Poll: Killzone Shadow Fall vs. Battlefield 4: Which is better?

  • 164 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Baurus_1
Baurus_1

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Baurus_1
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

I chose Killzone Shadow Fall. The game looks awesome!!

IMO, Battlefield 4 looks good, but not as good as Killzone Shadow Fall.

KZ:SF is the first game I am getting for PS4.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
lol joke right? Killzone is tee ball little league team, BF4 is in the MLB.
Avatar image for SexyJazzCat
SexyJazzCat

2796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SexyJazzCat
Member since 2013 • 2796 Posts

BF4.

Avatar image for ManatuBeard
ManatuBeard

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ManatuBeard
Member since 2012 • 1121 Posts

These 2 are games i only care for the multiplayer. So it will depend on how both play.

I prefer KZ3 mp than BF3 mp. I will have to try both to decide.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

I imagine BF4 will have greater longevity

Avatar image for amari24
amari24

1899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#6 amari24
Member since 2007 • 1899 Posts
I guess they're two different games, but I prefer Killzone. I've never been a huge fan of military shooters.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51574 Posts

How the **** would we know?

Avatar image for XxR3m1xInHDn3D
XxR3m1xInHDn3D

2365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 XxR3m1xInHDn3D
Member since 2013 • 2365 Posts
I'm sure killzone will win this poll but everyone knows bf4 will be better
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#9 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Single player: Killzone Shadow Fall

Multiplayer: Battlefield 4

Avatar image for PhazonBlazer
PhazonBlazer

12013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 PhazonBlazer
Member since 2007 • 12013 Posts

Wind Waker HD.

Avatar image for Clock-w0rk
Clock-w0rk

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Clock-w0rk
Member since 2012 • 3378 Posts

Single player: Killzone Shadow Fall

Multiplayer: Battlefield 4

mitu123

This aswell but GG have brought back the KZ2 MP director for SF so it could actually be close in terms of MP.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
The games are different but

Single player: Killzone Shadow Fall

Multiplayer: Battlefield 4

mitu123
I can agree with this.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd
deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd

4403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 1

#13 deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd
Member since 2008 • 4403 Posts

I like the large scale of Battlefield.  I'm sure Killzone would be awesome with tons of people all on a map but for some reason GG hasn't taken the series in that direction.

Avatar image for Baurus_1
Baurus_1

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Baurus_1
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

KZ:SF looks more technically impressive, and seems to have more atmosphere.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

KZ:SF looks more technically impressive, and seems to have more atmosphere.

Baurus_1

But I can't collapse a skyscraper 

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

how can i make a comparison? 

are you talking about graphics?

I'd say both have different artstyles and are good. Thats about all i can say. ( i prefer the BF4 colours a bit more though).  

Avatar image for Baurus_1
Baurus_1

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Baurus_1
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

KZ:SF looks a lot more futuristic with better weapons as well.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

KZ:SF looks a lot more futuristic with better weapons as well.

Baurus_1

Bf4 isn't supposed to be "futuristic" and it is supposed to have realistic weapons

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

Single player: Killzone Shadow Fall

Multiplayer: Battlefield 4

mitu123

Most likely.

Avatar image for Baurus_1
Baurus_1

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Baurus_1
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

KZ:SF looks a lot more futuristic with better weapons as well.

lostrib

Bf4 isn't supposed to be "futuristic" and it is supposed to have realistic weapons

Doesn't matter. KZ:SF looks like the better game: Better weapons, Better atmosphere, Better music, Better presentation

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

KZ:SF looks a lot more futuristic with better weapons as well.

Baurus_1

Bf4 isn't supposed to be "futuristic" and it is supposed to have realistic weapons

Doesn't matter. KZ:SF looks like the better game: Better weapons, Better atmosphere, Better music, Better presentation

and then 10 hours later it will be done.  And BF4 will still be going strong

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#22 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Single player: Killzone Shadow Fall

Multiplayer: Battlefield 4

Snugenz

Most likely.

I'll say it's guaranteed at this rate.
Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts
Holy shit your threads are terrible, how in the world could we know which is better?
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#24 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

How about wait until you've played at least one of them?

Also, lolbaurusthread.

Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

Killzone is such a "meh" franchise.

Give me BattleField any day.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#26 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

Single player: Killzone Shadow Fall

Multiplayer: Battlefield 4

mitu123

 

This, from the little I know about either I can't really choose an overall winner.

Avatar image for Trail_Mix
Trail_Mix

2579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Trail_Mix
Member since 2011 • 2579 Posts

I'll have to get back to you on this question once I've had time playing them both.

I mean, even based off previous titles it's hard for me to say too. It's been a long time since I played a Killzone title. I think KZ3 multiplayer beta was the last one I played. I didn't even bother playing BF3's singleplayer either, because I just assumed it'd be awful anyway.

Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

I'll have to get back to you on this question once I've had time playing them both.

I mean, even based off previous titles it's hard for me to say too. It's been a long time since I played a Killzone title. I think KZ3 multiplayer beta was the last one I played. I didn't even bother playing BF3's singleplayer either, because I just assumed it'd be awful anyway.

Trail_Mix

10/10 sig

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#29 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Not sure about the campaign, but no games come close to Battlefield, competitive multiplayer wise.

Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
KillzoneSnake

2761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#30 KillzoneSnake
Member since 2012 • 2761 Posts

KZ SF single player will be better for sure. But online is yet to be seen, we gotta wait until the 20. I go with SF anyway lol

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
REPORTED for trolling battlefield 4
Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

BF4 without a doubt.

Avatar image for gameofthering
gameofthering

11286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 gameofthering
Member since 2004 • 11286 Posts

Battlefield 4!


Well that was an easy decision to make :P 

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#34 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

Neither

Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

Killzone 4 is a true next gen game, BF4 is being held back by PS3/360.

Avatar image for Michael0134567
Michael0134567

28651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#37 Michael0134567
Member since 2008 • 28651 Posts

Shadow Fall obviously.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts
This is ridiculous you can tell how many die-hard cows are here that probably don't play either game yet voted killzone. Nowhere ever has Killzone come close to Battlefield .....
Avatar image for Sagem28
Sagem28

10498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Sagem28
Member since 2010 • 10498 Posts

Battlefield 4 doesnot exist. Game that is going to release is basically Bad company 4. just market as battlefield 4.SNIPER4321

What on Earth are you on about now ?

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

This is ridiculous you can tell how many die-hard cows are here that probably don't play either game yet voted killzone. Nowhere ever has Killzone come close to Battlefield .....MBirdy88

Killzone will have the better campaign and do a better job of showing what the hardware is capable of. BF4 will have the better multiplayer. Both will be great games.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

[QUOTE="MBirdy88"]This is ridiculous you can tell how many die-hard cows are here that probably don't play either game yet voted killzone. Nowhere ever has Killzone come close to Battlefield .....NathanDrakeSwag

Killzone will have the better campaign and do a better job of showing what the hardware is capable of. BF4 will have the better multiplayer. Both will be great games.

Well, considering what we have seen of BF4's single player, and Killzone SF single player I completely disagree.... yes ok BF4 is your typical army setting, but tdamn that aircraft carrier scene and the first level playthrough looked a hell of a lot better than Killzone's showings. and thats without vehicle combat scenes ect.
Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

This is ridiculous you can tell how many die-hard cows are here that probably don't play either game yet voted killzone. Nowhere ever has Killzone come close to Battlefield .....MBirdy88

What are you talking about? I played Killzone 2/3 and i played BFBC2 and BF3, Killzone is better, and Shadowfall doesnt have to worry about developering for previous gen consoles or PC or Xbone.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

[QUOTE="MBirdy88"]This is ridiculous you can tell how many die-hard cows are here that probably don't play either game yet voted killzone. Nowhere ever has Killzone come close to Battlefield .....crimsonman1245

What are you talking about? I played Killzone 2/3 and i played BFBC2 and BF3, Killzone is better, and Shadowfall doesnt have to worry about developering for previous gen consoles or PC or Xbone.

Yea sure... is that why KZ2's MP struggled to get 10k players at its peak and half the people couldnt even control it properly? and yes i am honest, look at my raptr achievements I was in that top 5% for a week. KZ3 was even more poorly recieved. BC2 and and BF3 were not. the latter still has nearly 100k players on each platform at peak. so no, not really debatable Killzone Franchise is NOT anywhere near.

 

I cant take anyone seriously who supports KZ2 even though I played it for 50+ hours doing the MP achieves. (back when I cared) ... the game was a mess, the level of collision detection delay in shoot was ridiculous... awful awful netcode.

Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

[QUOTE="crimsonman1245"]

[QUOTE="MBirdy88"]This is ridiculous you can tell how many die-hard cows are here that probably don't play either game yet voted killzone. Nowhere ever has Killzone come close to Battlefield .....MBirdy88

What are you talking about? I played Killzone 2/3 and i played BFBC2 and BF3, Killzone is better, and Shadowfall doesnt have to worry about developering for previous gen consoles or PC or Xbone.

Yea sure... is that why KZ2's MP struggled to get 10k players at its peak and half the people couldnt even control it properly? and yes i am honest, look at my raptr achievements I was in that top 5% for a week. KZ3 was even more poorly recieved. BC2 and and BF3 were not. the latter still has nearly 100k players on each platform at peak. so no, not really debatable Killzone Franchise is NOT anywhere near.

 

I cant take anyone seriously who supports KZ2 even though I played it for 50+ hours doing the MP achieves. (back when I cared) ... the game was a mess, the level of collision detection delay in shoot was ridiculous... awful awful netcode.

I dont play multiplayer, im talking about single player.

Avatar image for deactivated-58e448fd89d82
deactivated-58e448fd89d82

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-58e448fd89d82
Member since 2010 • 4494 Posts

[QUOTE="MBirdy88"]

[QUOTE="crimsonman1245"]

What are you talking about? I played Killzone 2/3 and i played BFBC2 and BF3, Killzone is better, and Shadowfall doesnt have to worry about developering for previous gen consoles or PC or Xbone.

crimsonman1245

Yea sure... is that why KZ2's MP struggled to get 10k players at its peak and half the people couldnt even control it properly? and yes i am honest, look at my raptr achievements I was in that top 5% for a week. KZ3 was even more poorly recieved. BC2 and and BF3 were not. the latter still has nearly 100k players on each platform at peak. so no, not really debatable Killzone Franchise is NOT anywhere near.

 

I cant take anyone seriously who supports KZ2 even though I played it for 50+ hours doing the MP achieves. (back when I cared) ... the game was a mess, the level of collision detection delay in shoot was ridiculous... awful awful netcode.

I dont play multiplayer, im talking about single player.

Killzone 3 single player was pretty much Crysis 2 in another shell.
Avatar image for Ghost120x
Ghost120x

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 Ghost120x
Member since 2009 • 6060 Posts
Always had more fun with Killzone so...
Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

[QUOTE="MBirdy88"]

[QUOTE="crimsonman1245"]

What are you talking about? I played Killzone 2/3 and i played BFBC2 and BF3, Killzone is better, and Shadowfall doesnt have to worry about developering for previous gen consoles or PC or Xbone.

crimsonman1245

Yea sure... is that why KZ2's MP struggled to get 10k players at its peak and half the people couldnt even control it properly? and yes i am honest, look at my raptr achievements I was in that top 5% for a week. KZ3 was even more poorly recieved. BC2 and and BF3 were not. the latter still has nearly 100k players on each platform at peak. so no, not really debatable Killzone Franchise is NOT anywhere near.

 

I cant take anyone seriously who supports KZ2 even though I played it for 50+ hours doing the MP achieves. (back when I cared) ... the game was a mess, the level of collision detection delay in shoot was ridiculous... awful awful netcode.

I dont play multiplayer, im talking about single player.

-_-; well that explains it but both are s*it in that department, my god i cant remember a single bit of the KZ2 campaign or Bf3..... both so awful. But yea exmaplins it then... Battlefield as always been multiplayer focused.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Killzone controls like total ass compared to BF. Its counter intuitive to what a competitive MP shooter should be

KZ has one good thing going for it and that's the mode switching during rounds. I would love a thing like that in BF4 where you could go from TDM to rush to CQ (though I don't know how that would even work) 

KZ will have a better campaign but BF4 will be better overall and will have a far bigger playerbase

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15874 Posts

Who cares? Neither of them will beat Secret of the Magic Crystals 2.

Avatar image for lilnazar
lilnazar

1923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 lilnazar
Member since 2011 • 1923 Posts

BF4 looks the same as ever. At least Killzone Shadow Fall looks different than the previous games. My vote: Killzone Shadow Fall.