So essentially that guy rejects the notion of virtual reality. Ummm.... **** idiot.
Uh, real reality kinda sucks, why do you want a virtual one. Am i the only one who is bedazzled by this comment? According to you, if real reality sucks, wouldn't that make sense to have, you know, a fake one? Umm.... you confuse me.
So essentially that guy rejects the notion of virtual reality. Ummm.... **** idiot.
Uh, real reality kinda sucks, why do you want a virtual one. Am i the only one who is bedazzled by this comment? According to you, if real reality sucks, wouldn't that make sense to have, you know, a fake one? Umm.... you confuse me. A fake one based on a perpetually flawed one?
So essentially that guy rejects the notion of virtual reality. Ummm.... **** idiot.
falconclan
Uh, real reality kinda sucks, why do you want a virtual one. That's the point of VR, my friend ;). Life sucks, but on the computer/console, I'm whatever the heck I want to be. One day, I can save someone's life, the next day I can be a total ass to the person...it could work either way, but life doesn't have a restart button yet :P.
So essentially that guy rejects the notion of virtual reality. Ummm.... **** idiot.
DethSkematik
Uh, real reality kinda sucks, why do you want a virtual one. That's the point of VR, my friend ;). Life sucks, but on the computer/console, I'm whatever the heck I want to be. One day, I can save someone's life, the next day I can be a total ass to the person...it could work either way, but life doesn't have a restart button yet :P. We've had that for damn near 40 years, and we've done it all without flailing our arms. I don't see how implementing motion controls does ANYTHING good.
Yeah that dude is kind of a douche. But he does make a decent point. Natal just seems like a gimmicky Wii rip-off to me. At least for now. Everyone used to make the same criticisms back when the Wii (or Revolution then) was first announced. So I'm not too sure what to think.
I don't even know why this guy is mad at Natal it's not like he HAS to buy it. Man god that guy is so annoying....He says that Natal is for little kids yet acts out the sound to a gun, makes him look like a little kid himself.
I don't even know why this guy is mad at Natal it's not like he HAS to buy it. Man god that guy is so annoying....He says that Natal is for little kids yet acts out the sound to a gun, makes him look like a little kid himself. FF6fan
The problem with natal is that it is inevitable that certain games will be natal only, it effectively does force you to buy the thing. You may say hey, its optional, but 5 months after it comes out and a game that interests you becomes natal only your stance will change. There is no reason they can't do 2 control schemes, however it is a waste of effort when you can push sales.
[QUOTE="FF6fan"]I don't even know why this guy is mad at Natal it's not like he HAS to buy it. Man god that guy is so annoying....He says that Natal is for little kids yet acts out the sound to a gun, makes him look like a little kid himself. falconclan
The problem with natal is that it is inevitable that certain games will be natal only, it effectively does force you to buy the thing. You may say hey, its optional, but 5 months after it comes out and a game that interests you becomes natal only your stance will change. There is no reason they can't do 2 control schemes, however it is a waste of effort when you can push sales. Well there's a difference in being aware of the consequences and just being afraid of change. And this guy just doesn't want anything to change, he wants everything to be the same thing over and over again.
Log in to comment