PlayStation vs Xbox brand as a whole

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts

which has served us gamers better through the years. (I'm talking all the way back to psone/psx [but there is actually a psx ]).

note: windows based games are not xbox brand games

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#2 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
It's obviously PlayStation. I don't think anyone doubts that.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Meh both. Nintendo >>> both of them.
Avatar image for Sonic_on_crack
Sonic_on_crack

2428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Sonic_on_crack
Member since 2007 • 2428 Posts
pretty equal imo -exclusives are pretty equal -psn is free and just about as good as xbl -95% of multiplats are same or better on 360 , only oblivion is better on ps3 -backwards compat is better on 360 -ps3 is a bluray player -360 console is cheaper
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#6 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts
[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]pretty equal imo -exclusives are pretty equal -psn is free and just about as good as xbl -95% of multiplats are same or better on 360 , only oblivion is better on ps3 -backwards compat is better on 360 -ps3 is a bluray player -360 console is cheaper

He said PlayStation vs. Xbox brands, not PS3 vs. 360.
Avatar image for Aku101
Aku101

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Aku101
Member since 2009 • 2114 Posts

Playstation. It's unfair though since the PS brand has 1 generation more than the XBOX brand.

Avatar image for teh_VU
teh_VU

754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 teh_VU
Member since 2008 • 754 Posts
I would say the PS brand. It may not be at the top this generation but I would say the PS1 and 2 were at the tops of their generations. There were also many, many games that I loved on those consoles.
Avatar image for Sonic_on_crack
Sonic_on_crack

2428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Sonic_on_crack
Member since 2007 • 2428 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]pretty equal imo -exclusives are pretty equal -psn is free and just about as good as xbl -95% of multiplats are same or better on 360 , only oblivion is better on ps3 -backwards compat is better on 360 -ps3 is a bluray player -360 console is cheaper

He said PlayStation vs. Xbox brands, not PS3 vs. 360.

then its basically a tie 360 brand is much more action based
Avatar image for LoseEagles1245
LoseEagles1245

1115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LoseEagles1245
Member since 2007 • 1115 Posts
Well since there was only a Xbox and Xbox 360 vs. PS1, PS2, PSX, PS3, and PSP. How is that exactly fair? Playstation wins just because it's been out longer and has more consoles.
Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#11 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts

While Xbox has made great strides in online gaming it seems Playstation has always provided the more unique games between the two. That is to say, while there may not be the most groundbreaking titles on the platform, I have yet to see 1st, 2nd, or 3rd party games on Xbox that rival what has been accomplished on Playstation in terms of gameplay, variety, and/or overall production values and to be honest, I don't see the Xbox brand ever achieving what the Playstation brand has simply due to current industry conditions.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62037 Posts

Playstation is obviously going to own, going back 3 generations with a handheld. Nintendo owns both though, newer generation not so much, but the older generations like NES, SNES, N64 etc own.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

lol at anyone saying xbox

Avatar image for moose_knuckler
moose_knuckler

5722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 moose_knuckler
Member since 2007 • 5722 Posts

Playstation is obviously going to own, going back 3 generations with a handheld. Nintendo owns both though, newer generation not so much, but the older generations like NES, SNES, N64 etc own.

lundy86_4
Yea I agree Nintendo>>>>PS+Xbox, it'll be awhile til you can stack an agruement on Nintendo brand vs PS brand vs Xbox brand.
Avatar image for Aku101
Aku101

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Aku101
Member since 2009 • 2114 Posts

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"]pretty equal imo -exclusives are pretty equal -psn is free and just about as good as xbl -95% of multiplats are same or better on 360 , only oblivion is better on ps3 -backwards compat is better on 360 -ps3 is a bluray player -360 console is cheaperSonic_on_crack
He said PlayStation vs. Xbox brands, not PS3 vs. 360.

then its basically a tie 360 brand is much more action based

what the hell does that have to do with anything?

Avatar image for hopesfall2own
hopesfall2own

2714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 hopesfall2own
Member since 2008 • 2714 Posts
Well since there was only a Xbox and Xbox 360 vs. PS1, PS2, PSX, PS3, and PSP. How is that exactly fair? Playstation wins just because it's been out longer and has more consoles.LoseEagles1245
Pretty obvious tc just wants to inflate the cow ego even more with a bs thread..ah well let him live in the alternate reality cows live in :roll:
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62037 Posts

[QUOTE="Sonic_on_crack"][QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] He said PlayStation vs. Xbox brands, not PS3 vs. 360.Aku101

then its basically a tie 360 brand is much more action based

what the hell does that have to do with anything?

lol good question... I'm under the impressiont that he just misunderstood... maybe not though

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62037 Posts

[QUOTE="LoseEagles1245"]Well since there was only a Xbox and Xbox 360 vs. PS1, PS2, PSX, PS3, and PSP. How is that exactly fair? Playstation wins just because it's been out longer and has more consoles.hopesfall2own
Pretty obvious tc just wants to inflate the cow ego even more with a bs thread..ah well let him live in the alternate reality cows live in :roll:

alternate reality when he's talking about the backlog of consoles... this is a bs thread though as PS is obviously going to win

Avatar image for dragonpuppy
dragonpuppy

952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 dragonpuppy
Member since 2006 • 952 Posts

PS brand > Xbox brand.

Nintendo>>>>>>PS + XBox.

Sega = Nintendo :P

Avatar image for Legendaryscmt
Legendaryscmt

12532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Legendaryscmt
Member since 2005 • 12532 Posts

I would go Sony, but at the same time, overall, they have a bigger leap than Microsoft ever will have, so I really wouldn't consider it an even fight.

Avatar image for vibrantdesign
vibrantdesign

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 vibrantdesign
Member since 2008 • 530 Posts

The PlayStation brand. No other brand since 1995 in my honest opinion has offered so much in terms of quality games than the PlayStation brand.

Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts

I would say Microsoft cares for its customers more... but they F'ed all that up with RROD

Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts

The PlayStation brand. No other brand since 1995 in my honest opinion has offered so much in terms of quality games than the PlayStation brand.

vibrantdesign

this^^

and the original xbox just drags the name down, at least when compared to playstation

Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts

I would say Microsoft cares for its customers more... but they F'ed all that up with RROD

leadernator

^^not this

they overprice hardware (excluding the console), charge for online, and the 360 has been (and still kinda is) plauged with faulty hardware

they care lots!

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

Playstation 2 alone beats both Xbox consoles easily IMO.

Avatar image for Sarge1442
Sarge1442

709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Sarge1442
Member since 2004 • 709 Posts

PS2 beats 360 and xbox put together

Avatar image for PrinceofSarcasm
PrinceofSarcasm

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 PrinceofSarcasm
Member since 2008 • 1743 Posts

[QUOTE="LoseEagles1245"]Well since there was only a Xbox and Xbox 360 vs. PS1, PS2, PSX, PS3, and PSP. How is that exactly fair? Playstation wins just because it's been out longer and has more consoles.hopesfall2own
Pretty obvious tc just wants to inflate the cow ego even more with a bs thread..ah well let him live in the alternate reality cows live in :roll:

dude calm down. In the amount of time the xbox brand has lived as a whole how has it served us compared to the ps brand as a whole.

Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

Playstation obviously had more impact on the gaming industry with its dominance over couple generations of consoles, but the XBox has pushed ahead in online console gaming as well as offering a good competitor for Playstation, forcing it to continue to improve its standards.

Avatar image for DonPerian
DonPerian

3773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29 DonPerian
Member since 2005 • 3773 Posts
Playstation has made a more significant impact for the gaming industry thus far.
Avatar image for n4styg1t
n4styg1t

122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#30 n4styg1t
Member since 2009 • 122 Posts

easily Playstation simply due to the ps1 and psp. Both have set the precedent for current gaming, xbox has done nothing new and released only two consoles, if you never owned either of them your only missing out on a few classic game series.

Surely Nintendo is the king though and atari are still around as well :)

Avatar image for CubanBlunt
CubanBlunt

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 CubanBlunt
Member since 2005 • 2025 Posts

pretty equal imo -exclusives are pretty equal -psn is free and just about as good as xbl -95% of multiplats are same or better on 360 , only oblivion is better on ps3 -backwards compat is better on 360 -ps3 is a bluray player -360 console is cheaperSonic_on_crack

The 360 is only BC for about 476 games, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Xbox_games_compatible_with_Xbox_360

Check this out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SimpsonsXbox360.jpg