[QUOTE="shadow_hosi"]to just run crysis? like on medium? you can do taht for $600-ish. you can run it on high-very high for between 800-1000
x360:375 ps3:400 = 775 games and movies
PC= 1000 games movies work reports reaserch chating (every console game is made on pc btw) games get by far the best support (except from ubisoft) modding comunity makes every multiplay 10x better. the real orange box, the way its ment to be.
you pay for quality, so. yeah. ill pay a little more, and enjoy it endlessly more
thatdanmgood10x
lmfao! IT CAN HAVE A MILLONGAMES DOSE'NT MAKE THEM GOOD
GTA MGS,GT5>EVERY PC GAME
In your opinion. It's a fact that the PC gets the most highly rated titles, but it's just an opinion that "GTA / MGS / GT5 > EVERY PC GAME". The PC has more good games than any single console combined, in fact it's got more than all of them - get over it. Which system has better games is purely subjective.
Besides, I'm an RTS fanboy and only a brainless idiot would deny the PC dominates in that genre. So, for me, Company of Heroes alone > GTA / MGS / GT5 / Every console game.
Anyway, why do people still think that the PC is all about graphics and no gameplay? Compare Bioshock (multiplat) to System Shock 2 (PC AAAE of last gen). Compare Crysis to Halo 3. Heck, just compare the whole damn frickin RTS library of the PC with the 360. You'll find that in the FPS cases, the 360-based games are damn shallow by comparison. In the RTS case, the RTS games are shallow for both versions, but the PC's one is still deeper.
It's not the PC that's all flash no substance. It's consoles. What's even more pathetic is that the PC is better at it's flash.
Log in to comment