Poll for all PS3 owners

Are you happy with multiplats on your PS3?

Are you happy with the quality of Fallout 3, Fallout NV, Oblivion, Skyrim, GTA IV, Bayonetta, BF3, and others?

Do you consider PS3 to have the worst version of multiplats?

Please vote and explain yourself.

Thank you

If you're able to distinguishthe difference between 360/PS3 multiplats you should probably take the time to go outside, walk a bit and really evaluate your life.

I haven't played New Vegas or BF3 but I have played the rest of them, and they are fine to play. If the games had big problems they were patched to fix them. Bayonetta was fine after the patch that let you install it was released even though i did sell it and get it for 360 after i got the platinum trophy...

Happy with Multiplats on PS3 no,when Pc versions or even 360 is better

Happy with quality.... depends on the game and developer

Most of the time yes PS3 is worse then 360 let alone Pc.

If you're able to distinguishthe difference between 360/PS3 multiplats you should probably take the time to go outside, walk a bit and really evaluate your life.

W1NGMAN-

Someone's jelly.

Yup.. no complains on my side, i played tons of multiplats on my PS3 :)

only fanboys, PC owners and screen wh**es care about graphics

when sites have to freeze and blow up pics and have to have them side by side just to notice a difference, yeah i'm content with the ps3 muliplats

Yup.. no complains on my side, i played tons of multiplats on my PS3 :)

only fanboys, PC owners and screen wh**es care about graphics

finalstar2007

For the most part, yeah. But I usually go with PC on multiplats. If its one of those occasions that there is no PC option and the 360 version clearly trumps the PS3 then I'll go with 360.

No issues. Still, I usually go with multiplats for my 360.

I use 360 more when it comes to multiplats.

Herp Dearp Derpy Derp Herpy Herp Derpedy Derp.

Skyrim is the only multiplat that annoyed me, never in my life did I witness such a poorly made game. It was my first and last bethesda game. Other than that I never had any problems with any previous multiplat games, even if sw is saying otherwise

Chose the 2nd option - Happy with 90% of them.

The high number of quality PS3 exclusives has compensated the problem.

Games that run poorly on PS3 comes from lazy developers who lack sufficient skills and talent. I have no respect for them.

There hasn't been a multiplatform game I wanted that was also avalible on PS3 that was bad so it is completely fine for me. I generally don't like low quality games to begin with.

If there is a game that is serverly flawed on PS3 to the point that I feel I need to get a diffrent version, then that game is most likely flawed and not up to my standards to begin with. A quality developer will release a reletivly quality product across the board for whatever platforms they work on so this would not affect me unless I was interested in lower quality games from developers with a low standard of quality

There hasn't been a multiplatform game I wanted that was also avalible on PS3 that was bad so it is completely fine for me. I generally don't like low quality games to begin with.

If there is a game that is serverly flawed on PS3 to the point that I feel I need to get a diffrent version, then that game is most likely flawed and not up to my standards to begin with. A quality developer will release a reletivly quality product across the board for whatever platforms they work on so this would not affect me unless I was interested in lower quality games from developers with a low standard of quality

casharmy

I don't have either a 360 nor gaming PC, and when I'm playing multiplats on PS3 I know I'm not missing anything.

I have both 360 and Ps3 and I can't tell the differance lol

I don't have either a 360 nor gaming PC, and when I'm playing multiplats on PS3 I know I'm not missing anything.

DealRogers

I am disappointed in the lack of JRPG's. :?bbkkristian

well that's a diffrent matter all together

[QUOTE="bbkkristian"]I am disappointed in the lack of JRPG's. :?casharmy

well that's a diffrent matter all together

Yea, I'm fine with them. I own a 360 but I buy pretty much all my multiplats on the PS3 because I'm more comfortable with the console plus the option of playing online is there since I won't pay for XBL. The barely noticeable difference between the console multiplats doesn't matter to me.

There hasn't been a multiplatform game I wanted that was also avalible on PS3 that was bad so it is completely fine for me. I generally don't like low quality games to begin with.

If there is a game that is serverly flawed on PS3 to the point that I feel I need to get a diffrent version, then that game is most likely flawed and not up to my standards to begin with. A quality developer will release a reletivly quality product across the board for whatever platforms they work on so this would not affect me unless I was interested in lower quality games from developers with a low standard of quality

casharmy

Same here.

I only buy high quality games.

I am happy that I am not supporting a company like Microsoft.

I am disappointed in the lack of JRPG's. :?bbkkristian

I only have a PS3 so even if the port is kinda shady, I have no other choice. But I have been happy with the current quality of multiplats on the PS3, their are some games that suffer greatly but those are few,

Kind of hard to answer this. I don't think they're bad on the PS3, but the PC experience is so much better for me and I feel like offers so much more that I tend to just play on PC. I wouldn't play them on Xbox either though, and I hardly think more than a few rare exceptions are actually BAD on PS3.

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="bbkkristian"]I am disappointed in the lack of JRPG's. :?bbkkristian

well that's a diffrent matter all together

This thread is about multiplatform games for 1.

if this thread was about not being happy with JRPGs on PS3, my answer and attitude would be diffrent that what I have said here.

I only use PC/360 for multplats, ps3 for exclusives.

I'm happy with all of them EXCEPT open world / sandbox RPG's. Skyrim and Fallout: New Vegas Ultimate Edition specifically. We all know by now that once the save file gets to a certain size in Skyrim you have to reboot periodically due to frame rate drops. Not too big a deal at first, but play long enough and you'll get to the point where you're rebooting it every 15 minutes.

I bought FO: New Vegas day 1 and don't remember any appreciable frame rate drops. Fast forward a year or two and I buy the ultimate edition with all the DLC on it. Apparently with all the DLC loaded onto the hard drive once you get to about 40-50 hours playtime you get similar frame rate issues to Skyrim. Kind of weird considering all the DLC content happens outside of the main map.

What do both of these games have in common? Bethesda. What was Bethesda's response to the PS3 audience? "We already got your money so you can sit on it and spin."

Skyrim has the benefit of the doubt, but with every passing month with no PS3 specific patch hope is growing dim. The FONV Ultimate Edition situation is inexcusable. The game's been out for what, 2 years?

If you're able to distinguishthe difference between 360/PS3 multiplats you should probably take the time to go outside, walk a bit and really evaluate your life.

W1NGMAN-

They may be marginally worse, but not enough for me to care. I had few problems with Skyrim and New Vegas.

I use my Xbox 360 to play mulitiplatform games.