you running Crysis and show us that it is on high/maximum settings. Also, post us pictures from another game that has better faces than the ones in Crysis.Why is everyone in such denial? crysis really isnt impressive....but neither is killzone2.
in crysis it doesnt matter if you got the texture settings on max....all of the moutain wall textures are low resolution lack gen textures.
flopzone2_429
I agree with the faces part , somehow the faces in Crysis look...fake , i cant explain they just feel fake to me .Ren_ekoThey look completely real and they are nearly lifelike.
this is the ultimate sig quoteLOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
flopzone2_429
[QUOTE="flopzone2_429"]this is the ultimate sig quoteLOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
-Mad_Rhetoric-
How about you play crysis? run upto a big moutains wall texture look at it....the things have no detail...it's just colored grey or pixelated lol.
[QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"][QUOTE="flopzone2_429"]this is the ultimate sig quoteLOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
flopzone2_429
How about you play crysis? run upto a big moutains wall texture look at it....the things have no detail...it's just colored grey or pixelated lol.
Post. Pictures. Of . You. Running. The. Game. You are in denial and everybody knows you don't own Crysis or have never played it. Stop posting fanboy rubbish, altaccount troll.crysis's level design is unimpressive it's very simplistic.
This game is a game that uses HDR to look good....without hdr this game is atrocious i mean nasty looking.
when you get some HDR/sun shinning on stuff making the stuff glow/look bright it looks badass then.
but crysis is basically all lighting.
the texture work is crap seriously.
So what you're saying can be boiled down to: I'm trolling. Right?crysis's level design is unimpressive it's very simplistic.
This game is a game that uses HDR to look good....without hdr this game is atrocious i mean nasty looking.
when you get some HDR/sun shinning on stuff making the stuff glow/look right it looks badass then.
but crysis is basically all lighting.
the texture work is crap seriously.
flopzone2_429
[QUOTE="flopzone2_429"][QUOTE="-Mad_Rhetoric-"] this is the ultimate sig quoteprinceofshapeir
How about you play crysis? run upto a big moutains wall texture look at it....the things have no detail...it's just colored grey or pixelated lol.
Post. Pictures. Of . You. Running. The. Game. You are in denial and everybody knows you don't own Crysis or have never played it. Stop posting fanboy rubbish, altaccount troll. dude don't bother with this fanboy, its obvious he lieingMy answer is yes. In some areas, like the death animations and post-mortem reactions the work in Killzone 2 is even better than in Crysis, but this is mainly because the extremly restrictive german laws -you known that in Germany oth UT III and Gears are banned because the in game mutilations?-. I must remak this because in Far Cry the death rag doll physics were present, but were taken apart in Crysis because legal restrains.
So yes, KZ2 is the most closest game in consoles to what Crysis means in PC in terms of technical power. An in some ways his artistical style has more credit, is not close to be a equal, but taking in consideration the PS3 hardware Guerrilla Games deserves all the credit.
About Resident Evil 5, the time when a japanese developer will publish a multiplayer shooter that could move more than 6 players without severe lag will be the time when the Hell will be frozen. Japanese are horrid about net code. My god, in RE5 you even can't shoot without stop you move, are you kidding? Also, RE5 shows nothing in graphics, atmosphere or gameplay that Dead Space don't do better.
lol notice all the shots people take of crysis is on the lighting....with the sun lighting stuff up/hdr it looks pretty cool.....but when you look away from sun everything looks nasty.
it's all lighting not graphics.
No i dont have crysis warhead that's why icons on my desktop
http://i33.tinypic.com/2v0ibzr.jpg
crysis the character models look good.... a few world textures look decent.
crysis has nice HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE LIGHTING.
but the actual world isnt all that greatly textured id say even unreal tournament 3 looks better overall, with exception crysis better hdr or models.
LOL
Crysis graphic's actually do suck for the most part.....the actual character models in killzone2's beggining of the game looks better than crysis.
crysis has crappy texture work....besides a few good looking textures.
flopzone2_429
No, Crysis not only looks better than all other games, it does so on a far bigger scale with a lot of other things going on as well.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment